← Home ← Back to /b/

Thread 936833308

37 posts 20 images /b/
Anonymous No.936833308 [Report] >>936833549 >>936833757 >>936833893 >>936834047 >>936834343 >>936837372 >>936839754 >>936847492 >>936849717 >>936849873 >>936849912
Camouflage Obsolete?
Will camouflage even matter in the next 20 to 30 years ahead? With how warfare is looking to go, and how it is going now, where do you see various nationalities' uniforms heading?
Anonymous No.936833419 [Report] >>936833517
chainmail?
Anonymous No.936833517 [Report]
>>936833419
>chainmail
did you mean oroton?
Anonymous No.936833549 [Report] >>936833893
>>936833308 (OP)
nope, it will all be drone wars
Anonymous No.936833757 [Report]
>>936833308 (OP)
Most wars are urban or countryside. Heat sensors and drones have made camo pointless. I think a lot of militaries will go with black, which is a poor choice. Darker greys and olive drabs are a much better choice. People don't realize that shadows are seldom black and grays and olive drabs blend into shadows more seamlessly. Dark blacks stand out in shadows and tend to draw the eye.
Anonymous No.936833893 [Report]
>>936833308 (OP)
>>936833549
Yes, it will and still does. There's no reason not to use camouflage.
Anonymous No.936834047 [Report] >>936834088 >>936837475 >>936851855 >>936853052
>>936833308 (OP)
>UCP.
>Desert camo at the back.
Why did the U.S. replace the superior choice for the Iraqi and Afghan desert environments during the Global War on Terror era with UCP, which just looks like an urban camo?
Anonymous No.936834088 [Report] >>936834184 >>936853070
>>936834047
the US military is ran by retards
Anonymous No.936834177 [Report]
Cobainouflage
Anonymous No.936834184 [Report]
>>936834088
i'd laugh if there was not countless example of burring tech that later became pivotal to win the war.
the mosquito wood plane comes to mind.
Anonymous No.936834259 [Report] >>936834423
Scatouflage
Anonymous No.936834343 [Report] >>936834380
>>936833308 (OP)
those light ghillies combined with thermal fragmentation tarp seem to be very effective tho
It will be mass produced, fire, fragment resistant, probably thermal non conducting and will likely include gambesons or protective inserts
Anonymous No.936834349 [Report]
We're going to have to resort to blackface if we're going to blend in with the BBC
Anonymous No.936834380 [Report] >>936834564
>>936834343
Forgot image
Anonymous No.936834423 [Report]
>>936834259
better than UCP
Anonymous No.936834435 [Report]
lenticular lens armor with oroton/chainmail under shirt.
Anonymous No.936834564 [Report] >>936841855
>>936834380
Is it legal to go hiking in this kind of outfit?
Anonymous No.936837372 [Report]
>>936833308 (OP)
we dont wear camo because its effective. we wear it because it's cool.
Anonymous No.936837475 [Report]
>>936834047
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJbd0qdmrAg
Anonymous No.936839754 [Report] >>936840582 >>936843240 >>936853108
>>936833308 (OP)
Camouflage has always been a grift. Just dressing in a flat, dull color works just as good as any weird pattern does. All you have to do is hold still and hide behind or under something, and don't move.

-t.former military.
Anonymous No.936840582 [Report]
>>936839754
Olive drab uniforms aren't even bad in a present context. The Israelis still use them, and I think several other countries might still have at least some of their forces with olive uniforms, such as Austria.
Anonymous No.936841855 [Report]
>>936834564
Bigfoot sightings up 5000%!
Anonymous No.936843240 [Report]
>>936839754
its probably effective at extreme distances but we have drones, satellites, helicopters, infrared cameras, high powered optics, etc. that completely negate any use camouflage has. To me it just makes them stand out more.
Anonymous No.936846187 [Report]
Nigger shoplifting camouflage
Anonymous No.936847492 [Report] >>936851288
>>936833308 (OP)
What if soldiers are just ordered to wear civilian clothes? Wouldn't that confuse enemies?
Anonymous No.936849717 [Report]
>>936833308 (OP)
no
Anonymous No.936849873 [Report] >>936853129
>>936833308 (OP)
A trigger finger and the naked eye will never be obsolete on the battlefield. They have to wear gear anyways, so it may as well have a camouflage pattern.
Anonymous No.936849912 [Report]
>>936833308 (OP)
I would this version may reach some degree of obsolesense

but you just adapt the camo to the new conditions like anti drone tech

or anti infared tech

or just flat out inviso gear
Anonymous No.936851288 [Report] >>936851555
>>936847492
Soldiers have to wear identifiers according to the Geneva Conventions.
Anonymous No.936851496 [Report]
mud
Anonymous No.936851555 [Report] >>936851690
>>936851288
al qaedas uniform was eerily similar to their civilians.
Anonymous No.936851690 [Report]
>>936851555
That's why plausible deniability and Gitmo are things. Waterboard them and let Allah sort out his own anong the dead.
Anonymous No.936851855 [Report]
>>936834047
They spent a billion dollars trialing patterns that would have worked better, including one that was almost identical to multicam, and then some bozo in the Pentagon went nuh-uh I like the grandma's couch pattern.
Anonymous No.936853052 [Report]
>>936834047
It's funny because both camps in the pic work perfectly fine depending on where you are in that pic. Not sure why'd you'd be laying in a road though.
Anonymous No.936853070 [Report]
>>936834088
Cope (and also occasionally true).

The thing you have to remember is if you think the US military is retarded just remember the other guys are liked 10 times more retarded.
Anonymous No.936853108 [Report]
>>936839754
It's funny because it's true. I always think of Jurassic Park when I hear this but when you're in the middle of the woods (or basically anywhere rural) if you do a 360 scan, outside of someone where white, black or safety orange.. you'll probably not see them if they're not moving. It's actually kind of fucking terrifying.
Anonymous No.936853129 [Report]
>>936849873
/thread

There's no reason for them to not wear it.