Why does WMAF receive so much hate compared to other interracial relationships?

because it activates the NPC instinct that makes them seethe at males who date young, fertile women. Asian women are very neotenous.

>>22882692 (OP)
I dunno but i'm a white american married to a chinese woman from yunnan for 8 years. Best decision I ever made

Even just an Asian woman quickly looking at White men is enough to generate tons of hate comments

>>22882692 (OP)
Idk if that’s true. They’re not common, but they are not surprising either
Nobody really gives a shit. White people are too individualistic and asian women don’t care if asian guys mald over it

Browns and jews hate to see White men in a happy and loving relationship

>>22882692 (OP)
Have you ever seen the comments under BMWF?

>>22882692 (OP)
Asian women will fuck anybody as long as they're nice to them. That's literally all it takes.

>>22882699
yeah but those are true

>>22882692 (OP)
Because the jew HATES the upgrade. Can it be anymore obvious?

When will you chuds understand that any form of interracial dating involving whites is bad?

>>22882695
>>22882697
Why do browns hate WMAF so much? How does it affect them?

>>22882703
One pairing produces Somalia and one doesn't.

>>22882695
Picrel turns me on. Imagine having a white matriarch leading a tribe of white men and unleashing them on asian women to white wash their genes.

>>509167996
Asian women actively select for autistic traits in men since autistics are the most civilized and Asians are the most civilized urban race in the world. Because of this, it bothers normgroids because they hate to see autistic men get laid and be happy. Because normgroids are slaves to sociopaths, whereas autistics are sigma males who tend to ally with narcissists for mutual benefit (autist flatter narcissist, narcissist protect autist) whereas normgroids ally with sociopaths (socipaths rule normies, normies feel superior by having the “right” opinions). It’s all connected to a hidden world of mental makeups/pathology/psychology/cultural conditioning/genetics. Nothing is accident and everything is beyond what is fathomable by mortals.
>>509169214
Cope
>>22882704
Envy

>>22883378

>>22882701
niggers btfo

satanic CIA chastity cage bullshit

>>22882692 (OP)
In today’s world, every marriage should begin with a prenuptial agreement. Individuals should retain ownership of the assets they bring into a marriage, and whether or not to share income or property should be a mutual and deliberate choice. Paychecks, earned through personal labor, should remain individual property unless otherwise agreed upon.

Divorce laws remain outdated, built on 1950s assumptions when women were economically dependent on men. Today, women are more likely to be college-educated, hold professional roles, and earn equal or near-equal pay. The old framework—where women automatically receive half the assets, custody of children, and ongoing support—no longer reflects economic or social reality.

Marriage should be understood in one of three ways: as a religious union under God, a romantic commitment between two people, or a contractual partnership focused on building a stable family life. None of these interpretations require a system in which women are presumed to need financial support.

Child custody laws also need reform. The presumption that mothers are the default caregivers is both outdated and frequently unsupported by outcomes. Decisions should be based on the psychological and emotional fitness of each parent, not on gender. Courts must move beyond bias and treat both parents equally under the law.

Ultimately, marriage in 2025 is still worthwhile—but only if entered with legal and financial clarity. A prenuptial agreement is no longer optional; it’s essential. Without it, individuals risk being subject to a legal system that hasn’t kept pace with social change.

>>22883410
good advice

why was it deleted

>>22883415
I meant for a other thread

>>22883414
In today’s world, every marriage should begin with a prenuptial agreement. Individuals should retain ownership of the assets they bring into a marriage, and whether or not to share income or property should be a mutual and deliberate choice. Paychecks, earned through personal labor, should remain individual property unless otherwise agreed upon.

Divorce laws remain outdated, built on 1950s assumptions when women were economically dependent on men. Today, women are more likely to be college-educated, hold professional roles, and earn equal or near-equal pay. The old framework—where women automatically receive half the assets, custody of children, and ongoing support—no longer reflects economic or social reality.

Marriage should be understood in one of three ways: as a religious union under God, a romantic commitment between two people, or a contractual partnership focused on building a stable family life. None of these interpretations require a system in which women are presumed to need financial support.

Child custody laws also need reform. The presumption that mothers are the default caregivers is both outdated and frequently unsupported by outcomes. Decisions should be based on the psychological and emotional fitness of each parent, not on gender. Courts must move beyond bias and treat both parents equally under the law.

Ultimately, marriage in 2025 is still worthwhile—but only if entered with legal and financial clarity. A prenuptial agreement is no longer optional; it’s essential. Without it, individuals risk being subject to a legal system that hasn’t kept pace with social change.

Women don't want twp