Thread 939471633

This sentence is false.

ok

>>939471633 (OP)
True.

>>939471633 (OP)
true

>>939473979
>>939473972
1. How do you know its true?
2. If it is true then it is false so it is not true, but then it is true since the sentence says its false, so it's true that it's not true because it's true that it's not true.

>>939471633 (OP)
Stop playing with the singularity and com eat dinner!

>>939474113
because i know your intent when making that statement. therefore it is true. qed.

>>939474241
How do you know what my intent was? What if my intent was to make a false statement? So because "this statement is false" is clearly a false statement, then my intention was to make a false statement. But it is true that it is false, so it was my intent to give a false statement that is truly false.

yes it is

>>939474294
i already wrote qed. it's now proven. move on.
> source: i have a ph.d. in logic.

>>939474208
At 12 midnight? What kind of fucked up life are you living?

>>939474626
So I'm guilty of fucking your mom? You can't prove your mom hasn't fucked anyone else. I don't even admit to fucking her.

>>939474113
It may be a mistake to assume the sentence refers to itself.