Thread 941953984

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION ON THE USA INTERNET IS DEAD. THERE IS MORE FREEDOM FOR USERS ONLINE IN RUSSIA!

t. fuck censorship and weird "groups" censoring others not allowing them to freely express themselves. the supressiion is unreal and the end of the usa freedom of internet.

want true internet freedom? move to russia and use russian internet services. end of story
>vid may or may not related

>pic related
this would get you prison time if this was a pokimane in 2025

>pic related
this would get you prison time if this was a pokimane in 2025.

kek

>>941953984 (OP)
>>941953990
>>941954023
The correct analytical framework is the centuries-old tradition of defiling a public effigy. This is a recognized form of symbolic, often political, speech directed not at a private individual to cause fear, but at a public symbol to communicate a message to a public audience. The act of burning a politician in effigy is protected not because it is polite, but because its meaning is understood as symbolic condemnation, not a credible threat of arson or murder. Its purpose is to express an idea—be it contempt, opposition, or in this case, a form of grotesque commentary on the nature of celebrity worship.

The First Amendment protects artistic expression, even when it is crude, offensive, and uses shocking materials to convey a message. While a tribute may be viscerally unsettling, it should be analyzed as a form of transformative parody or social commentary.


Allowing users to express themselves "in their own corner or domain" of the internet is harm reduction.

These users will have a place to express themselves and not have to express these urges or desires in person or on 'main stream' platforms

Are people like pic related a threat to USA citizen's first amendment right to freedom of expression online? Do their feelings come before the first amendment ?
>(second question)Yes. Their feelings most definitely come before your freedoms because they have money, lawyers, and connections.
> Haven’t you learned about the “wealth divide” in the USA? They say it’s the same for power.

Clearly labeled Parody content and transformative content isn't allowed in the USA if it involves a specific person from specific groups.

>these type of people have large sums of money to convince, "lobby", and otherwise skew public and law/legal opinion in the way that they choose using many methods and the available disposable funds and lawyers/goons that they have available to their large orgs/groups

>>941953984 (OP)
>The Supreme Court has affirmed that the First Amendment protects the right of private groups to associate and engage in expressive activities that define their identity and purpose. The "group of guys" is a voluntary, private association. The creation and sharing of tributes is the specific, unique form of expression that defines this group's subculture.
Valid thread
>CumOnPrintedPictures.COM
Brand new site from scratch - SEIZED


> they’re doing anything to demasculinization the population now a days … even stripping men of their fundamental freedoms of expression… and those freedoms are going to Russian owned ran and operated platforms.

>The traffic to replacement sites like bunkr simpcity and coomer is kinda insane.

Bro finally figured out their goal kek

>>941953984 (OP)
They probably have more money and connections and lawyers than you could ever dream of having or affording.

Haven’t you learned about the “wealth divide” in the USA? They say it’s the same for power.

These people and their orgs/groups have large sums of money to convince, "lobby", and otherwise skew public and law/legal opinion in the way that they want using multiple different methods utilizing their the gross amount of available disposable funds, connections, and lawyers/goons that they have available to their large groups/orgs

>>941953984 (OP)
>>941954094
"They are prioritizing the surface-level offense of the parody over the clearly stated context and intent of the platform."
"It’s a failure to understand genre and platform context. They are treating a work of satire like a news bulletin."
"They are too busy looking for something to criticize that they ignore the explicit rules of the sandbox they are playing in."
"They are fulfilling the prophecy: They are the fools the disclaimer warned us about."

>>941954023
>>pic related
>this would get you prison time if this was a pokimane in 2025
true
and harassed by [...] goons

Valid thread


Men’s right to express no longer exists online

>it's true
What's the point of living in 'muh free society' when Russian online users and services have more freedom than you?

Has the USA lost the concept of 'freedom of expression' especially online?

Allowing users to express themselves "in their own corner or domain" of the internet is harm reduction. These users will have a place to express themselves and not have to express these urges or desires in person or on 'main stream' platforms

Kill yourself and your family you porn addicted little faggot.

'these people', pic rel, have large sums of money to convince, "lobby", and otherwise skew public and law/legal opinion in the way that they choose using many methods and the available disposable funds and lawyers/goons that they have available to their large groups


Are people like pic related a threat to USA citizen's first amendment right to freedom of expression online? Do their feelings come before the first amendment ?
>(second question)Yes. Their feelings most definitely come before your freedoms because they have money, lawyers, and connections.
> Haven’t you learned about the “wealth divide” in the USA? They say it’s the same for power.

>>941954328
>Kill yourself and your family
Types of threats received based upon potential hostile forgien actors and potential takedown methods/attempts (including posting children)

A similar method was recently leaked by russian man on youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDfNXsbpSsU

>>941954328
>>941954445
Kek

Tribute Make You Mad?

>>941954445
>>941954508
Alr, just reported that video to yt mods. Just a matter of time till it's gone, you absolute scum. Get ready for jail and torture time.

>>941954860
>typical anti tribute goon from potential from […]


Providing users their own domain/space/corner to express themselves online is harm reduction.

>that reply is one reason why

>>941953984 (OP)
It’s the erosion of true American freedom. The first amendment is no longer what you grown up learning about.

Even if you participate on your own domain on your own corner of the internet, wealthy public figures can suppress you.

Even if they aren’t born in the USA.

>>941955298
>>941953990
Kek I was wondering why A.I. was so biased against tributes

>>941954094
Valid pic

>>941955298
> Even if they aren’t born in the USA.
And thus fundamentally don’t understand the true meaning of USA 1st amendment freedom of expression

They just spend and spend and spend and curate groups/“goons” to spread hate and censor.

>>941954205
If all else fails, just call the enemy a “Pedo”.

even Elon Musk knows this.
>kek

>>941955447
> If all else fails, just call the enemy a “Pedo”.

>even Elon Musk knows this.


Explains a lot.

>the absolute state of freedom in the USA

LOL

>>941955182
REAL

if you’re reading this and live in the USA don’t bother trying to create your own user generated content platform

Foreign nationals will brigade and collude with law enforcement to destroy your rights, your life, and purposefully make you homeless.

>over protected speech
>just accuse the other of “pedo”
>have goons […] while public opinion posts echoing that same claim are littered throughout social media

It’s the American dream!
>thanks USA!

>>941954066
Kek imagine some hostile actor born in Morocco spends her wealth suppressing and harassing USA citizens expressing their first amendment online

>thats just modern USA
>without money or connections no one stands up for your rights

>>941953984 (OP)
>THERE IS MORE FREEDOM FOR USERS ONLINE IN RUSSIA!
lol, lmao even
Also shut up and move to Russia then.

"NOOO. YOU CANT CUM ON A PICTURE OF THIS PUBLIC FIGURE WHO WASNT EVEN BORN IN THE USA AND FUNDAMENTALLY WONT
UNDERSTAND THE FIRST
AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EXPRESSION”

>the absolute state of freedom in the U.S.A.

>>941956215
>bro doesn’t know about simpcity, coomer, or bunkr

Kek

>>941956168
>if you’re reading this and live in the USA don’t bother trying to create your own user generated content platform

>Foreign nationals will brigade and collude with law enforcement to destroy your rights, your life, and purposefully make you homeless.


RT

>>941955298
> wealthy public figures WILL suppress you.

FIXED THAT FOR YOU

>>941956274
I don't give a shit because did you notice we're on 4chan? Almost anything flies here. Those look like some wanker sites. If I wanna wank I come to 4chan, not some Russia hosted shitholes

>>941956370
Newly leaked Discord exploit using same method slightly modified.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=86LnUk2Dk50

>>941956479
>everyone who wants to wank wants to use racist filled 4chan with text like “nigger” filled posts

No thanks.

Free country online that allows you to express yourself that won’t cave to wealthy lawyers and takedown methods that utilize children pics

Allowing users to express themselves "in their own corner or domain" of the internet is harm reduction.

These users will have a place to express themselves and not have to express these urges or desires in person or on 'main stream' platforms.

>>941956566
Why are you on this site if you're touchy about that?

>>941956689
>Allowing users to express themselves "in their own corner or domain" of the internet is harm reduction.

>These users will have a place to express themselves and not have to express these urges or desires in person or on 'main stream' platforms.

Instead the USA and their collusion partners want to suppress these men from their own first amendment rights under the guise of […]

Freedom is dead in the United States.
Especially on the internet.

Tributes are not revenge porn.
Tributes are not NCP.

>>941956771
Bro this is literally *the final place* on the entire internet that people from the USA can freely express themselves without woke censorship or harassment(you will find that in tribute threads though)


FYI any and all corrupt private investigators and law partners will subpoena every post on 4chan for your IP if you’re posting even just public available pics of them like […]

>>941956845
>Freedom is dead in the United States.
>Especially on the internet.

RT

>>941956917
>posting even just public available pics of them

“them” = their clients
fyi

>it's true
What's the point of living in 'muh free society' when Russian online users and services have more freedom than you?

Has the USA lost the concept of 'freedom of expression' especially online?

Allowing users to express themselves "on their corner" of the internet is harm reduction. These users will have a place to express themselves and not have not express these urgers or desires in person or on 'main stream' platforms

>>941956917
So instead you're willingly giving your IP to Russians lmfao
You have more issues than just porn addiction if you must post a shit ton of photos of some slag

The act is a "tribute," stemming from a motive of admiration, not malice. NCP laws were originally designed to combat "revenge porn," where the primary intent is to harass, humiliate, or cause distress. Applying these laws to an act of perceived admiration is a misapplication of a statute designed to punish a different kind of harm.

>>941957275
>The act is a "tribute," stemming from a motive of admiration, not malice. NCP laws were originally designed to combat "revenge porn," where the primary intent is to harass, humiliate, or cause distress. Applying these laws to an act of perceived admiration is a misapplication of a statute designed to punish a different kind of harm.
The correct analytical framework is the centuries-old tradition of defiling a public effigy. This is a recognized form of symbolic, often political, speech directed not at a private individual to cause fear, but at a public symbol to communicate a message to a public audience. The act of burning a politician in effigy is protected not because it is polite, but because its meaning is understood as symbolic condemnation, not a credible threat of arson or murder. Its purpose is to express an idea—be it contempt, opposition, or in this case, a form of grotesque commentary on the nature of celebrity worship.

>>941957305
Valid posting.

>>941953984 (OP)
>>941957305
Thats when your wealthy goons gather to start spreading opinion throughout the ethos and within social circles that tributes are a hateful act and meant to degrade

They are literally called fucking "tributes".

>If all else fails, resort to calling the other person a pedo.

>>941953984 (OP) (OP)
>>941957305
Thats when your wealthy goons gather to start spreading opinion throughout the ether and within social circles that tributes are a hateful act and meant to degrade

They are literally called fucking "tributes".

>If all else fails, resort to calling the other person a pedo.

The First Amendment protects artistic expression, even when it is crude, offensive, and uses shocking materials to convey a message. While a tribute may be viscerally unsettling, it should be analyzed as a form of transformative parody or social commentary.


Allowing users to express themselves "in their own corner or domain" of the internet is harm reduction.

These users will have a place to express themselves and not have to express these urges or desires in person or on 'main stream' platforms

>>941957834
>>The act is a "tribute," stemming from a motive of admiration, not malice. NCP laws were originally designed to combat "revenge porn," where the primary intent is to harass, humiliate, or cause distress. Applying these laws to an act of perceived admiration is a misapplication of a statute designed to punish a different kind of harm.
>The correct analytical framework is the centuries-old tradition of defiling a public effigy. This is a recognized form of symbolic, often political, speech directed not at a private individual to cause fear, but at a public symbol to communicate a message to a public audience. The act of burning a politician in effigy is protected not because it is polite, but because its meaning is understood as symbolic condemnation, not a credible threat of arson or murder. Its purpose is to express an idea—be it contempt, opposition, or in this case, a form of grotesque commentary on the nature of celebrity worship.
>The act is a "tribute," stemming from a motive of admiration, not malice. NCP laws were originally designed to combat "revenge porn," where the primary intent is to harass, humiliate, or cause distress. Applying these laws to an act of perceived admiration is a misapplication of a statute designed to punish a different kind of harm.
The correct analytical framework is the centuries-old tradition of defiling a public effigy. This is a recognized form of symbolic, often political, speech directed not at a private individual to cause fear, but at a public symbol to communicate a message to a public audience. The act of burning a politician in effigy is protected not because it is polite, but because its meaning is understood as symbolic condemnation, not a credible threat of arson or murder. Its purpose is to express an idea—be it contempt, opposition, or in this case, a form of grotesque commentary on the nature of celebrity worship.

>>941957834
>Allowing users to express themselves "in their own corner or domain" of the internet is harm reduction.
>These users will have a place to express themselves and not have to express these urges or desires in person or on 'main stream' platforms

True

>>941957552
>They are literally called fucking "tributes".

They are literally fucking called "tributes".
Fixed

>>941953984 (OP) (OP) (OP)
>>941957305 (You)
Thats when your wealthy goons gather to start spreading opinion throughout the ether and within social circles that tributes are a hateful act and meant to degrade

They are literally fucking called "tributes".

>If all else fails, resort to calling the other person a pedo.

>>941954023
I lived through this. Corcoran school of art DC. NEA and Jesse Helms.

>>941954023
>this would get you prison time if this was a pokimane in 2025.
valid take

Masonic thread

>>941953984 (OP)
why the govt still harassing that homeless dude
Valid thread
>CumOnPrintedPictures.COM
Brand new site from scratch - SEIZED


> they’re doing anything to demasculinization the population now a days … even stripping men of their fundamental freedoms of expression… and those freedoms are going to Russian owned ran and operated platforms.

>>941958501
>> they’re doing anything to demasculinization the population now a days … even stripping men of their fundamental freedoms of expression
And allowing hostile actors to do so while changing [...] laws

>>941958525
>>941958501
>>941958057

>>941953984 (OP)
man the way a circumcised person jerks off is so pathetic looking

>>941954445
I figured all those spam postings during 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024 were much sinister than just “selling”.

There was way too much other bullshit involved.

>>941954094
Nah. they’re still harassing them even though they’re homeless and even tried deleting everything and starting from scratch.

They are evil, evil people who want to harm a tribute site owner.
It’s hella fucking weird and strange, us govt. involved.

Allowing users to express themselves "in their own corner or domain" of the internet is harm reduction.

These users will have a place to express themselves and not have to express these urges or desires in person or on 'main stream' platforms.

>>941953984 (OP)
Imagine making somebody homeless because they were not the poster of your talent's "content", but just the systems administrator

>imagine colluding with hostile foreign actors

USA IN 2025

>>941954066
>>941954023
>>941953990
>THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF FREEDOM IN 2025

Are people like pic related a threat to USA citizen's first amendment right to freedom of expression online? Do their feelings come before the first amendment ?
>(second question)Yes. Their feelings most definitely come before your freedoms because they have money, lawyers, and connections.
> Haven’t you learned about the “wealth divide” in the USA? They say it’s the same for power.

Clearly labeled Parody content and transformative content isn't allowed in the USA if it involves a specific person from specific groups.

>these type of people have large sums of money to convince, "lobby", and otherwise skew public and law/legal opinion in the way that they choose using many methods and the available disposable funds and lawyers/goons that they have available to their large orgs/groups

What’s the point of having a first amendment if anybody can get it taken from you with enough money, goons, connections, and lawyers?


>and literally make you permanently homeless

>>941960468
>>and literally make you permanently homeless

Pic related. This is you in the USA after trying to express yourself online.

Russia doesn't even have real elections lol you can say whatever the fuck you want on the internet but you have to not be a retard and have awareness is the thing

rt

>>941960537
>>941960468
>>941959733
a Beautiful image of true internet freedom

>>941960537
>Pic related. This is you in the USA after trying to express yourself online.
KEK
That's shockingly true.

>>941960623
>>941960537
I was going to ask what’s wrong with the people of the USA… purposely making their fellow citizens homeless.

Then I realized pokimane and […] […] are/may be foreign nationals who are potentially hostile towards USA citizens who enjoy exercising their first amendment and expressing themselves on the internet.

>The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
>Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

valid bump

>>941957363
more of her

wtf

>>941960537
deplatforming and mass reporting leads to homelessness and many many other issues

Who would have guessed

Kek

>>941955473
> If all else fails, just call the enemy a “Pedo”.

>even Elon Musk knows this.

KEK

>>941965019
imagine supporting such evil efforts.
>freedom in the USA in 2025
>don’t like something
>kill it
KEK

>>941954150
USA 1st amendment freedoms BTFO BY MOROCCO BORN WOMA

Fucking KEK

>>941954181
Destroying sites like these is just destroying the first amendment of the U.S.A.

>>941953984 (OP)
Women are so stupid they don't know this is worshipping them

FREEDOMMMM

>>941953984 (OP)
valid

>>941966760
bro be careful if that's the """wrong""" face on that screen inside the USA.........YOU WILL BE ARRESTED!

>>941956917
>harassment(you will find that in tribute threads though)
as in goons will harass you for posting tributes if they're a tribute of [...]

>>941967585
?

Allowing users to express themselves "in their own corner or domain" of the internet is harm reduction.

These users will have a place to express themselves and not have to express these urges or desires in person or on 'main stream' platforms

Valid thread.

>>941960537
>Pic related. This is you in the USA after trying to express yourself online.
kek
true

Due process and freedom of expression are dead in the United States.

'these people', pic rel, have large sums of money to convince, "lobby", and otherwise skew public and law/legal opinion in the way that they choose using many methods and the available disposable funds and lawyers/goons that they have available to their large groups


Are people like pic related a threat to USA citizen's first amendment right to freedom of expression online? Do their feelings come before the first amendment ?
>(second question)Yes. Their feelings most definitely come before your freedoms because they have money, lawyers, and connections.
> Haven’t you learned about the “wealth divide” in the USA? They say it’s the same for power.

>>941954094
Valid picture and file name.

The First Amendment protects artistic expression, even when it is crude, offensive, and uses shocking materials to convey a message. While a tribute may be viscerally unsettling, it should be analyzed as a form of transformative parody or social commentary.


Allowing users to express themselves "in their own corner or domain" of the internet is harm reduction.

These users will have a place to express themselves and not have to express these urges or desires in person or on 'main stream' platforms

>>941972068
The correct analytical framework is the centuries-old tradition of defiling a public effigy. This is a recognized form of symbolic, often political, speech directed not at a private individual to cause fear, but at a public symbol to communicate a message to a public audience. The act of burning a politician in effigy is protected not because it is polite, but because its meaning is understood as symbolic condemnation, not a credible threat of arson or murder. Its purpose is to express an idea—be it contempt, opposition, or in this case, a form of grotesque commentary on the nature of celebrity worship.

The act is a "tribute," stemming from a motive of admiration, not malice. NCP laws were originally designed to combat "revenge porn," where the primary intent is to harass, humiliate, or cause distress. Applying these laws to an act of perceived admiration is a misapplication of a statute designed to punish a different kind of harm.

>>941954181
KEK

>>941953990
Valid A.i. bias

Think you can keep up with someone as fiery as me?
.

>>941976322
>Think you can keep up with someone as fiery as me?
Yes your snap isnt working?

>>941954023
fr