>>941622780
Fictional depictions of virtual characters who appear to be children are protected under the 1st Amendment of the United States. It went to the Supreme Court in 2002, in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition.
The case found that an act passed in 1996, which criminalized even loli/shota artwork, was in violation of the 1st Amendment due to how its wording would cause already world-famous works of art and literature illegal by our own law, as sexual activity between two consenting teenagers is an immutable truth about society, and has been a theme through art and literature throughout the ages. (e.x. Romeo and Juliet both in its original form and the film, American Beauty, and Traffic)
You want it to be about trans people so badly that you can't even do the research to figure out why it's legal, or realize that most of the people posting in loli/shota threads are straight dudes who want to diddle littles.
