Thread 22876155 - /bant/ [Archived: 739 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: hAbl1eFiUnited Kingdom
6/29/2025, 1:38:43 AM No.22876155
1718073961296218
1718073961296218
md5: 6219c091da6bcdc5a6c8ca65bcb959ff🔍
Why do women look at me like they deserve a compliment during dates?

Are they like 5? They already know they're hot.
Replies: >>22876176
Anonymous ID: 1HoygMV9United States
6/29/2025, 1:45:32 AM No.22876172
You are a moid.
You exist to serve women. Stop getting uppity and appreciate that she is giving you a chance. You can be replaced in a minute with any other scrote.
Replies: >>22876175
Anonymous ID: 0zOJmE+SUnited States
6/29/2025, 1:46:32 AM No.22876175
>>22876172
men and women are not moids and foids
that's just to make everything feel desolate/bleak & make you want to kill yourself
shut the fuck up
Replies: >>22876178 >>22876226
Anonymous ID: 0zOJmE+SUnited States
6/29/2025, 1:47:20 AM No.22876176
>>22876155 (OP)
don't participate in the industrial dating machine
if finding someone, meeting them, dating, and having a relationship all feel like pulling teeth, it defeats the whole point of a relationship
Anonymous ID: 1HoygMV9United States
6/29/2025, 1:48:48 AM No.22876178
>>22876175
t. angry sperm dispenser mad about his tiny wiener.
Replies: >>22876182
Anonymous ID: 0zOJmE+SUnited States
6/29/2025, 1:49:07 AM No.22876179
the women who act this entitled, the way they're pysopped to do, they end up in hell when they get older btw
no one just "has it easy" in post 9/11 CIA chastity cage world
women are being used to disarm men and make the country easier to conquer
Replies: >>22876230
Anonymous ID: 0zOJmE+SUnited States
6/29/2025, 1:49:59 AM No.22876182
>>22876178
i just think OP doesn't have to accept what you said at all, and it's stupid to do so
you can set whatever standards you want for yourself and others
Replies: >>22876192
Anonymous ID: 1HoygMV9United States
6/29/2025, 1:54:15 AM No.22876192
>>22876182
of course you can set whatever standards you want, but moids have to have lower standards if you want anything because you bring less to the table by default. a moid will fuck anything. women are not inherently attracted to moids. you are low value creatures and if you want a woman to want you at all you have to actually be worth something, which your average moid is NOT. op is probably a balding little porn addict. why would any woman want that? expecting the bare minimum from him in the form of compliments isn't asking for much.
Replies: >>22876205 >>22876208
Anonymous ID: lwOmDefhCanada
6/29/2025, 1:58:12 AM No.22876200
moids btfo itt
Anonymous ID: 0zOJmE+SUnited States
6/29/2025, 2:02:55 AM No.22876205
>>22876192
>but moids have to have lower standards if you want anything because you bring less to the table by default. a moid will fuck anything. women are not inherently attracted to moids. you are low value creatures and if you want a woman to want you at all you have to actually be worth something, which your average moid is NOT.
sounds like you have a very economic view of all this
it ain't like that though
but if enough people are forced to see it that way, maybe it COULD be, and then the app companies would make a lot of money
but anyway, even if you want to see it transactionally, it's not a zero-sum game.
like, certain traits might be worth more to one person than another person. it's not objective.
maybe it COULD be, the same way anything CAN be valued with money. that sounds like a horrible future to live in, though, and it would make everyone powerless.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzrE1K0FGLw
>op is probably a balding little porn addict. why would any woman want that?
it sounds to me like you're just trying to make OP give up or feel like shit
Anonymous ID: 0zOJmE+SUnited States
6/29/2025, 2:04:30 AM No.22876208
>>22876192
>expecting the bare minimum from him in the form of compliments isn't asking for much.
that's not a bare minimum, because there is no objective standard.
i agree it's not asking for much.
if it's the bare minimum for one woman, that's fine, and she'll find someone who meets that standard.
Anonymous ID: 1HoygMV9United States
6/29/2025, 2:06:01 AM No.22876210
1971
1971
md5: f9e9015bce682a146a4185f49ec475b6🔍
oh brother, i got one of them all worked up lmfao.
yeah, im not reading all that you little incel.
Replies: >>22876216 >>22876219
Anonymous ID: 0zOJmE+SUnited States
6/29/2025, 2:06:20 AM No.22876213
in other words, her and OP weren't meant for each other
Anonymous ID: 0zOJmE+SUnited States
6/29/2025, 2:07:52 AM No.22876216
1725142510618567
1725142510618567
md5: 20dc0ebe061717daeccd932c5d7cb4af🔍
>>22876210
Anonymous ID: 0zOJmE+SUnited States
6/29/2025, 2:09:09 AM No.22876219
>>22876210
why is this called 1971.png?
is this like a CIA file naming system?
are they indexed somewhere else? like maybe they're tagged in some external software, so you look up "emoji" and it gives a list?
maybe its just a year?
Anonymous ID: vTSvLAQIRomania
6/29/2025, 2:12:55 AM No.22876226
>>22876175
Based response.
Replies: >>22876232
Anonymous ID: vTSvLAQIRomania
6/29/2025, 2:14:05 AM No.22876230
>>22876179
Care to elaborate about the post 9/11 chastity cage thing? Genuinely curious what you mean
Anonymous ID: 0zOJmE+SUnited States
6/29/2025, 2:14:31 AM No.22876232
1695038460773390
1695038460773390
md5: a979497f7b9eb3d0be62da8bb8ba4963🔍
>>22876226
whole lotta darkness lately