>>936269736
>but there's "some" OC
No, there isn't.
And even if there was a couple of images, what is the point of this thread? Nobody cares about "clothed" to begin with and then to take a nude and shrink it down and put it in 640 rez in 2025 just to say you made another gay collage for your gay thread is just a waste of time and bandwidth.
Clearly, nobody has ever been interested in this stupid stuff. Why do you make threads with ancient content, shitty images, from content everybody has seen for decades, and then prance around like a faggot duping yourself into thinking people want it just because some random newfag screeches at you from his basement 1 out of a 100 posts you spend making for endless hours?
Are you seriously this fucking retarded and lonely?
Have you heard that we are in 2025 now? Maybe go over to any of a million sites and look and see how there is shit tons of high rez porn all over the fucking place. And you sit here making a lame thread from 1990?
