>>938274778
(You) argue that banks will continue to deny processing transactions for loli goonshit on websites like DLsite due to the content being obscene.
The executive order makes it so financial institutions must prove that the content is unlawful before they can deny such transactions, thus requiring them to follow the law and treat their platforms like appliances instead of a brand trying to defend its image.
I argue that loli is not necessarily obscene, and they must prove that in court before they can say it is unlawful and block a transaction.
You argue that it's only my personal interpretation, so loli must be illegal and it's lawful for banks to deny such transactions.
Therefore, I argue that it must mean that loli is illegal and 4chan is in violation of the law, which is absurd.
What did I not understand?