Lolicons deserve to die. They are literally PEDOPHILES that masturbate to drawings of CHILDREN getting RAPED!!!.
There is no forgiveness for lolicons. There is no acceptance for lolicons.
These "People" deserve only DEATH!
While you idiots are waisting your time debating which of the last 2 presidents are pedophiles, there are acive threads filled to the brim with weirdos and degenerates lusting after little girls. This must come to an end.
Even therapy can't fix them, the only thing that can cure pedophilia is death, which is exactly what lolicons deserve.
They may say it's "just a drawing", but to that we say "a drawing of what?"
They won't be able to give a straight answer.

>>937451657 (OP)
anon i agree with you but was the dude's stretched out asshole really necessary

>>937451657 (OP)
lolicon literally means pedophile. you can't defend it but pedophilia is age based so some lolis are not really lolis

>>937451657 (OP)
I'll take someone who jerks off to cartoons over a president who actually rapes kids in real life any day.

>>937452036
Cartoons of what?

>>937451657 (OP)
>"a drawing of what?"
A drawing of an anime cartoon character.
Thread closed.

>>937452090
A drawing of a CHILD getting RAPED

>>937452036
lolicons will rape a child

>>937452036
Taking out a hoarde of pedophiles is more important than exposing a singular pedophile

>>937452118
No, a drawing of a cartoon character. A child has a birth certificate; none of these cartoons have a birth certificate.
You sound like a person who would treat GTA gameplay as evidence of mass murder in the court of law.

>>937452201
>"Please, don't convict a real child sex offender! Look, look! These people jerk off to anime, this is a real problem because no child suffers as a result of it!"

>>937452201
So do you support removing Trump from power? Yes or no?

>>937452214
>a child has a birth certificate
only the real ones do, but the drawn ones are still children.
>You sound like a person who would treat GTA gameplay as evidence of mass murder in the court of law
I'm not saying jacking off to lolicon is the same as raping children, but the fact you get off to that proves you are a pedophile who is very capable of raping children in the future (if you haven't already)

>>937452214
some of those children have birthdays which say their ages

>>937452337
And how would that work exactly? There are plenty of "adult" anime characters. Are you planning to marry one and stay committed to it for life, refusing any real adult advances, because your mating needs have already been fulfilled? You are attracted to adults, right? Then why isn't an anime cartoon you would describe as an "adult" in the list of your potential marriage prospects?

>>937452275
>no child suffers as a result of it
lolicon can act as a gateway drug for pedophiles, which may lead to them harming real children.
>>937452293
No, he won a presidential election fair and square. there was photos of him with epstein long before the election and those retards still voted for him instead of commie kamala (aka hamas harris) so they got what they asked for.

>>937452337
You didn't answer my question.
>>937452293

>>937452434
And by the same logic, since lolicon is legal, you shouldn't kill anyone for owning lolicon.

>>937452459
i did
>>937452434

>>937452487
maybe it's legal, but it for sure as fuck isn't moral. slavery was legal for hundreds of years, dosen't mean it was right. (only femdom slavery is right)

>>937452531
And Trump fucking kids isn't moral either. You keep shifting the goal posts back and forth.

>>937452406
And some of those ages in anime are like 5000 years old, to make a simple point, that they aren't a real human to idiots who act like we evolved to mate with stickman figures.

>>937452434
There is no such thing as a gateway drug to pedophilia. You are either born a pedophile or you never will be one. It's not something you develop as a result of anything environmental.

>>937452565
it's better to get rid of 100 pedos than to get rid of 1, right?

>>937452596
>There is no such thing as a gateway drug to pedophilia. You are either born a pedophile or you never will be one. It's not something you develop as a result of anything environmental.

Correct. Actual pedophilia (not the lolicon kinds) is usually the result of birth defects. This has been scientifically proven.

>>937452609
So that is why you decided to get rid of 100 non-pedophiles, to enable 1 actual pedophile?

>>937452609
Why not do both?

>>937452652
wrong. pedophilia can be caused because once someone watches too much porn, it gets boring for them, so they start seeking out more extreme kinds. this may lead them to seeking out drawin CSAM (lolicon material) and then that may lead them to seek out actual CSAM.
>>937452655
what do you mean "non-pedophiles". Lolicons ARE pedophiles and getting rid of them is more pressing of an issue than the one pedophile you rape-ublicans elected president.

>>937451657 (OP)
We know which ones were pedophiles - #45 and #47.
Why does that matter? Because they're the chief administrator for the entire country. And a bunch of losers like you (many of whom are pedos themselves) voted for him. You're just trying to distract people from the pedo-in-chief.
None of the pedos on this board matter. They suck but they not where we should be focusing our attention right now. Once the pedo in the white house is out, we can turn our fight back to the little fish.

>>937452788
Excuse me? Do you position CSAM as more satisfying than regular pornography in this little escalatory hierarchy of sexual gratification you just fabricated?
You sound like a pedophile with extra steps of rationalizing jerking off to real kids as "just porn addiction".
That being said, your made-up nonsense is not even hinted at by anything in academia, so I take it your pet theory was fully derived from your personal experience as a professional pedophile. Seek a psychotherapist, anon, throwing people jerking off to anime into the lion's den won't get you reaccepted by society.

>"This one pedophile who victimized an actual child is not as big a priority as people whose biggest crime was jerking off to imaginary characters that can't experience suffering"

>>937452788
Literally no evidence for that.
And as for your second statement, Trump is a pedophile too, yet you're against removing him.

>>937452995
Exactly, this guy is the only person in the thread who is fine with ignoring a child sex offender in the highest position of power on this planet.

>>937452979
>Do you position CSAM as more satisfying than regular pornography in this little escalatory hierarchy of sexual gratification you just fabricated?
It is for those who got hooked on the idea of raping children by the gateway drug that is lolicon.
This therefore proves my point even more, consuming lolicon material is a gateway drug to pedophilia.
>>937452944
You are forgetting about #46, also i voted for commie kamala (aka hamas harris) so your assumption i support trump is unfounded.
also trump was president in 2016, and joe biden, an even bigger pedo than trump, was im power during 2020. did they ever lower the age of consent or legalise pedophilia? no, they knew it would get them impeached. plus the president is getting monitored 24/7 so there is no way they can get away with raping children while president.
lolicons on 4chan are more dangerous as they can sometimes rape children and get away with it. one time in a loli thread a guy admited to SAing children and not getting caught for 8 years.

>>937451657 (OP)
nnnghhh little children so hot

>>937453385
go unalive yourself PEDOPHILE.
you are subhumyn scum that deserves to rot in hell for eternity!

>>937453268
Nonono, not turning it around and pivoting. It was your personal judgment that CSAM is more gratifying, universally, to people. Otherwise, escalation from porn desensitization (which doesn't exist to begin with, but that is besides the point) wouldn't lead to it. You view recordings of real minors being abused as pleasurable. Not me, not others in this thread addressing your make-belief worldview.
I know it might be shocker to you, but CSAM isn't appealing, it's evidence of a horrible crime. And you really think it's better than regular legal porn. Seek help immediately. You already exposed yourself in 4k, and no amount of distraction by projection will work at this point.

>>937453520
>It was your personal judgment that CSAM is more gratifying, universally, to people.
Not universally, but instead only to those who got addicted to viewing Lolicon material.
>Otherwise, escalation from porn desensitization (which doesn't exist to begin with, but that is besides the point) wouldn't lead to it.
It only leads to it if you start viewing lolicon material. That's why it's a gateway drug.
>I know it might be shocker to you, but CSAM isn't appealing, it's evidence of a horrible crime. And you really think it's better than regular legal porn.
I don't believe that. STRAWMAN FALLACY. It's the people who got hooked on lolicon who belive that. it's those who viewed images of drawn little girls being raped on the daily getting desensitised to it and then turning around to view the real stuff. It's the lolicon material that makes them think this way.

>>937453796
No, you fuckign manipulativ,e deceptive pedophile. Your statement was, and I quote: " pedophilia can be caused because once someone watches too much porn, it gets boring for them, so they start seeking out more extreme kinds. this may lead them to seeking out drawin CSAM (lolicon material) and then that may lead them to seek out actual CSAM."
Your statement was about people in general, only then in the escalation, you mention lolicon as the next step, and after that, CSAM, acting like CSAM is some sort of highest and most potent form of drug for anyone, an inevitability of getting desensitized to everything else, since everything else was less potent.
You are not reading lolicons minds, you clearly did zero research on the topic of child abuse because it's clear you don't give a shit about the victimization of minors (you find it appealing and less of a priority than imaginary cartoon characters), the entire field of study in this subject directly contradicts every pseudopsychological idea your brain farted out. You either make things up, or all of this faux confidence comes from your own experience as a pedophile, and how you rationalized it. In both cases, you are a worthless piece of human garbage that should be exterminated from this planet, because it's precisely "people" like you, that are responsible for NOTHING being done about the problem of child abuse.
I rest my case. Everything you say from now on is nothing more than continuous stream of lies, as illustrated by your whole engagement thus far.

>>937452214
are you jacking off when you play gta and commit mass murder?

>>937454114
Does jerking off change your brain so that in one context it confuses artificial characters for real people, and in another it doesn't? Are you in some sort of competition about how can miss the point most effectively?

>>937454101
>Your statement was about people in general, only then in the escalation, you mention lolicon as the next step, and after that, CSAM, acting like CSAM is some sort of highest and most potent form of drug for anyone, an inevitability of getting desensitized to everything else, since everything else was less potent.
Okay, that may have just been bad wording on my part. Not all people who are on this downwards spiral of porn end up becoming lolicons, but of those who do, a lot end up seeking out CSAM. Only those who were first lolicons end up liking CSAM.
>"people" like you, that are responsible for NOTHING being done about the problem of child abuse.
I guarantee you if lolicon material was outlawerd, there would be a whole lot less pedophiles, and therefore less child abuse.

>>937454101
btw i didn't "make this up", i heard it from some youtuber.

>>937451657 (OP)
Didn't this guy die from fucking a horse? Degenerate OP should die

>>937454366
>Okay, that may have just been bad wording on my part. Not all people who are on this downwards spiral of porn end up becoming lolicons, but of those who do, a lot end up seeking out CSAM. Only those who were first lolicons end up liking CSAM.
You cannot even acknowledge that you were wrong. That you supported an idea only a pedophile would conjure in their sick head. And it triggered no self-reflection over how wrong your belief system is. You ad hoc try to rationalize, that what was a very definitive statement, was just "bad wording", when in reality you regurgitated accurately the same idea pedophiles has been spreading for decades now to convince others the child rape they committed wasn't ever their decision but somehow was magically caused by some external thing none of the actual pedophiles give a shit about.

>I guarantee you if lolicon material was outlawerd, there would be a whole lot less pedophiles, and therefore less child abuse.
You can guarantee shit. You are not an authority, we both know that, so stop acting like one, you pathological manipulator. You are an idiot who spreads disinformation about the problem of child abuse to serve to distract from real child abusers, like you did with the very person in charge of the US. Australia bans lolicon. Japan and the US don't. And what do we see in the data? 2000% larger rate of per capita sex crimes against minors IN AUSTRALIA COMPARED TO THE OTHER TWO. And that is only what is recorded, Australia has an extreme problem with underreporting of child abuse.

work bad job bad goon good (no children)

>>937454937
>You cannot even acknowledge that you were wrong.
I think you are talking about yourself here
>You ad hoc try to rationalize, that what was a very definitive statement, was just "bad wording"
Dafuq do you mean? It's a simple ideaa i'm trying to get across, that lolicon is a gateway drug to pedophilia. the fact i didn't initially dumb it down to your level says more that i didn't think people as dumb as you would keep twisting my words and misunderstanding me and keep ignoring me when i clarify it.
>when in reality you regurgitated accurately the same idea pedophiles has been spreading for decades now to convince others the child rape they committed wasn't ever their decision but somehow was magically caused by some external thing none of the actual pedophiles give a shit about.
What pedophiles have been spreading this idea? also, this dosen't mean "child rape isn't their fault", it means that lolicon is a dangerous thing that gives people the DESIRE to rape kids. wether or not they go through with is is up to them.
>Australia bans lolicon. Japan and the US don't. And what do we see in the data? 2000% larger rate of per capita sex crimes against minors IN AUSTRALIA COMPARED TO THE OTHER TWO.
That's because all the lolicons who were getting off to anime couldn't anymore so most resorted to raping kids to fufil their sick desires caused by their prior addiction to the lolicon material.

I think they should kill themselves. Example:

>>937453455
yeah keep calling me filthy...

>>937455422
>I think you are talking about yourself here
No, I very much explicitly pointed out the line in which you refuse to take accountability for the incorrectness of your beliefs, and instead, you try to gaslight everyone into believing you simply used bad wording, when your original statement contradicts that excuse.
>It's a simple ideaa i'm trying to get across, that lolicon is a gateway drug to pedophilia
It's a simple lie you try to peddle to disinform people about what leads to child abuse.
>That's because all the lolicons who were getting off to anime couldn't anymore so most resorted to raping kids to fufil their sick desires caused by their prior addiction to the lolicon material.
Australia never allowed lolicon to be legal, you so spare me this insanely retarded rationalization olympics you are just performing.

It's clear that the cognitive dissonance you are experiencing right now caused your mental faculties to increasingly start and shut down, because your comprehension of what I say drops post by post, with your responses being nothing but a reflection you make on what you've been doing thus far, projected onto me as a result of your shame. For every statement of fact and truth, you just make shit up to convince yourself that your worldview wasn't proven wrong. You care about justifying your misguided views and feeling correct, rather than being effective in preventing child abuse. It's a reflection of your character, and no fictional media made you this way, you were born a pedosociopath.

>>937455657
Okay, i mean you are disgusting pedophile scum that deserves to die and burn in hell for eternity istead of posting disgusting images in this thread.

>>937455711
>you try to gaslight everyone into believing you simply used bad wording, when your original statement contradicts that excuse.
It's not gaslighting, why do you always focus on the original statement and ignore the billion clarifications i made thus far?
>It's clear that the cognitive dissonance you are experiencing right now caused your mental faculties to increasingly start and shut down, because your comprehension of what I say drops post by post
>don't blame me for being unable to understand your retarded ramblings.
>and no fictional media made you this way, you were born a pedosociopath.
I'm not a pedophile, nor a lolicon, and am not "justifying" anything. this reeks of projection.

It has became clear that you are either a master troll, or an extreme retard, so i will stop replying to you. it is clear you are in no position to have an actual intelectual debate. don't even waste your time replying to this, you won't get the reply you're clearly after.

>>937455968
>It's not gaslighting, why do you always focus on the original statement and ignore the billion clarifications i made thus far?
Because none of the "clarifications" did any clarifying. What you wrote was a reframing of your original statement into another one that you simply didn't make. And I don't need to explain that to you, you know how fucked up and incriminating what you wrote was, and that is why you try to play mental gymnastics to rationalize it now, trying to rewrite history on a fucking image board that allows anyone to see your original statement.
>I'm not a pedophile, nor a lolicon, and am not "justifying" anything. this reeks of projection.
Yes, you are just a person who prioritizes putting anime fans in prison over world leaders guilty of child sex abuse, who spreads propaganda that pedophiles have been spreading for decades, who doesn't understand what makes child sexual exploitation unethical, and who displayed a repetitive pattern of being deceptive, manipulative, dishonest, and otherwise sociopathic. And that is just the tip of the iceberg.

And to prove everything I said thus far, you run away. A self-proclaimed hero on a crusade against pedophiles, running away from battle after being exposed as the most pro-child abuse person in the entire thread. Sure, buddy, tell yourself whatever delusions you need to hear to keep yourself emotionally stable. Everyone in this thread saw the sheer degeneracy you displayed. The sad reality is, if you had an actual moral ground, you wouldn't need to resort to lying over and over again. Good luck trying to prove to others you aren't a child sex offender by spreading the most common rationalizations child rapist repeat once they get caught, surely you are tricking someone!

>>937451657 (OP)
this reads like something a pedophile would write to deflect suspicion away from themselves. it's always the loudest ones...

>>937456292
this is 4chan, everyone is anonymous. how would this "deflect suspicion from themselves" when nobody knows who they are?

>>937455968
By your own statements: you view CSAM as the most sexually appealing type of material to jerk off to. And you desperately want to ban lolicon, while believing, doing so was responsible for a 2000% larger child rape rate per capita than in countries that keep it legal. You aren't just a pedophile who wants to have sex with a minor. You get off on mass child abuse purely out of your sadistic drive. These are your admitted positions and goals. You somehow did the impossible and outcompeted pedophiles at being the most fucked up child abuser on this planet...

>>937456372
I know who he is

>>937456372
The anonymity in here is a lie, your IP and browser fingerprint are recorded and will be provided to authorities at request.

>>937451657 (OP)
>pic rel is (YOU)
>OP IS A FAGGOT.

>>937454193
you think that jerking off to the things appearing before your eyes don't affect your brain? you retarded or pretending? it doesn't matter what it is, jerking off to it, producing dopamine while looking at whatever, and pleasuring yourself, rewires the brain, especially after repeated behavior. you are a retarded nigger and beneath me, kill yourself immediately.

>>937456492
the anonymity is to each other
obviously they can track you, they invented the internet and computers, I mean you'd have to be retarded to think that they can't instantly and easily track everything you do online. its why you have a MAC address. beyond that they bug all the tech before it's sold to us. im opening my phone and smart watch, it come with World Economic Forum apps preinstalled, very nice!

>>937456785
Spending time with your family produces dopamine. Helping people in need produces dopamine. Doing most things in life produces dopamine. Combined, it does in larger quantities than jerking off. You fucking evolved to manage it naturally, you fucking idiot. You really fucking believe images on screen perform neurosurgery on you if you jerk off to them? Let alone perform sexual conversion therapy?

You are an average, typical retard who read one sentence someone said online about this subject, and because you felt ashamed of your sick pornographic interests, you blindly accepted it, because it helps you restore your fragile sense of being normal. You don't know nothing about dopamine, how it works, what it actually does, how neurochemistry works, how sexology works, so please, shut the fuck up you low IQ subhuman and either read an actual book for once in your life, or kill yourself before you produce more retarded children to become burden for everyone else in this society.

>>937456998
tldr I don't read what niggers say (yes indians are niggers so that makes you a nigger, doesn't matter if you went to whitey school, idgaf)

>>937457117
No worries, your public humiliation was acknowledged just as much by everyone else as it was by you, given you don't even attempt addressing how deeply retarded you have proven yourself to be.

>>937457226
>says nigga who is defending CSAM inspired art
and yes, they really are that stupid!!

>>937451657 (OP)
whoever wishes death over someone else should die themselves. they are pedophiles, you're a deranged psychopath that will become a murderer, and yes for me it's about the same.
even worse actually, I don't have kids and I'm not empathetic enough to care about random ones, while I'm alive and having a murderer nearby is worse for my own safety, so in my book you're worse than the pedos.

>>937457403
I see you run out of retarded talking points, so you just insist on making shit up by attributing your sins to me. Typical...

>>937457467
So you don’t care about kids getting raped or murdered? Heh, imagine you were a kid back then and you got raped or murdered

>>937457616
I hated kids back then as well, and dying before reaching adulthood is a blessing for many people.
just rape would definitely not be great, but then again not my problem anymore.

>>937457474
I see you are yielding because you've run out of deflection techniques. Let us clarify again, you are the one arguing in favor of this content, me against. I have not jerked off to loli porn, I find such action reprehensible, I agree with OP

>>937458068
None of my statements argued in favor of this content. It argued against an objectively incorrect position. I don't like it when closeted pedophiles roleplay as antipedophiles to spread disinformation and antagonize groups against antipedophiles. It's not that difficult to understand.

And give me a break from your contact projection. You have been the only person in our conversation who was employing deflection strategies. You said nothing of substance, only long-debunked bullshit that you've been trying to distract from ever since.

>>937458229
look here man it says you talk like a fag and your shits all retarded. you type like a redditor because you are one, and you defend pedophilia under the very thinly veiled guise of whatever retarded explanation you just tried to pass off there. kill yourself thanks

I like my new manual transmission car. It has R mode for Rori when I feel like putting the cart before the horse and smashing little lolis into the pavement

>>937458427
>"listen to me, I'm not a pedophile, and yes, maybe I jerk off to CSAM, but at least I'm not a lolicon, it's porn that brainwashed me into being attracted to kids, yeah, that is how it works! When you jerk off, the dopamine in your brain performs sexual conversion on you, and that is all there is to it, and if you disagree, you defend pedophilia!"
Are you done reality-bending? The fact that you keep responding with the same boring and empty statements goes to show how desperate you are to prove yourself as not a pedophile to strangers. It's pathetic. Go back to whatever MAP support community you and your OP friend came from to discuss ways of committing suicide together, instead of wasting everyone's time with your nonsense.

This is why I masturbate to snuff films. There is nothing wrong with jerking off to a video of a real little girl getting decapitated by a chainsaw as long as she keeps her clothes on. People who masturbate to drawings of things I don't like deserve death though.

>>937458685
so you're trolling as a pedophile I'm hoping? not sure, obviously everything you just said is fuckin retarded so nobody wouldb take you seriously, in what world would it make sense for those who abhor these things to take up arms against them? This is clear to see when you look at donald trump and how he's backtracking on the epstein shit, kinda like you, making shit up and backtracking
>>937458908
this is also clearly you because its retarded, who is arguing for this position? I think you should probably either seek mental help, or jump off of a bridge, either way I don't really give a shit but you suck and your thread sucks and you should kill yourself NOW

>>937459059
tldr, stop being boring, we get it, you like kids and are uncomfortable about it, 4chan isn't your therapy session, gtfo

>>937459153
>im a nigger retard
real epic stuff thanks for sharing

>>937459188
>blah blah child sex, blah blah children can consent
That is all you are about. Are you done? You aren't interesting.

Anti-loli niggers use any and every logical fallacy in the book to conflate abstract drawing with what is real and consequential:
>"dRaWiNgS oF wHaT?"
Begging the question. A drawing consists of lines and colors perceived by the human eye. It has no soul, age, and is intangible.
Niggers who speak like this are the same to think an OC is an extension of them, or have such an absurd attachment to cartoons that they cry when their favorite character dies, or posts a picture of their comfort character supporting trans people or BLM. Mind melted by social media.
>"Do you masturbate playing violent video games? It's not the same."
Actually it is. When you kill someone in a video game and enjoy it, you indulge in a fantasy. Doesn't mean you'll want to kill in real life because they are two very different things.
>"Drawings are a gateway to the real thing!"
People play out rape fantasies in roleplay, is that a dangerous gateway to real rape? I would also argue that these depictions that you believe resemble girls vary widely, from unrealistic proportions for a real young girl, to the stature of real petite women of age.

>>937459449
Oh shit, finally someone opposing anti-lolicons (pro-pedophiles) with a solid and correct rationale. I was beginning to lose my faith in humanity's ability to use their fucking brains. Thank you for restoring a bit of it, anon. Lolicons tend to stumble upon their own words and play too much into the nonsensical premises of their opponents, so I lost faith in their ability to deal with these idiots long ago. Keep it up.

I bet it would be fun to brutally beat, rape, and kill a loli with kerosene

>>937451657 (OP)
why do you have trouble with fiction?

>>937454114
>Sex is... like... uhh—totally different. You guys! My pastor told me "sex is disgusting" and that I shouldn't shouldn't jerk my wee wee while he was touching me! it's different guys! >:(

the moment someone admits that a drawing is a drawing, rather than a real photo (or even a drawing of a photo) you've essentially won.

regardless of your stance on the matter, conflating fictional 'children' with actual children as a matter of concept is actually a very bad thing. It's irrational to pretend a photo of a child being abused (nonsexual or otherwise) with an actual photographed account of such a thing, and science doesn't support banning them since they don't promote actual child exploitation or abuse.

>>937459712
i think it's a problem that not many people call pedophillia or narcissistic pedophillia, what it's commonly called, loliconism; instead it's called pedophileism.

>>937451657 (OP)
Oh, so you enjoy Lolicon?
I'm sure there are plenty of people willing to help you build up your folder.
Here.
have one on the house

>>937451657 (OP)
How could anyone get off to the idea of removing an illustrated girl's clothes and licking her tiny body all over, nibbling her neck and kissing her adorable little nipples? Only a heartless monster would think about her cute girlish mouth and tongue wrapped around a thick cock slick with her saliva, pumping in and out of her mouth until it erupts, the cum more than her little throat can swallow. The idea of thick viscous semen overflowing, dribbling down her chin over her flat chest, her tiny hands scooping it all up and watching her suck it off her fingertips is just horrible. You're all a bunch of sick perverts, thinking of spreading her smooth slender thighs, cock poised at the entrance to her pure, tight, virginal pussy, and thrusting in deep as a whimper escapes her lips which are slippery with cum, while her small body shudders from having her cherry taken in one quick stroke. I am disgusted at how you'd get even more excited as you lean over her, listening to her quickening breath, her girlish moans and gasps while you hasten your strokes, her sweet pants warm and moist on your face and her flat chest, shiny with a sheen of fresh sweat, rising and falling rapidly to meet yours.It is truly nasty how you'd run your hands all over her tiny body while you violate her, feeling her nipples hardening against your tongue as you lick her chest, her neck and her armpits, savoring the scent of her skin and sweat while she trembles from the stimulation and as she reaches her climax,hearing her cry out softly as she has her first orgasm while that cock is buried impossibly deep inside her,pulsing violently as an intense amount of hot cum spurts forth and floods through her freshly-deflowered pussy for the first time, filling her womb only to spill out of her with a sickening squelch. And as you lie atop her flushed body, she murmurs breathlessly,"You came so much inside of me", then her fingers dig into your back as she feels your cock hardening inside again

I am 100% convinced anyone who actively hunts down pedophelia in their every day life is hiding something its such low hanging obvious fruit that nobody will bat against it its free goodboy points

>>937452118
Yes, the main word being DRAWING!
Get it?
IT'S NOT A REAL PERSON!
IT'S AN ILLUSTRATION!
Don't like it?
Don't look at it!
>Simple as...

>>937451657 (OP)
Double down and stand by your stance if all lolicons are pedos everyone that looks at even somewhat violent drawings are psychos that want to kill anyone who looks at food pictures is a fucking fatass who cant stop eating and you for that picture not only are gay but are an anal extremeist that not only likes ripping asses apart but wants the same to be done to you etc etc

>>937452531
According to The Bible, slavery IS MORAL!
Who the fuck are you to shove your own morality down other people's throats?

>>937451657 (OP)
>sperging out over drawings of anime girls (in current year)
>all of the same lazy, deboonked talking points
>"B-b-but you don't coom to GTA, so it's not immoral or unethical when you commit every manner of violent crime against hundreds of innocent people!"
>proceeds to cry about the morality of drawings, equating them to real-life children