Anonymous
7/14/2025, 7:20:04 AM No.937077396
Was he on the list?
Replies:
Thread 937077396 - /b/ [Archived: 285 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 7:28:02 AM No.937077678
Bitch he was like 70% of the fucking list
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 7:29:15 AM No.937077716
There is no list
Replies:
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 7:35:41 AM No.937077925
>>937077396 (OP)
epstein's best friend could never be on the list lol haha why do you ask
epstein's best friend could never be on the list lol haha why do you ask
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 7:38:51 AM No.937078018
Logfag was on it
Replies:
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 7:49:46 AM No.937078326
>>937077716
Pam Bondi said the list was on her desk.
Pam Bondi said the list was on her desk.
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 7:56:46 AM No.937078527
>>937078018
Proof??
Proof??
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 7:57:58 AM No.937078563
>>937077396 (OP)
He WAS the list.
He WAS the list.
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 8:06:51 AM No.937078788
>>937077396 (OP)
>Was he on the list?
Of course he was. They're stalling now as they purge the records. Then they'll produce the list but mushroom dick won't be on it.
>Was he on the list?
Of course he was. They're stalling now as they purge the records. Then they'll produce the list but mushroom dick won't be on it.
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 8:09:22 AM No.937078845
>>937077396 (OP)
Heh...
You Niggers think that such list still exists...
Will ameritards cast aside their differences for five minutes to get all the scum bags "allegedly" involved to face the music?
Or would they just move on to the next thing?
Hell, I wouldn't even be surprised if "humanity makes contact with intelligent interdimensional beings" to cover this shit up.
Heh...
You Niggers think that such list still exists...
Will ameritards cast aside their differences for five minutes to get all the scum bags "allegedly" involved to face the music?
Or would they just move on to the next thing?
Hell, I wouldn't even be surprised if "humanity makes contact with intelligent interdimensional beings" to cover this shit up.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 8:10:15 AM No.937078871
>>937077396 (OP)
He needs to be on a lot more lists
He needs to be on a lot more lists
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 8:23:21 AM No.937079167
>>937078845
Like it or not, we are a 2 party system, and that won't ever change without ranked choice voting.
Frankly, I am seeing a lot of people "playing both sides" on this issue.
That doesn't make sense, it just never made sense why everyone always treats the things Democrats do and Republicans do to be equally suspicious, even when there's a clear and distinct difference.
With Epstein, Dems told us the files existed, more or less, in the form of lots of different evidentiary pieces like flight logs and other journals where Epstein wrote names of both victims and Suspects.
They told us that they don't want to release it yet, and their excuses were:
A. It will make it more difficult, or impossible, to prosecute (If the court of public opinion is thorough, a jury could never be found that wouldn't be thrown out, making a conviction under rule-of-law impossible.)
B. Victims will be hurt by the early, fully unredacted release. (This was when the public believed it to be hundreds of victims.)
When Republicans got in, they took the House and Senate, and got to fill every top position with their hand selected choice, which, by the way, Biden didn't do. He didn't fire everyone, so all of Trump's original appointees for things like HEAD OF THE FBI, were the same throughout Biden's admin, but I digress. Trump gets in, owns the entirety of the government, including the executive seats and a bunch of agencies. What is Trump's excuse for no release?
1. The files will be released
2. The files are on my desk
3. We already released them (phase 1, shit Biden already released.)
4. The files never existed.
5. The files exist and are a Democrat fakery made by Obama and Hillary.
6. Why are you still talking about this Epstein guy?
I know which party was at least trying to convict people in those documents. It just sucks that people were so polarized, they immediately accused the Obama judge in ghislaines Case of being biased, so they overly favored every one of Ghislaines rqs.
Like it or not, we are a 2 party system, and that won't ever change without ranked choice voting.
Frankly, I am seeing a lot of people "playing both sides" on this issue.
That doesn't make sense, it just never made sense why everyone always treats the things Democrats do and Republicans do to be equally suspicious, even when there's a clear and distinct difference.
With Epstein, Dems told us the files existed, more or less, in the form of lots of different evidentiary pieces like flight logs and other journals where Epstein wrote names of both victims and Suspects.
They told us that they don't want to release it yet, and their excuses were:
A. It will make it more difficult, or impossible, to prosecute (If the court of public opinion is thorough, a jury could never be found that wouldn't be thrown out, making a conviction under rule-of-law impossible.)
B. Victims will be hurt by the early, fully unredacted release. (This was when the public believed it to be hundreds of victims.)
When Republicans got in, they took the House and Senate, and got to fill every top position with their hand selected choice, which, by the way, Biden didn't do. He didn't fire everyone, so all of Trump's original appointees for things like HEAD OF THE FBI, were the same throughout Biden's admin, but I digress. Trump gets in, owns the entirety of the government, including the executive seats and a bunch of agencies. What is Trump's excuse for no release?
1. The files will be released
2. The files are on my desk
3. We already released them (phase 1, shit Biden already released.)
4. The files never existed.
5. The files exist and are a Democrat fakery made by Obama and Hillary.
6. Why are you still talking about this Epstein guy?
I know which party was at least trying to convict people in those documents. It just sucks that people were so polarized, they immediately accused the Obama judge in ghislaines Case of being biased, so they overly favored every one of Ghislaines rqs.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 8:28:00 AM No.937079272
>>937079167
>If Democrats had files with Republicans in it, why didn't they release it! Because THEY are in it too!
They literally said why. It is impossible to convict either way, it would be mob justice, which is anarchy.
Also, this is Trump's projection 101. He has the files, and knows they're NOT full of Democrat names, so he's not releasing it. This goes both ways. It's literally brimming with Republicans and elite, probably hotel magnates and people who donate to Trump, hence, the files no longer exist.
>If Democrats had files with Republicans in it, why didn't they release it! Because THEY are in it too!
They literally said why. It is impossible to convict either way, it would be mob justice, which is anarchy.
Also, this is Trump's projection 101. He has the files, and knows they're NOT full of Democrat names, so he's not releasing it. This goes both ways. It's literally brimming with Republicans and elite, probably hotel magnates and people who donate to Trump, hence, the files no longer exist.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 8:30:44 AM No.937079318
>>937079272
>>937079167
Follow up; if there were elite democrats in those lists, he would've released a sanitized version with only those names, and the rage fueled public would've ignored the red flags. He would have done this, look at what he's doing right now to avoid having to address it. If there were Dems on that list, there would be an edited version out back in May, and he would be pointing at how Dems are all corrupt, and ride the wave all the way to a third term, which he would've earned from upending a massive underground pedophile ring run by the dem Party.
This didn't happen, why?
>>937079167
Follow up; if there were elite democrats in those lists, he would've released a sanitized version with only those names, and the rage fueled public would've ignored the red flags. He would have done this, look at what he's doing right now to avoid having to address it. If there were Dems on that list, there would be an edited version out back in May, and he would be pointing at how Dems are all corrupt, and ride the wave all the way to a third term, which he would've earned from upending a massive underground pedophile ring run by the dem Party.
This didn't happen, why?
Replies:
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 8:42:06 AM No.937079546
>>937077396 (OP)
Watch this video, this guy explains it really well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4uNk7xnZ9g
Watch this video, this guy explains it really well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4uNk7xnZ9g
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 8:50:41 AM No.937079743
>>937077396 (OP)
He flew on the plane. That's already confirmed. Maybe he went to the island too
He flew on the plane. That's already confirmed. Maybe he went to the island too
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 8:58:18 AM No.937079915
>>937077396 (OP)
Google "John Doe 174"
Google "John Doe 174"
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 9:10:57 AM No.937080175
>>937079272
>>937079318
If there were republicans on that list, there would be an edited version out back and dems would be pointing at how republicans are all corrupt, and ride the wave all the way to another term, which he would've earned from upending a massive underground pedophile ring run by the republican Party.
This didn't happen, why?
>>937079318
If there were republicans on that list, there would be an edited version out back and dems would be pointing at how republicans are all corrupt, and ride the wave all the way to another term, which he would've earned from upending a massive underground pedophile ring run by the republican Party.
This didn't happen, why?
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 9:21:24 AM No.937080425
Here are the possible scenarios as I see it
>The list really doesn't exist, and Epstein did kill himself
>Unlikely
>The List exists but the administration finds more power in keeping it to keep blackmailing the people in power for thier own agendas
>Possible
>He is on the list and instead of just producing a fake list, he instead makes it look super bad for him for no reason.
>Possible but kind of unlikely
>They are pretending the list doesn't exist so they can orchestrate the simultaneous arrests of the individuals involved, as they likey have a lot of money and are flight risks
>Possible but elaborate
>The List heavily implicates and directly links epsteins operation to Isreal
>Almost certainly the case, as both Biden and Trump did not release it.
>The list really doesn't exist, and Epstein did kill himself
>Unlikely
>The List exists but the administration finds more power in keeping it to keep blackmailing the people in power for thier own agendas
>Possible
>He is on the list and instead of just producing a fake list, he instead makes it look super bad for him for no reason.
>Possible but kind of unlikely
>They are pretending the list doesn't exist so they can orchestrate the simultaneous arrests of the individuals involved, as they likey have a lot of money and are flight risks
>Possible but elaborate
>The List heavily implicates and directly links epsteins operation to Isreal
>Almost certainly the case, as both Biden and Trump did not release it.
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 9:24:13 AM No.937080493
DOGE got tons of secret files, and gave them to Musk. That's why he said Trump is all over the Epstein list. If he didn't have proof, he would be opening himself up to a huge defamation lawsuit. Notice, the most litigious man in the world has NOT filed such a lawsuit against Musk, That's because the discovery process would make all those files, pics, and videos public.
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 9:27:05 AM No.937080550
Trump is desperate to distract us from thinking about the Epstein list. That's why he is doing all this crazy shit.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 9:32:14 AM No.937080645
>>937077396 (OP)
Yes, he was on the list.
Yes, he was on the list.
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 9:40:49 AM No.937080815
>>937080550
You sure? The whole "list" conversation only occurred after ICE started up, you could argue that its a distraction from that, or the Ukraine, Or Iran, or eggs or whatever the fuck you'd like. But just like all of those things your false outrage is obvious and boring, I'll see you on the next "thing".
You sure? The whole "list" conversation only occurred after ICE started up, you could argue that its a distraction from that, or the Ukraine, Or Iran, or eggs or whatever the fuck you'd like. But just like all of those things your false outrage is obvious and boring, I'll see you on the next "thing".