This is all a simulation inside a video game isn't it?

The Voyagers aren't anywhere near the edge of the Solar System.

Anyway, yes, we are in a simulation. GR proves it.

Its probably the friction from leaving the absolute gravity of the sun

>>22843354 (OP)
who created the simulation?

>>22843354 (OP)
ugh i HATE hitting map limits

>>22843354 (OP)
I find it amazing some antique from 1977 is still being maneuvered in space, still transmitting data, still in radio contact, still making discoveries.

All while modern engineers and scientists shrug their shoulders saying going to the moon was forgotten and we just simply cannot do it. Have engineers been enshitified?

>>22843354 (OP)
>news from 2012
still better than a twitter thread

>>22843356
I think it's more like how our planet has a magnetic field around it that deflects the solar wind, the sun has similar but around the entire solar system.

I think I'm in a simulation that I chose to be randomly generated

>>22843354 (OP)
>While not a hard edge, or a "wall" as it has sometimes been called, here both spacecraft measured temperatures of 30,000-50,000 kelvin (54,000-90,000 degrees Fahrenheit), which is why it is sometimes also referred to as a "wall of fire". The craft survived the wall as, though the particles they measured were extremely energetic, the chances of collision in this particle-sparse region of space are so low that not enough heat could be transferred to the duo.
Wow. It's nothing.

I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE
AAAAAAAAAAAA

>>22843359
>All while modern engineers and scientists shrug their shoulders saying going to the moon was forgotten and we just simply cannot do it.
We cannot go to the moon for fiscal reasons, technically we could go tomorrow

>>22843359
>going to the moon was forgotten and we just simply cannot do it.
if it was life or death we could
I believe the issue is that we cant do it with reasonable safety margins and without unreasonable risk to the crew

>>22843354 (OP)
50,000 kelvin “barrier” that’s too sparse to damage the craft, it’s just the kinetic energy of the very sparse amount of particles at that distance not a massive wall of fire that burns everything

>>22843356
you sound like such a faggot when you talk like that

>>22843354 (OP)
That's like living in BC mongolia not knowing that there's sea and going
>wow voyager found a liquid wall at the very edge of land

>>22843355
what

it already left the solar system years ago

>>22843354 (OP)
so what, the sun's corona is a gorillion degrees, but the parker probe flew right through it: the density and heat-transfer there is so low no one notices the heat.

>>22843365
>We cannot go to the moon for fiscal reasons, technically we could go tomorrow
We found a way to justify invading the middle east for like 40 years doing nothing. How about we just make up a reason to go to the moon and mars?

>>22843365
We literally forgot how to make the rockets the Saturn V used.

It's a brain drain question, we eliminated technical competency to save money and now we can't achieve what we used to be capable of achieving. I'm sure your place of business has recently experienced something like this when Dave from engineering retired and was replaced with Ranjesh Suunhapbapatravundong

It's a matrix simulation by higher dimension parasites (archons) to farm you of energy released by human suffering (loosh)

>>22843354 (OP)
No.
Unfortunately, it is very real (not the NASA bullshit, your life) and has eternal consequences.

>>22843372
>We've had the technology but we've lost it
is the official answer

>>22843365
We haven't "been back to the moon" because civilian telescopes got too good, anyone and everyone would be able to call bullshit

>>22843354 (OP)
all the suns energy collects at the edge of its gravitational area. for how long and to what end? does it eventually all get sucked back in or does it release?

>>22843354 (OP)
Its a space wall erected by the ayys to keep us from leaving our solar system

>>22843363
Sounds as well protected as our border wall

>>22843356
it's the heliopause. where ions that aren't travelling at the solar system's escape velocity collect.

>>22843357
Some code pajeet. That's why so much isn't working properly

>>22843365
We never did go to the moon.
No, is not about space not being real or other conspiracy crap, but the space being WAY more hostile (letal radiation, deadly space dust needing heavy armor) than we believe.

We lack the tech to send people beyond our upper atmosfere.

>>22843359
>>22843366
You two are children, all these decisions are driven by money. It would be astronomical to send people to the moon when he inflated the cost to oblivion so billionaires could get richer and Tyron could get his ebt.

>>22843376
Which is it then? There isn't a financial reason to go, or we lost the 60 year old technology that we simply cannot replicate today?

>>22843370
It passed by the most distant planet in Sol 36 years ago, but it's not even close to having left the system. It will hit the inner part of the Oort Cloud in 300 years and exit it in 30,000.

>>22843365
>>22843372
WHY go to the moon right now? We do not have the capacity to lift any meaningful amount of material into orbit. The surface of the moon is a dust that is as sharp as broken glass and rapidly deteriorates complex equipment. Anyone who goes there basically has to spend the entire time in a fucking EVA suit, they can't take it off until they land and are decontaminated. We don't need to send any more boomers up to do photo ops, whether you believe it was real or not Stretch Armstrong and Buzz Lightyear already milked that cow.

>>22843383
Oh yes we did

>>22843363
Now try that with a larger spacecraft and not some little piece of tin.

>>22843354 (OP)
>>22843370
its not that far out
they are still dwarf planets out there then it it keeps going still, thing is huge!

>>22843383
>letal radiation, deadly space dust needing heavy armor
Retard.

>>22843378
Entropy via thermal dynamics

>>22843354 (OP)
>>22843355
>>22843356
>>22843357
>>22843358
>>22843359
oh wow the universe is electric based and not gravity based. im so shocked the kikes led us down a cosmological dead end with their bullshit bad math. divide by zero to get a black hold goy, see its easy, we know they exist in nature. oh my calculations are wrong for galactic spin? just sprinkle in some dark matter and dark energy and it all works out see. no one should wonder why humanity seems forever 10 years away from the next great breakthrough.

>>22843359
Our institutions of higher learning have been completely usurped and destroyed

>>22843387
Same reason we do any science, research, or exploration. Sometimes you have to spend a bunch of time, money, and resources setting it all up for something greater.

Its already been suggested we have moon bases acting as a gas station or refueling station to get to mars and beyond. Turns out not everything is about next quarter's profit; there may be valuable minerals there, there may not be. How about we put a telescope on the moon so it can operate without atmosphere but it can take better data of the universe?

>>22843385
The truth is that no man has ever been to the moon. It may be possible today but it's still too dangerous and expensive.
The argument that we've had the technology in the era when the most powerful computer had the computing power of a 1990s game boy and we don't have the technology in 2025 is ridiculous at best.

>>22843393
Yep but what can you do? Basedance is totally cucked - PIs have to lie to get funding and they force their serfs to keep their mouths shut.

>>22843365
>fiscal limitations
>also, another 10B to Israel and Ukraine
Sure thing.

>>22843380
would be interesting if the mexos were 50k kelvin

>>22843354 (OP)
Why would this mean we're in a sim?

>>22843383
>We lack the tech to send people beyond our upper atmosfere.
if by "we" you mean "italy", I might agree

>>22843400
its a retarded and unfounded conclusion dreamed up by retards

>>22843354 (OP)
your universe needs to upgrade its ram and gpu

>>22843370
the solar system is incomprehensibly big

>>22843364
I FUCKING LOVE ALLAH AHHHHHHHKBAAR

>>22843397

"Our posturings, our imagined self-importance
The delusion that we have some privileged position in universe
Are challenged by this point of pale light
Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark
In our obscurity, in all this vastness
There is no hint that help will come from elsewhere
To save us from ourselves"

>>22843357
Some sick fuck. I mean, look at all the animals that have a vagina I could put my penis into. What kind of pervert makes a world like that?

>>22843354 (OP)

Did I here someone saying "Voyager"?

Jane Way to the bridge. Ensign Kim, I need a full report of that fake ass wall!

>>22843354 (OP)
here's what it looks like now

>>22843409
>Umm, Captain? Is it really necessary to risk the ship and crew by flying directly into this spacial anomaly wall?

>>22843397
its electromagnetism since atoms are nothing else than electric charges and not particles

>>22843408
well you understand the fallen angels now, they came to the world and were like "DAAAAMMNNNNN" look at those monkey cheeks

>>22843412
How does it spread so far? Electromagnetism is very short range.

>>22843354 (OP)
no it is an alien barrier to protect the galaxy from space niggers

>>22843409
>>22843411
nice tattoo
*tips slightly larger tattoo*

>>22843410
Why is it always some sphere of a room with something scary in the middle?

>>22843354 (OP)
Yeah, we're corralled inside this gay ass galaxy, there's also the Van Allen radiation wall preventing us from ever exploring other planets.

>>22843354 (OP)
Ultra thin gas (thinner than the best vacuum we can create on earth). That "temperature" is just the average kinetic energy (movement) of the particles.
It's not like something would melt there.

>>22843354 (OP)
>50,000 Kelvin wall
okay, and what does this mean OP?
Do pajeets really still clickbait retards with word mumble jumble trick?

>>22843376
This is one line from a random pop sci TV show
>>22843373
>we literally forgot how to make obsolete technology

>>22843420
50,000 kelvin is roughly 50,000 Fahrenheit. Never mind the vacuum of space and apparently infinite radiation, theres just a heat cloud outside the solar system because the sun somehow protects us from interstellar heat but not radiation? Its probably made up bullshit because theres only like 2 scientists that understand the math well enough to debunk it.

ITT balltards marvelling at retarded made up bullshit

>>22843414
density
thats how you have gasses, fluids and solids

>>22843398
It would cost trillions to return humans to lunar surface, it was controversial 70 years ago when 50% of nation wasnt total burden

We're living in a sin simulator. Lucifer challenged God that people with free will would choose to turn away from Him. God created this place for us, to let the truth unfold. Lucifer and the fallen angels are allowed to torment and misguide us, so that we can be tested. Its Gods beautiful reality, filled with unholy sinners and unholy obstacles. People don't realize they're participating in God's test. A higher power is observing your behavior, evaluating your moral character and seeing how you handle your struggle.

There is a reason the Bible talks about "The Truth" so much. Modern physicists are faced with evidence that Einstein's theories about the fabric of time and space aren't quite right.

We barely have a frame of reference for what an extradimensional God-being might be capable of. Writing on the wall, immaculate conception, reprogramming of the world or its history (mandela effect) etc.

>>22843375
I got 8 out of 10. Does that mean I win?

>>22843420
It means, that the movement of the particles of the galactic "wind" suddenly spiked up. The average density of that medium is about 1 particle (neutral atoms, molecules, ions) per cube, which is extremely low.

>>22843354 (OP)
>NASA engineers explain that the measured temperature does not correspond to heat that could burn solid material, but rather to the kinetic energy of particles traveling nearly at the speed of light.
>In this extremely thin gas, collisions are so rare that Voyager 1 passes through the region unharmed, like a true champion.
dumb mutt thread

>>22843424
So you want to go local? Okay.
> density
How do you tell up from down?

>>22843426
It seems like a lot of work and suffering for nothing

>>22843354 (OP)
At work I recently had a temperature sensor shit the bed and tell me a section of piping was over 9,000 Celsius. How do we know this relic of the 70's didn't have a mechanical hiccup? Or that the article is even true?

>>22843397
there model of gravity is wrong thats all.

>>22843430
lower density is up
higher density is down

>>22843431
have you played Dark souls

>>22843397
So the idea that earth used to orbit a electric version of saturn might actually be true?

I've seen some threads on it before and the idea always fascinated me. I even bought that Chan Thomas book

>>22843433
That gif is as retarded as flat earth.

>>22843435
>>22843426

3 Evil
The world is filled with horrifying, gut-wrenching evil. Billions of sentient beings die every second. Thousands of children die of preventable disease every day. For billions of years, animals have been suffering and dying—in numbers we cannot fathom, across time scales we cannot fathom.

Such a thing is obviously incompatible with the existence of a perfect God.

Are the aforementioned things bad? Is the world a worse place because it has cancer in it? Is it worse because it has malaria and genocide and starvation and predation? Anyone of remotely sane ethical persuasion would have to obviously answer yes. The theist, however, is tasked with explaining why a perfectly just, merciful, loving, and powerful God fails to intervene to stop these horrors. He could stop them with a thought, make it so that no child has to starve to death in her mother’s arms merely by saying the word. Why doesn’t he?

The theist doesn’t merely need to think that each of the world’s apparent evils are secretly so good that they shouldn’t be abolished (after all, if they should be abolished and God can abolish them, why doesn’t he?) They don’t merely have to think that it would be wrong of God to have intervened to stop COVID or 9/11 or the Nazi Holocaust. They must think that God couldn’t have set up the world in any better way. Not only does some great good come from the holocaust that makes it so that God should not prevent it, God apparently—in his infinite wisdom and majesty—could not have achieved that good in any other way.

Could any proposition be more absurd? Could anything be more ludicrous on its face than the notion that there is a good reason for babies to get cancer, for animals to starve, and for natural disasters to ravage the world claiming countless lives? Could anything be more ridiculous than the idea that these are uniquely required for some greater goods?

>>22843386
I read a Sci-Fi about how intersteller space ships were like sailboats in these solar and galactic winds and had magnetic "sails" and just their own meager gravity to gather matter to convert to energy as well as 'tack'. It was breddy goot.

>>22843422
Not really. There is no such thing as "heat" "wall" outside of the Sun's for the lack of the better word, "atmosphere".
The entire article is a clickbait.
However it is believed that the temperature outside of the influence of any star, ie inter-stellar space is a constant of -505 0F/-263 0C.
>>22843428
per cube what? meter? kilometer? centimeter?

>>22843438
What are the odds that the ideal mix of evils for our growth and character building would happen to be those randomly churned out by indifferent natural laws? If there was a God who was designing the laws, aiming at the good, he wouldn’t make the laws uniform across the entire cosmos! He wouldn’t make the ordinary goings-on of the world utterly indifferent to value, so that whether gravity pulls some object down is wholly independent of the moral consequences of it doing so. If an ethical person was creating the law of gravity, he would not direct it to bring objects down if doing so results in them fatally falling on the head of a baby.
This is the core problem with every theodicy. While perhaps some theodicies can explain why some evils might be conducive to greater goods, it would be utterly and wildly inexplicable if the optimal laws for bringing about those goods are indifferent to value. In addition, such a view simply strains credibility. Is it really plausible that the world wouldn’t be improved if God had stopped any of the particularly gratuitous instances of suffering? Is it really plausible that if God had done a secret miracle—never discovered by anyone—to make COVID never infect humans, the world would have been a worse place?

The standard theodicies, for this reason, are inadequate.

The free will theodicy, for instance, may explain why we are typically allowed to do things that harm others. But it cannot explain natural evils and it cannot explain why we are given strong desires to do evil things. Things would be far better if the rapist never had the desire to rape—if no one ever had a desire to torture small children in sheds. It similarly cannot explain why we are given the power to do even very terrible things to each other.

>>22843442
The soul-building theodicy claims that evils exist to strengthen our characters. How, pray tell, does the small child who starves to death in her mother’s arms have her character strengthened? How does the old lady with dementia who slowly wastes away have a stronger character as a result of her suffering? The notion—that must be believed by proponents of this theodicy—simply strains credibility that there are no instances of evil that are better prevented by God and that the best laws for soul-building would be ones that function with total indifference to the extent to which their behavior affects soul-building.

Or take the archon abandonment theodicy—a favorite of this blog. This theodicy suggests that the reason that the world is filled with grotesque horrors is that there are powerful angels who could have prevented the world’s evils but didn’t. God allows such a state of affairs because setting up a world where archons can make a great difference to our well-being allows us to closely connect with the archons. In the worlds where the archons don’t screw up, it creates connections that last forever and thus are worth all of the world’s evil.

This theodicy very clearly fails.

Put aside the fact that the theodicy posits powerful wizard demons with no evidence. Normally the fact that your theory has to posit magical beings to explain the data is seen as a cost of your theory. Few would have been impressed by Newtonians suggesting that demons explain the perihelion of mercury.

But putting that aside, why in the world would God make the demons be the only thing sparing us from great suffering? The theodicy can perhaps explain why there are archons who can make a great positive difference to our well-being. But why make it so that if the archons abandon us, most creatures on Earth will live short lives of intense suffering. God could make such creatures vast difference makers without making us miserable wretches in their absence.

>>22843354 (OP)
HUMANITY.

THERE IS NOTHING BEYOND THAT WALL. TURN BACK IMMEDIATELY. THIS IS YOUR FIRST WARNING.

I REPEAT.


THERE IS NOTHING BEYOND THAT WALL. TURN BACK IMMEDIATELY. THIS IS YOUR FIRST WARNING.

>>22843443
It’s particularly surprising that the world where the archons don’t intervene appears blind and indifferent. This is a rather striking coincidence. While it makes sense God might allow the archons to intervene, why the hell would the world where they don’t look, in its ordinary functioning, exactly like an atheistic universe? Why would there not be any agents that appear to be working?

It would be especially surprising that none of the archons would help us out. But if some of the archons are helping, why don’t we observe them?

Why doesn’t God simply give the archons a strong desire to help us? He wouldn’t force them—he’d just make them psychologically disposed to help us. He can do that. He is God. He could make the archons more motivated to help us than humans are motivated to have sex and eat food.

In addition, God could simply give the archons the belief that our lives will go badly if they don’t help us but not actually make their lives go badly if they don’t help us. It seems that what matters in helping others is how much sacrifice you give for how much expected benefit. Pulling a child out of a burning building produces no less objective-list benefit if, unbeknownst to the person who pulls the child out, the child would have been saved later by someone else. Thus, God doesn’t actually have to make the world horrendous if the archons don’t intervene—he could just make them think it’s that way.

>>22843440
I dont know why you're so concerned about people not seeing the same images as you, your mental state doesnt impact the'real' world in any meaningful way

>>22843434
But why is up up and down down? Why can't it flip at will?

>>22843445
Lastly, the argument assumes that objective list theory is right. If hedonism is right or desire satisfaction theory then God could simply make creatures with maximal pleasure or fulfilled desires. This is especially problematic because objective list theory is very implausible.

Thus the argument assumes:

There are archons.

Libertarian free will is right (otherwise the archons would just help us out).

Objective list theory is true.

The archons for some reason don’t make their existence obvious.

The world absent archons is filled with enormous gratuitous suffering—rather than merely being absent in certain goods.

The world absent archons doesn’t appear to be presided over by any agents.

God for some reason needs us to be in actual danger—rather than just having the archons believe we’re in danger.

Each of these assumptions, however, is quite doubtful. They range from somewhat dubious to ridiculously unlikely. Even if we give each of them a generous 1/3 chance of being correct, the odds they’re all right is 1/2187. Very unlikely!


Suppose one simply knew that God existed. Would they really expect a world as bad as this? This world? The one where thousands of children die every day, where nearly every organism who has ever lived has died after just a few days or weeks? If an angel proposed that God would make such a world, they’d be laughed at—and not invited to all the cool angel parties. The only reason anyone seriously entertains that this world is made by a perfect God is because they have status quo bias. They can’t imagine just how much better a world that God would actually make would be.

>>22843354 (OP)
>"The spacecraft managed to survive the harsh conditions, thanks to the vast emptiness of space, where the chances of particle collisions are very low, making it less likely for heat to be transferred to the probes."
Sure, there was particles of plasma detected at 50,000 kelvin from the interaction of the heliopause and the interstellar wind, but its still a vacuum and the particles are so spread apart as to not matter - so what if one hot particle hits you every 20 minutes? Its just another stupid clickbait article.

>>22843359
The Horus Niggardry destroyed much of mankind's technology, much lost, never to be relearned.

>>22843448
Another common reply to the problem of evil is skeptical theism. People claim that God might have all sorts of unknown reasons for allowing evils. But this is woefully inadequate. While God could, of course, have reasons we don’t know about, the odds that the optimal mix of goods would be brought about by blind and morally indifferent laws is very near zero. In addition, provided you think that, say, we can be confident that the holocaust was a bad thing, you should think that we can be confident in some ethical judgments—despite the suite of unknown reasons. The odds God wouldn’t have moral reasons to prevent a single one of the world’s suite of horrors are very low.

I don’t just think the problem of evil is a consideration against God’s existence. I think it’s single-handedly, overwhelmingly decisive. Theism does not withstand the problem of evil. Not even close. Theism requires one to believe a great absurdity—that all the world’s evils are for the best. That one who could prevent rape, slavery, genocide, starvation, hunger, torture, and each of the million other distinct and horrendous evils shouldn’t do so. That is almost too absurd to contemplate.

This absurdity was pointed out quite convincingly by Stephen Law. Imagine an evil God—limitless in power, knowledge, and wickedness. Such a being’s only motivation was to bring about evil. Do you think there’s any chance such a being exists?

Of course not! The world has too much good for such a hypothesis to be even remotely tenable. Such a hypothesis is laughably ridiculous. But all the things theists say about the problem of evil could be equally said about the problem of good. One could similarly posit that the being allows good because this is a side-effect of giving us free will. That our flourishing allows greater spiritual decay, so that we can exercise the evils of betrayal and wickedness.

>>22843440
per cm3

>>22843452
why does this fucking idiot piece of a php website not allow me to write cube

>>22843375
No brah I just get a hard reset and put back into the simulation

>>22843354 (OP)
Ayys built that wall to keep human rapefugees out of their space.

>>22843438
>>22843442
>>22843443
>>22843445
>>22843448
>GPT posting
kek nobody's gonna read all this pajeet

>>507996358
>>22843446
Wrong. It is 1 cubic meter. And it is only an assumption for the interstellar space which those spacecraft confirmed.
So there isn't really any "wall" outside of the Sun's atmosphere. That article is a clickbait, probably written by a desperate jeet.

>I dont know why you're so concerned about people not seeing the same images as you, your mental state doesnt impact the'real' world in any meaningful way
2=2=4
This is a fact. This is true anywhere in our Universe.
Science dont care about your feelings.

>>22843451
Such hypotheses, while coherent, are obviously absurd. But so is a good God.

Now there are two different versions of this challenge. The first one notes that obviously an evil God is disqualified by the world’s good. It claims that by parity, a good God is disqualified by the world’s evils. Generally theists just bite the bullet and say that an evil God isn’t ruled out by the world’s goods. If you believe this—that this world might be the creation of a maximally wicked being—I have a bridge to sell you!

The only half-decent reply I’ve heard to this challenge comes from Max Baker-Hytch and Ben Page. The core idea: it’s way more obvious that a torture would is worse than our world than that a bliss world is better than our world. A world where everyone was simply intensely pleasured all the time would not seem much better than the present world. In contrast a world where everyone was tortured all the time would seem obviously worse. Thus, it is claimed, this world is more obviously incompatible with maximal evil than maximal good.

First of all, I think this is quite doubtful. The reason we have this intuition is just because we can more easily grok how bad extreme suffering is than how good extreme pleasure is. If we had a better sense of how good experiences could get, we wouldn’t have this intuition.

Second, even if a mere bliss world wouldn’t be obviously better than ours, there are some conceivable worlds that are obviously much better. It’s as obvious that the best conceivable world is much better than this one as it is that the worst conceivable world is a lot worse than this world. It is obvious that a perfect being wouldn’t create this world, just as it’s obvious that a maximally terrible being wouldn’t create it.

>>22843453
Because go make your own website, Hanz.

>>22843357
I like to think that were some alien kid's school project

Pretty lame simulation if that's the case.

>>22843447
because its based on logic, not chance
we are able to calculate it

>>22843458
The second version of the challenge is, in my judgment, also quite decisive. Even those who think an evil God isn’t ruled out by goodness tend to think that the hypothesis is implausible. But why should such a hypothesis be much less plausible than the good God hypothesis?

There are a great many replies, each wildly unpersuasive. Let’s explore them:

“A good God has a higher prior. Perfection is a real property while imperfection is not.” Reply: if perfection is a real, joint-carving property (rather than e.g. just the property of being maximal in badness) why not think that its opposite is equally a real property?

“A good God possesses all great-making features. An evil-God possesses mostly great-making features but then one random bad-making feature. This means that it’s very unlikely it exists—it’s a weird, arbitrary, and disjointed entity.” Reply: infinite power is not a great or terrible property. Whether it’s good or bad depends on who has the power. There’s no more reason to suppose that power is inherently tied with goodness than badness.

>>22843354 (OP)
>Kelvin
Literally who? How did he get out there?

>>22843457
1 meter is between the galaxies.

>>22843463
“An evil God would want to deceive us. Thus, the evil God hypothesis is self-defeating, while the good God hypothesis is not.” Reply: First of all, if there are two hypotheses and one is self-defeating, they might still have equal probabilities provided they’re both low. For example, if at the start of the universe a leprechaun flipped a fair coin and then deceived everyone if it came up heads, you should have equal credence in it having come up heads and tails. Second, why would a good Got not deceive us? Potentially infinite goods are in the balance. Surely infinite goods would be worth a bit of deception. Third, there are parallel arguments for why an evil God wouldn’t deceive us as to why a good God wouldn’t. Perhaps by preserving our rational faculties we can more deeply betray others. Even if you think it’s slightly more likely a good God wouldn’t deceive us than that an evil God wouldn’t, this won’t explain why the evil God hypothesis is absurd and the good God hypothesis is reasonable. It might mean a good God is slightly more likely, but it won’t explain the massive gap in reasonable probabilities that theists claim there are.

Thus, I think the problem of evil—especially in its evil God variant—is single-handedly decisive.

>>22843456
I'm white and this was written by a human not an AI

>>22843359
White people made pact with the aliens residing inside the space ship known as the Moon. In exchange for helping their military and countries with advancing technology and military capabilities, westoids will not be landing for a very long time and for future landings to be on specific, agreed-upon locations and letting the aliens do their experiments and observations. EUV machines, undisclosed anti-gravity tech are examples of given alien tech in exchange for allowing aliens masquerading as Nordic Wh*tes kidnap innocents ppl all around the world. I hate wh*te people for being traitors to the human species.

>>22843466
>I'm white and this was written by a human not an AI
kek sure thing rankesh

>>22843365
The US literally has spent more than $2 trillion on the war in Afghanistan. That's $300 million dollars per day, every day, for two decades. Or $50,000 for each of Afghanistan's 40 million people. US taxpayers have been giving Afghan soldiers $750 million a year in payroll. Those headline numbers include $800 billion in direct war-fighting costs and $85 billion to train the vanquished Afghan army, which folded in the weeks since the Pentagon's little special retreat operation.
Don't tell me you cannot fly a mission to the moon because you're poor.

>>22843367
that's not fun at all
this thread a shit

>>22843354 (OP)
>89540 f
How many big macs is this?

>>22843393
The earth is flat and stationary with a dome. You are never ever leaving this enclosed plane alive you retarded golem, CGI is all you get in this life which is more than you deserve anyway.

>>22843429
keep projecting, shitskin. your family and your genes will always be nigger subhuman and you will always sleep in the dirt. reminder if ww3 happens we have nukes for brazil too, you don't get to survive

>>22843448
Death is total order. Chaos is total instibility. They have a daughter called life that inherets from both and lives in the middle. She bootstraps organisms into the ultimate survivors and generators of localized complex irder. This spits in the face of both her parents. We are her soldiers in an arena of neverending blood imposing order on chaos and laughing at death in a boundless blood orgy. It's metal as fuck. Stadium love.

>>22843354 (OP)
A simulation of what?

>>22843465
Most of the time they assume it is 1 atom (of hydrogen) per cubic meter for interstellar space.

>>22843354 (OP)
eh, even if this isn't completely made up it not what it sounds like.
4 atoms per square meter moving at 20% the speed of light might technically be 50,000K but it's fuck all total energy.
The outer layer of the Sun's atmosphere is hot enough to emit X-rays when the atoms collide but, again, it's so rarefied that it's fuck all energy.

>>22843389
Easy. Magnetic shield around the craft. Next.

>>22843362
Why didn't you choose a lottery win for me you faggot.

>>22843365
>We cannot go to the moon for fiscal reasons,
Suck my fucking dick dude. We're trillions in debt. We can do whatever we want.

>>22843475
The theory is we're either slaves acting as nodes for processing power (kinda like the matrix) or its AI simulating us like a virtual computer machine to process information in a different way for its own gain.

When we see blurry shit in space, its because the shader buffer was full and hasn't rendered anything out that far yet because humans aren't physically there. We have telescopes that can allegedly see black holes millions of light years away, but telescopes that cannot see the surface of the moon well, or even greater detail of planets within our own solar system.

one of these things aren't like the other.

>>22843386
>Voyager 1 crossed the heliopause and entered interstellar space on August 25, 2012, making it the first spacecraft to do so.[9][10] Two years later, Voyager 1 began experiencing a third wave of coronal mass ejections from the Sun that continued to at least December 15, 2014, further confirming that the probe is in interstellar space.

>>22843354 (OP)
i hope. it would explain why reality is such shit

>>22843354 (OP)
this is great news, that means we have only explored 0.0000000001% of the games total content.

why is everyone such a fucking faggot zoomer.

>>22843482
>troonpedia

>>22843481
Radio telescope =/= optical telescope

Fucking retard

>>22843485
>random 4chan image
https://science.nasa.gov/mission/voyager/interstellar-mission/

>Voyager 1 entered interstellar space on Aug. 25, 2012, becoming the first human-made object to do so. Voyager 1 entered interstellar space at about 122 AU, or about 11 billion miles (18 billion kilometers) from the Sun. However, it was not immediately clear to the Voyager science team that Voyager 1 had crossed the heliopause. Particle instruments on the spacecraft showed an increase in cosmic rays (which originate outside the heliosphere) and decreases in heliospheric particles. But what would have been an additional source of confirmation, the probe’s plasma science instrument (PLS), had stopped working in 1980. The PLS was designed to measure the speed and direction of the solar wind while Voyager 1 was inside the heliosphere, and in interstellar space, it would have detected a dramatic drop in those measurements. Without the plasma science instrument, the Voyager science team couldn’t be sure the probe had left the heliosphere. Thankfully, almost a year later, Voyager 1’s plasma wave subsystem (PWS) detected oscillations in the plasma surrounding the spacecraft, which indicated that Voyager 1 was moving into an increasingly dense region of plasma, a clear indicator that the probe had entered interstellar space.

>Voyager 2 crossed this boundary on Nov. 5, 2018, confirmed by data from both its particle instruments and its plasma science instrument. The twin Voyager spacecraft are still the only human-made objects to reach interstellar space.

>>22843475
Consciousness is a living entity, the universe exists only to experience itself before it will inevitably collapse. We are not individuals, we are simultaneously not the same entity

A simulation is impossible due to the fact numbers like pi exist

>>22843436
it is more plausible than the current aggregation nonsense they peddle. https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/ is a decent resource for getting familiar with the science behind it.

>>22843372
Difference is that killing people in the middleeast made a shitload of people related to politicians wealthy through various contract work and stock dividends.

Realistically a very small group of people with insanely skilled qualities would be contracted to make a moonbase possible; you can't just toss John Schmidt, the brother in law of Senator Smith who hires a crew of illegals a 20 million dollar contract to improperly build a moon base like you can for a desert "living space"
And because most of the people behind this wouldn't be private sector there isn't much money to be made.

TL:DR jews

>>22843491
>killing people in the middleeast made a shitload of people related to politicians wealthy through various contract work and stock dividends.
How about getting wealthy via the exact same mechanisms of skimming 10% off the top for science and exploration budgets?Rockets are expensive so while the profit margins are low, its still comes out to a massive amount of money. Ever wonder why Elon, Bezos, Mark, and every other wealthy person on the planet has their own space and rocket company?

>>22843354 (OP)
>random pic with random text
>no link or source
>no nothing
Bo bump

>>22843425
It doesn't cost trillions
They pay trillions
There's a difference.

>>22843375
Dogmacucks are insufferable faggots
Go back to thedonald

>>22843488
I don't buy that. Sounds like new age nonsense

>>22843489
>the fact numbers like pi exist
But it doesnt exist. There is no end limit because its only an interpretation. It cannot be fully defined and we only use an approximation of it as filler in equations that we are incapable of understanding.

>>22843497
>incapable of understanding
Yeah, we fail to understand the ratio of a circle's diameter to its circumference. Real abstract stuff.

>>22843370
How did it get past the 50,000 kelvin wall it just detected?

>>22843497
It does exist and tons of institutions put computer power towards figuring out more digits of pi. Numbers that go on infinitely disprove the theory of us being in a simulation as a the computer that is running the simulation would somehow contain infinity

>>22843500
as the computer that is running the simulation would have to somehow contain infinity*

>>22843404
Not incomprehensibly, but yeah far bigger (orders of magnitude) than the 9 planets which are already pretty spread out from Jupiter and up
There are some behemoths out there that make it look like a speck of dust though, and the whole dark energy thing that we haven't even begun to understand yet but some scientists believe accounts for most of the energy of the Universe. So it is speculated to be bigger than dark matter, energy, and matter combined

>OP's post: not about god
>christibois: makes it about god anyway

>>22843365
the fiscal reasons are artificial

>>22843508
yeah but fiat currency is "artificial" in the same sense
it's all artificial nigga

>>507992528
>This is all a simulation inside a video game isn't it?
no, anon, it's just you
when you were young, about 20, we placed you in a space shuttle and sent you to the edge of the universe
everything you do in your real life, is just a simulation to keep you from being lonely or bored, with synthetic matter generators that make food and keep you alive on board the Voyager 1
we sent you that news because now you're past the edges of the solar system, are about 60 years old and the machines are going to shut down marking your death
we decided not to tell you that you lived all your life within a simulation, because, after all, if it mattered to you then that is all that matters
even if you are not that old within the simulation, we're just going to run you over with a car or similar, to make you believe your own death
it was tricky to convince everyone to not tell you anything, like hiding santa from you, but I guess we managed
as they say, so long, and thanks for all the data you sent back over the years!
>movie plot me