Thread 936861777

true?

100% true

>>936861777 (OP)
you can't be a leftist and not have those points

it goes against the very definition

you will simply be outing yourself as a white supremacist right winger

>>936862060
because fuck nuance?

>>936861777 (OP)
>if you call yourself leftist, you can get away with embracing non-socialist economic positions.
Wrong. What's happening here is libs trying to rebrand as something more popular. The "progressive" brand failed but left politics are popular right now so they pivoted to calling themselves that. Libs are definitionally opposed to socialism, and they sabotage left organizing with the identity politics and purity testing.

>>936862060
>you will simply be outing yourself as a white supremacist right winger

only White people can be non-leftist?

>>936862397
You dont have to be repub to be racist but if youre racist you're prob repub

>>936862397
>>936862342
are you guys pretending everyone in this thread isn't some white loser?

>>936862060
Lol, you're a niggerloving faggot

>>936862459
the vice president's wife is some type of hindu

>>936862550
K...I would read my post again and then rethink your reply

>>936862467
there are probably a couple nigs and chinks

>>936862559
alright alright
what about racism against Whites?

>>936862690
That is covered by my post. Try rereading my post and then rethink your reply.

>>936862723
seems like most anti-White racism is on the left
the left (nigs and spics) are way more likely to do hate crimes (against fags for example but also interacial)

>>936862781
For the third time. Reread my post and rethink your post.

>>936862806
all you say is you have a feeling that racists are more likely to be republicans

>>936862879
So that leaves room for people to be racist and not repub, correct?

>>936861777 (OP)
>True
I’m 45 years old and I have totally lost the thread on who is say what for which reason…. Nothing is what it was, different factions have different propaganda requirements
The words this person wrote doesn’t make much sense to me, especially since we’ve abandoned grammar and spelling requirements.

>>936861777 (OP)
not true, this is just how americans act because genuinely the whole bunch of you are too retarded

>>936862903
sure, but that's why he's showing you counterexamples. you claim
>if youre racist you're prob repub
so he posted a significant democratic thought leader being racist, as well as an example from a leftist media source. Since influential figures and media on the left side of the spectrum are also racist hate crimers, your claim is starting to look pretty foolish. Just weighing in as an unbiased third party.

>>936862903
sure, but I'm saying we disagree that republicans are worse because anti-White expression and action seems to be done in the open on the left.

>>936863049
>hur dur you said racist is prob repub
>racist is prob repub
>prob
What does the word probably mean? Does it mean definitely?

>>936863068
>the left
>posts pic of a zionist
as i said, americans are generally retarded

>>936863068
Good one...
Let me guess, this "isnt" you
>>936862471
>>936862594

>>936863109
is biden on the left?

>>936863134
it isn't but you are one

>>936863150
What has donny, the current potus, done to defy israel? Bomb iran?

>>936863175
Very convincing

>>936863150
that you ask this kind of question is yet another example
the american society as a whole is genuinely retarded
it must be the lead in your drinking water

>>936863180
they are both controlled by the jew

>>936863099
but these aren't just anecdotes or exceptions, they're media figures that a plurality of liberal democrats look to for their opinions. If Jon Stewart is a racist, then it's very likely that a majority of his viewers will incorporate those opinions into their worldview. That makes it unlikely that that racists would "probably" be republicans.

>>936863201
you not being convinced is your own retarded situation

>>936863218
Cool story

>>936863109
Most, Anon, Most.

>>936863237
all.

>>936861777 (OP)
Can a leftist get away with affirmations of rights for everyone? Yes. Can they get away with calling for lynchings? No. Can a leftist be against trannies playing in women sports? Yes. Can they get away with calling for preventing someone from getting gender affirming care? Yes. Can a leftist be against migration taking jobs that americans want? Yes. Can a leftist be against a set of immigrants solely because of their race? probably not without being called out for it.

>>936863231
Very convincing

>>936864643
Less babies now means less soldiers in the future. It’s a very logical concept. You do want war to stop, right? Right?

>>936862459
I'm a racist and I'm I think republicanism is retarded

>>936862550
Weird, about 20 minutes ago I just watched him say that "get whitey" quote at the Don Rickles thing.

>>936862459
You got that backwards, either intentionally or you've fallen for your own party's propaganda.