Thread 941522842

If a society could create perfect synthetic women, what unique value does an organic woman have other than ova production?

>>941522842 (OP)
Shit, what value do men have NOW?! We don't even have Gynoids and Androids.

>>941522842 (OP)
if society could build the perfect shitposter, why would we need op?

>>941522877
Value? The same as always. They’re the ones fighting your wars, building your homes, fixing your power when it goes out, driving your food across the country, and dying first when anything breaks. You’re living in a world stitched together by men you don’t even notice, until something stops working.

>>941523650
Traditionally women are there to be supportive, helpful, and add beauty and joy to their surroundings. Women are there to make things better.
Men are there to chase away the problems and do the unpleasant things that need done. Men are there to keep things from getting worse.
Its not as if the roles of either can't be replaced by sufficiently advanced robots.
After you remove their roles any unique value would likely be tied to their personality and the appeal of their body but again this can be mimicked by sufficiently advanced robots.

>>941527770
So...Ova production then?

>>941529543
I mean those sufficiently advanced robots aren't going to be cheap. Even poorfags can get pussy with some charm so I don't see women being totally obsolete unless we abandon the capitalist model

I've never tried to have an intimate relationship with a chat bot. I know some people go off the deep end with that, but I have used chatgpt and it doesnt have shit on the mental back and forth you can have with a real woman. I guess I would have to see something able to pass the turing test with my own eyes to be able to make a judgement.

>>941522842 (OP)
Companionship I guess, but a sufficiently advanced AI could probably get you most of the way there.

>>941529543
I hear ova cells can be made using stem cells but the kinks have yet to be ironed out. Sooo odds are robots could do it at some point. We already have artificial wombs.
>>941529778
Also this.

>>941529778
First gen models will be but by Gen 5 it will be much more affordable and socially acceptable.

>>941529979
The only issue I would have with that is that 5000 years down the road we have to deal with some kind of Tzeetch-ian gene mutation from literal thousands of years doing it this way or some kind of unforseen outcome of having pod babies