← Home ← Back to /b/

Thread 938432728

64 posts 22 images /b/
Anonymous No.938432728 >>938432837 >>938432870 >>938432880 >>938432912 >>938432918 >>938433128 >>938433156 >>938433780 >>938433838 >>938434034 >>938434062 >>938435081
Why are EU governments trying to control my masturbation habits? WTF is this communist shit? Let me jerk my dick in peace! Fuck sake.
Anonymous No.938432771 >>938432822 >>938433027
>inb4 rapes increase 10 fold
Anonymous No.938432822 >>938433304
>>938432771
Or goes down 10 fold
Anonymous No.938432837 >>938435100
>>938432728 (OP)
But don't you trust your porn site not to leak all your searches for "midgets getting fisted"? Come on, don't be a pussy, they're totally trustworthy.
Anonymous No.938432870 >>938432966 >>938433056
>>938432728 (OP)
nobody cares about porn or """kids safety""", its just first steps towards total globohomo control over your activity on the internet. At first its porn, then any type of messengers (like AU recent law), then at some point you wont be able to visit internet without ID. And getting jailed for using VPN. Great future ahead of us.
Anonymous No.938432880
>>938432728 (OP)
>> GRAB HIS DICK AND TWIST IT. THE OOOLLLDDDD DICK TWIST
Anonymous No.938432912
>>938432728 (OP)
The numbers are totally misleading. Loads of people just got a VPN.

No idea why, most porn sites still work just as normal.
Anonymous No.938432918 >>938432993
>>938432728 (OP)
They want you to suffer and live shorter because of it. It's not just EU and UK. Character ai censorship, steam porn games blocked. It's all part of the effort to make life of lonely men more sad and miserable than it is rn.
Anonymous No.938432966
>>938432870
This. Also everyone taught to value their lives over freedom. That is the reason we are going this way.
Anonymous No.938432993 >>938434305 >>938434515 >>938435025
>>938432918
Or maybe it's governments that want to force their citizens to go out and have sex instead of jack off onto a hatsune miku plushy. Maybe people feeling bad about being alone is a perfectly desirable reaction and feeling more content with sitting at home alone is not.
Anonymous No.938433027
>>938432771
>import millions of jeets and muslims
>ban porn
This should be interesting KEK
Anonymous No.938433056 >>938433088
>>938432870
Exactly. Literally the next day the announced their expert online safety team to monitor social media, absolutely fuck all to do with kids but 100% what it was intended for
Anonymous No.938433064 >>938433088
I have told everyone before many times over.
It is not and never was about porn or kids. It is incrementally increasing control on what you experience and communicate. The goal being to control what people think and do.
This power is and will continue to be used to control, manipulate, deceive, and suppress people as well as those they have a relationship with. Don't doubt it. Well over a billion people already live their lives this way.
All the fools cheering for loli censorship are either stupid frogs on slow boil or traitors to humanity. There is no middle ground.
Same with the push for internet IDs. Same with their ongoing attempt to gradually ban all porn. Same with their ongoing attempt to gradually put the screws to gamers too.
Naturally it wont stop there because short of total domination there is no stopping point.
Perhaps the most disturbing part about it all is so long as they keep playing it all off as a way to fuck over pedos or say it is FOR THE CHILDREN retards will clap like trained seals every step of the way.
Anonymous No.938433088 >>938433122 >>938433201 >>938433978
>>938433056
>>938433064
Here's a hot take: Kids cannot ho into a bar and buy a drink. The same set of laws should be in place online.
Anonymous No.938433122 >>938433167
>>938433088
low quality bait, redditor
Anonymous No.938433128
>>938432728 (OP)
Anonymous No.938433131
Masturbate to lolis
Anonymous No.938433156
>>938432728 (OP)
>UK
>EU
nigga they left more than 5 years ago
Anonymous No.938433167 >>938433201 >>938433204 >>938433314
>>938433122
Give me one solid argument against that simple idea, and don't try to argue with technical problems, because those can be solved.
Anonymous No.938433201 >>938433281
>>938433088
>Compares eyesight to drinking alcohol.
Shit take. Better idea. Let kids in bars and permit drinking in modest amounts.
>>938433167
The solid argument is mind your own business. The world is better off when you do.
Anonymous No.938433204 >>938433354
>>938433167
If a kid has access to the internet you must assume they have their parents full permission. Anything they do or view is their parents responsibility. Their parents are clearly of age therefore you do not need Digital Ids
Anonymous No.938433281 >>938433410
>>938433201
So you want to live in a state with minimal rules, many people prefer a bit more safety than that. In that sense you are not representative of the average person.
Anonymous No.938433304
>>938432822
Christ cuck detected
Anonymous No.938433314
>>938433167
I dont wanna make my online presence vulnerable just because of some kids. It's parents responsibility to keep them from porn. I grew up with dumb phones that had infrared data transmission. That's how we send videos to each other, including porn. Kids will find away anyway, it's pointless.
>because those can be solved
by wasting taxpayers money
Anonymous No.938433354 >>938433445
>>938433204
It's not reasonable to assume that this is the case and you know it.

I understand you enjoy the liberty of an unregulated internet, and you'd like to keep it that way, but don't pretend your claim is reasonable.
Anonymous No.938433410
>>938433281
I would literally rather every god forsaken nation burn to the ground and take every single child to the grave than have one more law that reduces liberty FOR THE CHILDREN.
I don't give one single fuck about what the "average" person has to say. We have all seen what the "average" (aka dystopian government and the idiots that approve of them) person does.
Anonymous No.938433445 >>938433496 >>938433610
>>938433354
Of course it's reasonable, the activities of peoples families is regulated by the parents in everyway. They have the final say on their childrens usage of all entertainments. Why does it feel like I'm argueing with a AI?
Anonymous No.938433496
>>938433445
I was thinking the same about them. It comes off like a bot or politician. Neither of which are fit for trying to reason with.
They do however have a good point. Parents are not gods. Kids do their best to get around unreasonable and unwanted rules.
They are mentally aware of this so they know kids don't want this either. The only ones that want this are those that think it is their right to decide the minds of others and control their lives. The antithesis of the internet given living form.
Anonymous No.938433610 >>938433700 >>938433790 >>938433834
>>938433445
How can you assume that parents can effectively watch over the complete internet usage of their kids?
It's obviously not feasible to do so, unless you have some helicopter parents that can literally watch your every step.

Also going back to the concept of the kid entering a bar: You're basically suggesting that bars should be handing out drinks to toddlers, because parents should be the ones to stop their kids from entering a bar, which is obviously retarded.
Some of the burden can be dealt with by the business operators.
Anonymous No.938433700 >>938433819
>>938433610
NTA. Thats the beauty of it. Its a shitty idea to begin with and every child determined to do it despite the wishes of their parents should be able to.
The job of a parent is to parent. To raise a human capable of sound judgement and the ability to endure or avoid what life throws at them. You don't do that by bubble wrapping the world like some perpetually nervous neurotic.
If those like you had their way kids would be locked indoors all day long because the outside world is dangerous.
Anonymous No.938433728 >>938433800
You wanna know something REAL funny? If this was to protect kids (it's not), it's going to have the opposite effect, BECAUSE they're relying on sites to do the checks.

Sites that were always legal will implement these checks, so your PornHub and XHamster will now be inaccessible to 13 year old trainee gooners. You know where they'll go? The sites that were bordering on illegality in the first place and couldn't give a shit about being 'double illegal'. Luxure. Motherless. This act ensures that, rather than kids gooning to some milf banging the plumber, they'll be gooning to hardcore scat porn and beastiality. Looking forward to seeing the absolute depravity that the next generation gets up to if this is how they end up spending their formative years.

In 5 years time we'll all be plowing hot 18 year old twinks who want us to roleplay as their incontinent grandpa and piss in their ass, and I'll be thanking the government for setting up this wonderful opportunity.
Anonymous No.938433735
First they came for the porn sites and you didn't speak out, yada yada, something, "digital ID slavery" something

Enjoy
Anonymous No.938433780
>>938432728 (OP)
Fascism! That's why we can't have anything nice. Porn fuckin police.. riot! Swinging dicks and hairy bush, riot!
Anonymous No.938433790 >>938433871
>>938433610
My guy, bars are different. The bar tender can tell if you're an adult. In the rare cases where someone still looks like a kid, they can show their ID, and it will be seen for 3 seconds and return to you.

The issue is that in the internet they can't look at you to judge, and they WANT to keep your ID or private information after the verification.

I think parents should be able to regulate their children's internet usage. I think kids shouldn't be allowed to own a smartphone before 18, only a phone that lets them call and text their parents/family/friends. Now they don't need "some helicopter" to keep track of them, right?
Anonymous No.938433800
>>938433728
10/10 post
Anonymous No.938433819 >>938433885 >>938434108 >>938434802
>>938433700
There's rules in place that exist for a good reason. Ask yourself: Why is heroin illegal?
Maybe it's because shit has a very bad for you and people *cannot* be trusted to self regulate. Now add to that that kids are easier manipulated, therefore you're in definitive need of more stringent rules.
Anonymous No.938433834
>>938433610
PS: When your plan involves fucking with the lives of countless people who are not kids the topic stops being kids. The topic becomes everyone.
You are not determining how kids are treated. You are determining how everyone is treated. Under the circumstance where others are dictating what I am permitted to do online my sentiment has remained the same at every age. Fuck off.
Anonymous No.938433838
>>938432728 (OP)
How else will teenagers learn what a dirty Sanchez is??

This, is insanely! Insanely, I say!!
Anonymous No.938433871 >>938433979
>>938433790
What you're suggesting is something I could get on board with, but that is also a more severe cut into personal liberties of people, and I would understand that the backlash would be even bigger than for the porn site age verification.
Anonymous No.938433885 >>938433917
>>938433819
Nope. You parent your own kids assuming you have them. If you want to go beyond that fuck off. Then keep fucking off. After that fuck off some more. Keep fucking off until your feet bleed and then fuck off some more. If your so called rules for kids involve adults start swimming because you didn't fuck off enough.
Anonymous No.938433917 >>938434000
>>938433885
Autistic screeching is not an argument
Anonymous No.938433978
>>938433088
My identity isn’t indexed by every bar I walk into? I show the bouncer/bartender ID and then I’m free to consume alcohol independent of the government’s knowledge.
Anonymous No.938433979
>>938433871
The internet affects everyone. Kids not having access to smartphones affects only kids. Are you braindead? That would be one of the only ways where "protecting the kids" would actually be that without stripping the privacy of every other internet user who just wants to wank.
Anonymous No.938434000
>>938433917
Who is going to argue with someone that needs to fuck off? Your ideas are bad and no one wants to shave years off their life rehabilitating you.
Anonymous No.938434034
>>938432728 (OP)
>EU
nice bait
Anonymous No.938434062 >>938434072
>>938432728 (OP)
it's the same idiocy as with the prohobition...if you criminalize people, they will find ways to satisfy their needs..in illegal ways.
Anonymous No.938434072
>>938434062
prohibition
Anonymous No.938434108
>>938433819
Comparing unfiltered internet usage with heroin... Are you fucking serious? Teach your kids the golden rules. Don't give out their personal info or meet strangers online and don't take the internet too seriously. If they can't manage that much let evolution do what it does.
Anonymous No.938434305
>>938432993
The reason why dudes don't go out to have some sex is that they are shun upon and reported to police by women. While online dating is dead for anyone who is below 7 and is not looking for a role of ATM. Fuck off normie/glowie.
Anonymous No.938434515
>>938432993
>It has nothing to do with kids and the government is lying once again and using fearmongering to manipulate the public.
Agreed.
Anonymous No.938434802
>>938433819
>Advocating for the horny police to be real.
Anonymous No.938435025
>>938432993
>Or maybe it's governments that want to force their citizens to go out and have sex
Holy cope KEKEKEK
Anonymous No.938435081 >>938435128
>>938432728 (OP)
Non gay adults do not watch porn so it makes sense that traffic is down, more countries should do the same.
Anonymous No.938435100
>>938432837
He is a /b/ regular so his search is all bbc cuckold gooner mental asylum stuff
Anonymous No.938435123
muh privacy brainlets seething with no arguments as to why this shouldnt happen
Anonymous No.938435128 >>938435141
>>938435081
WTF...that's just a brainfart of yours, i assume.
IΒ΄m not gay and like to watch porn now and then.
You wouldn't be human, otherwise
Anonymous No.938435141 >>938435163
>>938435128
Lol kys npc coomer.
Anonymous No.938435163 >>938435230
>>938435141
i see that you are not really up for a serious discussion.have a good one!
Anonymous No.938435230 >>938435249
>>938435163
Serious discussion over humdrum faggotry such as porn? Just go back to plebbit, or stay here and accept the fact that everyone hates you, actually you probably enjoy that.
Anonymous No.938435249 >>938435270
>>938435230
you are cute^^
Anonymous No.938435270
>>938435249
So is your mom
Anonymous No.938435498 >>938435688
so which sites are working without a vpn?
Anonymous No.938435688 >>938435752
>>938435498
Bestgore.yu niggermania.gov thekkk.io
Anonymous No.938435752
>>938435688
LMAO