>>938343864>Obviously that’s a factor.No.
>But it’s still true that, generally, women prefer less physically intensive roles and more caring ones.No. Women generally prefer pleasure-seeking hedonism. We don't need to sugar-coat it, and make no mistake, no woman is going to sugar-coat your lack of having a 6in dick, being 6+feet tall, or having a monthly 6-figure income.
Stop simping.
>Not all womenStop simping.
>but a good majority.The predominate majority of women just want to pay their bills and then spend the rest of their money on drinks, sex, and experiences. If they have to pretend to care about children or the bed-ridden, then they'll do just that.
But make no mistake: if they don't even notice you when you walk down the street? They *continue* to not notice you when you're bleeding out on the surgeon's table, only being aware enough not to cause malpractice.
Stop. Simping.
>And generally, women prefer to be submissive.No they don't.
Women prefer to call the shots just like any other ego-driven human.
>That’s just true, see the polls.Women lie on polls. Their main currency is lying because 100,000 years ago they were not going to out-muscle Brutus the Bronto-buster. So they misled him.
>I think part of it is below average men, yesIn a sense. In a world without the internet and TV then women's natural instincts would have them assess from their local pool, and from there they'd choose a local Chad. With TV? Local Chad is nice... but celebrity Chad is nicer and she is going to sleep with him if she ever gets the chance. With the internet? Well celebrity Chad might be it, but so is some other hyper attractive Chad. Local Chad is blown out of the water twice over.