>>22883414
In today’s world, every marriage should begin with a prenuptial agreement. Individuals should retain ownership of the assets they bring into a marriage, and whether or not to share income or property should be a mutual and deliberate choice. Paychecks, earned through personal labor, should remain individual property unless otherwise agreed upon.
Divorce laws remain outdated, built on 1950s assumptions when women were economically dependent on men. Today, women are more likely to be college-educated, hold professional roles, and earn equal or near-equal pay. The old framework—where women automatically receive half the assets, custody of children, and ongoing support—no longer reflects economic or social reality.
Marriage should be understood in one of three ways: as a religious union under God, a romantic commitment between two people, or a contractual partnership focused on building a stable family life. None of these interpretations require a system in which women are presumed to need financial support.
Child custody laws also need reform. The presumption that mothers are the default caregivers is both outdated and frequently unsupported by outcomes. Decisions should be based on the psychological and emotional fitness of each parent, not on gender. Courts must move beyond bias and treat both parents equally under the law.
Ultimately, marriage in 2025 is still worthwhile—but only if entered with legal and financial clarity. A prenuptial agreement is no longer optional; it’s essential. Without it, individuals risk being subject to a legal system that hasn’t kept pace with social change.
7/1/2025, 1:01:48 AM
No.22882692
[Report]
>>22882694
>>22882696
>>22882699
>>22882700
>>22882702
>>22883410
