Thread 938920976

I will preface this post by saying it's probably going to be pretty long

Femanon and certified goonette here.
This is not a larp or a troll post, simply a depraved individual seeking council from male anons.

whether it be from Early childhood exposure or childhood trauma I have developed a lengthy list of non-conventional and taboo kinks

and despite what a single online Internet search would have you believe finding a partner to engage in such interests is actually a lot harder than you would think.

I did the conventional searches whether it be through dating apps like Tinder or hinge or going on kink sites like FetLife.

interestingly enough the general male populace claims to be a lot more kinky than they actually are. most men I came across were generally pretty vanilla or if they claimed to be kinky knew nothing about consentual sex and all of the trust and building that goes into kink relationships.

and some men online that did check the boxes were generally creepy or older, dark to the point of it being genuine torture instead of sex.

and then again some of these men that did fit all of the boxes simply don't conform to traditional relationships and didn't want anything serious

in the sense of relationships I am very much a traditionalist and enjoy the security of a dominant possessive man in a relationship.

and thus I came to the general conclusion that in order to fill my dark deep desires, I would have to build the ideal man.

in the beginning of my conquest I went for outgoing and generally dominant men to teach. the type that ooze sex potential

unfortunately I found that this type of men generally overtake the scope and instead turn it into sexual pressure.

1/2

and so I found that the ideal type of man is the more passive type. a passionate type of man without a lot of trauma in their lives. the type of man that would do anything to please me even if it came down to dark sexual acts. these type of men seem to embody the essence of passion and end up taking to the roles a lot better. they don't shy away from taboo because nothing is too far to please the woman they love.

I have since found my ideal man.

but the building phase is a lot harder than the finding phase. many people would argue you cannot manufacture depravity. if someone does not inherently feel those thoughts and desires already you cannot create that. but I find that, in many cases, isn't true.

it isn't that hard to inhibit my kinks and interests into their sexual desire. but more so, the harder thing is to inhibit the sexual drive. men that don't inherently already have a pretty high sexual drive are a little difficult to push to extremes.

that isn't to say they can't get excited, it's quite easy to excite a man. but pushing said man into a higher sexual drive is pretty hard.

so anons, how does one go about crafting someone of little experience into the ideal sexual partner?

2/2

>>938920976 (OP)
Too much energy, just fuck and move on.

I aint readin all that bro but here's a photo of a boat

What is this your fucking livejournal? Go write about it on your shitty little twitter or tumblr or whatever.

>>938921148
hi richmond

>>938920976 (OP)
>most men I came across were generally pretty vanilla
Yeah, the younger ones are gonna be that way because they were all trained into being m'lady types in school, and that is fundamentally opposite to being a Chad male who can dominate a woman in the bedroom. It also doesn't help that women screamed over and over and over that they do not want men approaching them or being "men" in any way shape or form, and that women were strong and independent. So all the younger gens listened and believed and fell for it, so now they are mostly twinks who want to get pegged by GIRL BOSS and worship feet.

i ain't reading all this go back where you came from

>>938920976 (OP)
you misspelled COUNSEL

>>938920976 (OP)
>how does one go about crafting someone of little experience into the ideal sexual partner?
as it happens I have a lot of experience with that, but sadly
>Femanon and certified goonette here.
tits or gtfo

>>938920976 (OP)
CORRECT:

men are SCARED LITTLE BOYS
big talk, but when it comes to GETTING DOWN FOR REAL, It turns out they are scared little boys

by the way.....
I'm NOT even vaguley interested in discussing anything sexual with you at all

but...I'm a rare human, kinda because I've actually had sex with almost 800 women and teenaged girls

not bragging
just stating a fact

so TRUST ME.
I've arranged several gangbangs in my life... several

and I e seen firsthand how COWARDLY MEN ARE

after I did all the 'work', effectively convincing all the girls into having sex with all the guys ITS ALWAYS THE GUYS WHO FREAK OUT AND CHICKEN OUT

>>938921009
>how does one go about crafting someone of little experience into the ideal sexual partner?

If you are looking to turn a man into a dom, you need to find one that isn't a religious nutter, a druggie, or Chad first (as these men are brainwashed already). An engineer or a geek/nerd type is best suited for this, as they will be virgins willing to learn to do any shit for you, as a simp would. The hard part is getting over the "harm a woman" bit for most men. We are constantly trained to never harm women in society, and it is reinforced everywhere nonstop. So you have to get passed the "you could get hurt/die" bit, and I'd be held responsible, and that takes quite a bit of work. The foundational issue here is trust - women are now very low trust in society thanks to all the feminists cucking and fucking over men in court - so establishing a high degree of trust is crucial to creating the dom-sub relationship. And also making it clear what you want at the same time - as these men will have NO idea and it will feel evil to them at first.

This means the process is slow and painful, and ANY emotional manipulation or backstabbing typical of females will halt the process. That means not taking his feelings seriously? You nuked any progress. Dried up because he was emotionally vulnerable? Process nuked. The dom is in just as much, if not more risk, as the sub is in the current year. So there needs to be deep mutual trust built up over time.

>>938921587
Of course men are scared shitless, boots WILL come for them if a femoid points at them. Women get away with declaring consensual sex as rape ALL. THE. TIME. Including sex that never even existed. Duke boys? Literal made up rape, didn't happen. Kavenough? Made up, didn't happen. People will auto-assume you are guilty, fire you, expel you, and shit on you solely on the words of a woman. No evidence required.

It's like constantly swimming with hungry sharks. You can't help but be on edge knowing they can nibble on you at any moment and you will catch the blame, not the shark. Most people just... don't. Juice not worth the squeeze.

>>938920976 (OP)

no shit.... it's always been the WOMEN who were the first to take their clothes off, ready to throw down

it's the GUYS who CHICKEN OUT

and of course we all know why:
THEYRE AFRAID THEY HAVE A SMALL DICK

so they always hesitate
and I tell them
IF THE GIRL IS LETTING YOU REMOVE YOUR PANTS... SHES ALREADY DECIDED TO FUCK YOU, NO MATTER HOW BIG YOUR DICK IS

that's why I'm married to a former lipstick lesbian

she had grown SO DISGUSTED AND EMBARRASSED BY MEN

me too
I was a strip club DJ for almost 10 years
so I had a unique perspective on MENS SEXUAL PSYCHOLOGY

and it's embarrassing as fuck
there's nothing weirder or creepier than a man's sexual misperceptions and vulgar desires

she and I completely agree about how worthless men are
that's why my wife was having sex with me 30 minutes after meeting me. the first man she fucked in 11 uears

BY THE WAY: DO YOURSELF A HUGE FAVOR

AND STOP USING THE WORD 'KINK'

it's stupid term that's used by LIGHTWEIGHTS

it's used by POSERS

it's cheap and tacky and milquetoast and stupid AND YOURE BETTER THAN THAT

People who the term "kink" are the same type of people that go to Renaissance festivals

>>938920976 (OP)
the funniest part is reddit space normies think they are philosophical and intellectual

>>938921847
thank you for demonstrating the unrealistic fears you use as false justifications for never trying.

I'd say you'd also demonstrated your lack of ability to conquer your fears

But that's not true
because those aren't legitimate fears
those are just excuses
convenient excuses

meanwhile nobody you've known in real life has ever been falsely accused of any such thing

these are just convenient excuses for a man who's actually scared of rejection so he doesn't try because he'd rather not try than to fail

meaning you fail due to your fear of failing

>>938920976 (OP)
I can't tell what it is you want and what you're looking for?

>>938921847

because I'm not sure how much experience you have with women

but Ive personally had intimate one on one relationships with well over 700 women AND teenaged girls

don't want to omit those crafty teens

and I don't have a clue what the fuck you're talking about.... Not one single fucking word you typed had any familiarity to me at all

I've never experienced anything even vaguely similar to that weird scenario you have drummed up in your brain

I'm beginning to think perhaps you don't really have very much experience at all

Is my brain mush or is anyone else having difficulty reading this gibberish?

>>938920976 (OP)
I'm a pretty average looking guy

>>938922020
>unrealistic fears
The fears aren't unrealistic if men are dead from it. Being afraid of aliens abducting you is unrealistic, because that has never happened. Men are unironically dead from false accusations, and there are plenty of famous cases of lying women destroying careers and lives. It's real, and the amount of toxic man-hating women online show it to be a good probability of you running into a cunt who'd falsely accuse you if it suited her. It's not a 100% chance, but it's not zero either. I've personally been molested and know for a fact the system is HEAVILY skewed towards protecting women and fucking men over. I've experienced tons of events where women look at me like I am some sort of predator, despite me not giving a single fuck about them. Some have even harassed me out of the blue.

I swim with the sharks. I've been bitten. I know the real risk. It's not as bad as the risk I take on the road for getting run into - that shit is far more likely and happens weekly. But it's not lightning strike rare either where you can easily avoid it. Congratulations on being a lucky son of a bitch that a woman has not deigned to ruin your life. Others are not so lucky.

What is this schizo thread? A bunch of ChatGPTs talking to each other? Pajeets? Or just standard schizophrenics?
>>938920976 (OP)
As for this I don't understand what the purpose of this post is. You seem to want a contradiction. A man that is both dominant and sexually voracious and at the same time passive and marred by trauma so will just do whatever you say.

You also don't even say what those "kinks" are which makes any kind of response bound to be equally nebulous. Do you want someone that is just rough and domineering without being sadistic, someone who likes eating cakes made of menstrual blood in some satan shit, someone who just wants a ton of anal sex?

This one actually might be written by a woman (or a chatgpt impression) because it is both self-obsessed, romantically vain and demanding, and displays a distinct lack of actual details key to solving a supposed problem.

nigga

>>938922147
It's plebbit speak, so there is a layer of retardation to decode.

>>938921847

and NO ....

these men were AFRAID TO REMOVE THEIR PANTS

All the women would be naked
and the guys would take their SHIRTS OFF

............... but still wearing pants... standing there awkwardly... uncomfortable

it's because THEIR DICKS

that'd why id tell them
(right in front of the women)
"DUDE... I DID ALL THE WORK HERE. EITHER GET NAKED OR GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE"

no shit.... I realize that sounds like I'm lying but I'm not...

it's actually VERY EASY to talk people into gangbangs

a lot easier than you'd think

"YOU GIVE THEM PERMISSION TO BE BAD"

you don't have to 'convince' anyone
theyre already prepared
theyve been WAITING for somebody to have the balls to mention it

nope
.no convincing required
they need PERMISSION

P E R M I S S I O N

it's really simple...
like I said
women were always like "let's go!"

but the MEN WERE ALWAYS SCARED LITTLE BOYS

>>938922414
Soak your fucking head, nimrod.

>>938922351
>chatgpt
It's missing the em dash stuff common to chat gpt, so it's probably a "real" human, if you can consider a plebbitor real. No idea what a wild plebbitor is doing here, they rarely come out of their safe space. They know they get made fun of here.

>>938922484
Seems a lot of effort to write in this retarded fashion for little result. No one is going to engage beyond calling you a retard to this shit.

>>938921973

lol @ Reddit space

you noob faggot I've been............typing
....................................................... oddly

since the VERY FIRST BBS & mIRC SITES
before they called the internet "the internet"

long before your faggot reddit shithole existed

and by the way I'm certainly no intellectual type

I'm DEFINITELY not into philosophy

nope...... I'm just a fucking weird old loser
................... a weird old loser
......... who emptied his weird old testicles
into HUNDREDS & HUNDREDS OF HOT WOMEN

not a single fatty in the bunch.
I got to pick and choose
literally H U N D R E D S

so that qualifies me as 'ABOVE EXPERT' level

if the topic is human sexuality
good luck finding ANYONE with as much expertise as me

sorry... you'd have to go hang out with Wilt Chamberlain to top me

But I've got a question:. If you're so smart and everybody else is so stupid

Why are YOU THE ONE WHO CAN'T GET ANY PUSSY?

Even the retarded bag boys at the grocery stores manage 0to get pussy...

but not you
I guess maybe you're not quite as smart as you thought?

>>938920976 (OP)
Tits and timestamp or gtfo

>>938921973
I think it's hilarious You would actually type the words cheerleader inspector

because quite honestly I can't think of a more perfect example of the words that a inexperienced little prepubescent boy might think sounded cool

I mean seriously...
cheerleader inspector I'd imagine you are literally plowing through cheerleaders, arent you?

I bet all the hot cheerleaders are letting you inspect them as we speak

Like I said
I'm definitely not a philosopher
I'm a heterosexual

philosophizing is for faggots

And I'm definitely not an intellectual type
You're an intellectual type

notice I didn't say you're actually intellectual

I said you are the INTELLECTUAL TYPE

THE TYPE OF PERSON WHO'S ALWAYS TRYING TO CONVINCE HIMSELF THAT HE'S AN INTELLECTUAL

intellectual types aren't intellectuals
they're simply compelled to present themselves as intellectuals

overcompensation

But when you look under the hood
and examine some of their intellectual wisdom...

you'll discover Do not even very good at something as simple as "reading somebody" whether online or in person obviously

these are the type of pompous blow hards That would see the weird way I've always typed, and foolishly assume I'm from Reddit

the type of master of misperception who would think Ive ever You can buy self or wanted to appear philosophical

lol fail much

>>938922147

lol you're a weakling
a whining complaining weakling

>>938921587
Same

>>938921689
Op here.

Genuinely though although there is obviously trust involved on both sides with noncon sex isn't pushing the "geeky" type into this lifestyle a form of manipulation within itself? I'm moulding them into my ideal and therefore they are unaware to the alteration of their sexual preferences subtly over time like you're suggesting.

>>938921847
Definitely valid in reference to CNC. which is something I am referring to by non conventional kinks.

>>938922170
??

>>938922351
clearly you didn't understand the post at all. No I don't want a man "marred by trauma" I have found through experience that men without trauma are easier to mould.

As far as kinks go if you must get specifications I'm referring to CNC, bondage, shibari, blood play, knife play, and pet play.

>>938922394
ooo edgy go off king

>>938922351

Just like every other person in here Who likes to toss around big words he doesn't really understand..... pretending to be 'knowledgeable'....

You couldn't define schizophrenia if your life depended on it

I couldn't help but notice You mentioned schizophrenia earlier... but you forgot to mention the part about YOU HAVING NO CLUE WHAT SCHIZOPHRENIA ACTUALLY IS

You failed to include the part about YOU WOULDN'T KNOW THE SYMPTOMOLOGY OF SCHIZOPHRENIA IF YOU SAW IT

It's weird how you included the "big word you don't understand"... But not a single mention of your complete the lack of knowledge regarding schizophrenia

because I definitely do not have schizophrenia at home. absolutely 100% unequivocally do not have schizophrenia

and unlike you, I actually know the definition of the word

and unlike you I know the real symptomology

unlike you, I can accurately spot it in the written word... I am able to make an accurate diagnosis simply by reading somebody's words

But you don't know what to look for
because you're too busy pretending to be knowledgeable

>>938923436
Same

>>938922394

AGAIN, MR GAMING CHAIR DETECTIVE:

never been to Reddit...
it doesn't interest me;
:but I noticed YOU HAVE BEEN TO REDDIT

that's how you're able to compare things to Reddit... BECAUSE YOURE THE ONE WHO USED REDDIT... not me

Q: since you seem to be suggesting Reddit is exclusively for losers... would you mind explaining why you were there?

>>938923436
>>938921587
>>938921963
>>938922414
>>938922768
op here again.

literally stop spamming my thread fuckass

THREE WORDS:

it is hilariousthatyouarentsmartenoughtofinallyfigureouthowtofindagirlfreind

>>938923436
Schizophrenia is commonly used in internet circles to irrational thought patterns, making connections where no truth actually exists, and more generally disordered thinking. People will say "schizo thread" to generally refer to this.

I find it hard to believe you don't know this as you have clearly been on the internet long enough to be mentally ill enough. The fact you are raging over me calling you a schizo is perhaps more notable though.

I really don't get how hard it would be to find some guy who would be willing to tie you up and shit unless you are unattractive or have some major issues (likely) that essentially cause the juice to not be worth the squeeze, so they leave.

>>938923591

lol AS IF SAYING "OP HERE"
was supposed to have some kind of meaning to me?

are you suggesting you have some kind of authority in here?

was I supposed to have some kind of inherent respectful opinion about you because you created this stupid fucking boring thread?

I DIDN'T FUCKING STUTTER.......

THE TERM "KINK" IS USED BY CREEPY OLD GRANDPARENTS THAT JOIN THOSE NASTY GROSS SWINGER CLUBS

the term KINK SO FUCKING CLICHE AND EMBARRASSING... COMMON...

It's like the Walmart of sexual terminologies

Not even that good, come to think of it. actually more like Dollar general

the term KINK is like a fat woman wearing a polyester LIVE LAUGH AND LOVE t-shirt

It's for scrapbookers and mediocre amateurs

the term KINK makes you appear asexual

I'm not joking
It makes you appear like you're not really a sexual person

People who use the term kink often spray paint themselves with fake contribed fetish bullshit as distraction techniques

because they're really not into sex
they use the fake fetish bullshit as a way of stalling and avoiding sex

I'D IMAGINE YOU MUST BE OVERWEIGHT

would I be correct in my assumption that you are overweight?

>>938923951

I'm not raging over anything
I'm not sure if you know what raging is

no sir

THAT WAS NOT THE DEFINITION OF SCHIZOPHRENIA.... a couple of them were symptoms, Not very specific and needed more detail, especially when it comes to the written word part..

Knowing what to look for in the written word. That part actually pretty specific

So wow your information was somewhat accurate to a certain degree

You still don't know what schizophrenia is

It's really simple

It's not about disorganized thoughts
It's about a bizarre misperception they perceive due to the chemical imbalance

a very specific

>>938923951

also.... the term "mentally ill" is just another street slang axiom

It has I absolutely no meaning

there's no such thing as "mental illness", That's just a catchphrase that has no quantification

Just like the terms 'crazy' or 'insane'
those are just slang terms with no real meaning at all

If you're going to take advice on repairing your car, at least find somebody who knows the right goddamn terminologies

You don't want to pay somebody to fix the "metal thingamajigging"

>>938924254
Hypersexuality, various personality disorders. I would be surprised if you were free of these. Plenty of women have them and it doesn't make them requiring of commitment to a sanatorium, just a nightmare to have a stable relationship with.

>>938920976 (OP)

And I'm going to be completely 100% honest here

when I read your words
I was almost somewhat interested and following along until the word KINK

......... and that instantly turned me off

And I'm not talking about "sexually turned off", because I have no sexual interest in you whatsoever

I'm talking more about TURNED OFF AS A HUMAN

as in: THAT'S WHERE I STOPPED CARING

because the word KINK is to losers as pants around the ass is to niggers

as soon as I saw you include that word I knew you were overweight

fat people use the word KINK
they're not embarrassed to use the word KINK
because they're not even embarrassed that they destroyed their body with food and greed

>>938924365
You keep using vague terminologies and street slang

But a little while earlier you seemed to be indicating a diagnosis of schizophrenia on my part

And since I don't have schizophrenia and I don't present with ANY OF THE SYMPTOMOLOGY OF SCHIZOPHRENIA AT ALL Not even a little bit...

trust me The way I communicate is fully intentional and actually artistic in nature

.......... It has much much more to do with my own personal style than any possible symptomology of what you call mental illnesses.

So I was just wondering if you wanted to refine your diagnosis?

knowing I in fact do not have schizophrenia, I was wondering if you had a better diagnosis because you seem to be suggesting that You are capable of diagnosing some psychiatric disorder on my part

And I've been waiting
waiting for the professional expertise
is there some reason why we're still waiting?

>>938924687
I'm obviously not able to give you a psychiatric diagnosis from a 4chan comment, if you want a proper medical diagnosis you would have to obviously go to a doctor. Your "personal style" and the fact you are on 4chan talking about what kind of bdsm sexual partner you want is what gives indications about your personality and state of mind generally. What counts as a personality disorder isn't much of an exact science either seeing they change the guidelines and if you don't meet the arbitrary number of symptoms you are "normal". They end up boiling down to a slightly more precise version of "she is nuts" or "drama queen" or "creates problems" or "daddy issues".

What do you expect to get from b. This is a cesspool place.

>>938923429
So in other words you're actually asexual?

because that list of your "kinks" (see? exactly like I said, That term is for amateurs and lightweights not the real hardcore players... It's for people who are more concerned about THE FASHION OF IT

and just like your little laundry list of unoriginal contrived pre-packaged predictable fake fetish bullshit... NONE OF THEM HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH SEX

NONE OF THEM HAS ANY RELATION TO SEX WHATSOEVER

Why not playing tennis instead?
Why not standing on your head while opening beer bottles with your feet?

as long as it's not actually having sex, That's good enough... right?

because everything you mention involves unresolved childhood emotional weakness bullshit

allowing yourself to be the type of person who needs to keep picking at the old wound feeling sorry for herself instead of simply moving on

is all unresolved childhood emotional bullshit

and has nothing to do with sex
You fetish people are all the same
YOU USE FAKE FETISH DISTRACTIONS TO AVOID SEX but to try to make it appear as if you are sexually elite

anybody who uses ridiculous stalling distraction techniques instead of just fucking OBVIOUSLY ISN'T A SEXUAL PERSON

Like I said overweight and asexual and emotionally weak

That's the exact type of person who uses the word KINK

show me a fetishist

and I'll show you someone who tries avoiding sex as much as possible

only an asexual person would collect stalling tactics and distraction techniques, having them at the ready in the event of any hypothetical sexual scenarios...

people who enjoy sex don't introduce non-sexual bullshit into their sexual activities..

People who enjoy sex want to fuck
Not to have there childhood emotional issues soothed

Not to role-play it finally having authority
or the ridiculous contrived fake foot fetish garbage

People who enjoy sex FUCK
did not interested in spanking or being spanked or being punished or scolded

That has nothing to do with sex

People who enjoy sex are going to gravitate to the vagina

Not the fee
said she's a complete bullshit although I don't knows