>>942405316
>I think I'm actually rather proficient
No you're not, I am an ESL and it's like I'm speaking to a fucking alien
There are no arguments in your moral outrage.
You have no leg to stand on when it comes to trying to prove correlation between cartoons and reality.
You keep speaking of "solidifying of neural pathways" but how long exactly is that supposed to take? 20 years? 30, 40, 50 years? When does "jacking off to drawings" turn into "raping kids"?
And surely you base your arguments off of something concrete, like research, studies, whatever, or are you just speaking out of your ass thinking that constitutes as an "argument"? And did you actually read those papers or just parroting headlines?