Thread 942281270

Hold on... if I'm fighting for a better climate why am I supporting immigration so they'll emit 5 or 10 times more carbon emissions?

Oh, you failed statistics.

>>942281270 (OP)
Because to do otherwise would be “racist” and that’s the greatest sin of all. Better we all go extinct than ever say “no” to brown people.

>>942281772
What are you talking about? OP's graph shows that white people pollute the most.

>>942281897
If white countries admit migrants from less polluting countries, those same people will end up polluting more, thus raising the total amount of pollution.

>>942281963
Or it would be less polluting if it's less white
This is an insane troll thread so the logic fits.

>>942282063
No, when people immigrate they adopt the lifestyle of the country they move to, including emissions.

OP here, I feel like the vibes are off so I'll just be a good person and support both I suppose...

>>942282138
What if it's skim color tho? We can only see that per captia whites create more. If we moved Canada to India amd vis a versa would India increase pollution.

>>942282581
Because it’s not skin that generate greenhouse gases. It’s machinery like central heating, cars, power plants, consumer goods, etc..

>>942282670
If that were true then white people would pollute less

>>942283005
No, read my comment again, very slowly.

>>942283005
I think OP is really bad at stats

>>942283039
Yeah. All your consumer goods are produced in non-white countries using the machines you outsourced in the 90's and 00's. Read your own comment again slowly and then consider where all your shit is made. White people pollute more because they're naturally destructive. White people destroy nations faster than any other race.

>>942283143
Right, and people with a higher standard of living use more consumer goods thus contributing more to pollution. So when people immigrate from developing to developed countries, their contribution to emissions rises as well.

>>942283441
Using consumer goods doesn't produce emissions, retard. Producing user goods does. You think your toilet paper starts emitting carbon as soon as you flush it?

>>942283592
It doesn’t matter, the more consumer food I consume, the more are produced, the higher the total emissions. If I use a roll of toilet paper I day my emissions are higher than Shitdeep who wipes his ass with his hand.

>>942283664
You think people only need food in white countries? You're fucking high. Just look at England. As soon as white people got there they cleared out all the forests and killed all the wolves. White people are the most destructive people on earth.

>>942283744
Right but that doesn’t change the fact that if a Pakistani moves to the UK his average emissions will increase.

>>942283770
That doesn't follow. Pakis aren't white.

>>942281270 (OP)

We changed our mind on this. AI cat girls more important.


Bill gates, Elon Musk, and Hamas wouldn't lead us estray.

>>942283905
That’s because emissions are tied to lifestyle, not skin color.

>>942284065
You're just wrong. Look at OPs graph. Emissions are clearly tied to skin color and the whiter you are the more you emit. If it makes you feel better we can call it a cultural difference.

>>942283744
>White people are the most destructive people on earth

>>942284190
>Look at how good I can pick cherries!

>>942284158
No, it’s tied to lifestyle. That’s why immigration is actually bad for the environment.

>>942284578
That's simply not true. It's tied to the color of your skin. That's why no matter where in the world they are white people pollute the most.

>>942284578

So the cows aren't producing the c02, the immigrants are!

>>942284753
No, it’s tied to lifestyle that’s why when a Pakistani moves to the uk he ends up emitting more.

>>942284763
It’s the people who drive the production of emissions. The more people live in high-emitting societies, the higher then emissions.

>>942285008
That's simply not true. OP's graph proves otherwise. Why can't you just admit that white people are stupid and destructive?

>>942285278
Because emissions are tied to lifestyle not ethnicity.

>>942285030
>It’s the white people who drive the production of emissions
ftfy

>>942285298
Simply not true. White people have destroyed every environment they've ever been introduced to. It's because they're white.

>>942285302
>>942285320
No, emissions are driven by lifestyle so people who live in developed countries have higher emissions on average regardless of ethnicity.

>>942285359
If you are OP it's not that people deny your claim it's that your evidence for it is so poorly demonstrated people are taking the piss out of you because you could conclude it's skin color as much based on that graph

>>942285412
Only if you didn’t look closely. Like the Middle East for example.

>>942281270 (OP)
At least they'll stop having children. It works out in the long run.

>>942285030

It will be fixed and futuristic by 2080

>>942285359
Then how do you explain England's forests and wolves? It's because white people are so destructive. We should round them up for all of our sakes.

>>942285489
England has been densely populated since ancient times. That’s why it has relatively few forests or large predators. Not really related to present-day emissions though.

>>942285447
That's where all the oil is produced. You don't think they need to use oil to get more oil?

>>942285532
Right, and despite not being white they have extremely high emissions.

>>942285531
And it wasn't until the white people got there that all their wolves were killed and their forests were cut down. I'm glad you agree with me.

>>942285556
They're being paid by white people to have high emissions. It's always the white people.

>>942281897
I got it. Like all these dirty whites. Disgusting.

>>942285583
No, not really, their emissions are tied to their economic model, not ethnicity.

>>942285651
You've never seen rednecks, have you?

>>942284417
Cope and seethe harder my skinskin turdworld friend

>>942285665
That's just not true. You think they pull oil out of the ground for fun? They didn't do that until white people paid them to. If white people stopped paying them then they would stop. It's always white people.

>>942285723
No, everyone needs oil. Including China and India and African countries.

>>942285687
Are there necks red?

>>942285760
If that were true then humans would have gone extinct millennia ago. The fact of the matter is that white people are the most destructive invasive species on the planet. There's not country they've lived in where they haven't destroyed the ecology and polluted everything.

>>942285799
Yours is, you illiterate sisterfucker

>>942285826
Humans are pretty good at destroying the environment all around the world including in non-white developing countries, unfortunately.

>>942285845
Cope harder nigger poop boy go worship the cows asshole

>>942285860
That's not true. Non-white countries have green wall projects and other projects to restore the environment after white people have invaded their country and destroyed all their natural resources.

>>942285914
Get you are GED and come back.

>>942285941
Go play on some train tracks but make sure your recording i want to watch

To me it looks like Arabs, Turkics, and Amerimutts pollute more than Whites.

>>942281270 (OP)
that is why white countries should only accept subsaharan africans into their countries

>>942286107
You must be blind

>>942286087
t. illiterate sisterfucker

>>942286185
>Darkest countries are Qatar and Kuwait (Arab)
>Next tier Includes: Saudi Arabia, Oman (Arab)
>Australia (White)
>Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Turkmenistan, South Korea (Asian/Turkic)
>America, Canada, Russia (Mixed).
That's who pollutes the most.

>>942286497
Yeah, you're blind. Thanks for confirming it.

>>942286597
Point out what I'm missing. What other countries are coloured dark?

>>942286652
You think Russia is a mixed country. You're definitely blind.

>>942286822
Only 70% of Russia is ethnically Russian. There are tons of ethnic minorities there, mostly Turkic peoples. I'd call that a mixed country.

>>942286973
Lol thanks for confirming that you're blind.

>>942287005
I'm just telling you what it says on Wikipedia.
Russia aside you're the blind one if you can't see that Arab countries are polluting the most. Look at Kuwait and the UAE, they're darker than the rest of the map.

>>942287140
I cannot believe you looked it up and still decided that Russia was a mixed country. Congratulations. You are officially the stupidest person ITT.

>>942287204
This is not mixed?

Anyone else up late and feeling a little restless?

>>942287204
Are you a Tatar who thinks he's White?

>>942287285
That's white as fuck. You are blind.

>>942287968
>70%
"White as fuck"
Man your head would explode in most Nordic countries despite their immigration rates
Or the American Northeast

>>942288147
You're really trying to distract from the fact that white people are the most destructive species on earth and that's why they need to be dealt with.

>>942281270 (OP)
Climate change alarmism is a grift. Mr climate himself bill gates has dialed it back now. The whole thing is a fucking scam.

>>942288248

Come and try.

>>942288502
You don't want to issue that challenge as a minority.

>>942288248
Idc I'm just watching OP taken to task for the laziest conclusion

>>942288248
in what way

>>942288248
>most destructive species on earth
Look again. Arabs are more destructive.