Thread 941012231

>we will accept 600k international chinese students to american universities
>we will sell the most advanced nvidia gpu's to china that were previously banned for national security reasons
>we'll provide a 20billion bailout for argentina's financial crisis while china buys all argentina's soybeans instead of american, then we'll bailout american farmers
>we'll pay anywhere from 15-40% more for all products from china at any given time
we're winning so bad

china also gets to keep tiktok algorithm in the deal so really they're still very happy about that

>>941012231 (OP)
Plus, China is limiting its exports of rare earth elements to us.

>>941012814
which means trump has to turn around bend over and give them even more stuff lmao

>>941012231 (OP)
Here was your chance. But it got subverted, (((somehow))).

>>941013946
implying corporations embracing gay was meant to subvert ???? gayness was already coming around to be accepted in 2008, sure it was more common place to make fun of gays or denigrate them but there were so many openly gay people by 2010 it was already accepted mostly.

the reason occupy wall street failed was because it was too many cooks in the kitchen. originally it was tax the 1% but then climate activists and gayass tea party/anarchists joined the cause etc. if occupy wallstreet happened today they would just have chatgpt come up with a quick list of bullet points to demand whereas back then there wasn't even 1 coherent voice in the occupy wallstreet movement.

also we're not looking for some reset or the global orders. i was happy with biden presidency, US was in a respectable place, he was about to start withholding funds from israel, no major changes in policy that effect my job security, no awful global headlines. joe times were good quiet times
>>941013975
i think since 2012 republicans have repeatedly vetoed a bill that would not allow for outside anonymous money be donated to political campaigns or pacs. just seems very fishy

>>941016597
What subverted Occupy Wall Street was IDpol.

>repeatedly vetoed a bill that would not allow for outside anonymous money be donated

None of them are going to vote to kill their golden goose.