>>941943151
>You seem to be advocating for a trial without any evidence
what? where did I suggest there's no evidence?
trials have discovery, and evidence
if there's no evidence there wouldn't be any indictment from a grand jury and the defense lawyers could have the case tossed with no merit, that's how that works
>You don't see the irony there?
no, I don't see what's ironic about calling for a trial
or would you rather we just put people directly in prison without the trial instead?