Thread 938163401

Does loli hentai turn people into pedophiles?

>>938163401 (OP)
No, it turns pedophiles into loli hentai

>>938163401 (OP)
Hasn't turned me yet.

>>938163401 (OP)
Nah, I was a pedophile long before I saw loli hentai

You don't turn into a pedophile, you either are or aren't, and if you like drawn little kids then you sure as fuck are.

>>938163934
>>938163891
samefag

>>No.938163401

No

>>938163956
>You don't turn into a pedophile, you either are or aren't
Are you sure about that?
I don't think there's conclusive evidence about why people become pedophiles.

>>938163956
i masturbate to yaoi and im not gay. Explain this

Nah, it's just Casy doing shinnanigans

>>938164007
Probably the same as faggotry, some people are wired weirdly and makes them more susceptible to gay/pedo impulses then something pushes them past the edge

>>938163956
Womp womp

Mass psychosis

>>938163401 (OP)
The question implies anybody can be a pedophile if they just watch the right stuff. Pedophilia in a person cannot be "made" any more than any other sexual attraction or fetish. It's brains being wired in funky and oftentimes inconvenient ways, and it's all more-or-less predetermined.

I'm a niggerphile.

>>938165085
What reason is there to believe that pedophilia is the same as other sexual attractions
What reason is there to believe that sexual attractions can't be changed?

>>127324860
No.
A bottle of wine cannot turn a good person into a bad person overnight, just as a church or synagogue cannot convert a bad person into a good person overnight.

>Pic semi related

>>938163401 (OP)
No.
A bottle of wine cannot turn a good person into a bad person overnight, just as a church or synagogue cannot convert a bad person into a good person overnight.

>Pic semi related

>>938163401 (OP)
You're inverting causation.

>>.938165157
I hate niggers, and even I'd fuck this bitch!

>>938163401 (OP)
99% of sexual fantasies, fetishes and philias come from exposure to the subject matter, the internet has created more pedophiles than ever before and anyone who thinks loli doesn't contribute to that is fucking retarded. Pornography in general has ruined human sexuality and turned potential men and fathers around the world into gooners.

>>938165157
I hate niggers, and even I'd fuck this bitch!

>>938163401 (OP)
Japan proved pretty thoroughly in the 00s and 10s that having an outlet for negative inclinations that wasn't reality lowered actual occurrences of the negative behavior in reality.

[spoiler]It was also proved across a series of studies in Japan that started in the 90s and 00s and concluded in the late 2010s. [/spoiler]
[spoiler]But no one cares because the content is such an easy target for social groups and politicians theyd rather outlaw these things then make use of them to make a safer society for the people they claim to protect when banning the content[/spoiler]

>>938167368
>turned potential men and fathers around the world into gooners
The real reason for that is feminism. But feminists don't like this obvious fact and blame porn instead.

>>938167368
Nah there have always been that many, if not more, than modern numbers suggest.

Society telling men theyre evil and turning away from them probably did more to create a bunch of dudes that stay home play games and jack off to weird porn than anything else. The feminization of men is also the fault of feminists and a female oriented education system in fact not just education nearly every system is female oriented now.

Dudes just retreated into fantasy by and large because the world started rejected them or importing replacements for them. Dudes wouldnt be looking for weird porn if they had a woman to do weird stuff with instead and thats what society used to guarantee it was the social contract that if you worked hard you got enough money for yourself your wife your kids your house your car and your hobbies and then a retirement package. they pulled that out from under men and so they retreated. You can tell thats the case because the retreat of women has women retreating into their own fantasies (usually books) that are just as fucking depraved (most of them are rape fantasies involving some strong dude that has everything he needs to take care of them, or a monster, or an animal dude or whatever like I said its depraved shit).

If the social contract is restored a lot of them just goes away on its own outside of a few social outcasts who will be fine and harmless as long as they have a fantasy outlet. Japan proved long ago that these outlets prevent real crimes it's just not useful for other parts of the world to acknowledge. It works better as a scapegoat.

>>938164004
>>>No.938163401

>>938167684
This. You gonna be fine.

Also real kids are annoying as fuck, anons. I love mine because they’re mine, otherwise I’d avoid them irl. Energy vampires without equal.

No but those with deviant or pedophile behavior may seek it out,
Other factors that may influence someone's attraction to it may be childhood abuse and trauma, autism, being raised by a single mother, seclusion and isolation, and low IQ.
There have been studies done on this very thing and people who have had this attraction have had brain scans show that their gray matter has a somewhat different distribution than your typical person, and on average, at least in the somewhat limited data that's been gathered, showed a reduction in gray matter including the frontal lobe and portions of the hippocampus by at least 2% and up to 5% compared to your average "normal" person.
Interestingly these persons also tended to be more conservative, not exclusively mind you but its interesting because theres also evidence that people with diminished IQ or brain injuries, lack of education also tend to be on the conservative side.

I'm still convinced the only reason I became a lolicon is due to stumbling over this godforsaken site a decade ago

>>938163401 (OP)
I (unfortunately) have a type that this shit captures. It's not the age. It's the body type. Flat, skinny, petite... I find it more feminine than tits and ass. I hate that this shit works for me. Would never cross the line irl but hentai hebe shit is wild.

loli thread?

>>938167684
Btw this "outlet" was literal child porn, having literal fucking child porn legally lowered the incidence of child molestation

And I wasn't just Japan, the same was observed in Denmark and Czech republic

>>938168713
same

>>938168843
Ive liked the body type as along as I can remember, before I ever saw or knew hentai loli/hebe existed. I'd never do anything irl but I can't not admire their beautiful eye candy

>>938168964
The problem is, you can't produce child porn without abusing children so it makes perfect sense to ban it. Loli drawings on the other hand are pure fiction, no child is harmed.

>>938163401 (OP)
No u

>>938163401 (OP)
Do threads like this turn OPs into faggots?

>>938163401 (OP)
No.
This is now the loli thread, btw.

>>938169494
That's not really logical, by that argument keeping videos of people getting killed should also be illegal

Any good loli sites to recommend?

>>938170820
Peakmata

>>938171740
I haven't said anything about keeping, but about producing. Last time I checked, making snuff videos was illegal.

>>938171969
ATF, Gelbooru, Baraag, Sad Panda
These are like the holy tinity of cunny art

>>938169494
>you can't produce child porn without abusing children
But what if the child consents?

>>938172197
I wasn't talking about production, just possession

>>938168275
I admire your ability to observe and form logical conclusions. You spoke my heart.
Have a nice day.

normies even ruin loli with their stupid hebe trash-term. think about that. 20 years it has been "loli threads" and now that summer has started "loli and hebe" is suddenly the norm. they are just lolis too, fucking newfags, so stop seperating the term just so you can say "b-but uh... they are already developed and mature! they aint no kids!!1"

i hate this gay earth and hope the AI overlords fire the nukes asap

Tst

>>938172336
Thank you.

>>938172518
>somehow literal babies and toddlers are lolis but hebes aren't
You can't fathom how much I hate those niggers in the loli thread

About all I can say is this pic says it all, Japan has loli stuff, has one of the lowesty SA rate vs children in the world, and they get compared to the UK, that is telling japan to ban the loli stuff, meanwhile they have like 100x or more the crime rate vs kids.

>>938172596
same

>>938172518
>>938172596
>toddlers
>lolis
Have they never heard the term "toddlercon"?

-050e2609aa48e38fac0d7fe8df1eb4afa3
57da42b1bd8596cd2d1398a2817d444b-

I don't share first.

>>938173467
Todlols are HNNNNNNNGGGGG
Todd loli cunny ToT
Toddler sex ToT

>>938163744
This.
Fantasy quite literally is better than reality in this case.

>>938175541
kys

>>938168929
might as well

>>938165157
How does she have fat only in the right places and none in the wrong places?
God damn!

>>938175577
kys = kindergartners yove sex

I see people with this link out of nowhere, what would that be?

>>938175264 #

>>938167368
> Pornography in general has ruined human sexuality and turned potential men and fathers around the world into gooners
Do you really think men rather fap to porn if they have a willing and avalable woman to fuck?
Really?
Because it seems rather obvious that porn and fapping are just a outlet when a dude doesn't have a woman in waiting to fuck.
Truth is men and teen boys have less changes to fuck women, so have to take matters into their own hands.
If you take away porn men aren't going to suddenly acquire women. No, they will continue to not have women, only now they will be more pent up and sexually frustrated since fapping without porn isn't as satisfying.

It would be like blaming women's pickiness on romance novels/female porn equivalent when it really obviously isn't.

>>938175264
What is this,?

>>938163956
but they don't even look human?

>>938177116
They look human enough.

This loli thread sucks. Too much pointless talk, too little loli pictures.

>>938177116
>Anime men clearly look like human men
>Anime women clearly look like human women
>Anime elderly clearly look like the human elderly
>Anime children don't look like children because... Because reasons
This is a poor cope

>>938177506
It's such a poor cope as well, because it doesn't need to exactly look like a 1:1 copy of the real thing to be a representation of it.

Pic related is not literally the same as a cat, it's stylized to hell and back, but you can clearly see it's supposed to convey the idea of a cat, and it does a very good job at it, to the point that if you showed this to someone who has never watched an anime they will still say "that's a cat"

how old is the character in this drawing?
drawn characters are weird abstractions, approximations or caricatures of the human form of ambiguous size and age. there are obvious cases of each but the line between is extremely blurry

>>938177812
You can't tell exactly how old it is but you can infer how old it was made to look like, no one would see that character and guess she's an 8yo or an 80yo, for obvious reasons.

>>938177912
>no one would see that character and guess she's an 8yo or an 80yo, for obvious reasons.
Obviously. To me it appears like it could be anything between 16 and 35 though

>>938177812
I have a better one for you, what gender is the character in that drawing? Do you think there's any ambiguity there at all? Stylization doesn't remove the core aspects of the concept you're portraying.

Ambiguity is always variable, for example, do you think she is beautiful or rle is handsome based on this drawing?

>>938178055

Loli/Hebe whatever you wanna call it, I don't think makes you want to seek out sexual shit with something real.
I think if you want to chase after the real thing then you already had that in your mind before you discovered loli/hebe content.

It's like how playing call of duty/battlefield/counterstrike/GTA games doesn't make you a violent mass murderer/thief, etc.
Do I think there's some people that are murderers/thieves/kid fuckers in either fandom? Sure.

However I think if you try to ban one or the other, you're just going to take away that material people use, and who knows what they may do without it. Will most be fine? Probably. Will some have issues? Probably. That's just how humans work. There's no fix for everything.

>>938177506
None of those look like actual people. They look like cartoon characters and you know it.

Hey! Eatcha doin' doen there!
Don't be naughty!

Or else correction is needed!

ToT
Cunny! When it is SUNNY I can see the CUNNY

That what is CUTE and FUNNY

UOHHHH
PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP
IMPREGNATION IS NEEDED

we need more loli hentai posted in these threads

>>938180179
Sure, I'll post some scientific loli. The kind that will fire up the neurons in the brain. The thinking man loli hentai.

>>938180318
ah, a fellow thinking cunnyseur

>>938179800
>None of those look like actual people
Again, just because they don't look like carbon copies of real people doesn't mean they weren't made to be recognized as "people". Cartoons are nothing but a stylized representation of human (for the most part) beings. Which is why the fact that from all the cartoon characters that exist you decide to masturbate to the ones that were supposed to represent children is quite telling about your sexual preferences, regardless if you want to fuck kids irl or not

>>938180532
Now a question to all /b/ tards. At what age does a loli stop having the "loli" look?

>a bunch of drawings and writings about real life child development
>IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ACTUAL KIDS I SWEAR

>>938178055
>unironically an "a drawing of what?" argument
Representation is limited by intention, respectively for both creation and consumption.
Also, we are generally all male or female since birth, but sexualize things in personal ways at uncertain ages, thus subjectivity and fetishism.

>>938180747
autism

>>938180753
>intention
The intention is to portray children in a drawn anime form, so yeah it is "a drawing of what" using some "I AM SILLY!" fallacy does not diminish its validity because observing an object still has an effect on a person, even if it's not the same as physically interacting with it
>thus subjectivity
There's no subjectivity here, those figures are clearly a representation of the female gender in it's adult/mature form

loli generals were better when people posted random lolimanga pages
still wish I could find one manga where some ogre-size guy used a loli like an onahole and left her on the floor

>>938181243
ik ik
but the guy was really huge, probably had glasses and the loli was basically a toddler
and the scene was kind of zoomed out
and ik that doesn't narrow it down, but not much I can do, that's all I remember. I wish the archives weren't complete ass.

>>938181286
oh actually one other tiny detail, I think the guy may have had a short ponytail. but that's about it.

lolis are magic

>>938163401 (OP)
I think i've always been a pedo, back when i was 12 i fell in love with lolis and hebes, now im 24, im still in love with lolis and hebes.

>>938179800
>>938177116

>>938163401 (OP)
I remember christ chan, she was cute.

>>938180318
Sauce?

>>938163401 (OP)
not necessarily

SHE'S.
A .
CARTOON!!!!!!!!!!!!

SHES NOT REAL.
HER AGE IS LITERALLY JUST A CONCEPT SHE CAN BE 1600 YRS OLD BC AT THE END OF THE DAY SHE'S NOT REAL

>>938163401 (OP)
>Does loli hentai turn people into pedophiles?

No, Loli Hentai attracts pedophiles. Loli Hentai is produced by pedophiles for pedophiles.

If loli hentai turns you on, then you're already a pedophile.

>>938183988
read the name in the image dude.>>938180734

>>938163401 (OP)
no, hentai just allows such people not to assault your kids
The source of problems lie in legal japanese anime with little girls. Same as with furry - children cartoons with animals creates animal jerkers

If a boy gets horny when he's 8 years old and has a crush on his classmates and fantasizes about them erotically while masturbating I don't think that attraction really ever goes away, it just gets repressed and overshadowed by greater options. Such activities might not be common for everyone at 8, but they are certainly common for everyone by 12-13. And anyone who lost his virginity at 13 can be said to have fucked a 13 year old before no matter how old he gets, and he must have a pleasurable memory of doing so.


To me a hypothetical sudden penchant for loli hentai would be more of a narrow subversion of moral conditioning than a real conversion, but this should be pretty rare and tied to some other collapse of faith. I've been into loli since I was 10 and never really stopped, and this should be true for most people into the stuff.

>>938184503
I would imagine that most kids suddenly hitting puberty and discovering that half their classmates are of the opposite gender tends to stick. I still remember going back to school after summer break and realizing that the girls and butts and boobs. Very nice feeling.

I usually hate furshit but I thought this was pretty damn sexy... thoughts?

>>938185844
nice but need to get on some adhd meds

>>938171969
h a p p y h e n t a i (DOT) n e t
p u r e l o l i (DASH) h e n t a i (DOT) c o

Lots of 3D lolicon on both

>>938172336
>Lists four sites
>Calls it the holy TRINITY

>>938185844
Same boat.
The penis wants what the penis wants.

>>938163401 (OP)
STOP posting that edit
ALL men are pedophiles. Little girls are superior to old hags, that's a FACT

>>938168929
>>938170820
Well, in that case.....

>>938163401 (OP)
No you're already a pedo if you think anything of lolis

>>938172518
>just so you can say "b-but uh... they are already developed and mature! they aint no kids!!1"
They literally aren't; They're just adults. XD
>>938175541
Based!
>>938180409
>"13 year-old"
>20

need funny onion links

Stop trying to get the thread shut-down, nigger.

>>938181005
>The intention is
What image are you referring to here?

Hey guys, serial killer from the states looking to kill someone. If you feel like getting murdered, hmu. No federal agents. Thanks and God bless.

>>938181005
>There's no subjectivity here, those figures are clearly a representation of the female gender in it's adult/mature form
ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT???

>>938183848
You realize adult traits fall under the same purview, right?

>>938190529
>People can draw lolis with tits
D:

>>938186726
oof that's a drainer

No. Serious answer: There's a difference between being attracted to explicitly sexualized drawings and actual children. Real children don't act anything at all like how they're depicted in hentai. Not just the poses, even the facial expressions, posture, everything. Real kids are gross, they smell, they're sticky, they're whiny, they're annoying. Anyone who is aroused by a prepubesent kid is legitimately mentally ill. Anyone who would take advantage of someone who's sexually mature but still underage is a cunt. I think I like loli because I first got laid in middle school and I have a thing for that kinda skinny flat chest body type. Since hentai of all kinds doesn't look real and nobody is actually taken advantage of, I don't feel bad about it since it's just my fantasy for that body type. I don't get off on them specially being drawn to look "like kids." The toddler shit, realistic stuff, and some 3d weirds me out, but I just scroll past since no actual people are being hurt so live and let live. It's a fetish like any other and I'd rather people who like toddlers jack off to that than bottle it up until they can't control themselves. But the fucktards that talk about fondling little kids, even if it's not true or pure bait, are the ones who will get 4chan to ban loli, which is bad for various reasons, and in the worst case get actual law enforcement to look here and start thinking about loli as incentivizing child molesters. That, and it's just fucking gross. Maybe I'm moral fagging, but some shit really is just fucked up, and talking about being horny putting sunscreen on your nieces, enjoying their cameltoe, and wishing you could share pictures of it on 4chan is one of those things.

>>938180547
>is quite telling about your sexual preferences, regardless if you want to fuck kids irl or not
Like, wanting to wack it to cute cartoons?

Lolis are so cute and killable. I'm glad they're fictional and I'm not a messed up person. Had me worried with the whole pedophile killer thing, lol.

>>938190800
This guy gets it

>>938181286
Anyone remember the one with Baby Blender in it??

>>938181196
I'm pretty sure posting doujin has a high chance of killing a thread. Otherwise I agree

>>938190800
I've always said that I don't care if you like lolis, as long as you don't cross a certain line, that being actual kids.

>>938163401 (OP)
No


A chat on 4chan board /v/
user
Are there any games you've played where you didn't want it to end? If I can't say that I want more then the answer is a resounding no

>>938193177
Get out of my fucking walls I just read this one today - she takes the boy to the bathroom and absolutely teaches him everything about his first time, he leaves in a dreamlike state, and she goes back and finds another boy at the end.

>>938193972
Isn't it AI slop?

>>938194037
Nah, that's a real manga far as I'm aware. She takes him into a public bathroom and fucks his brains out every which way. Could probably get you the source from my history if you want?

>>938194155
>if you want?
No.

>>938194218
like this?

>>938194354
???

>>938194155
I would want, as it just so happens.

>>938194458
https://www.sankakucomplex.com/books/9krZvdyWrg8

>>938194388
perfect for loli

>>938194870
Thanks anon, have an image.

>>938193177
Women and men are the same

>>938195134
Let me know what you think!

>>938194870
I love shota

>>938197080
While I enjoy SS and all, sometimes the giant women with weird /d/ proportions kinda kill my enjoyment.

>>938197376
>>938191411
bubukka draws such kino lolis

>>938197080
Shota is not loli

>>938163401 (OP)
It turns everyone straight.

>>938198656
JAS!

>>938192163
Really? Does it get shut down due to hentai manga being copyright protected?

>>938164010
I killed someone in GTA but I'm not a murderer, right?

>>938199573
I fucked your mom and she didn't want it, now if I imagined it does that make it a crime? Guess it depends on what date it is.

>>938186273
the pure loli one just tries to get you to sign up to some shitty file sharing service to actually get anything

>>938199303
Nah, it just triggers the spam detection bot sometimes, and everyone becomes lurkers while the comic is dropping.
The combination means if the person gets locked mid comic due to spam filter, no one post anything because they are lurking and the thread dies.

So it's just better to post a page or two followed by source or a link so those interested can find the rest.

>>938163401 (OP)
no. that behavior is already instinctively hard coded into our genetics. Loli just redpills people to the absolute schizo mental gymnastics of normies, and the actual derangement of people who believe a stick figure drawing is a good enough reason to exercise their most violent fantasies if they don't like the stick figure. This shit is actually mental illness, but noone says anything because they are afraid of peoples most violent fantasies

I hope they have like a Twilight vampire movie for pedophiles where we get to choose between team Dahmer or team Gacey. I would definitely choose team Dahmer. That guy was super cool with how he killed children. Gacey was a faggot clown. I want to collect serial killer pedophiles like pokemon and battle them, too.

bass guitar sounds cooler

>>938200550
>stick figure drawing is a good enough reason to exercise their most violent fantasies
I mean, this is just as valid for non-loli art. People draw all kind of degeneracy.

>>938200482
Yeah, but the Happy one only accepts crypto, even though are are a few freebies

>>938201145
Bro... literally no one has ever suggested throwing incest enjoyers into woodchippers. No one fantasizes of caving footfag skulls in with a hammer. And the worst thing you literal faggots care to do to cuckolds is shit talk them, which lets be honest, they probably get off on. So no, you fucking retard, anti-pedo hate is NOTHING like other degeneracy. "Pedophiles" are a socially acceptable target for anything and everything, which is why I think everyone has been really pushing it in political shitposting for the past 5 years. And i really think that entire ideology is extremely dangerous. but again, no one speaks up. because that would be defending pedophilia, and only pedos would defend pedophilia, and pedos belong in the woodchipper.

TLDR: basically shut the fuck up and do what you are told or you go into the woodchipper too

>>938201328
I'm pretty sure most of the stuff on there is just stolen from other creators that do the standard patreon (or equivalent) model with their subs.

>>938163401 (OP)
According to several nordic countries's crime laws which are changing every year by this rate, say they are...
I'm in Denmark.
Starting July 1st, they've criminalized Animated porn whether 3D or 2D as long as it "looks realistic enough even if it isn't real"

It's under the assumptions that it could have been inspired by real CSAM, and while 2D drawn Loli isn't criminal here yet, it probably will be very soon. A lot of the sentiment is that any sexualization of children has to be criminalized period.

And I guess that soon leaves Japan as the only country still allowing it, which is probably when they'll back out of it too.

>>938163956
I strongly believe that sexual orientation is acquired actually.

I don't consider myself a pedo, but I did fap to several things that I learned has been categorized as loli when I got a bit older. I think a lot of millenials grew up with a chaotic internet where as soon as you started looking for porn of your favorite anime waifus you ended up seeing adjacent pornographic fanart of other characters. My best example is Mikan from To Love-Ru who is a child. Actually, I think they're all only 15 but it's like Persona. You kinda didn't think about that fact when you were around the same age.

But I saw a bunch of comics with Mikan in it and thought it was hot, even though I knew it was basically pedoshit.

I guess if non-pedos could see the same things and always found it repulse I have to make my concessions, but for the longest time I've thought that a lot of people got sort of "caught up in it" and now as grown men we're realizing that it's actually a deep problem.

>>938202863
Isn't Denmark the country where all the women get raped by Niggers, or am I thinking of Sweden?

>>938191022
Megan is the best lilandy girl.

>>938203009
Both, but sweden is more famous for it. Nordic countries are nigger heaven nowadays.

>>938186273
just a warning to any danes in here. Since July 1st this counts as CSAM now.

>>938203135
Have you ever been raped by a nigger or watched someone be raped by a nigger

>>938203009
Probably sweden. I can't recognize that generalization. Denmark is basically one of the worst countries when it comes to women being nannies though. We have a female prime minister and a female minister in charge of our Online Safety laws coming next year, and she's also in charge of developing the app that all of EU is gonna use next year.
We've just made laws stricter against CSAM including more loli-related content, and right after we did that and doubled the prison length, the same interest group that pushed those laws came out saying "It's not nearly enough". so I guess all loli even non-pornographic use like Cyberpunk's Rebecca is gonna count as CSAM soon.

>>938202863
>"looks realistic enough even if it isn't real"
this is an entirely normal legal standard that most 1st world countries have already ready codified. If the average person walking down the street, can not discern at a casual glance, that an image is not actual CP, it should legally be treated the same as pizza. There are very reasonable arguments on both sides of this, but I really believe only one specific type of individual wants Indiscernibly realistic pizza

>>938203229
I hope more niggers get imported into Denmark while they ban loli so that way half black rape babies of Danish women can make their way to the top and make loli great again

>>938187079
Source? Os it Orenji? Can't find their art anywhere

>>938203301
>If the average can not discern at a casual glance, that an image is not actual CP, it should legally be treated the same as pizza.
>only one specific type of individual wants Indiscernibly realistic pizza
Dude, cp is not illegal because of pedophiles. It's illegal because of a real kid being abused for its production.

>>938203301
yeah but I've seen several pictures of video-game characters from TLOU and those surely count now, so I guess I'm fucked. In fact, I think it was last year, a big cop car rolled by my window, and stopped for a while, and we both happened to have open windows, and I heard one say "Isn't it that guy in there?"
Nothing happened though. So idk if I'm being investigated for some of the crap I've seen that I thought was legal.

>>938163401 (OP)
Yes and that's a good thing

>>938203564
>Dude, cp is not illegal because of pedophiles. It's illegal because of a real kid being abused for its production.
Yeah... until now, because child protection lobby groups are now saying that 2D Loli "could be inspired by CSAM" which is sadly is in some cases because Japanese people have been allowed to posess CP until 2014 without getting any punishment. But the general idea is that, look, loli, 3D loli and just generally sexual objectification of fictional child characters has exploded in popularity and the public has become aware of that for a while, so it's turning into a problem. Did you see how many views Shoujo Ramune had on Hanime before they banned loli? It was more than a million.
So now politicians are starting to take action against it, even in the nordics which were kind of known as being soft on it for a long time. In fact.

>>938203564
Are you aware that the majority of it now is made by underage people sending it themselves online often to each other? It is still fucking up their life but it isn't the rape van or something.

There was some girl that had an onlyfans at 14 for like a year before the site noticed. Her parents didn't know and she was earning lol.

>>938180734
Age of Consent has more to do with brain maturity than pubescence you motherfucker.

>>938203761
I believe this is the primary reason they're doing the Online Safety Act.
Just like the recent report that there are 12 year olds looking up to OnlyFans as a future career.

>>938203805
Ur mom has no brain maturity, but I fuck her every night

>>938203761
What's annoying is that they still act like whores even when they are of age. They don't mature. Women are just stupid and like to be victims. If they could reverse their age to say they were raped, I bet they would.

>>938203761
i really think all it would take to fix that problem is putting a single head on a pike. Send Lil Tay's agent to federal fuck me up the ass prison for the obvious grooming of a minute 1 porn shoot. and then tell all of these "indie porn sites" like OF or etc, that if they catch CP charge, than the CEO is PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE for it. full stop.

>>938202465
Yeah, probably

>>938203851
No the primary reason is greater government control over the internet to supress political dissent. The anonymity of the internet has been a pain in the side of the government for years now and they want to clamp it. If it was just for protecting kids they wouldn't have put parts in about restricting anti-migrant talking and "hate". They just want everyone registered so if you do anything they don't like Kier can come and molest your ass.

If they really cared they could ban under 18s from social media which would be an obvious good as it is well known how much it fucks with people's heads. They could also just ban porn or do the older proposed idea where you would go to a shop and buy a code to put in and show your id there just to prove you are over 18 like you had to do when you in retro porn shops. That way you prove your age to unlock it on your router but your face isn't in some government database whenever you want to look at either porn or anything restricted in general. Sites get restricted without id for political dissent or violence etc....

The government doesn't give two shits about children here. This is the same government that has been covering up for paki rape gangs for years and voted against an inquiry into it. It is laughable that the British government cares about the safety of women and children. It is just a useful way to extend state control.

>>938204659
i made a normal loli thread, if youre intrested

>>938204503
If the government cares about children, they would start by targeting product chains that use child labor. They never will because cheap goods keep goy happy. I'm convinced that moralfags are so delusional that they would justify child exploitation while simultaneously saying they're against it. The price of a "civilized" society will always rest on the top of exploitation whether people want to accept that or not.

>>938204503
I'm not just talking about the UK though. EU is also installing a Online Safety Act next year, and granting police full surveillance of encrypted services sometime this year despite a bit of pushback.

Everyone has jumped on Palantir. It's tech feudalism going into effect.

>>938204882
If your country has "for profit" prisons they'll exactly go after the consumers more than the suppliers. Because then they have to make sure they can always fill a quota of arrests. It's fucked up but it's the truth, and it's why America has extremely long prison sentences for a lot of things once it becomes federal. And UK also has for-profit. I'm afraid nordics are going to do it too because it's a capitalist thing.

>>938204438
>>938203851
>>938203564
>My little princess would NEVER do that! She has rules and restrictions!

>>938172389
Ephebos and late Hebes can, nothing lower. The ability of reproduction is the mark of self awareness regarding sexual choices.

>>938205107
I don't give a shit what the parent says. if their daughter turns out to be a porn star at the ripe old age of 18 years and less than an hour, then that girl has obviously been a victim of grooming and/or corruption/exploitation of a minor. A parent who allows their child to be exposed to this kind of stuff on the internet should unironically share the same legal responsibility as the person who actually sexually exploited them.

But I you just know any attempt to actually hold people responsible will fail

>>938168713
Kek

>>938205332
maybe penetration is too much but kids start masturbating way before they can reproduce

>>938163401 (OP)
I don't know, but I'm fucking pissed since Pixiv and Sankaku Complex nuked their loli content. Where the fuck else am I going to go for high quality loli animation?

>>938190800
This is a textbook pedo in denial cope
>Real children don't act anything at all like how they're depicted in hentai.
>Act
Most lolicon prefer lolis over adult anime girls because of how they look, you can't expect anyone to believe what attracts you is how they act when not only there are lolis written to act like children (think Yotsuba) but there are plenty of adult looking characters that act like those other girls
>they smell, they're sticky, they're whiny, they're annoying.
So again, what you dislike is not their physical appearance but behaviors and context that aren't really inherently related to children
>Maybe I'm moral fagging, but some shit really is just fucked up
That's literally the same thing a "normal" person thinks about you liking loli drawings

>>938207504
Well, let me just ask you, do you think vorephiles genuinely want to swallow women?

>>938207385
What do you mean with Pixiv nuking loli?

>>938207600
If they could do it like in their fantasies I think they would, that's not really a good argument in your favor

>>938207609
Most of their 3D loli got nuked. No idea where to get any new 3D loli content that isn't anime-style. Where's JollyLolly, Xentho, and theincrediblechris?

>>938207835
>if they could do it like in their fantasies
They can do it. In fact, there are videos you can find right now, of women being prepared, basted, and "pretending" to be put into ovens and cooked, for cannibalistic fetishists.

>>938207947
>They can do it
>They just have to do something completely different
I'd imagine the difference between a vorefag and a random cannibal is the part of the other person being swallowed as a whole and being alive inside their distended bodies and so

If such a thing was physically possible in real life I think they'd like to do it, yes.

>>938208103
>If such a thing was physically possible in real life I think they'd like to do it, yes.
Rape is possible in real life, and that's a really popular fetish. And wouldn't you know it, sexual assault has decreased with increased access to pornography.

>>938208199
>Rape is possible in real life, and that's a really popular fetish
You're not making the point you think you're making, the fact that they won't act their fetishes in real life doesn't mean they don't have those interests

You know that most pedos DON'T try to rape kids either, right?

>>938208336
>You're not making the point you think you're making, the fact that they won't act their fetishes in real life doesn't mean they don't have those interests
I am, and you are feeding into it indirectly. The reason a fantasy, which is what a fetish is, is a fantasy is because the fantasy aspect is more attractive than actually doing it, which is why people are into vore, and rape, and pokemon, and even bestiality to a certain degree, or incest. There are millions of people who are into incest, but the thought of sex with one of their own family members is disgusting to them.

Are there some of them that would act on those interests? Sure, but by your logic, someone with a fascination with violent video games is likely to go out into public and start shooting up everyone thinking it's GTA, when it's not. What people find entertaining is not up for you to decipher from a psychological perspective. You've inadvertently made the argument that has been debunked dozens of times over the last 60 years, which is correlation between acts in media and acts in real life.

>>938163401 (OP)
No, silly. Pedophiles come from right wing religious people and MAGA trash.

>>938208629
This is true, I am a deeply devoted Muslim

>>938206871
That probably out of porn shown to them or whatever else from other peers or family members. I would consider that result a consequence of grooming. Look at records 100+ years past and see marriages 15 and above viewed as acceptable in society.

>>938208566
>the fantasy aspect is more attractive than actually doing it
Anon, don't you get that this applies to literal pedos as well? You're not creating a case that could differentiate between them and lolicons.
>which is correlation between acts in media and acts in real life.
Literally no one has said a single thing about "acts", if anything you've been told several times that most pedos don't act on kids either, what we are talking about here is about the nature of the attraction and how these fictional objects are unequivocally related to real concepts, even if they aren't literally the same as them

This is gay porn.

>>938205107
retard (you) fishing. obviously this language has to include provisions that allow you to assault your own children until they agree with you

>>938168713
Same. JB threads, lolicon, not to mention the rampant CP that would stay up for hours at a time before a mod ever got around to it. I was probably 13 or 14(?) when I started visiting this site and would say seeing that type of content normalized, almost like a meme, definitely had some impact on me.

>>938177743
You live in a cave if you confuse ideas with reality. A very famous and studied cave.

>>938210125
reply to the wrong post?

>>938211328
>if you confuse ideas with reality.
Strawman, the post clearly tells you that they aren't the same, that one is the "representation" of the other, and by being so, they are both intrinsically related, even if they aren't literally the same.

I wouldn't say that everyone who likes loli is a pedophile, but if someone a pedophile who likes hentai they are probably into loli.

>>938167684
>Japan proved pretty thoroughly in the 00s and 10s that having an outlet for negative inclinations that wasn't reality lowered actual occurrences of the negative behavior in reality.
>>938172963
>About all I can say is this pic says it all, Japan has loli stuff, has one of the lowesty SA rate vs children in the world, and they get compared to the UK, that is telling japan to ban the loli stuff, meanwhile they have like 100x or more the crime rate vs kids.
japan also massively under reports rate of sexual abuse. The defintion was extremely lenient. there was a notable case when a man was acquitted of raping his daughter because of lack of physical resistance.

>"UMM ACKHTUALLY IM NOT INTO ZOO, ITS JUST A DRAWING"
Who do you think you're fooling?

>>938172336
that's 4 sites lmao. Not a trinity.

>>938212559
>japan also massively under reports rate of sexual abuse
Unlike the west?

>>938212566
i feel like that guy only draws women fucking animals.

>>938212593
>Unlike the west?
in different ways.

Does anyone know where I can get LostLife 1.52 uncensored?
Also, any word on when 2.0 is coming?

>>938213042
what is lostlife?

>>938192163
no it doesn't, retard

>>938202863
and europe/the west still thinks its free

>>938181196
when was it posted?

>>938213652
probably a year or so ago iirc.

>>938163401 (OP)
Does anyone have a link to that one website that had an archive of greentexts? It was some sketchy site with a section where you could control cameras of random businesses? I remember reading some good stories there

>>938163401 (OP)
If you encounter it when young enough, and have been told that CP is dangerous/illegal/forbidden, then yeah, there's a high chance that the taboones of it will create an extra layer of excitement around the material, which then solidifies into a fetish.

You can also develop it as an adult, trying to find excitement in sex(uality) that has now become boring and mundane to you, but it's an order of magnitude less likely due to reasons.

cun bump

>>938163401 (OP)
no not inherently but it certainly can.

legalize it

>>938163401 (OP)
Yeah

maybe for some
anime doesn`t even look human to me, though i watch a lot of anime. they dont act human in hentai either. i just see anime people almost like a separate species from irl humans. but most people probably dont make that separation. but its an issue of fantasy vs reality and the reality is not hot.

>>938220350
>anime doesn't even look human to me
They do to a certain level in order for you to recognize or project stuff on them like what gender a character is, what species it is or how old it looks. The fact that you pretend this isn't the case actually makes you look like you're coping about something
>They act
What does that have to do with how they LOOK?

bump

These threads always get the same 4 groups of people doing the same thing over and over again:

>>938223311
1st one avoids being simply honest, and saying "The reason why I know that I'm not a pedophile is because I never felt about any minor the way I feel about loli. Don't ask me why, it's simply how it is, I can't answer these questions since I'm not a fucking psychologist".

>>938223339
2nd one made it their whole life mission to prove that you can indeed draw yourself a wife, and that to your brain, it will make no difference if it's a stickman figure or a real individual, because evolved cognitive mechanisms apparently are easily confused by how you choose to interpret symbols, fighting for decades now to get as many people to join the MAP movement as they can for some reason.

>>938223357
3rd one are the fake pedos. They like loli, believe it makes them a pedo, never felt attracted to a child, but will proudly wear a label of pedophile and argue on their behalf, because they feel special and unique when they do so. After all, most people wouldn't admit being a pedo and argue lowering AoC, so it's like a new edgy hipster thing to do among degenerates. They like to troll other lolicons for "coping and seeing" over things they have given up on. They became a bit self-destructive and are giving the government ammo to ban more fiction by becoming examples of its dangers. All while aspiring to become the most avid pedocucks, carrying lube for some assholes to rape their underage daughters, because they think they benefit their own interests and help "fellow pedos".

>>938223403
And then there is the 4th one, who are genuinely attracted to kids, some like loli, others have no interest in it. This group tries to join the second group, to gaslight the first group into becoming the third group. I bet these ones have the most fun, seeing how easy it is to manipulate people with an allergy to basic sex-ed, who either want to prove that their waifus are real, or are trying to prove that it's impossible to interpret loli as a child character.

>>938221199
Interspecies sex???? Mmm.mmm.mmkmm

>>938207504
>>938190800
It will never not be funny to me how in order to prove they aren't pedos the 2d lolicon will almost exclusively talk about the way kids behave, or how they smell or what they sound like, kinda implying that if kids irl behave different they'd totally fuck them, but then (and only then, mind you), when you mention this fact, they 180 and go on about how hideous kids actually look like not realizing this also makes them seem mentally ill, as normal people don't usually abhor children like that

I mean, there's a reason why we as human beings are basically hardwired by nature to consider kids cute, to the point that the concept of "cuteness" could just be said to be an extension of our reaction to childlike proportions, and how the anime aesthetic could just be said to be an exaggerated version of neoteny (again childlike features) making them sound very hypocritical too.

I'd say it's just easier to admit you like kids

>>938223339
>>938223357
>>938223403
>>938223428
1 is wrong and 2,3 and 4 aren't, simple as

>>938223428
It's a spectacle of unadulterated collective retardation, and I'm all for it.
I cum every time I hear how loli is a body type, and actually an adult, but at the same time saves real kids from being raped.
I cum every time I hear how shapes and symbols are replacements for real mates in the most cognitively sophisticated species on this planet, and how somehow everyone is getting themselves in committed relationships with stickmen once in a while, "if they are only shaped closely enough" to how real women look like.
I cum every time I hear how saying "child" in context of art somehow eradicates the possibility of words having multiple meanings depending on context, and it must be a proof that a person thinks loli is their niece or something, and that every disagreement with this logic is a proof of coping because disagreements are symptom of pedophilia somehow.
Keep up this creative innovation, people. The more overconfident you are in your statements, the better. There is no other topic that causes such an enormous mass decline in the gray matter of participants talking about it than this weird japanese cartoon porn. How many decades has this battle been ongoing? 3, maybe 4? It keeps on going and keeps on giving.

>>938223747
Yes, that is precisely what I'm talking about. Thank you for your contribution. You just made me cum!

>>938163401 (OP)
No. People are naturally born pedophiles and have been throughout history and since prehistoric times. We follow laws and cultures that try to keep us within the legal age range. It's brainwashing basically.

>>938223755
>in the most cognitively sophisticated species on this planet
As if messing with our visual processing was a hard thing to do lmao

We are still 99.8% apes after all

>>938223339
>>938223357
>>938223403
>>938223428
Based takes. Now guess which one i am

>>938223949
>optical illusions prove our brains will mate with paper instead of a person, removing itself from the gene pool, and that is why it's so universal
Another wonderful contribution. Thank you, kind sir. Who is next? What spicy hot take will now arrive in this thread?

>>938224051
>I'll just be disingenuous and refute my own retarded strawman
Let me guess, you're actually >>938223339 part of the #1 group

>>938224051
>What do you mean visual stimulus has an effect on living beings that rely on images and pattern recognition to interpret the world around them
Nigger

>>938223960
Of course, a fourth one. And now the entire thread will continue like your group doesn't exist. The first group will continue insisting on how every loli is actually an alien and how it's impossible for pedophiles to exist in their community, because a lolicon cares more about their shitty drawings than kids or even hating pedos. The second group will go full "reeee, I hate pedophiles. Lolicons, embrace being attracted to kids, you sick monsters, here is my essay about how sexual attraction to cartoons is a natural evolved adaptation of the natural selection process, admit finally your true nature to yourself and how you secretly lust over kids and become proud of it, because I hate pedophiles sooo much". The third group will continue smugly insisting that only pedophiles refuse to admit being pedophiles, and that only non-pedophiles would say they are pedos, as they finish ordering a whole box of Onatsuyu Female Nectar Lotion lubes from JList. Amazing work tbh, you pedophiles pulled out the most effective psyop on this planet, and none of these idiots will change their ways no matter how explicit you are about it. I salute you.

>>938224198
No, I'm a member of this group >>938223755 as I stated. I see representatives of the second continue on to prove the aforementioned. Keep it up!

>>938224421
Sure you are, retard.

>>938224275
>Yes you see, the two distinct patterns are similar in my interpretation, so it proves they are indistinguishable, and your brain is incapable of having distinct responses. Your brain tastes sweetness both when eating a lime and a fresh apple, because both are oval-shaped green patterns!
I just cuuuumed soooo hard, thank you!

>>938224515
>I keep refuting my own retarded strawmen as some sort of gotcha
Yeah man, literal chemical compounds physically going into your body are totally the same as watching random visual stimuli and images

Okay, we had a representative of the 4th group, and representatives of the 3rd and 2nd groups, like a clockwork, doubling down in the face of proving what was said about them to be true.
I only need a few lolicons, just a few lolicons to provide me with some class-A mental retardation. What will it be? Are lolis actually Will Smith? Is the light reflecting off the canvas or emitted through the screen that passes through our eyes, specifically when we see loli drawings? Are the real kids used as references in loli hentai fictional, too? Maybe, human children aren't real, and it's just a conspiracy of pedophilic elites that control payment processors and ban anime out of pure dedication to hating anime fans? Please, be quick. I can't edge for this looong!

>>938224750
You're the biggest brainlet retard in this thread

>>938224722
>reeee, I have no way to respond, so here are some names of logical fallacies, and let me tell you about chemicals I know nothing about
A b s o l u t e c i n e m a !

>>938224793
What are you gonna cry? piss? shit and cum? Maybe puke?

>>938224838
>gonna cum
That's the plan

>>938224810
>make up an argument no one is saying
>proceed to refute said argument no one was saying
>be surprised when people disregard it and call him a retard
Yeah anon, please tell me more how interpreting random beams of light shot into your eyes and physically tasking chemical compounds going into your mouth work in the exact same way

>>938223883
True and based.

>>938224921
Ahh, classic pivoting to a strawman. I love it. Especially after being accused of fallacies I'm being now treated with. .Please, anon, tell me, how is your drawn mother feeling? After all, judging from their offspring, your father must have been so deeply cognitively retarded, they only mated with a cartoon character. It's how evolution works. And I know I know, you will tell me to just look around, and see, all of the couples between real people, and anime waifu body pillows. That is human nature.
Excellent take, may I add. Very hot and arousing. Also, care to explain why you recruit more people into MAP movement?

>>938207901
That's for the best. It's become criminalized in several countries recently and international police agencies are tipping each other on it.
I know where some of it is, but I don't go there since the laws changed.

>>938224921
Seriously, you can spare me the bullshit. Go and marry an anime character. And stay faithful to it for life. No cheating with real people. If you succeed, you win. Simple as.
But I get the feeling that you never will even attempt to do something like that, because for all of your fuckign retarded mental gymnastics, it doesn't change the simple fact that your brain doesn't view cartoons as potential mating options. It doesn't matter how it looks, how you interpret it, what demographic group it reminds you of, or any other bullshit. By the end of the day, you don't feel that very thing about it, which makes people bond. with other actual living people.
Also, fuck you for making me make a case for the lolifags. These fuckers have yet still to provide their bullshit, and you make it difficult for them with such behaviour. Very naughty, anon! Very naughty :<

>>938224838
That's the goal
-t. Fourth Grouper

>>938225234
>"n-no u"
Ah yes, the intellectual man's argument of choice, a perfect way to crown yet more bullshit that literally no one has ever said or even implied at all.

>>938223960
>MAP pride flag
Pride is a sin

>>938225390
Or maybe, just maybe, thinking your brain reacts similarly to similar visual stimuli regardless of its source is not the same as literally thinking fictional objects are something that exists in real life
>your brain doesn't view cartoons as potential mating options
Then what does the blood getting pumped to your penis imply?

>>938225626
>haha, maybe if I continue yet another empty post, smugly implying I'm better than my opponent, it will distract everyone from the fact that I couldn't refute even a single thing that has been stated and explained
I'm past my climax at this point, buddy, so this is teasing at this point. You are tricking nobody. Get married to a cartoon or be silent forever. Simple as.

>>938225803
NPCs in GTA are realistic depictions of civilians.
You can kill them in this game, using the depicted gun.
Does your brain respond to it identical to how it would if you were to kill real people with a gun?
It doesn't. Cope harder. Your waifu is not real. Never will. But you know that already. At least your brain does. Your conscious mind is still clearly in denial, given the rationalizations.

>>938225769
So is much else in the thread

>>938225867
>If they don't reply to my rebuttal to arguments I myself made up I WIN!
Suit yourself, anyone above room temperature IQ can see things for themselves

>>938226177
>you made up arguments
>that is why I will respond to them with anger
>they aren't addressing me because you made it all up
>that is why I got personally insulted
>I will not attempt to debunk them, why would I waste my time?
>so I will continue responding, arguing against a position that nobody has, because I got offended for no reason, since what i believe wasn't challenged
Anyone with an above-average IQ can indeed see things for themselves. I'm sad to inform you, though, that your brain has been freezing ever since you came into this thread.

Ever since I enumerated these 4 groups, everything said has been proven true.
It's unbelievable how saying the simple, obvious truth to you all is the single fucking thing that gets you united.
There is an actual pedophile in this thread, many of them actually, none challenged, but one came after my posts and proudly approved of what every fucking normal person has been noticing for the past few years about your fucking discourse.
And for as much as you try to cope with my points, pretending they aren't directly or indirectly addressing your positions, and show it by how deeply engaged you all have been EXCLUSIVELY on me, and nobody else, like a bunch of triggered fucking snowflakes, this waterfall of copium you all just produced speaks for itself.

>>938225934
>consuming random entertainment works in the same way as feeling sexual arousal
So the masks are off now and you've gone full on 2d lolicon cope now, kek. You don't murder GTA npcs out of a biological imperative you can't control.

I love how you disregard my question about what was the nature of that sexual arousal felt if it wasn't desire for reproduction, btw

>>938226312
>walk into a thread
>say something retarded
>get called a retard
>"Heh, I guess you felt personally insulted"

>>938226405
Every normal person will call all lolicon pedophiles, because they are.

>>938226502
It's downright pathetic that the only way you see to rescue how completely obliterated you became in your fucking retarded pseudopsychological argument is to hallucinate everyone that opposes you as a lolicon.
I don't fucking care if you or anyone views me as a pedophile. All that pedophiles have to do to be left alone in this society, your type created is to scream "loli bad", and everyone claps. As you all illustrated in this thread.
Your mentally retarded kind is just as bad as lolicons. You are physically incapable of comprehending what people say to you, and you cope with your cognitive dissonance by continuously reinventing conversation.
A person argued that pattern similarity leads to cognitive confusion. My example debunks that. You claim that the biological imperative doesn't refute that your brain does not confuse fictional characters for real people, as illustrated by different emotional responses to NPCs than to real people. And once again, no amount of digging deep into granular aspects of the neurology and psychology changes the fact that the end of the equation is the same: people don't treat cartoons like they treat real people when it comes to relationships and sexual engagements.
And now, your other response will be yet another simulacrum of my statements, stated in an arrogant tone, to pretend you have a case, that was gone before it even started. How desperate are you to get more people to join the MAP movement?

>>938226655
Every normal person will call you a pedophile supporter, because you are.
It's true because I said it. Good standard retard.

>>938226619
>sees a post that they claim isn't about their position
>spends hours smugposting in response to it
Does this coping session of yours ever end?

Lolicons aren't attracted to kids, people who jerk off to anime characters aren't doing so because of attraction to anyone. Fucking statues, mannequins, paintings, including hentai, have been recognized as a distinct form of paraphilia, known ever since the times of ancient Greece. Most people find others attractive, but they aren't into jerking off to cartoons, let alone marrying them as they do the actual subjects of their attraction. You are an abnormal freak if you do. Deal with it instead of rationalizing your paraphilia.
But this doesn't change the fact that lolicons are fucking evil. Despite not being a pedophile, they shield child predators who were tracing real kids and advocating sex crimes in their forums, acting like they don't see them, and mocking anyone who points them out. When having to choose between sacrificing a child and sacrificing their cartoon porn, they always choose to sacrifice real kids.

to be fair, I'm broken. I was molested when I was 11. I've got some weird repressed hebe/loli stuff going on. Back in the wild west days of /b/, you'd see some shit. I had a panic attack and felt after seeing the real stuff.

I still have night terrors and dreams about fighting and killing my perp. I'd love to publicaly drag these type of people with no repercussion. I say, as long as this stuff is fictional, it's fine.

But once you start thinking about them kids, kys.

Anyway, I enjoy loli stuff, but as grown married man now, I'd say my favorite stuff is milf / pregnancy / lactation, and then heb / loli. It's weird.

>>938227032
Antilolicons are sociopaths with an inferiority complex that desperately try to prove themselves as more aware and smarter than everyone else by inventing shit on the fly, and lolicons are a low-hanging fruit, an easy target to get away with abusing in public with impunity. Deep down, they know they don't measure up to anyone other than the intellectual bottom of the barrel, like the lolicons. And to maximize their effectiveness, they began cooperating with legitimate pedophiles who have been trying to recruit lolicons for years, using precisely the same rhetoric, all because in doing so, they have more manpower to torture the group of people they hate more than child rapist themselves. They really do try to grow the influence of MAPs, just to win this retarded debate. Their entire sense of superiority depends on it.

>>938227126
And then there is the third group, of mentally retarded losers, whose biggest accomplishment is roleplaying as the category of a person nobody would want to roleplay as. And they think being able to do that makes them stronger and, therefore, better than everyone else. They like to accuse everyone of coping, because their entire existence is one big cope over being a nobody. And that is why they see becoming a pedophile as an upgrade. And then, to keep the appearance real, they aid pedophiles, with disregard for the consequences it carries. All to keep up the appearances and annoy lolicons, who do fuckign deserve it.

>>938226857
>people don't treat cartoons like they treat real people when it comes to relationships and sexual engagements.
And literally NO ONE is arguing otherwise, you seem not to understand that there's a difference between comparing the effects different stimuli have in someone and comparing the actions that someone will have. Literally NO ONE but you is equating real people to fictional people, that's why NO ONE is considering loli porn and irl child porn to be equal in moral standing, because clearly "acting" on a drawing and acting on a person are different. What I (and anyone who's not a coping retard) am claiming is that the sexual desire that precedes such action is rooted on an attraction to similar impulses, even if the actions taken afterwards are completely different.

See this pic? This isn't a woman, these are just beams of light being shot to your eyes. Many people will find it attractive and even feel aroused for it, even if it isn't a flesh and blood person they are interacting with. And you know why? Because in the end reality matters little to sexual desire, what matters is how an impulse, any impulse, gets processed by you. You can feel sexual desire for literal images you conjure in your own mind while reading erotica or even while dreaming or just daydream fantasizing, reality only affects the actions you take, not the desires you have, those are ingrained in your mind and are not dependent of things existing in the actual world.

>>938226979
>Act like a retard
>Surprised someone calls him a retard
It shouldn't be that hard for you to grasp

>fuck I have no internet but want to jack off
>I'll have to do it to my imagination instead
>*cums*
>Welp I guess I am now an imaginationicon

>>938227179
All of you are kidding yourself if you think you aren't as bad as pedophiles. Lolicon, antilolicon, fake pedos. You are all the lowest of the low. Your entire life became dedicated to debating cartoon porn, and opening even a single book about each relevant psychological topic fucking resolves it. Nobody sane cares about this shit, you are all delusional. What I wrote is merely a reflection of how you tone deaf retards are perceived by everyone else, and it's astounding how incapable you all are to admit that, despite clearly recognizing it's true by how annoyed you got by my statements.
It's fucking obnoxious to see you idiots play out the same routine over and over again for fucking decades at this point, spamming every fucking place. Especially considering that actual pedophiles always come at the top of these discussions. You motherfuckers did zero challenging of pedos in here. I was the one dogpiled instead. You can have a thread full of people glorifying child rape, and you all sleep, but how dare someone mention that jerking off to cartoons is abnormal? You will be moralfaggiing about how incorrect this statement is for hours without an end!
I had my fun, but it's gone now, so I plan to find something better to do than waste time reasoning with delusional morons of all kinds. You can continue responding to me, to get the last word, and prove to everyone how deeply not affected your feelings were by something that, after all, you insisted wasn't applying to you. Or better yet, pivot to another strawman, to ignore the substance of what was said to you. Cheers.

>>938227032
>Fucking statues, mannequins, paintings
Funny how they always choose the statues/paintings that match their normal sexual orientation, such a koinkidoink

Loliniggers will watch someone jacking off to Michelangelo's David and say he's not gay as fuck

I love reading incest stories. I have zero interest (nor do I find any family/relatives) attractive. This is how I feel about loli. I got 2 girls. I'd bludgeon anyone who touched them, and I'd hope the same happened to me IF I did such a thing. There is no place in this world for it. Kid's can't consent, and for me, that *alone* is enough. I can't even RP rape, it hits too close to my own traumas. Anyway, you also factor in how gross kids are in general. They can't have refined hygiene of an adult and are basically at the mercy of how frequently their guardians clean them.

I think my attraction to loli content is partly taboo, but also like an innocence fantasy. I was stripped of mine forcibly. Maybe I'm living it vicariously through that content, who knows, but I know for damn sure I'm not attracted to kids.

BUT, do people who are pedophiles seek out Loli content? Probably. As others have said, there are a lot of factors. Impulse control. Does it reinforce pedophilia for those individuals? I don't know.

Every single lolicon is just one slutty kid grinding their crotch against them away from turning into a pedophile

Does watching Jon wick or playing call of duty make people murderers?

>>938227930
>I love reading incest stories. I have zero interest
I'll never understand this train of thoughts. I'd get if your family members are not that good looking but if they were and if incest stories turn you on them what's causes this separation?
>It's just gross
What is? And why? Incest is just two people having sex, why does their consanguinity changes anything outside societal conventions and inbreeding (which isn't necessarily something you'd have to advocate in order to have incestous sex)

People get hung up on morals just because society says so are weird, but people who use technicalities to pretend they aren't breaking such morals to feel better about themselves are weirder

>>938228382
Does your dick get hard when watching John Wick?

>>938163401 (OP)
Did you say "child"?
Uh oh stinky

>>938228130
Yikes that sounds horrible

>>938227930
I have conventionally attractive cousins and sister.
I don't see them sexually attractive, nor do I care. I like the taboo nature of incest stories. I've also enjoyed sex in public (but secluded) places. It's exciting. That's probably where my fetish lies. Others are different, clearly we have real people doing real incest. I was a victim to a real pedophile, but I know my attractions lay elsewhere.

As I said, consenting is my biggest hangup. Incestuous relationships that don't involve grooming (which are few and far between) are fine with me. They're two consenting adults. I do think breeding in an incestuous relationship is dangerous with ever increasing odds of fetal abnormalities as the diversity pool becomes more homogenous. Anyway, that's another topic.

But other than that, I have no moral qualms with it. I have a problem that child marriages are allowed in 37 states in the US, while incest is strictly forbidden. Make it make sense. Consenting adults can't have sex, but child marriage is perfectly fine? It's backwards.

What I was saying is gross is kids. They get shit stains on their underwear, my daughter tries to be independent enough without her mother, but she's not cleaning as best as she can, and we have bidets on every toilet in our house. I just changed my youngest's diaper this morning. Do people really want that shit? You'll see the loli pics of guys sniffing underwear and I just look at that and say "yeah, no" because I'm not trying to just smell piss and shit. Maybe they too like the idea of being caught with that? Once again, a taboo thing, or maybe they do like the smell of piss and shit.

Like I said though, I'm brain broken cuz of my own traumas, I could be just coping deep down inside.