>>942077704 >I actually made this art so it's automatically better than AI art. I don't have to improve my skills because I'm in an echo chamber that will tell me my art is good
>>942079763
because the moneyboys want to use it to destroy us and themselves they are insane
ai evolving alongside normal human beings would be alright
ai niggers are not normal human beings though
1%ers want a genie in a bottle, a captured satan who can answer their insipid questions and replace human beings as far as they understand other people
>>942077522 (OP)
imagine being so upset about antiAI people you dig through days old posts with no likes and no engagement as evidence that AI haters are bad.
Bro also didn't need to destroy his local envrionment for a shitty data center to make that either.
its so amusing going to the aco threads and looking at the ones that say no Ai...its all shit that looks like it was drawn by a down syndrome 10 year old. like I honestly cannot fathom how they can get hard to that slop. there's no "soul", just poorly drawn shit 99% of the time.
>>942077522 (OP)
Because using a search engine and picking the best result from other people's work doesn't qualify you as an artist, so you technically aren't a worse artist than them.