Thread 936344719 - /b/ [Archived: 734 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/28/2025, 1:17:48 AM No.936344719
IMG_9836
IMG_9836
md5: 5fd27359c0e654e90a99b3a8e8d5db40🔍
Trump keeps winning and liberals keep losing lmao
Replies: >>936344746 >>936344775 >>936344793 >>936344826 >>936345536 >>936349740
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 1:18:36 AM No.936344746
>>936344719 (OP)
LOL
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 1:19:26 AM No.936344775
So Much Winning_thumb.jpg
So Much Winning_thumb.jpg
md5: 448741eb6d6bafde2f05067a8c4f0a33🔍
>>936344719 (OP)
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 1:19:54 AM No.936344793
1737419333958
1737419333958
md5: fe3e116e3f70a0c35e85e7ed5b98fc22🔍
>>936344719 (OP)
Make America Great Again!
Replies: >>936344915
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 1:20:35 AM No.936344818
1741538280605123
1741538280605123
md5: 4df7c7c740b45bb370fbb5d25cbda8e9🔍
He's trying to draw in an off beat "cutesy" artstyle. It's a big thing with the trans and furry lofi art communities on discord. Think of the kind of stuff adjacent to sewerslvt or the boykisser meme. It all rhythms with the archetype of low esteem men getting into anxious cylces who then end up surrounding themselves with other discord friends as a coping mechanism and outlet, but those same people who are highly receptive to their worries (and, woah, they are even flirting with pathetic guy like me!) trade their baggage in return. Then the guy starts getting more involved with their interests and what do you know they like quirky music, interesting art and are refreshingly open about porn. If that pathetic guy is an artist they will soon take inspiration while being egged on by their "alty" friends to do more and more. Then the cycle of egg cracking starts, because those exact same people who have become that guy's "friends" don't just like pornagraphy but also include it as part of their lifestyle which then gets pushed more and more on the guy. Overtime the he picks up the same habits and interests as these people and starts to see these groups as a big part of his identity, so he starts to conform with the desires and wishes of people who at their core are just as low in esteem as he is but make up for it with sexual gratification which he will fill. He will either crack or he will become a chaser for "cute" guys or "enbys" as he finally told about the pink or furry pill by his friends and takes it as a serious cool alternative for his life and not a confession of nerfarious intentions by people he knows online.
Shen is falling into that archetype and his art is an indicator of his gradual downward spiral.
Or maybe he just sucks, that could be true too
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 1:20:49 AM No.936344826
>>936344719 (OP)
If by "liberals", you mean Americans (including Trump's own supporters), yes.
Sage
6/28/2025, 1:22:13 AM No.936344878
>still no Epstein files
Replies: >>936345020
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 1:23:07 AM No.936344915
>>936344793
She looks underage.
Trump's favorite age.
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 1:25:43 AM No.936345020
>>936344878
Why would Trump incriminate himself?
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 1:34:42 AM No.936345345
Blart
Blart
md5: 3c027ea788acb7ac82b783daab0eed60🔍
America is healing. Slowly, but surely. It's fantastic to be a part of it.
Replies: >>936345464
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 1:37:49 AM No.936345464
>>936345345
Yeah.
It's fantastic to be led by Israel's bitch.
Replies: >>936345708
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 1:39:40 AM No.936345536
>>936344719 (OP)
Okay Shlomo
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 1:44:30 AM No.936345708
Hicks
Hicks
md5: 81f210b26eb459912a29c606e42ed6ce🔍
>>936345464
America has been Israel's bitch, since 1947. But that's an issue for another time. Before you fight the final boss, you have to take care of the other matters first.
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 1:45:05 AM No.936345739
1742106778861890
1742106778861890
md5: 696d6eb3b552072f96f8b4fb4aba7e9f🔍
Yes Dawkins is a scientist so of course he's going to discuss religion with respect to its material claims. He wouldn't have such fertile territory to explore were it not for the fact that religions often do make material claims about the universe or, at the very least, they have a large number of believers who interpret their faiths in such a way.
You simultaneously criticize him having insufficient knowledge outside his field yet demand his arguments attain an unbounded breadth so as to encompass more diverse interpretations of religion. Now satisfying one surely means betraying the other, no? You admit no plausible criteria in which Dawkins' argument can satisfy you or even be evaluated by you as substantive because you have a puerile hostility towards his existence. In short, you're arguing in bad faith.
It's also worth nothing that defining a narrow bounds for a conversation is scholarly practice. If you don't agree with the material claims put forward by most religions then Dawkins' criticism should mean nothing to you. If anything, you should appreciate it, as it may drive away the more clownish adherents who tend to detract from everyone else.
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 2:24:59 AM No.936347257
IMG_2779
IMG_2779
md5: 113d50c5ab57618cde722075d4ddec17🔍
Do you like my balls?
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 3:34:45 AM No.936349740
>>936344719 (OP)
dddd