>>938748599 (OP)
A simple question - or is it?
Who is she really - philosophically speaking? That is a much more interesting question I believe...
To answer this, we would need to know her values. What make act the ways she does? What is the motivation innate to her person? Unfortunately, without analysis, we can only speculate.
Perhaps she can be defined as a people-person - one who enjoys the company of others and is successful in social interactions. Maybe she's analytical in nature - always looking for details to the larger picture.
We can't know anything for sure about the true nature of her personality, likes, dislikes or otherwise.
The only thing we can be certain of is that I would put my face between her legs.
>checked
