Thread 940021038

>Wake up today

>get on 4chan

>lefties are still crying about their freeze peach

>>940021038 (OP)
I bet /pol/ would like to know. You should go tell them, since this isn’t the political board

>>940021038 (OP)
>HAHAHA DEAD FASCIST GOT SHOT IN THE NECK HIS WIFE WILL BE RAPED SOON TOO. THE REST OF YOU WHITE CONSERVATIVES WILL JOIN HIM SOON LETS MAKE IT HAPPEN REDDIT
>noooo I was fired from my job what is this?? I was just criticizing him! I can't say anything bad about drumpf now???? muh FREEZE PEECH

>>940021038 (OP)
Quick question before you go back to /pol. Do you think that if poor people are able to vote they will inevitably vote for socialism and wealth redistribution?

>cancel culture when libs do it
gay and retarded
>cancel culture when rightists do it
gay and retarded
how hard is it?

>>940021970
It’s okay when our cult does it

>>940021038 (OP)
Listen there are bigger issues right now. I just wasted like $12 on a sub from the get-go gas station where they make food, I get back in this steak sub, because it's steak-tember over there, I get it and I bring it home and it's a soggy fucking mess. This mother fucker is supposed to be toasted, but you can't toast soggy waterlogged fucking bread.. they totally fucking suck making sandwiches. I decided I would be throwing it out, but I take one bite and part of the bread doesn't even feel like it is fully cooked, there was very little taste coming from the state, and the caramelized onions and grilled peppers are all cold!

>>940021038 (OP)
This is typical of people controlled by emotions. When they have a problem with someone, they want that person to pay, when someone has a problem with them, they want that person to listen and understand.

>>940021038 (OP)
>different articles written by different people express different viewpoints
okay

>>940022422
You joke, but twice in my life this administration has had a negative impact on my life.

>>940022350
Certainly looks like the Israeli playbook with the Gaza genocide, and how they've treated the rest of the world. Never has a entire people's behaviour spoken so loudly, and in unison, to tell the world what a threat they are.
>Israel is the number 1 problem in the world

freeze peach !!!

>>940021038 (OP)
You’re referencing two opinion articles from two different people lol what the fuck is your point?

>>940023262
Congrats, you've figured out what we've known for over 20 years. Why do you think we've been ousted from everywhere but here?

>>940021581
Not that anon, but poor people will vote for whomever they are told, as poor people are stupid cattle.

>>940021581
Will Rodgers (a comedian / social commentator in the 1920s) said that socialism will never be a thing in the US because no one considers themselves poor, they are just temporarily embarrassed millionaires. (temporarily embarrassed meant short on cash). He was commentating on the fact that people believe the myth that anyone can grow up to be rich.

>>940021038 (OP)
Kirk is dead LMAO

>>940027136
>marxists be like

>someone has more money than me

>I am going to make my envy of their wealth my whole personality

>>940021038 (OP)
"Dominion voting machines were rigged!"
No cancel culture

Mathew chisum is a gay ass faggot who should infernally die.

>>940021970
Libs cancel people for being bigots. Cons cancel people for not being bootlickers. If you really can't see the difference then I can't help you.

>>940021038 (OP)
Rolling Stone is about as "reliable" as Ben Shapiro; I don't care what they have to say. Don't give your rights up to anyone.

>>940021970
First off, liberals don't support cancel culture, it's fundamentally opposed to the concept of a liberal democracy. But replacing libs with progressives and answering your question, extremists believe they should be held to a different standard as everyone else. That's a large part of what makes them extremists.

>>940034906
>>940035656
Love your work. Mildly surprised it actually seems to be effective at times.

>>940036226
their whole ideology is based around not having to work for anything ever. it's not just the free lunch, it's the fact that you don't have to work for anything ever.

they would rather see everyone die in the streets than see you struggle for a second.

>>940036226
Thank you. It's hard to do when the ragebait is one sided because then they can claim A or B is doing it. But it's also hard to be polarizing without targetting everyone, so that balances itself.
The real limiting factor is I have work, bills and a life to support, and I mostly do this on the side. Also Silksong just came out sooooooo..........

>>940021038 (OP)
Two different opinions from two different individuals. What a concept.

>>940021181
I con second him.
who knows, you might find some friends there, loggy.

>>940025909
>when you make fun of your own rights

>>940037000
>when you pretend you're not a disgusting hypocrite

also checked

>>940039975
This person would have been killed or at least sent to a camp in any Marxist-Leninist regime.

>>940037000
>Free speech isn't freedom from consequences!
kek. The funnest part about this is that we just have to go back a couple of years to find all the arguments you guys were making that were pro-censorship and anti-free speech.

>>940021038 (OP)
The difference of cancel culture between the factions is, liberals cancel politicians/executives/celebrity/famous, conservatives cancel all tiers of populace particularly focusing on the lowest levels en masse.

>>940040375
Bullshit. Liberals were going after no-name boomers for posting facebook memes.
Why lie?

>>940040375
Liberals don't support cancel culture, period, aside from maybe asserting that private companies have a right to hire and fire people as they choose. And that's more of a liberal rightist opinion than a liberal leftist one.

>>940040503
>Gaslighting
You faggots invented it, STFU.

>>940040122
True.

>>940040537
Liberals, by definition, support free speech.

>>940040561
Sort of like how most neo-Nazis would have been euthanized by the Adolf bunch. It takes a certain type to latch onto blatantly failed ideologies.

>>940040647
OK, so you aren't really liberals. We've known this for some time. You're authoritarians who believe only you and those who agree with you should have "free speech."
You can play all the word games you want, it doesn't change the facts of what you've been doing for the last decade.

>>940040738
I'm a liberal. I got called a fascist for saying big tech shouldn't have to power to control conversation in a digital society and now I'm apparently a communist for saying the government shouldn't engage in censorship. Even though both of those groups are historically opposed to the very free speech I support. Weird, no?

>>940040841
Welcome to the club. Liberals have been doing that to people for the last ten years at least.

>>940040944
Those weren't liberals. Once again, by definition.

>>940040975
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

>>940041104
If someone is born in Scotland they are a Scot. If someone supports civil liberties they are a liberal. If they do not, they are not. A matter of definition.

>>940041139
>No true Scotsman or appeal to purity is an informal fallacy in which one modifies a prior claim in response to a counterexample by asserting the counterexample is excluded by definition

>>940021038 (OP)
*Ivan works 48 hr shift*

>>940041182
This isn't a No True Scotsman you fool, it's a matter of definition. A liberal supports civil liberties. The word 'liberal' has the same root word as 'liberty'; it refers to freedom. Everyone should be a liberal whether they are left, right, progressive, or conservative. The opposite to liberalism is authoritarianism.

>>940021038 (OP)
You're making a false equivalence and are using a strawman. The following is the whole truth:

>People do the canceling
Free speech in action (boycotts, protests, criticism)
>Corporations do the canceling
Profit-driven censorship or virtue signaling, protecting brands rather than real accountability
>Government does the canceling
Unconstitutional coercion, using state power to silence opponents.

The tactic the Right is using now looks similar to #MeToo on the surface (collect names, apply pressure, push institutions to punish), but the substance is very different.
#MeToo was about exposing sexual harassment and assault, often crimes or serious workplace misconduct that had been ignored for decades. It carried moral and legal weight far beyond “hurt feelings.”
What the Right is doing here is about punishing political disrespect, turning jokes or indifference into thought crimes. That’s not accountability; that’s loyalty enforcement.

>>940034318
The illusion of choice

To the average viewer, MSNBC and Fox News look like bitter enemies. But higher up, their ad buyers, shareholders, and sometimes even board members overlap. So while the tone differs, the structural boundaries of debate (e.g., pro-capitalism, pro-growth, pro-status quo institutions) tend to be the same.

This is why critics on both Left and Right argue:

Leftists: say corporate media suppresses anti-capitalist, anti-war, labor-focused stories.

Right-wing populists: say corporate media suppresses nationalism, cultural conservatism, and outsider voices.
And in a way both are right — because the system filters out ideas that threaten profit or elite stability, no matter Left or Right.

So yes: the same corporation can (and often does) push both anti-Right and anti-Left narratives — not out of ideological schizophrenia, but because it’s good business and maintains their gatekeeping power.