Thread 936813551

Are there any 'converting lesbians' kinos?

Gigli with Affleck and jlo. Never saw it buy did see parts. Turkey time, gobble gobble
Stand out.

>>936813551 (OP)
real life

>>936813551 (OP)
Yugioh 5d

Reverse of this is Zoe saldana and mila kunis in college.

>>936813551 (OP)
Lgd?

>>936813551 (OP)
that dick is black btw

>>936813551 (OP)
>>936813556
RIP

Chasing Amy, also starring Affleck. Wtf?

>>936813551 (OP)
What about Quirk Chungus?

>>936813551 (OP)
They solved this by being psyopped into breeding with trannies

>>936813558
>being a nephew

>>936813562
How do they compare to faze?

Saved by the bell had the curly haired biker chick. She was definitely queer coded.

>>936813558
>>936813562
>chinese doter

>>936813551 (OP)
there was some show i seen a trailer of called “my lesbian homie” that seemed hilarious

>>936813553
No, it isn't. I tried to have sex with my lesbian friend. We cuddled, kissed, and she even let me touch her boobs, but she still couldn't have sex with me.

>>936813551 (OP)
letsbeans don't actually look like that irl

Reminder that lesbianism isn't real and women can't have sex with each other. Nothing that two women can do with each other would be considered sex if it were done by a man and a woman. If lick a woman's pussy and nothing else, can you say "I had sex with her"? No. If you rub your dick on the exterior of a woman's pussy and don't insert it, can you say "I had sex with her"? No. If you masturbate a woman with a dildo and nothing else, can you say "I had sex with her"? No. That's all that women can do with each other, therefore women cannot have sex with each other, and you cant' have a "sexual orientation" towards something you can't have sex with. Therefore lesbianism is not real. QED.

>>936813561
maximise mental illness in the offspring.
it hangs itself on the umbilical cord on the way out.
the baby's first word is "ACK"

>>936813551 (OP)
Who makes this shit?

>>936813571
lesbian

>>936813571
People who understand that lesbianism is fake.

>>936813568
Cammie Scott, Joanna Simon, Shannon beverage, rose and rosie on YouTube are all lipstick femme lesbians. Georgia bridges and keara graves are honorable mentions.

>>936813551 (OP)
NO.

You are defiling my inner sanctum with your pestilent emanations of corporeal impurity, whose images contaminate the pristine architectonics of my consciousness through their infiltration of phenomenologically corrupted visual artifacts.

>>936813567
did you try giving her a massage and then eating her out?

>>936813574
>lesbians
No such thing

>>936813575
Based cerebral schizo.

>>936813569
There's much less evolutionary advantage to being a homosexual woman than a homosexual man. Having said that, lesbians are real but a lot of them are LARPers who just hate men and hook up with women sometimes. "True" lesbians are really rare and they all hate trannies so I don't really have a problem with them.

>>936813567
That's because she was raped by a man. Either that or you're ugly. Lesbians aren't real, all women are straight and some are bi, the rest are THE RAPED

>>936813577
They are married and have children for several years. Quite a grift if they are putting on a show.

>>936813581
Women can't marry each other because they can't consummate a marriage because they can't have sex with each other. Sorry bro.

>>936813579
Cara deviligne, kstew, and Annie Clark seem to talk the talk and walk the walk.

>>936813582
Legally they can, at least in England they can. They can consummate with a feeldoe.

>>936813565
For a Chiense team, LGD was pretty kino

>>936813584
>Legally they can
Legally a man can say he's a woman if he chops his dick off, he still isn't one no matter what the "law" says.
>They can consummate with a feeldoe.
If I (a man) stick a dildo in my "wife"'s pussy I didn't consummate the marriage.

>>936813569
Listen man I'm not an SJW of anything but this is an incredibly pseudointellectual takedown of lesbianism. Definitional language errors don't have an actual effect on the real world. Carpet munchers aren't going to stop doing what they do because you informed them of dictionary contradictions.

>>936813623
>If I keep LARPing as something it will become real!
No it won't. Lesbianism will never be real. Women will never be able to have sex. If women can have sex with each other then a man can lose his virginity by getting a handjob. Same fucking thing.

>>936813623
Or conversely, a woman can lose her virginity without ever having anything inserted into her vagina. A woman rubbing her pussy on it is "sex". Or can people still be virgins after they've had "sex"? There's no way it will ever make sense because lesbianism itself is a contradiction.

>>936813689
>>936813716
I don't think you understood what I was saying. I literally agree with you that lesbianism is a contradiction and definitionally two women can't have sexual intercourse. I'm saying that it doesn't matter because it's literally just words. Women will continue eating each other out if they're into that. The dictionary saying it's not "real sex" or a real sexual orientation isn't going to stop them.

>>936813551 (OP)
We live in a world where a man looking at a woman is sexual harassment.
And where women can retroactively decide they did not consent.

>>936813798
It's important to recognize the truth, for anyone who's open to it. Men are going to keep cutting their dicks off and saying they're women, but I'm going to understand that they are still men. Knowing what reality is, instead of being demoralized into delusion by degenerate freaks, is a good thing.

>>936813846
Yeah but a man can't turn into a woman due to biology, definitions are irrelevant. Two women can eat each other out biologically.

>>936813894
>a man can't turn into a woman due to biology, definitions are irrelevant
Would the definitions in a modern "biology" textbook confirm that? I doubt it.

>>936813952
are you fucking retarded? men are men, women are women. there is no in-between.

>>936813952
What I meant by "biology" is reality, a man is a man and a woman is a woman, no changing that. It's the inverse for lesbianism. The dictionary can say lesbianism is a contradiction but in reality they're still eating each other out.

>>936813971
Yeah this guy seems a little slow and doesn't realize I'm transphobic, low-key defending trannies to dunk on lesbians is weird

>>936813971
I agree, but a modern "biologist" is going to tell you otherwise.

>>936814023
so what?

>>936814004
>>936814049
>low-key defending trannies to dunk on lesbians is weird
I'm not defending trannies. I'm saying the even when you talk about biology you're dealing with definitions, and those definitions are currently set by people who do not agree with us. It is not all "just words," because once it becomes "just words" (nominalism) then anything can become anything. If you think that then you've already lost because the lunatics are in control of the dictionary.

>>936813551 (OP)
All women are bi. Eithe bisexual or bipolar depending on circumstances.

>>936814069
You're doing this thing where you switch the framing of the argument every time I disagree with you. I said your takedown of lesbianism was nonsensical and a bad argument because dictionary/language contradictions don't have any actual impact on objective reality. You responded by equating lesbianism to transgenderism which is insane and dumb.

A man cannot turn into a woman and vice-versa. Reality and the dictionary agree with this.

Women can be attracted to each other and eat each other out, the dictionary can disagree, but it's still happening in real life, therefor it is real regardless of whether or not you think it's right or wrong.

Doesn't matter. Women need to learn how to ask. But they won't and will lose their privileges in 1-2 generations again.

>>936814158
You're ultimately just a demoralized nominalist who hasn't accepted the current paradigm shifts. You don't have any actual reason not to, you just haven't come around to it yet. Your view "Well sure that's true but they're going to keep doing it anyway so it doesn't matter whether it's true or not." If that's your view then you've lost and you'll give in and accept the lie eventually, because the lie being wrong doesn't matter to you.

>>936814211
Holy fuck you're genuinely an illiterate retard

language informs reality but reality exists independent of language, we literally agree on transgenderism/lesbianism I'm just saying your argument against lesbianism doesn't hold any weight

>>936814290
And it doesn't hold weight because women keep eating each other's pussies. Who give a fuck?
>Uh actually people disagree with you therefore your argument is wrong

lesbians are a real thing but dick always wins in the end, which should be obvious

>>936814363
>And it doesn't hold weight because women keep eating each other's pussies.
Yes? I'm glad you finally understand. If dipshit leftists changed the dictionary definition of sexual intercourse to exclude penis-in-vagina, you'd unironically be saying heterosexuality isn't real, which is delusional.

I don't really care if our politics are aligned, I'm not going to stay silent when someone I agree with is being retarded.

>>936814421
based

>>936814363
you are lost brother

My 19yo wife was dating a girl for a year before we met. She is a stoner rotter alt girl and i want to have them make out on my dick and fuck the lesbian girl. Shes never had sex with a man. Wish i could marry them both and have children with both. Trying to get her to hang out with that girl again and invite her here.

>>936815797
You will need your wife’s help to make that happen. Can you get her 100% on board with that idea, without making it sound like you want cheat.

>>936816080
Indeed i know. To be clear i love my wife. The only way this would ever happen is if we got there tactifully, if it becomes her idea too. Shed have to want to fool around with her independently of me. And im sure id never have them both as wives. If it never happened organically then im not going to push for it or pursue it against my wifes wishes.