← Home ← Back to /b/

Thread 938053683

29 posts 16 images /b/
Anonymous No.938053683 >>938054063 >>938054401 >>938054849 >>938056119 >>938056592 >>938059186 >>938060858
Based
Fuck the Woketards.
Anonymous No.938054063 >>938056051 >>938059586
>>938053683 (OP)
Anonymous No.938054401 >>938054600
>>938053683 (OP)
OP here. Just wanted to add that I have no friends. I smell really bad too.
Anonymous No.938054600
>>938054401
OP here again, forgot to say I love sucking jewish cock
Anonymous No.938054849
>>938053683 (OP)
Anonymous No.938054883
The real problem with divisions of species isn't that they are just guidelines, but that nobody can agree on the rules. Evolutionary biologists have proposed almost 30 different species definitions (called "species concepts") over the years, and none of them apply to all organisms. For example, the "no fertile offspring" definition is a paraphrase of one of the most popular species concepts called the Biological Species Concept (BSC), which actually states that a species is "a population or group of populations reproductively isolated from other such groups". "Reproductively isolated" in this case can mean "no fertile offspring", but it can also mean "they never encounter each other" or "they don't see each other as potential mates". The problems with the BSC are: 1. it doesn't work for organisms that reproduce asexually, 2. lots of organisms we would otherwise call different species have hybrids from time to time, and 3. reproductive isolation is actually really difficult to test (many organisms will hybridize in captivity but almost never in nature). As I said, there's like 30 more definitions of species that have been proposed, and most of them are slight modifications of other species concepts to fix problems with them (and introducing new problems lol). Some researchers have tried to come up with a definition that unifies all these different definitions (e.g. "a species is an independently-evolving metapopulation lineage"), but unified definitions fall apart because they're almost impossible to apply in the real world (how do you determine if something is "independently-evolving" or part of a metapopulation?)..
Anonymous No.938056051 >>938056555 >>938061540 >>938062608 >>938063299
>>938054063
If they're so damning to Trump, why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?
Anonymous No.938056119
>>938053683 (OP)
Anonymous No.938056555
>>938056051
WHO CARES! Release the files now!

Also, did biden's campaign run on transparency and releasing the epstein files?

Asking fir a faggot (yo)u
Anonymous No.938056592
>>938053683 (OP)
you got Woke Derangement Syndrome
Anonymous No.938059127 >>938059377
There is truly no point in these threads anymore. There isn't any actual debate anymore, hardly anyone understands reason or logic, it's just two narratives being presented in what is supposed to look like organic conversation. But it is so obvious there is a script or at least pavlovian responses to triggers. Couldn't you have at least been original? No I suppose that would defeat the purpose of these threads
Anonymous No.938059186
>>938053683 (OP)
Reminder that anyone upset about "woke" is a racist dumb shit
Anonymous No.938059377
>>938059127
The only point of these threads is to identify the log fag who made them

And to enrage him
Anonymous No.938059586 >>938061134
>>938054063
>Believing libtard conspiracy theories.
Anonymous No.938060858 >>938061482
>>938053683 (OP)
Trump attacks the big banks. Economy collapses. Society collapses same week. A new america can start, with bartering, anarchy, hunter gathering.
Anonymous No.938061134 >>938061180
>>938059586
>Believing trumptard conspiracy theories.
Anonymous No.938061180
>>938061134
Donald Trump being a retard isn't a conspiracy.
Anonymous No.938061482
>>938060858
will fucking children still be okay?
>asking for a friend
>taht friend is trump
Anonymous No.938061540 >>938061763 >>938063541
>>938056051
Epstein died during Trump's 1st term
Anonymous No.938061763 >>938062554 >>938064650
>>938061540
You mean years before Biden was even president? Then uh why didn't he release them during his term chuckle head? It was already in the conversation and went nowhere.
Anonymous No.938062554
>>938061763
epstein doesn't need to be dead for anything to be released, they have nothing to do with each other
Anonymous No.938062608
>>938056051
Why did Trump say he couldn't release the files because they made him look bad?
Anonymous No.938063299 >>938064890
>>938056051
>Biden Biden Biden Biden
Anyways, Epstein files?
Anonymous No.938063541
>>938061540
>Epstein died during Trump's 1st term
Can you prove that he's actually even dead?
Anonymous No.938064650
>>938061763
There be diddlers on both sides. Release the files now.
Anonymous No.938064890 >>938065922
>>938063299
Anonymous No.938065152 >>938065417
Where's all the fucking faggots that whined constantly about executive overreach as Trump uses the power of government to go after any bank, business, or individual he doesn't personally like?

Furthermore, if there's democrats on the Epstein list and Trump isn't releasing it, WHY NOT, if not because protecting his OWN ASS is more important? Why are you tolerating this senile pedo bastard?
Anonymous No.938065417
>>938065152
>Where's all the fucking faggots that whined constantly about executive overreach as Trump uses the power of government to go after any bank, business, or individual he doesn't personally like?
Its against the law to discriminate. Banks and so on going after conservatives because of their woketard shit is discrimination. The government has legal authority to go after them and punish them for this discrimination.
Anonymous No.938065922
>>938064890
i'm not supporting the people who are against the righteous cause, but the fact that everyone hates on these types of movies as if they had never seen the likes before is stupid.