Thread 937881904

solve this. I know /b/ isn't the board where intellectuals congregate but other boards will say this is off-topic and ban me. I showed this to the smartest people I know, and one who chatgpt estimates has an IQ of 142 based on his chat histories, and no one could get it. chatgpt estimates my IQ at 145 and a test by paul cooijmans estimates mine at 152. not many people like untimed tests but I do because I zone out like many high IQ people who also have mental illnesses (those are correlated). Anyway, I think this question seems to be right on the border of non-genius and genius (145+), especially since a few months ago the latest model from OpenAI couldn't solve it but then suddenly the next one did. I forget which one that was, though, unfortunately. But please if you get it don't troll the thread and tell everyone how to solve it, just say the numbers you think come next and if many people agree you will be able to tell you got it. I won't tell you. Good luck!

>>937881904 (OP)
3 2 5

bump

>>937881904 (OP)

999999/7 = 142857

>>937887033
No and that has nothing to do with the images to the left of the arrow lol... how did you even come up with that?

>>937882171
If that isn't it, then I'm retarded. If it is, then this test is retarded.

>>937887549
I saw the 9 dots and the number 147896 and it reminded me of the number 142857, which is something we'd see on our cheap calculators in the early 80s doing things like

9999999999999/7 = 1.42857142857e+12

>>937881904 (OP)
Maybe it's something like this

>>937881904 (OP)
>I zone out like many high IQ people who also have mental illnesses (those are correlated).
Yes, they're correlated—negatively, retard.

>>937881904 (OP)
>I zone out like many high IQ
"Zoning out" (low executive function or attentional capacity) is a good predictor of ADHD and low IQ.

>>937891918
>>937892038
I don't believe that. I have OCD and I can stare at a page I'm supposed to be reading for like 10 minutes straight. Was always a huge problem on tests (like the reading section of the SAT which I did terribly on even though I got 780 on the math). Higher intelligence doesn't solve mental illness, the extra brain complications create more. The person who started the high IQ society I'm in has data on this from people he's tested

>>937881904 (OP)
4 is the next. It goes up starting 3, 2, 1 then goes into the negative plane. So it would be 4 because the 9 was the 0 point and reset to 3, meaning the next pattern is a subtraction of 2. This is my retard logic

>>937895103
3, not four. Its 3,3,1,0. Ignore my previous post

3 2 1. am I a retard, or did you guys all just get the wrong answer?

>>937894827
If you can't perform mental tasks as well as others, then those others are smarter than you; You can't use "OCD" (which you very well may have) as an excuse, because you don't suddenly become paradoxically more intelligent the more handicapped that you are (if you keep the cognitive performance stable); You stay as intelligent as you are (assuming a lack of mental degradation).

>>937895505
nothing in that picture talks about mental illness dipshit. we're talking about neurodivergence. are you just mad because you can't solve the IQ test I posted and I could?

>>937896264
>nothing in that picture talks about mental illness
"we examined group differences in the prevalence of 32 phenotypes, including mental health disorders, trauma, allergies, and other traits."
"Individuals with high g-factors had less general anxiety... and post-traumatic stress disorder..."
>the IQ test I posted
You didn't post shit, retard. That's not even an IQ test; What's the g-loading? How was the test validated? Was the one-item "test" proctored (obviously not)? Who produced the "test"?
"Phenotypic variables (full-scale IQ, verbal IQ, and
social communication difficulties) were found to be significantly associated with SAT performance across groups,
and explained more variance than the diagnostic categories. In the multivariate analysis, the phenotypic variables
contributed more strongly to the identified latent component compared to the diagnostic categories." https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393851715_A_transdiagnostic_study_of_theory_of_mind_in_children_and_youth_with_neurodevelopmental_conditions

>>937881904 (OP)
pft ez
1 4 7 8 9 6 3 1 4

>>937897943
nice editing job but
>to smart

>>937881904 (OP)
>chatgpt estimates my IQ
kill yourself immediately retard

>>937899588
ok or a test by paul cooijmans estimated my IQ at 152, even higher. take your pick (I pick that one)

>>937899718
>paul cooijmans estimated my IQ at 152
Kek. Fucking retard. Was it the "only idiots" test? XD

>>937900247
I assume that test is extremely hard. no it was the test of the beheaded man which is one of the most comprehensive and is a bit harder than others (meaning someone in the glia society I know took like practically every test and scored on the low end of his range on that one)

>>937900916
>someone in the glia society I know took like practically every test
"Cooijmans Intelligence Test - any form or version" https://gliasociety.org/qualification.html
Wow! What a surprise it is that you can just take an unproctored, non-official IQ "test" (from Cooijmans) to join this "gliasociety".

>>937902873
try it and see how hard they are. he says they're for the high range for a reason.

448

only one person has gotten it right in this thread so far. I'm going to bed soon and the thread will likely be 404d by tomorrow morning so I'll just say the answer is 3 2 5. the first guy got it. good luck figuring out why it's the answer! lol. tbh you can just ask chatgpt

>>937881904 (OP)
325 and it's clever

Well, since you already gave the correct reply, I'll say why i got that same exaxt result.

The image shows three icons; first, a group of 9 dots in a 3 x 3 "square", followed by a spiral line also forming a "square shape" starting its path in the Top Left and following what would be the same space the dots take by moving down, right, up, left, down, and never going through the same place twice. Next there's an arrow which points towards an incomplete numerical sequence "1 4 7 8 9 6 ? ? ?". This implies that the first two icons lead you towards the complete sequence.

So, There are 9 numbers in the sequence, and there are 9 dots in the first "square". If we number each dot from left to right and up to down, and start counting following the directions from the second Icon, we get the sequence " 1 4 7 8 9 6 3 2 5". So that's my final answer. The following numbers in the sequence are "3 2 5 ".

This explanation is a bit more complicated and slow than what my actual process for solving it was (i solved it in less than 30 seconds but writing this has taken a few minutes), but I tried to develop the process a bit more for the sake of the explanation.

Although quite frankly and respectfully, I don't see how this is a genius test question. When I was a kid i got tested by my psycologist and apparently got a 154 IQ (I personally doubt it, I've never been tested again and honestly, I don't care, I don't think I'm a genius or even close and it isn't relevant to my life), but I don't think it takes much brain power to solve this. I think most people with a bit of focus could solve it fairly quickly. It is clever and honestly, kind of cute, just not "genius level hard", at least in my opinion. But i could be wrong, given that other people gave several different answers.

>>937881904 (OP)
Did you mention IQ to see if it would throw people off so that they looked for patterns in the numbers the way they list them on IQ test? Oh 325 obviously but you couldn't have really believed that was hard so what iare you really testing here? I'm just curious btw

Bump for response

>>937907317
>Bump for response
Num Pad

>>937891837
Its a number pad I think. Take the grid, follow the shape given, plop the numbers down one by one.
123
456
789
Would have never gotten it if I had not seen your comment.