Anonymous
11/2/2025, 9:16:59 AM
No.942007884
[Report]
>>942008030
>>942008210
>>942009653
>>942013233
>>942016270
>>942017808
>>942018213
>>942018612
>>942020906
>>942021069
>>942021152
>>942023311
>>942023414
>>942024150
>>942028511
The popular public sentiment concerning trannies is a very "if you're not with us, you're against us" type mentality. If you don't unquestionably support LGBT people, you're the enemy. I've tried to respectfully raise a point, but I've been shut down and called the enemy as well. First they wanted tolerance, now they demand acceptance.
My "controversial" stance on the matter concerning trans people: Nobody should be coerced or made to approve or accept an identity they don't agree with.
Let's imagine the perspective of a man named Joe: Joe does not agree with the whole trans thing, he won't even use a person's preferred pronouns. He is principled and won't budge. However, in spite of his refusal to accept identity changes, he does not wish harm, persecution or abuse on trans people. Joe just wants to live his life and live his truth.
According to trans people, however, Joe's tolerance is not enough. He deserves to be fired from his job and punished because he's still bigoted by their definition.
My "controversial" stance on the matter concerning trans people: Nobody should be coerced or made to approve or accept an identity they don't agree with.
Let's imagine the perspective of a man named Joe: Joe does not agree with the whole trans thing, he won't even use a person's preferred pronouns. He is principled and won't budge. However, in spite of his refusal to accept identity changes, he does not wish harm, persecution or abuse on trans people. Joe just wants to live his life and live his truth.
According to trans people, however, Joe's tolerance is not enough. He deserves to be fired from his job and punished because he's still bigoted by their definition.