>>942353465
>If someone do not rent, don't use public roads or health care, just stays on his private property and produces his own food an electricity, they don't have to pay taxes right? WRONG
If you're just staying on your own property, producing your own food, not interacting with the rest of society in any way, then you wouldn't be affected by income taxes, sales taxes, etc, etc.
But you're never actually going to do that, are you? Because although libertarians might talk about living in a cabin in the forest completely off the grid, they'd last about a week on their own before they came running back to civilization.
And if the land itself is taxed, let's not forget that only reason you're able to 'own' that land is because the cops - and, in a broader sense, the military - are there to stop other people from taking it. You benefit from government spending on security passively whether you interact with it or not.
>Elections are the consent. Cool, that means if i don't take part in it, I get to keep my money.
Again, if you are a shareholder in a company and you choose not to exercise your voting rights, that doesn't mean the company can't spend the money you invested. If you don't like the way the majority voted, your option is to take your money and leave the company.
>renounce your citizenship, not every country lets you
Okay, well if you live in one of those then your whining about freedom would have some justification. But you don't, do you.
>>942338921
>Tell that to the no King's protesters or anyone complaining about someone's KKK uniform.
But they're not complaining about the fundamental concept of government.
>>942339354
>I don't have an actual argument, so I'll just call him a bootlicker
