>>942451754
It's about securing prosecutions and witness cooperation. Trading small fish for big fish.
You really think that if all of the worst things the Democrats have accused Trump of were true, and they've known about Epstein since the 90's, that they wouldn't have released the files during the Clinton Administration, the Obama Administration, or the Biden Administration?
After Trump usurped Dem plans in 2016, particularly pissing them off with their hopes of a first female president sure thing, why didn't Obama sink Trump is they were so sure the files were so damning? Why didn't they sink him before he ever got to be President Elect the first time? If the Epstein files are the silver bullet the screechiest feminazis think they are to Trump, why not nuke him with it before his second win?
There's a bigger picture at play here that regular dumbdumbs don't get to know about yet. Favours are most certainly being traded, deals are getting made, offers of immunity are getting talked about. If the entire Democrat apparatus ACTUALLY had a sitting president dead to rights on pedophile and rape charges, they'd pull that trigger and make Watergate look like a polite misunderstanding. There would be congressional hearings until the end of the century. There would be military tribunals. People would be getting blackbagged. Dems don't wait until Republicans control the House, the senate, Congress, the Oval Office, have the popular vote and the will of the people to whine about thirty year old water cooler gossip that's unsubstantiated for no reason. If they ever had the files, or copies, they'd keep every Xerox machine in DC running 24/7 to stick stacks of them on every windshield in town. Every media outlet would have copies. Every blogger and streamer would have copies. If they had him, and truly had him, they wouldn't be crying about redistricting and gerrymandering. They'd be coordinating assassinations and renditions.