>>938684348
I've noticed two distinct types of loli pictures.
There's the kind that actually look like little kids, and have features that you'd only see on kids, like missing teeth, and baby fat all around.
Then there's the kind where it's basically just a normal woman, but with less pronounced features, and drawn in a cuter style.
Think about how many cartoons you can think of where the art style makes it look far cuter than it would be with realistic proportions. The head, and especially eyes are bigger, and there's a sort of softness around the entire design.
I'm not saying that a loli drawing isn't supposed to be a drawing of a child character. I'm saying it doesn't matter because it doesn't even look like a real child in the first place.
The reason why these sorts have to be child drawings is because of the taboo aspect. Knowing that this is perverse and unnatural is part of the allure. Just think about how many Anons discuss their fantasies here, and how elaborate the stories they create are. There are endless possibilities for what kind of loli you can be into.
