>>937176806 >all founders are inherently board members
Where in business expansion and investment is that the case? I know founders that were pushed off to VP level. Paid well but their company isn’t required to make them permanent board members indefinitely that’s not how the world works. Equity companies could tell an owner to fuck off even if the contracts say so.
>>937176806
You just made up a scenario with circular logic and wrote it out.
You think founders are untouchable icons by investors?
What law states founders are inherently evil n the board of directors or can’t be moved out?
Are you denying the increase in Indian visas?
>>937179043 >turbo nepotism
by invaders.
what they do in their own countries is none of my concern but all of them should be stripped of anything White they own, and kicked out of our nations
