Thread 939498602

In the modern world most, if not all discussions should be conducted in a narrative of "what is better" and not in "what is right".

To prove that something is right, you need knowledge so profound that you hardly have any chances of convincing anyone to change their mind, even if you are a professor of philosophy or a medical doctor or whatever.

But on the other hand, to prove that something is better, you just need a good dose of pragmatism.

What do you think? I think it's better.

>if I ever meet Peterson in real life I will asking him that

>>939498602 (OP)
Ah yes, the old saying "might makes better"

Sorry but while you're trying to convince whores not to kill their babies, I'll be thriving with my harem and an army of loyal men.

>>if I ever meet Peterson in real life I will ((asking)) him that
whats better for u is to learn english mudafukka

i always operate based on what profits me the most whilst also crippling any competition
>picrel. i want to rape those filthy zoomettes

>>939498944
sorry, I was typing really fast while doing something else. I will ask him*.

>>939498775
sorry I didn't know that saying :(

bump for discussion

>>939500488
the saying is "might makes right". whatever group is dominant will set the rules for everyone else until someone kills them and takes over.

>>939498602 (OP)
>Using night vision with the lights on
What a larping faggot

>>939503627
This

>>939504264
>to prove that something is right, you need knowledge so profound that you hardly have any chances of convincing anyone to change

>>939505260
Thank you for quoting me.