>Why do people still starve if we make enough food for everyone?

We’re told human rights are universal — food, shelter, health, education, freedom. But in practice? You pay to live. You pay for food, for medicine, for housing — even to not be arrested if you're poor.

Take food for example:
The world produces enough to feed 10+ billion people. Yet over 700 million go hungry. Why?

Because food is a commodity, not a right.

Countries export food for profit while their own people starve.

Governments literally destroy surplus to stabilize prices.

Supermarkets throw out tons of food instead of giving it away.

30–40% of all food is wasted.

Massive farmland goes to biofuels or animal feed, not hungry people.

We already solved the logistics. What we haven’t solved is greed.

Same with healthcare, housing, even clean water. If you can't pay, your "rights" don't exist. So what does that make them? Privileges, rationed by profit.

>We're not lacking solutions.
>We're lacking will — and systems that actually serve people.

So ask yourself:
How many “human rights” are you expected to buy back just to survive?
And how much of this “scarcity” is just manufactured?

kys already spamming redditor

>>936404710
I’m here to talk about human rights — not to impress anyone or pass some online purity test. If you don’t like the way I present ideas, that’s fine. You’re free to ignore the thread. But telling someone to harm themselves isn’t criticism — it’s cruelty.

If you disagree with the content, challenge it. If you’re just here to be hostile, maybe ask yourself what that’s really accomplishing. I’m here for a better kind of conversation.

1

2

Getting ass-raped in your stupid thread the other day wasn't enough for you?
Kek

>>936404710
Better than porn spamming. Or logposting. Or counter-propaganda gaslighting.

>>936404687 (OP)
retard take right here.

>>936410716
Really curiously wondering what you mean by that...