>>939830230
Charlie Kirk believed that the government should be run by Christians and that Christians should be in control of not just government, but the arts, education, the legal system, and everything else. This isn't necessarily new, but as far as I'm aware, Mitt Romney and his ilk at least nominally respected the democratic process. Christian extremists are the ones we need to focus on. Real extremists, the ones who want a totalitarian theocracy, for whom Charlie Kirk was merely a figurehead/spokesperson. (Thus, killing him sent a message, but the violence needs to be focused on people who are more of a threat; if that's the argument that you're making, then I do agree.)
But, again, this specifically is the conversation we need to have. It wasn't until recently when Collective Shout (a Project 2025-linked Christian extremist organization) got all the rape/incest games banned from Steam that a lot of my terminally-online right-winger friends realized that, no, the Christians don't just want to "own the libs", they think they own you, too. That was a real 9/11 moment for the fringe right, lmao.
Most normalfags are actually against banning art and don't want a bunch of nuns checking your art against Hays Code back in power. The more these people institute online ID-checking laws and otherwise trying to turn America into another Commonwealth nanny state, the more people will hate them. The entire strategy the Xtian Taliban is relying upon is trying to flip that narrative into something it's not; when the gloves come off, it's between people who want you to have more rights and people who want you to have less rights for their benefit, and gravity only falls one direction.
>Discord
I don't really use that much, and I certainly don't frequent the furry antifa servers he apparently did. I guarantee you I've been on the JTTF's watchlists for years before any of those people.
