Thread 937440178

Why is pedophilia so common among LGBT?

Never beating the groomer allegations

>>937440178 (OP)
You should go to as red state. The entire state is pedophiles. That's why they don't care that trump is one.

>>937440178 (OP)
You worship a pedo

>>937440178 (OP)
Why is pedophilia so common among MAGA?

>>937440221
Correct. They support a pedo president because they want pedophilia to be normalized.

>>937440221
>You should go to as red state. The entire state is pedophiles
Red states are full of liberals now? Wtf

>>937440255
I don’t worship Biden
>>937441300
You mean why is pedophilia so common among pedocrats
>>937441330
Since when do they support Biden?

>5 trans people exist
>one is a pedophile
>20%of trans people are pedophiles
>1000 cis hetero exist
>20 are pedophiles
>2%
Its not that its more common. Its that they have a significantly smaller sample size, so when one fucks up idiots like you assume all of them do. Kind of like asking why are school shootings so common among young white men?

>>937441300
Their cult leader is a child molester.

>>937442475
>Its not that its more common
Except it is, a lot.
No media or researcher is bold enough to question the narrative, so you have to add 1+1 yourself.
Start by checking the percentage of gay people in your country and then compare the number against the percentage of gay child sexual abuse perpetrators.
I'm sorry anon.

>>937442260
You voted for a pedophile. You are a chomo lover. You all deserve ass rape in prison.

>>937440178 (OP)
This is deflection. trump is the king of pedophiles.

>>937440210
trump rapes children. trump is a chomo pedophile

>>937443248
>sees two hundred stories of cis white men raping children
>nothing to see here
>sees one story about LGBT raping a child
>this is a huge problem!

>>937443420
Nice strawman.
At no point I said or implied that I don't see a problem with hetero child abusers.
All I did is stating the fact that homosexuals are statistically more likely to abuse a child.

>>937440178 (OP)
Because they're all leftards with serious mental health issues

>>937440178 (OP)
It isn't, Paedophiles are in every walk of life, race, religion etc.

It's a sad day when people get political and use Paedophilia to attack the whole of a group because a couple of them did it.

Pretty sure your everyday white employee on minimum pay and Christian has the highest number in the US at least.

>>937444453
Can you prove that statistically without citing paul cameron?

>>937444453
Care to share that statistic? Or did you just make it up?

Why are most all pedophiles men?

>>937440210
Breaking news!
from 2013!
trying too hard

>>937440178 (OP)
OK, you post a pic
I post a pic
you post, I post, etc until one of us runs out of pics
Deal?

Prison for Pam Bondi

>>937440178 (OP)

And for that matter, why is it so common among conservatives?

>>937441300
Lol, are you retarded you lil paid Democrat shill?
Good job proving the opposite of what you intended to suggest.

1. Riley Carter is a REGISTERED DEMOCRAT.
2. Riley Carter is literally a REGISTERED DEMOCRAT who got elected on the Democrat ticket to Ward 5 of Aberdeen, Washington, not far from Seattle, WA, Democrat city run by Democrats, also with an ENTIRELY Democrat City Council, lmfao!
3) Riley Carter is NOT wearing a red MAGA hat. In fact, he is wearing a well known hat (around Seattle) intended to MOCK the MAGA movement, and this hat says, "MAKE PEDOPHILES AFRAID AGAIN" wherein he, like you, want to pretend the opposite of what is true is reality. In fact, the Democrat Party has 8x the rate of convicted sex offenders nationwide compared to the Republican Party.
4) No one with half a brain would ever believe that the Democrat Party, the Party that is run by TRANSEXUALS and LGBTQ nonsense, which is all derived from disgusting fucking of everything other than what nature intended (and mutilation of genitals, especially in children) is somehow the party that is not full of pedophiles!

tl;dr
YOU ARE RETARDED!!!

>>937444453
Your king is a child molester.

>>937447889
Shut the fuck up chomo lover

this >>937447889
am from seatlle
i remember when this story came out
it was all over nightly news here and yeah, this guy was in fact a registered democrat
not sure how a pic of him from the past openly mocking maga and claiming maga is full of pedos somehow equates to him being aligned with maga
did the anon that posted this even bother to read what is on the hat?
that hat is to claim that the maga movement is all about making pedophiles afraid and clearly riley carter as a democrat and now convicted child rapist, doesn't want to be afraid

>>937448155
You got owned. Demoncrats are pedos!
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ couldnt be me. I wouldnt waste my time. Jew tactics are ancient. Accusing people for what you do baselessly with no logic doesnt work anymore.

>>937448347
kikes get called out

>>937447889
>Riley Carter is NOT wearing a red MAGA hat.
why would he pick red, given the significance of red hats since 2015?
curious

>>937442475
>5 trans people exist
>one is a pedophile
>20%of trans people are pedophiles
>1000 cis hetero exist
>20 are pedophiles
>2%
>Its not that its more common. Its that they have a significantly smaller sample size, so when one fucks up idiots like you assume all of them do. Kind of like asking why are school shootings so common among young white men?

First, the question anon posed was why is it so common among LGBT, e.g. why does that admittedly small group have such a high rate? And it is absolutely a high rate. Law enforcement shows it, social workers show it, sex offender registries show it - the LGBT community has a higher rate of offenses against children than their respective communities at large.

But it's still a stupid question, like asking why gun owners are overrepresented in gun violence. Perverts are gonna perve.

It's still a s

>>937447889
>Riley Carter is a REGISTERED DEMOCRAT.
you what other registered democrat is a pedo?

>>937447889
>1. Riley Carter is a REGISTERED DEMOCRAT.
still waiting

>>937449651
*you know what

lololol MAGA's orange god-king turns out to be a bona fide kiddy fucker so congress shuts down early and all the incels go on the offensive posting silly "but da gays" and "demoncrats" threads.

>>937440178 (OP)
Just my opinion here, but there's a population of LGBT who's first sexual experience was homosexual statutory rape, which normalized it in their brains, and then they perpetuate it as adults.
They got raped. They identify that as what sex is. They grow up and rape.
It's definitely not "All LGBT", but I've heard enough stories from people to know it's too common.

>>937440178 (OP)
That's like asking "why is biting so common among biting insects?".

>>937440255
>big mad at orange man
>*gets dick sucked by Destiny to calm down

>>937446837
>>937446845
Like I said
>you have to add 1+1 yourself
I know it's annoying and takes effort, but there is a reason why you won't find any numbers on google with a simple search.
I am sure you can come up with some ideas on how to prove or disprove this theory. Remember my original question about percentages? That's a starting point.
If you really have absolutely no idea how and where to start, read DOI:10.1023/A:1010243318426
>>937448060
Jokes on you, I have no king.
I am neither American, nor do I care about your child molesters.

>>937449899
terrific guy
loves his girls on the younger side

>>937450375
trust me bro.. proceeds to drop a paper based on the horrifically flawed and at times fabriced data of Tomeo, M. E. (2000), Tomeo, M. E., and Templer, D. I., Anderson, S., & Kotler, D. (2001) like a mic drop.

>>937450375
So you couldn't share the statistic and you then pull out the "YoU hAvE tO dO iT yOuRsElF" excuse.

Here is your "read" attempt per pic. Suddenly you think 942 participants equates to the population of the US. How sad and ignorant do you have to be.

If they chose another different 942 people it would have different results. Why? Because not everyone is the same.

>>937450375
>read DOI:10.1023/A:1010243318426
no thank you
not when the editorial board issues "An Expression of Concern"
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02540-7

>>937447889
Convenient how every right-winger who does something fucked up is somehow a Democrat according to you people.

>>937442187
no u

>>937444453
But only one group merited your notice here. So your denial is a load of shit.

>>937450847
>actually literally autistic

>>937450847

Lol, the cutoff for childhood is 16, there's no examination of consensuality, and over 2/3s of the gay men identified as gay before their molestation. This is just measuring that teenagers are more likely to have sex with older people of their preferred gender (and that it's way easier for teenage boys to hook up with older men than older women).

Troons are loons

>>937448347
trump is still a child rapist. He rapes children. He's a molester of children. his pedophilia is very strong. So why do you support someone like that?

>>937450375
Jokes on us, he's merely pretending to be a retarded pedophile supporter

>>937451814
See Rule 2

>>937450659
>trust me bro
Today is strawman day, isn't it?
At no point I said to just trust me.
I asked the dear reader to prove or disprove the claim. That means I told him to use his own brain instead of just trusting me. Isn't that the exact opposite of "trust me bro"?
>horrifically flawed
>fabriced data
One table got two interchanged values and the rest are some minor numerical errors:
>6.7% should be 5.8%
>45.5% should be 45.1%
>24.3% should be 24.1%
>29.3% should be 28.7%
>16.4% should be 16.1%
Damn right fabricated data! I was wrong, you are right, the whole study is trash. Lets just ignore it.

>>937450945
>Editorial Expression of Concern
Ah yes, thank god someone tells us what is right and what is wrong.
God forbid we have to use our own brains and actually read the study, ew.
Jokes aside, I suggest you actually read it instead of just rejecting the whole study because someone voiced concerns.

Imagine defending Trump in 2025. Anyone who still follows the Pedophile of the United States is enough too fucking retarded to see what scumbag he is or are pedophiles themselves

>>937450847
How many participants would this study require for you to acknowledge a statistically significant pattern?

>>937452574
>leaves out where she on multiple occasions cited her variables the wrong way round 68% vs 32% small margin of error, no biggie.
basing a paper on conclusions drawn from such flawed work is less than worthless.