← Home ← Back to /b/

Thread 942096375

47 posts 64 images /b/
Anonymous No.942096375 [Report] >>942096378 >>942099447
old school xray thread
pic related
Anonymous No.942096378 [Report] >>942096385
>>942096375 (OP)
Anonymous No.942096385 [Report] >>942096394
>>942096378
Anonymous No.942096394 [Report] >>942096444
>>942096385
Anonymous No.942096444 [Report] >>942096527
>>942096394
Anonymous No.942096527 [Report]
>>942096444
Anonymous No.942097039 [Report]
Anonymous No.942098274 [Report] >>942098293
Before
Anonymous No.942098293 [Report] >>942101421
>>942098274
After
(OC, btw)
Anonymous No.942098349 [Report]
Before 2
Anonymous No.942098367 [Report]
After 2
Anonymous No.942098395 [Report]
Before 3
Anonymous No.942098424 [Report]
After 3
Anonymous No.942098442 [Report]
Final Jen before
Anonymous No.942098471 [Report]
And a final Jen after.

All the last four sets done on Gimp. I'm not an expert, just OK
Anonymous No.942099343 [Report]
Anonymous No.942099440 [Report] >>942099566
Can anything be done with this or material too thick?
Anonymous No.942099447 [Report]
>>942096375 (OP)
Fuck yeah used to love these. Better than fake AI tits
Anonymous No.942099566 [Report] >>942107054 >>942108248
>>942099440
Too thick.
Let me post you a guide from when I used to do Xray threads (I'm the guy with the Jen efforts, above)

For reference, swimsuits are made of material that won't go transparent when wet, so it stops light - so swimsuits won't work. Anything with a bra under it won't work. Similarly lace or heavily patterned or ribbed/textured fabrics won't work well because of different transmissibility and levels. Skin-coloured fabrics are tricky for Gimp as it can't differentiate between skin and fabric. Ideally the fabric should be thin and in contact with the body. Black-and-white images are unlikely to be successful as there are no colour levels to manipulate in Gimp, just shades of grey which won't work. Similarly, colours which are totally saturated won't allow Gimp to manipulate the tones, but some of you may not be able to tell this - I'll cut you some slack in this case.

If the image is small and full of jpeg artifacts or has already been digitally processed then the results will probably be shit. As a test, zoom in on the picture and if it breaks into blocks then forget it.
Anonymous No.942100380 [Report] >>942100485 >>942100581
Would anon be able to do her?
Anonymous No.942100485 [Report]
>>942100380
Doubtful
Anonymous No.942100581 [Report]
>>942100380
Here's another, I know she's not wearing a bra in either.
Anonymous No.942101136 [Report]
Can this pic work
Anonymous No.942101138 [Report] >>942108095
Anonymous No.942101303 [Report] >>942102680 >>942104009
Did this in 2018. Has been sitting on my HD all these years for some reason.
Anonymous No.942101421 [Report]
>>942098293

>sir is your refrigerator running?
Anonymous No.942102680 [Report] >>942103926
>>942101303
That's fakeray, not Xray
Anonymous No.942102845 [Report] >>942103238
Anonymous No.942103238 [Report]
>>942102845
Has potential, but I think the black may be a little too saturated
Anonymous No.942103388 [Report]
Anonymous No.942103926 [Report] >>942103947
>>942102680
I don't recall what I did. I just know I have that image and these few images saved to work on from 2018 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Anonymous No.942103947 [Report] >>942103975
>>942103926
Anonymous No.942103975 [Report] >>942104009
>>942103947
Anonymous No.942104009 [Report]
>>942101303
>>942103975

here's the original
Anonymous No.942104669 [Report] >>942107054
If someone can do legit x rays, drop your disc I will pay for good work
Anonymous No.942104822 [Report] >>942107332
get anything from this?
Anonymous No.942107054 [Report]
>>942104669
I did the before and after shots earlier in the thread
But you need to be mindful of
>>942099566
Anonymous No.942107314 [Report] >>942107356 >>942107486 >>942107958
can she be enhanced?
Anonymous No.942107332 [Report]
>>942104822
Maybe. I doubt it would be good, and depends if the image has already been digitally processed
Anonymous No.942107356 [Report] >>942107486
>>942107314
Yes
Anonymous No.942107465 [Report]
Anonymous No.942107486 [Report] >>942107958 >>942108546
>>942107314
>>942107356
Eternally grateful if someone can xray her, I don't have the know-how
Anonymous No.942107958 [Report] >>942108010 >>942108095
>>942107314
>>942107486
Quick and dirty job as I don't have a lot of time.
Anonymous No.942108010 [Report]
>>942107958
many thanks!
Anonymous No.942108095 [Report] >>942108248
>>942107958
>>942101138
Can you try
Anonymous No.942108248 [Report]
>>942108095
>Can you try
No point. Read this
>>942099566
Not wasting my time. Xray just brings out what's there by messing with levels, saturation, brightness, etc. it's not Hogwarts
Anonymous No.942108546 [Report]
>>942107486
>I don't have the know-how
Nor did I until I downloaded Gimp and did some Googling, followed by practice, practice, practice

Why not try to learn, then you too can have fuckwits ask you for impossible xrays on shitty images..