Thread 938900839

Important study, this proves the stereotype of the male sex offender is false.
Most pedos are female. The pretext to smear men is now destroyed.

>>938900839 (OP)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38416411/
This is information that need to be shared as far and wide as possible.

>>938900839 (OP)
That sudy counst pedophilia and "hebephilia" spereratley. KEK

>Women aroused by zoophilia: 1.4%
>Women engaged in zoophilia: 1.7%
wut

>>938900839 (OP)
The loli threads on this site prove otherwise.

>>938900839 (OP)
it's true

>>938901444
One is clearly different than the other. How is this not obvious?
>People who THINK about something
>People who DO that thing.
Ta-da!

>>938905014
Jesus christ you're an autistic retard. I'm clearly wondering why the percentage that have done it is higher than the percentage that are interested in it. Like why would you fuck an animal if it doesn't turn you on?

>>938901677
Women are in the shota threads, dumb dumb

>>938900839 (OP)
That was painfully obvious. Hence why they pushed men being predators so hard. Always accuse others of what you yourself are guilty of.

>>938905146
>I can't read.
It's in that chart. Using the full chart, the correlation is positive, but picking out a piece of data, which is statistically wrong, you'll get an incomplete number, hence the mismatch. Add up all male and female desire and action, and it's a positive correlation.
The full sample correlation of those who engaged in Zoophilia was tau=0.20
With the arousal sample being Tau=0.32
According to the study, that's a probability factor that is quite high at .47

Tl;Dr it's because you're reading a small part of a dataset that was calculated as a whole.

>>938905333

Trips of truth. Checked.

>>938905706
>>938905146
Simple English;
32% of people found it arousing, and only 20% actually engaged in the act; that's 62% of people who followed through, with a p-value of .4, it's unlikely to be wrong.

Interesting to see proper studies into this. Before I was settling for stuff like this chart.

>>938901677
How so?
>>938905821
>>938905706
Either the data is mislabaelled, or rape by animal was involved.

>>938900839 (OP)
I’m more concerned with the 43% engaged in transvestic fetishism. Where are all these girlsissies?

>>938908450
>>938910368

Let me try this again.

In that chart, the "masturbating as male" and "masturbating as female" are very close and both are preferred by women. Is this saying women prefer to watch other women masturbate?

>>938900839 (OP)


Ugly covert feminazis are on Trump’s case regarding his natural sexuality. leL


They’re so maaaad and desperate

>>938905146
>Like why would you fuck an animal if it doesn't turn you on?
Because whatever guy they were dating or were trying to impress at the time pushed her to do it for him.
Alot of the sexual acts that women do were simply them complying to their partners desires.
That doesnt mean that the women werent into it also, but in some cases women will do things they arent even into just to please their man

>>938901444
Aroused: look at furry art and fap
Engage: look at pet doggo and fuck

That is the difference. Same shit with pedo stuff - one will look at loli/shota art for arousal, engagement is actually fucking kids.

>>938908450
>white people