>>941597420
>doesn't have an actual response so it argues the validity of labor and how I spend my free time
Someone is paying money/resources to have a thing made. Company says we can make those. I do one of the steps and company gives me some of the resources.
Ultimately, company needed help making thing, I smack it with a hammer for a few hours, and then I get paid or I rightfully sue them.
Wages should be higher, for sure. And anti-homeless architecture is a waste of my tax money because it doesn't solve anything for anyone trying to not be homeless. None of this really has to do with your broader idealism and shit understanding of the relationship between labor and resources.
Food and carpentry are some of the few industries where the actual labor can be considered more "pure" because it directly pertains to food and shelter.
I myself work with circuit boards, so you can say it's less of a pure labor in this sense, but ultimately someone paid to have a thing done, and I'm good at thing in general, which I exchange for trading resources which translates to most other resources instead of a limited amount like in bartering.
Do you need any more handholding?
