← Home ← Back to /b/

Thread 940071734

429 posts 78 images /b/
Anonymous No.940071734 >>940071847 >>940071877 >>940072017 >>940072129 >>940072219 >>940072231 >>940072847 >>940073841 >>940074094 >>940074135 >>940074788 >>940077401 >>940077547 >>940077970 >>940078649 >>940079326 >>940079446 >>940080090 >>940080885 >>940080911
Jimmy Kimmel was fired due to pressure from the FCC - a government organization. So yes, it is government censorship.
Anonymous No.940071847 >>940072087
>>940071734 (OP)
Anonymous No.940071877 >>940071911 >>940072583 >>940073186 >>940075242 >>940076562 >>940081586
>>940071734 (OP)
Oh well, if you wanted to keep your democracy you probably shouldn’t have amused yourself by making enemies out of half the country.
Anonymous No.940071911 >>940071959
>>940071877
Are you saying conservatives haven't made enemies out of half the country?
Anonymous No.940071959 >>940072035 >>940072133 >>940073438 >>940075242
>>940071911
No, conservatives just want to keep things the way they were. If that makes them your enemy, look in the mirror.
Anonymous No.940072017 >>940072168 >>940073262
>>940071734 (OP)
Why the fuck do you think I should care when you fuckwits censored and abused us for speaking our minds?
"Cancel culture"
Ever heard of it?
Fuck you. Kill yourself, vermin.
This is what you get and this is only the beginning.
You truly despicable vermin aren't worthy of life.
If you want "free speech," then practice it. Until then you will get whatever you throw at us and it will hurt you much more than it hurts us.
Anonymous No.940072035 >>940072248
>>940071959
>No, conservatives just want to keep things the way they were
By having the government want kickbacks for selling chips to china? By bombing Iran? By rejecting Visas for anyone that talks bad about Israel?
Anonymous No.940072087
>>940071847
>Parody account
Woah!
Anonymous No.940072129 >>940072161
>>940071734 (OP)
Lol. No. He was fired by Bob Iger for shit ratings and for violating FCC rules.
But, keep kvetching for your big daddy Trump.
Anonymous No.940072133 >>940072190 >>940072278
>>940071959
And liberals just want equal rights for everyone. If that makes them your enemy, look in the mirror.
Anonymous No.940072161 >>940072309
>>940072129
Trump is dying of congestive heart failure. Just thought you should know. You messiah will probably be worm's meat in 6 to 8 months.
Anonymous No.940072168 >>940072217 >>940072450 >>940080461
>>940072017
THAT NEVER HAPPENED.
You subhuman trash are just too lazy and stupid to fact check your masters when they lie to you.
They can tell you the Democrats are sacrificing 5 year olds to dark gods and then when the Republicunts start doing it you subhuman pieces of shit would defend it by screeching, "Democrats were sacrificing children to dark gods for years and you didn't care so now our masters get to do it and we will defend them to the death while they do!"

That's you. That's how unforgivably stupid you are. Your masters constantly accuse their enemies of everything evil they want to do so when they start doing it you utter fucking retards will rush to defend them by claiming they get a free pass to do evil shit because they told you Dems did it first.

Meanwhile, Dems say shit like, "If Biden and Clinton are in the Epstein files, PROSECUTE THEM BOTH." You subhuman fuckwits don't give a shit that your masters are hiding the Epstein Files from you because you have the attention spans and the morals of toddlers.

You're fucking trash.
Never wonder why everyone makes fun of you.
Never be confused about why everyone looks down on you.
Do not be surprised that everyone fucking despises you stupid little bitches.
You're dumber than most Leftists were in the 3rd grade.
Anonymous No.940072190 >>940072466
>>940072133
Equal rights are retarded though, a lot of people clearly can’t handle freedom and aren’t suited for it.
Anonymous No.940072217 >>940072360 >>940072373
>>940072168
Elon Musk and his companies have not received any money from the US government you fucking retard
Anonymous No.940072219 >>940072257
>>940071734 (OP)
If it was government censorship why was it ABCs decision
Anonymous No.940072231
>>940071734 (OP)
This is true
Anonymous No.940072248 >>940072286 >>940073282
>>940072035
Do you think I'm blind?
You know Fuentes has to accept superchats through cryptocurrency because banks ban him.
Do you think we don't realize what you're trying to do?
All of this is going to come back to hurt you.
Anonymous No.940072257 >>940072519
>>940072219
“When Trump-appointed FCC Chair Brendan Carr suggested Jimmy Kimmel should be suspended and said, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” ABC and its local affiliates were listening. Within a matter of hours, ABC suspended Kimmel’s show “indefinitely,” a stunning move that has raised serious First Amendment concerns.
Anonymous No.940072278
>>940072133
>liberals just want equal rights for everyone
No. You switched to "equity," where brown "people" are given greater resources.
Anonymous No.940072286 >>940072481
>>940072248
>Do you think I'm blind?
I think you're being disingenuous if you're not blind.
Anonymous No.940072309
>>940072161
>Trump is dying of congestive heart failure
>will probably be worm's meat in 6 to 8 months.
t. Utterly Deranged
Didn't you say he was dying for the past 10 months straight?
Anonymous No.940072360 >>940072562
>>940072217
They are trying to make it sound like government contracts are charity and the government is simply giving Tesla and SpaceX money.
Anonymous No.940072373
>>940072217
B-but a random account on Elon's own social media claimed the ultra evil MAGA govt did!
Anonymous No.940072450 >>940080306
>>940072168
>Cancel culture NEVER HAPPENED
So you think I'm blind and have no memory.
LMFAO.
Anonymous No.940072466
>>940072190
>people
Shitskins aren't people.
Anonymous No.940072481 >>940072548
>>940072286
>has to accept superchats through cryptocurrency because banks ban him
Do you think this is acceptable when all he does is freely speak his mind?
Anonymous No.940072519 >>940072567 >>940072580 >>940073324 >>940077488
>>940072257
*Censors people for questioning the COVID vaccine on FaceBook*

W O A H
O
A
H

HMMM.... THERE MIGHT BE A CONNECTION HERE???!??!?!?!?
Anonymous No.940072548 >>940072596
>>940072481
>conservatives just want to keep things the way they were
Why are you getting away from the point? I have pointed out things that have never been a thing, there is no keeping things the way they were.
Anonymous No.940072562
>>940072360
Well it says something about how things work, doesn't it?
Our lives are influenced by unseen forces.
Anonymous No.940072567 >>940072674 >>940072709
>>940072519
what the hell are you talking about you fucking schizo lmao
Anonymous No.940072580 >>940072674
>>940072519
Take your meds.
Anonymous No.940072583
>>940071877
This is exactly what we voted for.
Anonymous No.940072596 >>940072692
>>940072548
>>>/b/ is one person
No.
Anonymous No.940072674
>>940072567
>>940072580
You know things have a certain way of "coming to a head," if you understand the terminology.
Anonymous No.940072692 >>940072733
>>940072596
Well then you can fuck right off, I want to talk to the person that was saying that conservatives just want to keep things the way they are when even ray charles could see that's not true.
Anonymous No.940072709 >>940072766 >>940072832 >>940073074
>>940072567
The FBI forced facebook to censor stories about the Biden laptop.
Anonymous No.940072733
>>940072692
Too bad.
Anonymous No.940072766 >>940072879
>>940072709
>The FBI forced facebook to censor stories about the Biden laptop.
Who was president when this was happening?
Anonymous No.940072832 >>940072898
>>940072709
I’d love to read your sources on this if you can link them
Anonymous No.940072847 >>940073072
>>940071734 (OP)
No, it's the company's fault for making their business decision in firing him. The government had no leg to stand on if it went to court, the networks overpaid lawyers know this. You're a nobody on 4chan who knows nothing of the constitution past "mah first amendment." GEt over it faggot.
Anonymous No.940072879
>>940072766
A very good point; an error requisite of correcting.
Anonymous No.940072898
>>940072832
No link. Zuckerberg spoke about it with Rogan.
Anonymous No.940073072 >>940073287
>>940072847
>You're a nobody
Thank you.
>>>/x/41128564
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ij1778c7hUc
Anonymous No.940073074 >>940073191
>>940072709
>Zuckerberg told Rogan: "The background here is that the FBI came to us - some folks on our team - and was like 'hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert. We thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election, we have it on notice that basically there's about to be some kind of dump that's similar to that'."
>He said the FBI did not warn Facebook about the Biden story in particular - only that Facebook thought it "fit that pattern".
>Facebook did not completely ban sharing of the article, but instead limited how much its algorithm automatically shared it to other people for a week, while third-party fact-checkers tried to verify the reporting.
Is there more to it than that?
Anonymous No.940073186 >>940073293
>>940071877
>we'd rather rather the US than participate in a pluralistic republic
Die soon authoritarian traitor
Anonymous No.940073191 >>940073231 >>940073591
>>940073074
That’s not what happened. They specifically told them to suppress any post mentioning Hunter Biden, not because of Russian propaganda, but because it would put Biden and his family in a bad light.
Anonymous No.940073231
>>940073191
>They specifically told them to suppress any post mentioning Hunter Biden
Do you have a direct quote?
Anonymous No.940073262 >>940073355
>>940072017
hey at least you admit it was never about free speech
please have the honor to not use it as a shield from now on
Anonymous No.940073282
>>940072248
So youre saying Fuentes had to have Charlie Kirk killed to cut down competition for wingnut welfare. Got it.
Anonymous No.940073287
>>940073072
>>>>/x/41128564
Notice how these threads get to bump limit within 3 hours lol.
Anonymous No.940073293 >>940073386
>>940073186
You can’t betray faggots and corporations, they aren’t human and they don’t deserve your loyalty.
Anonymous No.940073324 >>940073439
>>940072519
>thinks social media has free speech guarantees
dumbfuck
Anonymous No.940073355
>>940073262
It IS about free speech. That's what you don't understand.
Anonymous No.940073386
>>940073293
But Nick Fuentes does
Anonymous No.940073438 >>940073466
>>940071959
>conservatives just want to keep things the way they were
by turning the country into a dictatorship?
Anonymous No.940073439
>>940073324
You tried to invisibly limit our speech via invisible and hidden mechanisms.
Don't think we don't know what you did.
A biased, lop-sided implementation of "speech" restrictions is censorship.
Anonymous No.940073466
>>940073438
By purging the shitskins you freaks seem to equate yourselves with.
Anonymous No.940073591 >>940073646 >>940073709
>>940073191
Seems weird that Trump's FBI would try to tell zuck to suppress any information on Hunter Biden.
Anonymous No.940073646 >>940073696
>>940073591
>Thinking the FBI doesn’t still report to Biden
You retards are so funny
Anonymous No.940073696 >>940073754
>>940073646
Wasn't Trump president during the 2020 campaign? Biden controlled the FBI, with Trump's own FBI director almost 4 years after he was VP?
Anonymous No.940073709 >>940073746
>>940073591
You really are despicable.
Anonymous No.940073746
>>940073709
Because I'm dropping harder facts than Kimmel? I hope the FCC chairman doesn't threaten 4chan to suppress my speech.
Anonymous No.940073754 >>940073774
>>940073696
Do you know what "impartiality" means? It represents a responsibility that many have failed to uphold.
Anonymous No.940073774 >>940073908
>>940073754
Do you know that when trying to claim that the left is censoring people, it's best to not use examples from a republican administration?
Anonymous No.940073779
Jacob Jacob don’t do this Jacob Jacob don’t go better that it’s killing her SHES DYING ANYWAY
Anonymous No.940073841
>>940071734 (OP)
You don't care you suck Trump's cock log shit
Anonymous No.940073908 >>940073944 >>940074005
>>940073774
Do you know you're not worthy of genuine discussion?
You refuse actual logic, instead opting for perpetual agenda pushing.
Thus, you are not afforded the honor.
As such, your opinion is equally discarded.
Your deceit is of little to no value, except where it can be turned against you.
Anonymous No.940073944 >>940073976
>>940073908
Your incoherent gibberish reply says otherwise hypocrite
Anonymous No.940073976 >>940074096
>>940073944
Learn to read.
Anonymous No.940074005 >>940074086
>>940073908
>You refuse actual logic
What? Someone was trying to claim the HB laptop stuff, which happened in the election of 2020, when trump was president, with his own appointed fbi director.
Anonymous No.940074086 >>940074178
>>940074005
Exactly. So why did the FBI censor the story?
Needs investigated.
Anonymous No.940074094
>>940071734 (OP)
The FCC has always been there to perform that function. It's just performing it once again. What's the problem?
Anonymous No.940074096 >>940074635
>>940073976
That kind of meant shut up Trumper
Anonymous No.940074135
>>940071734 (OP)
Rightoids have no honor, respect or principles anymore, that much is clear.
It's laughable that they expect the rest of us to bow down at the grave of some disrespectful e-celeb like it's a fallen president or something, just utterly pathetic.
Anonymous No.940074178 >>940074459
>>940074086
As far as I can find, the FBI didn't censor it, I gave zuck's quote on it. If you have a quote suggesting otherwise from him, feel free to disprove me.
Anonymous No.940074459 >>940074518
>>940074178
I personally know people who were censored for their normal, conservative opinions on FB.
Anonymous No.940074518 >>940074672
>>940074459
because the government openly threatened facebook if they didn't punish them?
Anonymous No.940074635
>>940074096
I know that, dumbass.
You're NEVER going to silence me.
Anonymous No.940074672 >>940074737
>>940074518
I don't care what your excuse is.
I don't care how you try to twist things or shift blame.
Anonymous No.940074737 >>940074873
>>940074672
Look, I get that you don't actually care about actual constitutional violations, but at least learn the difference between the government making threats demanding people be punished for what they don't like, and companies doing it on their own.
Anonymous No.940074788 >>940074982 >>940075020 >>940075036
>>940071734 (OP)
lol
Anonymous No.940074873 >>940074927 >>940075019 >>940075087 >>940077307
>>940074737
>you don't actually care about actual constitutional violations
The constitution specifies "Freedom of Association."
What does that mean in the context of the government FORCING students to go to school with niggers, using the US military to achieve this end?
What does that mean in the context of the government FORCING corporations to accept non European customers whilst simultaneously classifying them as "legal persons"?
Anonymous No.940074927
>>940074873
>The constitution specifies "Freedom of Association."
wrong
Anonymous No.940074982 >>940075055 >>940075122
>>940074788
correct, the FCC didn't threaten ABC to remove roseanne or they will suffer consequences, whereas they did so for kimmel. That's a big difference.
Anonymous No.940075019
>>940074873
https://dunnhistory.com/national-black-history/the-desegregation-of-central-high-school/
>President Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne Division (Paratroopers) into Little Rock to enforce desegregation. He ordered the troops to carry live ammunition and fixed bayonets
Anonymous No.940075020
>>940074788

Lol, anyone defending Kimmel is a retard. Kimmel played himself. Even Kimmel agrees with Kimmel.
Anonymous No.940075036 >>940075097 >>940079258
>>940074788
>still doesn't understand the difference between the Roseanne situation and this one
Lole
Anonymous No.940075055 >>940075127 >>940075372
>>940074982
>the FCC threatened ABC to remove kimmel or they will suffer consequences
wrong
Anonymous No.940075087 >>940075128
>>940074873
>whilst
For God's sake, get a fuckin life and stay out of our shit, bong
Anonymous No.940075097
>>940075036
If you love niggers so much why don't you move to africa?
Anonymous No.940075122 >>940075246
>>940074982
Roseanne made several racist tweets which got her show cancelled.
Kimmel criticized Dear Leader so the Dear Leader appointed FCC Chair threatened ABC to cancel his show.
Anonymous No.940075127 >>940075291
>>940075055
>“He says, ‘We can do this the easy way, or we can do this the hard way,’” Cruz said – quoting Carr’s Wednesday comments to podcaster Benny Johnson on his own podcast,
>“And I gotta say, that’s right out of Goodfellas, That’s right out of a mafioso coming into a bar going, ‘Nice bar you have here, it’d be a shame if something happened to it.’”

That's Ted Cruz's comments on the FCC Chairman's statement.
Anonymous No.940075128 >>940075297
>>940075087
If you want to worship niggers, you can move to africa.
Anonymous No.940075242
>>940071877
>>940071959

Retarded bait attempt
Anonymous No.940075246 >>940075272 >>940075331 >>940078594
>>940075122
>Kimmel criticized Dear Leader
No. He spread false statements about matters that pertain to a murder investigation.
This is a violation of FCC rules.
Anonymous No.940075272 >>940075338
>>940075246
False statements about our dear leader must be punished of course
Anonymous No.940075291 >>940075349
>>940075127
Sounds like a figure of speech many people use.
Anonymous No.940075297 >>940075577
>>940075128
No really, imagine if Americans stuck their noses into your politics as much as you faggots do ours. You'd probably think it was pretty pathetic, huh? And you'd be right.
Anonymous No.940075331
>>940075246
What are the quotes in question which violate FCC rules?
Anonymous No.940075338 >>940075405 >>940075516 >>940075669
>>940075272
>dear leader
It has nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with the shooter, who Kimmel falsely characterized as a "MAGA supporter."
Anonymous No.940075349 >>940075686
>>940075291
lol, no. the federal government isn't allowed to make those threats demanding punishment.
Anonymous No.940075372
>>940075055
>“These companies can find ways to change conduct and take action,
frankly, on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”
that is impermissible coercive conduct.
Anonymous No.940075405
>>940075338
Still can't get over it Get over it can yousnowflake
Anonymous No.940075516 >>940075650
>>940075338
Wow I didn’t realize falsely said that the shooter was a MAGA supporter
Anonymous No.940075577 >>940075824
>>940075297
You think I'm not American?
Like I said, if you want to worship niggers, you can move to africa. Western nations are not for you.
Anonymous No.940075650 >>940075719
>>940075516
He didn’t. He said the right is trying to paint the shooter as anything other than one of their own, which is a factually correct statement.
Anonymous No.940075669 >>940075719
>>940075338
>characterized as a "MAGA supporter"
No he didn't.
Anonymous No.940075686 >>940075745
>>940075349
>the federal government isn't allowed to demanding punishment
The threat of punishment is the primary means by which the government forces tax payments and regulate anti-social behavior such as murder, theft, and violence.
Anonymous No.940075719 >>940075771 >>940075813
>>940075650
>>940075669
Yes, he did.
Anonymous No.940075745 >>940075896
>>940075686
demanding punishment for speech is not something the government is allowed to do.
Anonymous No.940075771
>>940075719
At no point did he call the shooter a MAGA supporter.
Anonymous No.940075813
>>940075719
Do you have the quote?
Anonymous No.940075824 >>940076012
>>940075577
Bitch I know you're not American. "whilst" is distinctly Britbongistanian
Anonymous No.940075871 >>940075942
>be Republicans
>be retarded (obvs)
>have an opportunity to super-charge your cult after the assassination of one of your most powerful propagandists
>instead, you super-charge your spergatry to such an extreme degree that the national dialogue shifts away from left-wing extremism towards widespread concern over government censorship and the possibility that maybe, just maybe, the Trump regime is full-blown authoritarian

You dumbfucks played yourselves so hard lol
Anonymous No.940075896 >>940075998
>>940075745
It does it all the time. Of course its something the government is allowed to do.
Usually the cases involve credible threats to perform harm against others.
Anonymous No.940075942 >>940076124 >>940076216
>>940075871
You are so deluded it's funny.
Everyone is supporting the counter-cancel-culture now.
Anonymous No.940075998 >>940076284
>>940075896
>It does it all the time.
Not really.
Anonymous No.940076012
>>940075824
Move to africa, nigger worshipper.
Anonymous No.940076124
>>940075942
Even super maga retards like Ted Cruz are balking at this.
Anonymous No.940076216 >>940076310
>>940075942
Yeah, I'm deluded. Just ignore the fact that everyone is talking about Jimmy Kimmel and government censorship now?
Anonymous No.940076284 >>940076325 >>940076364
>>940075998
https://www.losangelescriminallawyer.pro/california-penal-code-section-422-pc-criminal-threats.html
>Under California Penal Code Section 422 PC, it is illegal to make criminal threats. This offense was previously called “terrorist threats,” however it can involve any threats of violence or harm.
https://pioneerpublishers.com/concord-police-arrest-report-for-the-week-of-august-13-through-19-2025/
>08/17/25 2020 PC 422(A) – Threaten Crime with Intent to Terrorize (F)
>08/17/25 0100 PC 422(A) – Threaten Crime with Intent to Terrorize (M)
>08/14/25 1324 PC 422(A) – Threaten Crime with Intent to Terrorize (F)
WOAH!
Anonymous No.940076310 >>940076463
>>940076216
>everyone
Your tranny cock sucking social bubble isn't everyone, loser.
Anonymous No.940076325 >>940076452
>>940076284
You're talking about threats which are not covered under free speech, whereas with kimmel we're talking about a factual statement that upset MAGA.
Anonymous No.940076364 >>940076508
>>940076284
You think making violent threats being illegal is a breach of free speech? Surely you must be trolling or baiting, or else you are absolutely fucking retarded lmfao.
Anonymous No.940076452 >>940076513
>>940076325
>threats which are not covered under free speech
Threats are free speech, moron.
Anonymous No.940076463
>>940076310
Nigger, we are literally talking about it right now. Go look at the catalog.
Anonymous No.940076508 >>940076686
>>940076364
>violent threats being illegal is a breach of free speech
It is. There is no rationale able to derive any other conclusion.
Anonymous No.940076513 >>940076556
>>940076452
>Threats are free speech, moron.
Not really.
Anonymous No.940076556 >>940076674 >>940077029
>>940076513
They are, and you are still not escaping the fact that the Government has the ability to enact penalties for unacceptable speech.
Anonymous No.940076562
>>940071877
It is the failure to see those that control Trump are using his rhetoric to divide us and his shenanigans as a distraction. Liberals or Conservatives, your enemy is the ghouls responsible for the kleptocracy. This country will be a very unfortunate place to live. All of the assets, money, rare elements will be syphoned into the hands of a handful of people. They are creatures who thrive on suffering of others. They don't want any more money for themselves, they just don't want you to have anything.
Anonymous No.940076674 >>940076813
>>940076556
>They are
violent threats are certainly not free speech. A federal regulator threatening to punish companies unless they specifically punish someone that upset them, could be free speech but also a severe violation of their oath of office.
Anonymous No.940076686
>>940076508
Poor quality bait
Anonymous No.940076743 >>940076993
This is the country that runs around the world lecturing everyone else on freedom and democracy.
Hypocrisy is the only true American value.
Anonymous No.940076813 >>940077048 >>940077056 >>940077137
>>940076674
>violent threats are certainly not free speech
Free speech means the ability to freely speak.
If you cannot freely speak, including the emission of a sequence of words that can be interpreted as a credible threat, then your free speech is restricted.
There is no rational argument that can result in any alternative conclusion.
Your "free speech" is restricted to a limit that society deems acceptable.
Anonymous No.940076993 >>940077070
>>940076743
America is the only country in the world where you’re free to drink a beer in a public space. Name a single other country that has that kind of freedom.
Anonymous No.940077029 >>940077176
>>940076556
Both terroristic threats and inciting violence are not protected under the 1st amendment.

Your personal definition of free speech is irrelevant.
Anonymous No.940077047
Well /b/?
Anonymous No.940077048 >>940077160 >>940077176
>>940076813
>Free speech means the ability to freely speak.
It does not mean you can make threats to other people.
Anonymous No.940077056 >>940077176
>>940076813
you obviously lack the self awareness to tell on your own, so I’m sorry to let you know but you’re retarded
Anonymous No.940077070
>>940076993
>America is the only country in the world where you’re free to drink a beer in a public space
That really depends on the state, some states do not allow that.
Anonymous No.940077137 >>940077307
>>940076813
>The Supreme Court has cited three reasons why threats of violence are outside the First Amendment—protecting individuals from the fear of violence, from the disruption that fear engenders, and from the possibility that the threatened violence will occur.
Anonymous No.940077160 >>940077337 >>940077424
>>940077048
If I cannot go into a police station, walk up to a police officer and say “I’m gonna steal your gun from your holster and shoot you and every cop in here” without them doing anything against me, then I do not live in a country with free speech. There is simply no rationale to derive any other conclusion than this.
Anonymous No.940077176 >>940077403
>>940077029
>>940077048
>>940077056
>Both terroristic threats and inciting violence are not protected under the 1st amendment.
Unfortunately this does not redefine what "free speech" means.
If you can't speak freely, you don't have true free speech.
Like I said, your speech is limited to what society deems acceptable bounds.
Anonymous No.940077307 >>940077349 >>940077355
>>940077137
The constitution was abandoned many years ago. They don't even care about "Freedom of Association" anymore (>>940074873).
Anonymous No.940077337
>>940077160
Correct.
Anonymous No.940077349 >>940077503
>>940077307
There is no freedom of association specified in the constitution.
Anonymous No.940077355
>>940077307
Correct.
Anonymous No.940077401
>>940071734 (OP)
he should reboot The man show
Anonymous No.940077403 >>940077546
>>940077176
In order to understand what "free speech" truly entails, you need to understand the nature of freedom, itself, and whether it's even possible to possess in degrees - hint: it's not.

But we're not talking metaphysics here, are we? We're taking about the parameters of free speech as it relates to jurisprudence - and according to the law, the "free" in "free speech" is not an absolute.
Anonymous No.940077424 >>940077553 >>940077599
>>940077160
No, you're not allowed to do that. Are you saying that people should be able to read out state secrets to foreign adversaries for cash or else we don't have free speech too?
Anonymous No.940077488
>>940072519
millions of deaths > -1 podcaster
Anonymous No.940077503 >>940077587
>>940077349
https://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment1/first-amendment-freedom-of-association.html
Anonymous No.940077546 >>940077621
>>940077403
You're not even allowed to challenge people to duels anymore.
Anonymous No.940077547
>>940071734 (OP)
no one asked
Anonymous No.940077553
>>940077424
Correct.
Anonymous No.940077587
>>940077503
>There is no freedom of association specified in the constitution
>specified
If you're going to use scotus rulings as being "specifications" in the constitution, then you cannot say threats are included in free speech.
Anonymous No.940077599 >>940077629
>>940077424
Usually there are contractual agreements prohibiting such things. Completely outside of 1st amendment rights.
Anonymous No.940077621
>>940077546
We need to bring back duels tbqh
Anonymous No.940077629 >>940077656
>>940077599
who would enforce the contract?
Anonymous No.940077656 >>940077679
>>940077629
1st amendment police.
Anonymous No.940077679 >>940077765 >>940077770
>>940077656
It would be the government having to enforce it, meaning it would be violating 1st amendment rights.
Anonymous No.940077747
Arresting someone for "credible threats" is basically pre-crime if you actually believe in free speech.
Not that I disagree. Psychos just need to be put down.
Anonymous No.940077765 >>940077815 >>940077946
>>940077679
trump is trying to overturn arbitration as a legal concept so anything goes with the dictator trump, he'll try anything as is his criminal nature
Anonymous No.940077770 >>940077928
>>940077679
No. Violating a contract has nothing to do with the constitution/amendments. That's a separate contract.
Anonymous No.940077815
>>940077765
It's the FCC, not Trump. Dumbass.
This concerns a murder investigation.
You can't muddy the waters like that over such a serious matter.
Anonymous No.940077928 >>940078162
>>940077770
The government would have to enforce it, meaning they would be violating your freedom of speech. NDAs would be unenforceable, because it is silencing your speech.
Anonymous No.940077946
>>940077765
Yeah, he wants to be king, it's absolutely disgusting.
Anonymous No.940077970 >>940078113 >>940078231
>>940071734 (OP)
>checks thread
>rightoids have no good counter argument to this in 162 posts
sad
Anonymous No.940078113
>>940077970
They never do. All they say is “The left unable to be reasoned with and thus unworthy of discussion. I win by default.” without ever making a coherent argument.
Anonymous No.940078162 >>940078221
>>940077928
No. That's a separate contract.
Anonymous No.940078221 >>940078279
>>940078162
No, the government would have to enforce a contract, limiting your ability to speak, which would be a violation.
Anonymous No.940078230
CUCKservatives the country wide are mourning the fact they won't get to gargle and blow bubbles with the loads Charlie CUCK would blow on their mouths.
Anonymous No.940078231 >>940078281
>>940077970
>no good counter argument
There's no counter-argument. It is censorship, which the FCC MUST do.
They don't let companies broadcast pornography for a reason.
They don't let Kimmel lie about a murder investigation for a reason.
It all has to do with acceptable speech bounds.
Anonymous No.940078279 >>940078375
>>940078221
The contract has different jurisdiction to the constitution, and employment is likely requisite upon the contractual obligations.
Anonymous No.940078281 >>940078383
>>940078231
Well good thing Kimmel didn't lie.
Anonymous No.940078375 >>940078422
>>940078279
>The contract has different jurisdiction
We're talking about the enforcement of the contract. If you violated it, the counter-party would have to seek reprieve from the government, forcing the government to violate your rights.
Anonymous No.940078383 >>940078441 >>940078499 >>940078865
>>940078281
He claimed the shooter was in a "MAGA gang."
That was a lie, which may lead the public to false perspectives about the shooter and damage the case against him.
This is an FCC violation and has nothing to do with Trump.
Anonymous No.940078422 >>940078465
>>940078375
No. That's an agency of the government, which has different jurisdiction than the constitution.
Anonymous No.940078441 >>940078457
>>940078383
He never claimed the shooter was in the "MAGA gang"
Anonymous No.940078457 >>940078517 >>940078564
>>940078441
Yes, he did.
Anonymous No.940078465 >>940078490
>>940078422
>which has different jurisdiction than the constitution
anon, the federal government is bound by the constitution
Anonymous No.940078490 >>940078543
>>940078465
Which specifies restrictions on congress, if you read the actual text.
Anonymous No.940078499 >>940078535
>>940078383
>damage the case
trump was running his mouth about the suspected shooter from the start, demanding the death penalty
get a grip you insane trumpfag nothing you say you care about is real
Anonymous No.940078517 >>940078565
>>940078457
Nope. He said the MAGA gang was pointing fingers at anyone but them(truth) and trying to score political points off of it(truth) and trump was in not really grieving kirk in a normal way(truth)
Anonymous No.940078535
>>940078499
What Trump said is very different to claiming the shooter is a member of a "MAGA gang."
Anonymous No.940078543 >>940078660
>>940078490
No, the constitution places restrictions on the federal government as a whole.
Anonymous No.940078564
>>940078457

>The shooter was raised by his MAGAt pedophile father that would pump two loads of cum in his rectum daily. Cocksucking cop.
Anonymous No.940078565 >>940078587
>>940078517
Nope. He falsely asserted that a "MAGA gang" was trying to claim that the shooter was not one of their members.
Anonymous No.940078587 >>940078675
>>940078565
He asserted no such thing. Your inability to comprehend words is not his fault.
Anonymous No.940078594
>>940075246
These are obviously bot posts. I wouldn't be surprised if the log fag receives Russian money.
Anonymous No.940078649 >>940078715 >>940078787 >>940078793
>>940071734 (OP)
He was fired because his ratings were in the gutter, and bringing public and government scrutiny against his company, without remorse, gave them the excuse they needed to fire him. Stay mad, shitlib.
Anonymous No.940078660 >>940078855
>>940078543
the Constitution doesn't place restrictions, it only enumerates the powers of the government described in the Constitution

the government doesn't have any powers that aren't listed in there

>inb4 de jure vs de facto
Anonymous No.940078675 >>940078750 >>940078953
>>940078587
He falsely asserted exactly that, and I quote:
"The MAGA GANG [which he has been fear-mongering the public with for months] [is] desperately trying to characterize this kid [...] as anything other than one of their own."
Anonymous No.940078715
>>940078649
And now they are trying to score political points with this own-goal by claiming that "dear leader" (referring to Trump) is trying to violate free speech, even though this is the FCC and has nothing to do with Trump.
Anonymous No.940078750 >>940078832
>>940078675
Here I'll make it easy for you to understand
>The Maga gang is desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it

Who? : The MAGA gang
What? : desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it

That is an accurate statement.
Anonymous No.940078787
>>940078649
What else did Fox News tell you chud
Anonymous No.940078793
>>940078649
>Charlie CUCK is still dead

>>Stay mad, CUCKservative pedophile
Anonymous No.940078832 >>940078883 >>940078948 >>940078974
>>940078750
Ergo, implying the shooter was actually in a "MAGA GANG," which this particular cretin has been fear-mongering the public with for months. Even though no such gang exists. There are no "MAGA" leaders.
Anonymous No.940078855
>>940078660
>the Constitution doesn't place restrictions
It most certainly does, generally within the bill of rights, but also in the constitution proper with the separation of powers, and listing who can do what.
>it only enumerates the powers of the government described in the Constitution
It enumerates, but also places restrictions on it's powers.
Anonymous No.940078865 >>940078914 >>940078953 >>940078994
>>940078383
Can you provide quotes for what he said?
Anonymous No.940078883 >>940079027
>>940078832
Not even close to implying anything about the shooter, only calling out what MAGA was doing.
Anonymous No.940078914
>>940078865
inb4 look it up
Anonymous No.940078948
>>940078832
MAGA gang wouldn't be gang as in street gang, gang would be a synonym for group
Anonymous No.940078953
>>940078865
>>940078675
>"The MAGA GANG [which he has been fear-mongering the public with for months] [is] desperately trying to characterize this kid [...] as anything other than one of their own."
Anonymous No.940078974 >>940079089
>>940078832
So he didn’t make a false claim pertaining to a murder investigation, and rather implied that the shooter was part of MAGA by saying that MAGA is trying to paint the shooter as anything other than one of them (which they are)?
Anonymous No.940078994 >>940079125 >>940079135
>>940078865
Here's the quote without the idiots feelings involved.

>The Maga gang is desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it
Anonymous No.940079027 >>940079107
>>940078883
He very strongly implied the shooter was a secret member of a "MAGA GANG," even though we all know "MAGA" is just a lie made up by the left to blame their suspiciously burning cities on. There are no "MAGA" leaders, no particular person you can point at and say "MAGA GANG!".
Anonymous No.940079089 >>940079271 >>940079375 >>940079644
>>940078974
The shooter is a confirmed ANTIFA leader. Nothing to do with the non-existent "MAGA GANG."
Anonymous No.940079107 >>940079211
>>940079027
No, he didn't. He didn't imply anything about the shooter. He talked about MAGAs actions.
Anonymous No.940079125 >>940079187 >>940079233
>>940078994
Is this a “false claim and misinformation pertaining to a murder investigation”, warranting FCC intervention?
Anonymous No.940079135
>>940078994
Sorry forgot the very first part.
>We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang trying to characterize this kid who killed Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it
Anonymous No.940079187
>>940079125
I wouldn't think so. There's nothing false in there.
Anonymous No.940079211 >>940079276 >>940079340
>>940079107
>"The MAGA GANG is desperately trying to characterize this kid as anything other than one of their own."
What conclusion can you draw from that?
The implication is extremely strong that the "kid" is indeed a member of this supposed gang.
Anonymous No.940079233
>>940079125
Yes. This is a very high-profile murder.
Anonymous No.940079258
>>940075036
the difference being?
Anonymous No.940079271 >>940079298
>>940079089
Sources for this claim?
Anonymous No.940079276
>>940079211
>The implication is extremely strong that the "kid" is indeed a member of this supposed gang.
"MAGA" is just a lie made up by the left. There are no "MAGA" leaders, no "MAGA" gangs, no particular person you can point at and say "MAGA!".
Anonymous No.940079298 >>940079341 >>940079409 >>940079644
>>940079271
Ask their members.
Anonymous No.940079303 >>940080498
FACT
Anonymous No.940079326 >>940079358
>>940071734 (OP)
Literally the FCCs job. He lied about a crime with the intent to deceive the public.
Anonymous No.940079340 >>940079368 >>940079388
>>940079211
>We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang trying to characterize this kid who killed Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them
Well from that, I get that over the weekend MAGA was pointing fingers at anyone they could but them(which is true) and trying to get political points off of it(also true). The implication is that MAGA is doing what MAGA does, which is true.
Anonymous No.940079341 >>940079420
>>940079298
Ah, so you don’t have or don’t want to provide a source for your claim?
Anonymous No.940079358
>>940079326
He was, providing cover for a murderer and attempting to muddy the legal case against him. This is near treasonous.
Anonymous No.940079368 >>940079381
>>940079340
Mental gymnastics. The implication is clearly that the shooter was MAGA.
Anonymous No.940079375 >>940079476
>>940079089
you say confirmed but can’t back it up. strange.
Anonymous No.940079381 >>940079525
>>940079368
>mental gymnastics
You mean like where you're trying to say Kimmel said something other than what he said?
Anonymous No.940079388 >>940079414
>>940079340
No. He was talking about how "MAGA" was characterizing a "kid." (a.k.a. murderer)
Anonymous No.940079409
>>940079298
i am a member of antifa and i can confirm that Charlie Kirk was also a leader of antifa before his untimely death
Anonymous No.940079414 >>940079519
>>940079388
He was talking about how MAGA was pointing fingers at anyone they could and trying to score political points off of it, over the weekend.
Anonymous No.940079420 >>940079644
>>940079341
It's already been well documented. You could ask >>>/pol/ if you're desperate. The fact he sucked a trannies "girlcock" is proof enough.
Anonymous No.940079430
>itt: delusional migafags
I miss when America was actually great and you guys didn't exist
Anonymous No.940079446
>>940071734 (OP)
The "lamb and the beast choice" is a spiritual concept, often referencing the Book of Revelation, where individuals must choose between following the nature of the Lamb, representing purity, sacrifice, and meekness, or the nature of the "wild beast," symbolizing worldliness, deception, and evil powers. This choice is not just a future event but is made in the present through one's thoughts and actions, determining one's destiny as they either align with Christ's kingdom or the opposing worldly powers.

It is a sinless and holy lamb bred pure white and sinless with the smallest penis possible. That is the true nature of reality

>For you know that you were not redeemed from your useless [spiritually unproductive] way of life inherited [by tradition] from your forefathers with perishable things like silver and gold, but [you were actually purchased] with precious blood, like that of a [sacrificial] lamb unblemished and spotless, the priceless blood of Christ. For He was foreordained (foreknown) before the foundation of the world, but has appeared [publicly] in these last times for your sake
Anonymous No.940079476 >>940079558
>>940079375
"MAGA" doesn't exist except in liberals minds as a source of collective fear-mongering against the right.
Anonymous No.940079519 >>940080068
>>940079414
>MAGA was pointing fingers at anyone
No. How MAGA was characterizing a "kid" (who is actually a murderer).
Anonymous No.940079525 >>940080041
>>940079381
Nope, it's clear what he said, you're playing word games to try claim he didn't.
Anonymous No.940079558
>>940079476
MAGA is only an idea.
Everyone should want to make America great.
Anonymous No.940079644 >>940079700
>>940079089
>>940079298
>>940079420
>makes baseless delusional claim
>unable to provide proof
>leaves
Yup, another libtard schooled. It’s good to be great.
Anonymous No.940079700 >>940079769
>>940079644
>baseless
He called a tranny "my love."
How delusional is that? LOL!
Read the transcripts... he almost thinks of himself as doing this public execution on behalf of the tranny.
Anonymous No.940079769 >>940079916
>>940079700
>If you love a trans person you must be a high ranking member in Antifa, there is simply no other conclusion
Mental gymnastics?
Anonymous No.940079916 >>940079960
>>940079769
ANTIFA doesn't exist. How could Trump ban it? There are no leaders, dumbass.
Anonymous No.940079960 >>940080133
>>940079916
My fellow anon just said that Tyler Robinson is a CONFIRMED leader of the organization of Antifa. How can this be confirmed if Antifa isn’t a structured organization with leaders?
Anonymous No.940080041 >>940080223 >>940080318
>>940079525
>Nope, it's clear what he said
I'm saying he said what he said. You're saying he said something different, then you're saying he implied it. His statement was all about how MAGA was acting over the weekend.
Anonymous No.940080068 >>940080170
>>940079519
>How MAGA was characterizing a "kid"
They were characterizing anyone as the shooter before anything was known, before the bullet left ck's neck, they were claiming it was trannies or israel or muslims
Anonymous No.940080090 >>940080557
>>940071734 (OP)
dont care, were done talking to the left anyway we've seen where that gets us
Anonymous No.940080102
Anonymous No.940080133
>>940079960
Exactly! ANTIFA doesn't even exist!
!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THEY ARE MAKING THINGS UP!!!!!!!
Anonymous No.940080170 >>940080248 >>940080493
>>940080068
>They
Err... that wasn't MAGA.
Anonymous No.940080223 >>940080549
>>940080041
>You're saying he said something different
Nope. The interpretation of what he said, what he implied is very clear. Kimmel unironically implied the murderer was a member of a "MAGA gang." When it comes to a murder investigation this is actually VERY serious and it is necessary for the FCC to step in and stop it.
Anonymous No.940080248
>>940080170
Exactly! MAGA doesn't even exist!
!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE RIGHT ARE MAKING THINGS UP!!!!!!!
Anonymous No.940080306
>>940072450
Libturd defense tactic #1. Deny and gaslight.
>That literally has never happened you are insane!!
Anonymous No.940080318 >>940080580
>>940080041
No, I'm saying that the logical implication is inescapable, while you're playing word games to pretend it's not.
Anonymous No.940080429 >>940080490 >>940080527
“private company bro” stops being private when a fed says “easy way or hard way.” That’s jawboning, not a free market. ABC can fire a host for trash ratings, sure. But the government still can’t lean on them without turning it into state action and a first amendment problem. See Bantam Books v. Sullivan (1963). “informal” pressure = unconstitutional censorship. I want a government so small it can’t even suggest which jokes are allowed. Principle > team.
Anonymous No.940080461
>>940072168
SpaceX got the nasa contract because all the other competitors couldn’t deliver. SpaceX has proven themselves to be America’s best bet in the new space race. If you don’t believe this is true, look at the embarrassing disaster Boeing created. And Blue Origin seems to only be interested in sending rich people *just* above the karman line so they can *technically* say they went to space.
Anonymous No.940080490 >>940080565 >>940080592
>>940080429
Not even worth attempting to argue. The right only understands feelings, not logic. All they see is that their favorite TV racist who affirms their beliefs got shot, and they act irrationally based on their feelings about this event.
Anonymous No.940080493 >>940080553
>>940080170
That was definitely MAGA, people like Loomer, DJT jr, etc
Anonymous No.940080498
>>940079303
Who listens to what whores have to say...
CUCKS, MAGAt CUCKS
Anonymous No.940080527 >>940080582
>>940080429
The federal agency was literally created by congress to do just this, control what content is allowed on broadcast airwaves. Kimmel violate FCC regulations by lying about a crime for the purpose of deceiving the public, and this is entirely within the FCCs power, as granted by congressional legislation.
Anonymous No.940080549
>>940080223
>what he implied is very clear
Maybe if you have brain damage you think that is what he implied. He was clear that he was talking about what the MAGA group was doing, factually.
Anonymous No.940080553 >>940080641
>>940080493
MAGA doesn't exist.
Anonymous No.940080557 >>940080626
>>940080090
Sounds to me like it gets your ass handed to you
Anonymous No.940080565 >>940080657
>>940080490
Just like you FEEL you're a woman and chopped your dick off?
Anonymous No.940080580
>>940080318
>I'm saying that the logical implication is inescapable
The logical implication is that you are unable to read what he said, or listen to it, and choose this very small portion to try to justify the threats the FCC chairman made.
Anonymous No.940080582 >>940080643 >>940080645
>>940080527
Sure, the FCC exists. But the Constitution exists too. Congress can’t delegate away the First Amendment just because they passed a statute in 1934. Agencies don’t get a “censorship carve-out.” The Supreme Court has slapped down “informal pressure” before (Bantam Books v. Sullivan, 1963). Pretending coercion is just “regulation” is how you end up with bureaucrats deciding what jokes you’re allowed to hear. That’s not free markets, that’s state speech control with extra steps.
Anonymous No.940080592 >>940080627
>>940080490
Well, you need to understand the powers granted to the FCC by congress. Because you apparently don't know what the FCC is, why it was created, or what powers it has to regulate speech over the broadcast airwaves.
Hint: Private corporations do no have the right to do whatever they want over public airwaves. That is strictly licensed by the federal government and has been for over a hundred years.
Anonymous No.940080626 >>940080648
>>940080557
Seems more like trying to talk to the left IRL gets you shot.
Anonymous No.940080627 >>940080668 >>940080700
>>940080592
That's a lot of fancy words to say you kiss Trump's ass.
Anonymous No.940080641 >>940080664 >>940080686
>>940080553
Then why do they wear hats declaring it does exist?
Anonymous No.940080643 >>940080801
>>940080582
>“censorship carve-out.”
We're talking about a murder investigation here.
Anonymous No.940080645 >>940080676
>>940080582
>Bantam Books
Printed word is much different than corporation broadcasting over public airwaves. A free press is literally mentioned in the constitution. Private companies broadcasting over public airwaves is not.
Anonymous No.940080648
>>940080626
Maybe you should've gone along with us when we wanted gun control then. Instead you seem to think anybody should have a weapon
Anonymous No.940080657 >>940080687
>>940080565
nice counter argument
Anonymous No.940080664 >>940080729 >>940080974
>>940080641
That's liberals creating a boogeyman for the left to create self-inflicted collective fear.
Anonymous No.940080668 >>940080725 >>940080760
>>940080627
>Loses argument, lashes out in anger
kek
Anonymous No.940080676 >>940080706
>>940080645
Faggot shut up
Anonymous No.940080686 >>940080745
>>940080641
MAGA is just an idea. Everyone should want to make America great.
Anonymous No.940080687
>>940080657
It is thank you. Can't claim to be the side of logic when you guys are that delusional.
Anonymous No.940080700 >>940080740
>>940080627
>The FCC exists therefore you kiss Trumps ass
IQ: Two Digits
Anonymous No.940080706 >>940080774
>>940080676
>Gets BTFO, angrily lashes out
Anonymous No.940080725 >>940080780
>>940080668
What argument? That it's OK to weaponize a public agency?
Anonymous No.940080729 >>940080820
>>940080664
charley kirk was a liberal?
Anonymous No.940080740
>>940080700
Sorry not a Trump supporter
Anonymous No.940080745
>>940080686
Well no, MAGA has a leader. It's a cult, not an idea.
Anonymous No.940080760 >>940080803
>>940080668
As is their style.
Anonymous No.940080774 >>940080794
>>940080706
You didn't do shit bootlicker
Anonymous No.940080780 >>940080829 >>940080866
>>940080725
You seemed to have no problem with that during the Biden and Obama administrations. Anyways, the FCC is doing what it was created to do, and within the statutory authority granted by congress.
I'm sorry if you're too dumb to understand this.
Anonymous No.940080794 >>940080859
>>940080774
Pithy counter-argument. Did you debate in college?
Anonymous No.940080801 >>940080866
>>940080643
“murder investigation” doesn’t magically suspend the bill of rights brother. government can investigate crimes all day, but it can’t use that as a pretext to threaten broadcasters into silencing speech! if Kimmel lied, take it to court under defamation or fraud statutes. what they can’t do is back-channel “fix your content or else.” that’s jawboning, and it turns law enforcement into a speech police. and just to be clear, I was a Charlie Kirk fan and glad to see Kimmel gone. but constitutional rights don’t disappear just because the government says “trust us, it’s serious this time.”
Anonymous No.940080803 >>940080848
>>940080760
>as is my same fagging
You must be a bottom. Nobody could possibly be this big of a masochist getting outed over and over again
Anonymous No.940080820 >>940080846
>>940080729
>charley
Isn't it "Charlie"?
Anonymous No.940080829 >>940080867 >>940080896
>>940080780
You're no expert you stupid chud.
Anonymous No.940080846 >>940080917
>>940080820
I think you mean "wasn't it"
Anonymous No.940080848 >>940080904
>>940080803
>Liberal unable to have a conversation without bring in his gay sex fantasies.
Anonymous No.940080859
>>940080794
You're no debater you do whatever daddy Trump says
Anonymous No.940080866 >>940081037
>>940080801
>doesn’t magically suspend the bill of rights
>>940080780
>the FCC is doing what it was created to do, and within the statutory authority granted by congress
Anonymous No.940080867 >>940080922
>>940080829
Count down to accusing everyone of being logfag in 3.....2....1
Anonymous No.940080885
>>940071734 (OP)
Eat shit faggot
Anonymous No.940080896 >>940080953 >>940080961
>>940080829
R u gonna shoot him now?
Anonymous No.940080904
>>940080848
You know it'd be pretty easy to pay a bull to get you to submit to total ass updominance just based on your posts
Anonymous No.940080911
>>940071734 (OP)
Nobody watches this boring old boomerfaggot, stop gaslighting.
Anonymous No.940080917 >>940080929
>>940080846
No.
Anonymous No.940080922 >>940080983
>>940080867
Why? Feeling a little extra guilty are you?
Anonymous No.940080929
>>940080917
yes.
Anonymous No.940080953
>>940080896
He needs some kind of conditioning to bring his latent homosexuality to the surface
Then he wants a good ass fucking
Anonymous No.940080961 >>940081028
>>940080896
This crazy fuck had a meltdown on here a couple of years ago where he threatened to do just that. Then he disappeared for about 3 months. Assumption is he got a 90 day psych hold because of his online threats. He's been more careful with his threats of violence since.
Anonymous No.940080974 >>940081083
>>940080664
oh man these liberals passing out hats. it's crazy.
Anonymous No.940080983 >>940081050
>>940080922
No, I'm just familiar with your crazy MO.
Anonymous No.940081028 >>940081044
>>940080961
Log fag literally same fagging his own cringe as usual

Doesn't it seem odd that it appears to just be one or two posters and you pretending to be about five in here?

Almost like you can't make your fucking retarded right wing shit stick lol
Anonymous No.940081037 >>940081107
>>940080866
statutory authority does not equate constitutional authority. yes, congress can “create” an agency, but it can’t create an exception to the first amendment. the supreme court has already said that government threats or “informal pressure” on speech are still unconstitutional (again precedent: Bantam Books v. Sullivan, 1963). the FCC can police frequencies and technical standards, true, but once they start leaning on content because it’s politically inconvenient, they’ve crossed into state censorship. this is simple. and yeah, I’m glad Kimmel’s off the air (Charlie Kirk > late-night smug) but principle still matters. we should lean on the constitution to limit the reach of government no matter which side is doing the overreach.
Anonymous No.940081044 >>940081077
>>940081028
>Called it
Anonymous No.940081050 >>940081155
>>940080983
What would that be? Making you upset?
I can't be the only one it's so fucking easy
Anonymous No.940081077 >>940081152
>>940081044
Called what? More like you got called. Every one of these stupid retarded threads are yours because you're fat stupid and you suck Trump's cock
Anonymous No.940081083 >>940081142
>>940080974
Calm down retard. It's clear your sarcasm detector is completely bunk.
Anonymous No.940081107 >>940081120 >>940081220
>>940081037
Kimmel violated their rules regarding lying about a crime with the intent of deceiving the public. Notifying ABC of their violation of the regulations is well within their statutory authority.
Anonymous No.940081120 >>940081186
>>940081107
No he didn't Trump shit shut up
Anonymous No.940081142 >>940081206
>>940081083
Is it just sarcasm?
Anonymous No.940081152 >>940081217
>>940081077
You only go into this logfag shtick when you know you've lost the argument and just want to derail the thread.
It's a clear indication that in your own estimation, you've lost.
So I accept your concession.
Anonymous No.940081155 >>940081235
>>940081050
It's because you're retarded.
Anonymous No.940081186 >>940081255
>>940081120
Bro I think your one and only neuron has blown.
Anonymous No.940081206 >>940081246 >>940081266
>>940081142
What else could it be?
Anonymous No.940081217 >>940081288
>>940081152
You're clearly fallen into a k-hole over this
so I'll continue discussing the topic

Actually the fact that your side has to lie so much suggest that perhaps there was some sort of election fraud during 2024

Because you retards really shouldn't of been re-elected hahahaha
Anonymous No.940081220 >>940081338
>>940081107
stop and think of how you would look at this if the tables were turned. please apply critical thinking and disengage from the emotion. if it’s really about “lying with intent to deceive,” then prosecute under existing law (fraud, defamation, incitement, whatever you think applies). that’s called due process and is our american way of legal life. what you can’t do is have unelected bureaucrats jawbone a network into compliance under vague “rules,” because that turns the FCC into a ministry of truth. is that what you want? statutory regs don’t override the first amendment, my man. Kimmel was ass, but cheering government censorship sets the precedent that tomorrow it could be your guy they silence. Principle > convenience.
Anonymous No.940081235 >>940081272
>>940081155
Retards keep making these threads about Charlie shit hole. So he got shot.
Tragic. Let's finally regulate firearms properly
Anonymous No.940081246 >>940081292
>>940081206
Crazy guy here isn't very bright. It never occurred to him that it was just a rehash of the "Antifa is only an idea" bullshit.
Anonymous No.940081255
>>940081186
He didn't do anything you're talking about boomer, you're not exactly one to lecture others about blown neurons
Anonymous No.940081266 >>940081317
>>940081206
Not the first time MAGA has been trying to act like they're akin to a leaderless organization and not a group.
Anonymous No.940081272 >>940081311 >>940081516
>>940081235
>Someone got shot
>Therefore we need to BAN ALL GUNS!
No.
Anonymous No.940081288 >>940081347
>>940081217
In 2024? So you're claiming Trump didn't win?
Anonymous No.940081292 >>940081377
>>940081246
>sameyfag isnt very subtle

Funny how your side has to talk to imaginary "allies" since you don't have any
Anonymous No.940081311 >>940081419
>>940081272
It might take banning a lot of weapons to keep guns from getting into the hands of a person like Robinson yeah
Otherwise enjoy your next chud getting shot
Anonymous No.940081317 >>940081358
>>940081266
Not the first time that you're such an idiot you completely miss obvious satire.
Anonymous No.940081338 >>940081592
>>940081220
DUDE... LIKE... IMAGE IF THE SHOE WAS ON THE OTHER FOOT!!!
Anonymous No.940081347
>>940081288
I'm saying something fucked up happened, because if you're so fucking awesome, then why do you have to lie about everything?
Why are Trump's numbers so low?
Anonymous No.940081358 >>940081402 >>940081446
>>940081317
It's almost as if you've never heard of Poe's law, or the fact that MAGA lies about a lot.
Anonymous No.940081377 >>940081455
>>940081292
I do love how emotionally worked up you get when you get BTFOed.
I mean, there is no clearer an indication that you know you've lost the argument. You don't have these emotional outbursts when you think you're winning, do you?
Anonymous No.940081402
>>940081358
Republicans typically exhibit textbook R-Complex behavior
Anonymous No.940081419 >>940081473
>>940081311
Not how things work.
Anonymous No.940081446 >>940081550
>>940081358
I've not only heard of Poe's law. I was active on the forum when "Nathan Poe" first proposed it many years ago. It was on the evolution debate sub forum on Christian Forums, which I used to frequent when I was in grad school.
Anonymous No.940081455 >>940081485 >>940081502
>>940081377
Except you're literally acting like Trump when he loses an argument
Your orange God tried to weaponIze the FCC. This is an impeachable offense
Anonymous No.940081473 >>940081554
>>940081419
That I guess you want a lot more dumb shits shot on stage. Because you clearly don't want to solve the problem
Anonymous No.940081485 >>940081522
>>940081455
>impeach
lol
Anonymous No.940081502 >>940081569
>>940081455
I've already accepted your concession. As I said, you don't have these emotional outbursts when you think you're winning. Log off and go touch grass.
Continuing to work yourself up emotionally isn't good for you.
Anonymous No.940081516 >>940081574
>>940081272
>A leftist shot someone
>Therefore we must ban all leftists
No.
Anonymous No.940081522
>>940081485
Of course you don't agree
How dare we question Dear Leader?
Anonymous No.940081550 >>940081625
>>940081446
well gee. then I guess you have it all figured out why someone would mistake satire for the generic MAGA retardation.
Anonymous No.940081554 >>940081606
>>940081473
>Banning guns works
What's next? Knives?
Banning both has completely FAILED in the UK. Criminals still have both.
Fuckwit.
Anonymous No.940081569 >>940081684
>>940081502
> I've already posted other log faggy cringe speak
It's almost like some of your brain cells are fused and can only form certain words and expressions
Anonymous No.940081574 >>940081668
>>940081516
>>A leftist shot someone
>>Therefore we must kill* all leftists
Yes.
Anonymous No.940081586 >>940081623
>>940071877
>being intellectually dishonest
>wants collective punishment for people that don't agree with him
lmao
Anonymous No.940081592 >>940081846
>>940081338
yeah exactly, that’s my whole point. you don’t write laws and build precedent for “our guy vs. their guy.” once the gov gets the green light to jawbone speech it doesn’t like, the shoe will be on the other foot. I’m glad Kimmel’s gone, but I’d rather win in a free arena than hand Washington the power to pick who speaks.
Anonymous No.940081606 >>940081875
>>940081554
Don't make it come to that because fuck yeah I'd ban knives if they were a problem

See, your side doesn't even see this as a problem you think "the left" is a problem because Kirk got shot
You're stupid power hungry retards
Anonymous No.940081623 >>940081655
>>940081586
also, i respond to bait in /b/ to start flame wars because they're funny here.
Anonymous No.940081625 >>940081719
>>940081550
Except it was OBVIOUS that it was a play on the leftist bullshit that "Antifa is only an idea."
I used the exact same fucking wording, you retard.
Anonymous No.940081655 >>940081706
>>940081623
Until your little pet right wing thing gets attacked. What is it so I can trigger you?
Anonymous No.940081668 >>940081915
>>940081574
The party of non-violence strikes again
Anonymous No.940081684 >>940081899
>>940081569
kek. It is entertaining, though, when you have these emotional outbursts and just get more and more worked up and can't calm yourself down. Like a tired toddler in the midst of a sugar crash.
Anonymous No.940081706
>>940081655
i don't like rightoids. just don't attack people irl tho.
Anonymous No.940081719 >>940081790
>>940081625
oh okay, so it was actual MAGA retardation. Thanks for admitting it.
Anonymous No.940081790 >>940081821
>>940081719
I sometimes forget how unbelievably stupid you are.
Thanks for the reminder.
Anonymous No.940081821
>>940081790
Can you try not drooling while typing. It's pretty distracting.
Anonymous No.940081846 >>940081984
>>940081592
Are you ignorant of the fact that they did exactly that to their opposition? That's the problem. Until they work to remedy things, it isn't going to change. We will have to counter each of their actions at minimum equally.
Anonymous No.940081875 >>940081977
>>940081606
The power hungry ones are the ones who want to take away peoples property: Guns and knives... maybe cars as well... because they can be dangerous weapons.
Anonymous No.940081899 >>940082003
>>940081684
Can’t make a counter argument besides repeating “Emotional outburst LOL” over an over. Quite entertaining, especially considering how you think of yourself as the winner of that interaction.

Please feel free to respond to this comment by ignoring my argument and saying that I’m experiencing an emotional outburst.
Anonymous No.940081915
>>940081668
Keep pressing the line.
Anonymous No.940081977 >>940082143
>>940081875
Nope you're still making excuses because you don't want responsible regulation for anything, because your side literally thinks like children.
Look at Trump FFS
Anonymous No.940081984
>>940081846
I am not ignorant of this. I get the frustration but handing the state a censorship hammer because “they did it first” just guarantees everyone gets crushed in the end. the constitution isn’t a team jersey it’s supposed to be the rules of the game for both sides. if we abandon principle and say “ok, our turn to censor,” then we’ve conceded the whole fight. the remedy isn’t to copy their abuses, it’s to strip government of the power to abuse in the first place for fucks sake! otherwise we’re just cheering for a bigger boot on everyone’s neck.
Anonymous No.940082003 >>940082091 >>940082196
>>940081899
The best part is that you try to use arguments back at people and you just reveal that they really hit you hard.
Like, no we know that the "emotional outburst" part REALLY gets you worked up.
The fun part, you're so dumb, you don't even realize how much you reveal about yourself.
Anonymous No.940082091 >>940082182
>>940082003
You're literally some kind of average intelligence right winger who thinks your Dunning Krueger level understanding of patterns isnt cringe as fuck to watch
Anonymous No.940082143 >>940082251
>>940081977
I fully support impartial, "responsible" regulation.
Anonymous No.940082182 >>940082451
>>940082091
>Dunning Krueger
Here we go! I've seen you try this same thing before about a dozen times. The funny part is that you don't actually even know what it means. It's just something someone beat you up with one time, and it made you really sad, so you try it over and over.
Anonymous No.940082196 >>940082221
>>940082003
What? I’m not even the original person you replied to. I just interjected because it was curious how you never counter-argued and instead just attacked the person directly by using the same line over and over. I guess that’s what’s considered a “discussion” on your side of the aisle?
Anonymous No.940082221
>>940082196
And......here goes the samefagging!
kek. It's like you have scripts set up and just follow them regardless of what's said.
Anonymous No.940082251 >>940082299 >>940082361
>>940082143
No you don't. Your side blocks all attempts.
Anonymous No.940082299 >>940082513
>>940082251
>Inflexible thinking, loose association
You might look up with mental illness diagnosis those things are associated with. But I'm sure you already know from your care team.
Anonymous No.940082361 >>940082540
>>940082251
>Your side
Each side has bounds of what they consider responsible or impartial however it is clear that one side has taken things way too far.
Anonymous No.940082451 >>940082509
>>940082182
You keep proving it actually. You literally think your ignorant take on things is some sort of expert level peer reviewed conclusion. Like your other failed memes, it's incredibly painful to watch, especially when you double down and escalate like you're doing now
Anonymous No.940082509 >>940082579
>>940082451
kek. Then why did you stop your "logfag" scree after I pointed out how it made it obvious you've lost the argument in your own estimation?
Anonymous No.940082513 >>940082583
>>940082299
It's actually called facts. My side tries to initiate attemps at regulation
your side opposes it
You're literally acting like a Nazi trying to make your opposition appear mentally ill like they did
Anonymous No.940082540
>>940082361
The people did not vote for this. It's up to us to stop it
Anonymous No.940082579 >>940082625
>>940082509
The fact you think you've won this exchange is further demonstration of your DKS
Anonymous No.940082583 >>940082661
>>940082513
Come on, guy. We both know you're mentally ill. Stop playing for the audience. You're crazy and you spend your every waking moment doing this shit, and that is literally insane.
Who are you trying to fool? Us or yourself?
Anonymous No.940082625 >>940082712
>>940082579
I made no claims to that effect. I said it was obvious that YOU think so, because of your emotional outburst and use of the logfag script. Which you only do in such a situation.
Anonymous No.940082634
“once replies shift to insults and buzzwords, that usually means the argument’s empty. i’ve said it already: glad kimmel’s gone, but government jawboning isn’t something to cheer. free speech limits on state action apply no matter who’s in power. the court has been clear on that since bantam books and reaffirmed in nra v. vullo. facts don’t vanish just because people get loud.”
Anonymous No.940082661 >>940082694
>>940082583
Who's "we"first of all. Secondly, why are you such a fucking pussy? I don't think I've ever gotten an answer.
Anonymous No.940082694 >>940082735 >>940082779
>>940082661
>“once replies shift to insults and buzzwords, that usually means the argument’s empty
Anonymous No.940082712 >>940082748 >>940082841
>>940082625
You're clearly getting upset because you're really convincing anyone you're the expert texpert you think you are.
Also Trump tried to Weaponize the FCC against Jimmy Kimmel
And this is hardly his last attempt
Anonymous No.940082735 >>940082776
>>940082694
You're no debater lol.
Anonymous No.940082748 >>940082818
>>940082712
>upset
Man, that one really chapped your nads, didn't it?
Anonymous No.940082776 >>940082839
>>940082735
>debater
As did that one, kek
Anonymous No.940082779 >>940082822
>>940082694
You still won't tell me why you get so upset when somebody figures out this is one of your threads. I thought you were awesome I thought you were knowledgeable I thought you were in the right about Trump being right and Jimmy Kimmel being wrong
Why do you act like such a manlet?
Anonymous No.940082818
>>940082748
Everybody should be upset that Donald Trump put pressure on a private network to fire somebody who said something that upset his little boy fee fees chud
These people are called adults
Anonymous No.940082822 >>940082877
>>940082779
Aaaaaand.....back to the logfag script.
Anonymous No.940082839 >>940082893
>>940082776
Yeah but clearly you're upset that it's been pointed out to you that you have zero debate skills we could keep going over your projections
Anonymous No.940082841 >>940082902
>>940082712
Drumpf!!111 Nevermind the fact, not fiction Kimm lost Disney 3.8B and his viewership is literally less than 1 million. In 2023 4 in 10 houses had cable tv and hes not even getting half that
Anonymous No.940082877
>>940082822
We haven't left that one. You literally appeared to have a microcosm of perhaps 20 words and phrases that you compulsively tend to use in these stupid threads. Still not seeing any variation
Anonymous No.940082893 >>940082924
>>940082839
Your fingers are literally trembling with that hot anger in the pit of your stomach as you try to type, aren't they?
Anonymous No.940082902 >>940082930
>>940082841
More like you're a fucking pussy who can't admit that ABC caved to Trump
I thought that was Trump being awesome
I thought that was Trump doing the will of the people
Why do you have to lie Trump shit?
Anonymous No.940082924 >>940082997
>>940082893
OK that was pronouncably cringe lol
Anonymous No.940082930 >>940082990
>>940082902
Take your meds, schizo
Anonymous No.940082949 >>940083069
Muh abc, muh. Disney stock TANKED just days ago muh drumpf. Shareholders know moar than you do
Anonymous No.940082990
>>940082930
Yeah one can literally count your vocabulary on two hands
Anonymous No.940082997 >>940083030 >>940083074
>>940082924
>pronouncably
As opposed to unpronounceable cringe?
You just drive home with every post how utterly retarded you are.
Anonymous No.940083030
>>940082997
If I were retarded I'd make thread after thread about Jimmy Kimmel and Charlie fag
Anonymous No.940083069 >>940083091
>>940082949
Good. Fuck those woke retards at Disney. They ruined Star Wars.
Trump getting liberals to boycott a woke corporation like Disney is fucking hilarious.
Anonymous No.940083074 >>940083118 >>940083140 >>940083146
>>940082997
Trump needs to be impeached for weaponizing the FCC against Jimmy Kimmel
Anonymous No.940083091 >>940083117
>>940083069
Um if they were woke they would let Kimmel keep his job. See, You Trump shits are so unbelievably stupid
Anonymous No.940083117 >>940083147
>>940083091
OK, go boycott Disney now
kek
Anonymous No.940083118 >>940083146
>>940083074
Absolutely
Anonymous No.940083140 >>940083188
>>940083074
Once Obama and Biden do for using the DOJ and IRS -lois lerner, until then. Neh
Anonymous No.940083146 >>940083208
>>940083074
>>940083118
Samefaggory. Kek
Anonymous No.940083147 >>940083228
>>940083117
They're gonna implode financially with or without me
And I already don't buy any Disney shit
Anonymous No.940083188
>>940083140
They're not president and you don't have any case against them
Anonymous No.940083208 >>940083276
>>940083146
Top post actually. If anything it's probably you pretending to be somebody else because your thread sucks shit and you need placeholders
Anonymous No.940083228 >>940083248
>>940083147
Good. Fuck 'em. The retards managed to tank some of the most valuable IP in history by sucking off the wokies for a decade, and now they find out that the left doesn't give the slightest fuck.
Let them be a cautionary tale for future business and marketing classes.
Anonymous No.940083248
>>940083228
Yeah whatever you'll still buy their dolls shut up
Anonymous No.940083276 >>940083343
>>940083208
I do love how you always unintentionally reveal your stratagems and tactics.
Dunning Kruger in full effect.
Anonymous No.940083343 >>940083443
>>940083276
Yeah no you're the retard trying to pass yourself off as some kind of political science professor there Dr. Krueger

You also have some kind of aberration where when cornered you simply repeat whatever is being beaten over your head. This is why you're most likely a bottom and want a dick up your ass
Anonymous No.940083443 >>940083520
>>940083343
>when cornered you simply repeat whatever is being beaten over your head.
Keeeeeeeeek
Anonymous No.940083520 >>940083587
>>940083443
You're the one repeating things Trump shit.
You're the biggest fucking pussy. Like your hero Donald Trump you can't take any criticism
Fortunately unlike him you can't do anything about it
Anonymous No.940083576
The log fag reaches for his shit covered black dildo
Anonymous No.940083587 >>940083612 >>940083656
>>940083520
God, this is hilarious. I literally point out this is one of your tactics. Mocked you in several posts about it. Then obviously did the same thing you've been doing, and now you're trying to call me out for it, and you're so dumb, you're not realizing what's happening.
Too funny.
Anonymous No.940083612 >>940083647
>>940083587
textbook DKS/sociopathy
Anonymous No.940083647 >>940083677
>>940083612
My work here is done.
Anonymous No.940083656
>>940083587
No you literally started slipping into a K hole when your Dunning Kruger syndrome Tennessees got called out, and you've literally been sperging & spinning out
Anonymous No.940083677
>>940083647
Are you sure? Does that mean you don't have to post another 12 to 15 retarded threads about how you suck Trump's cock?
Because I think you do
Anonymous No.940083722 >>940083807
I’m a Charlie Kirk fan and glad Kimmel’s gone. that doesn’t mean I celebrate government jawboning. if you want fewer “woke” networks, vote, market, and sue. don’t hand unelected bureaucrats a censorship hammer. principle > convenience. we win by arguing better, not by arming the state to silence the other side.

good luck out there either way, boys
Anonymous No.940083807 >>940083833 >>940084001
>>940083722
im a leftist and opposed to many of Kirk’s opinions but this is a very based take and you are a rational and reflected person
Anonymous No.940083833 >>940084001
>>940083807
The left are by definition unable to be reasoned with.

Kill all leftists.
Anonymous No.940084001 >>940084411
>>940083807
>>940083833
> I'm a same fag &
Anonymous No.940084411
>>940084001
Whatever you say friend