Thread 939031026

Your breakfast is ready faggot

>>939031026 (OP)
>posts his dick for guys
>you're the faggots
nah

Where foreskin?

mornin

>>939031026 (OP)
you're a faggot too, you want a guy to suck your dick

>>939031026 (OP)
Huh it seems to be stuck to you, ah yes this knife will sort that out.

>>939031081
His parents had it removed for esthetic reasons, because there is no good reasons to remove it.

>>939033803
You have a lower rate of cancer and STDs when circumcized.

>>939033826
Try looking into those studies anon, they were done under unethical circumstances and they don't actually prove what they're claimed prove.
The only western country that doesn't consider infant male circumcision a sort of genital mutilation is the USA.

>>939033936
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4040210/
>After necessary, detailed scrutiny, we find that Van Howe's arguments and data attempting to discredit the ability of male circumcision to protect against various STIs lack scientific rigour and lead to conclusions that cannot be justified scientifically. They convey an impression of being part of a deliberate, ongoing campaign in support of a deeply ingrained agenda opposed to male circumcision.

>>939034786
The AIDS studies were done in africa and the lowered transmission rates were only recorded while the men who had the procedure done were healing, so they couldn't have sex.

>>939034883
Nice source.

>>939034900
I used to have more sources at hand, but when I search for them now the results seem streamlined towards one opinion.

>>939035169
Yeah because you're retarded and don't even understand what a meta analysis is and why I linked one.

>>939035261
Can you find any analyses that agree with it from outside of the US?

>>939035389
No I'm not doing your homework for you.
You know why?
Because you're never going to change your mind. You'll always be a conspiracy fag and no matter how much evidence, context, or handholding I provide, you will still manage to mind fuck yourself into an irrational position.

Looks like there’s some hungry faggots clicking on cock pics in this thread…open your mouth and let daddy feed you

>>939035471
Piss off anon, my only point of contention with circumcision is that it is done to boys who aren't able to consent or understand the reasoning for why someone decided to modify their penis shortly after they were born and leaving them with permanent cortisol scarring on their brain.
If it was something that was only done to minors in their teens because they have sever phimosis and something that legally adult men can opt into if they wish, I would have zero issues with it.
It's just immoral to put a baby through that procedure.

>>939035524
>and let daddy feed you

>>939035756
severe*

>>939035756
You do it to yourself because spew bullshit like,
>>939033936
>Try looking into those studies anon
Which is positing a scientific premise. Then turning around and making a moral argument,
>>939035756
>It's just immoral to put a baby through that procedure.
You don't give a fuck about science or reality. It's all about making bad faith arguments because you're upset about your own penis or whatever and making it society's problem.
People against abortion do it, vaccines, trannies, Jewish cabals, etc, etc, etc, and on and on and on.
All you conspiracy/red pill fags all argue the same way and it's a huge waste of time.

>>939036000
I'm intact anon and this issue is about bodily autonomy for me, I think it is wrong to modify the genitals of children without their informed consent, whether they are male or female.

>>939036263
That's your opinion.
There's people who are circumcized and have zero issues with it.
It's not generally a problem, reduces disease, looks better, and barely feels any different.
>THERE'S 10,000 NERVE ENDINGS ANON YOU'RE WRONG
I know. But the pleasure of orgasm comes from the penis not it's skin.
>YOU'RE WRONG ANON I'VE HAD MY FORESKIN MY WHOLE LIFE I'M AN EXPERT ON YOUR OWN PENIS

>>939036418
I've been trying to find a way to word my argument against male infant circumcision that wouldn't set you off like this, but you seem invested in considering any argumentation in opposition to it irrational and invalid.
You could get all of the benefits from being circumcised if you had it done as an adult and that is fine by me if you want it for that reason.
I simply don't understand why it is okay to do to babies who will be spending the next couple of years stewing in their own piss and feces, which exposes them to a high infection risk, when you can have the procedure done later in life while you're able to avoid that.

>>939031026 (OP)
41% death to all faggots

my 2 cents,
>not generally a problem, reduces disease, looks better, and barely feels any different.

- less std with circumcised dick is bs,
(how the fuck open penis makes less contact than penis with foreskin?) looks better??? bruh.

- foreskin >> no-foreskin and consent is a thing. i doubt any toddler or young ones are going to bang women so let them have their choice for their future versions.


>>939031026 (OP)
>>939033678
- now then back to main point i will still suck your dicks until you scream in post orgasm hehe

>>939039086
Sadly your thread is well and utterly derailed, he's dead Jim.