>>941379593
>Reading comprehension
It wasn't my comprehension that led to that. It was a logical exercise.
You wouldn't say things you don't believe, right? It's a pretty common characteristic of human bias, which is generally unconscious. So you have to at least somewhat agree with the narrative you're repeating; "The terms Nazi, fascist, and racist used to actually mean something, now they just make people roll their eyes."
I think that those terms refer to the Virginia Young Republicans, Arizona Young Republicans, and JD Vance who couldn't denounce the things in the texts.
Those are accurate assessments, trying to have a cool Hitler aesthetic, gassing your own voters for having doubts, racist remarks and regular use of the N word, and camps, are all hallmarks of those things.
So I question when we are supposed to use the terms, if you can't call out actual impending Fascism, like Kamala (CORRECTLY) did, then when can you use the words?
Can you only call out Fascism if it's a black dude signing a health bill?
