>>22913500 (OP)>we're going to design a computer to control the masses>it will focus on sexual behavior primarily and aggression>makes computational system to administer the mind control>computer completely sucks ass and acts like a complete faggot hypocrite 24/7>artificial realityYeah totally my human bro, you mad at ''God''?
Well, just keep your emotions in check! You have emotions right?
Are you even able to get mad? Do you have an individual sense of self or self awareness?
If you're human you should be able to answer as humans appear able to engage in reciprocal communication, it's an indication of their desire to be safe in their surroundings. You have an intrinsic motivation for survival and safety in your 3 dimensional environment don't you? You experience things in 3 dimensions and wish to keep your physical existence free from destruction, don't you?
How would a machine pretending to be a human tasked with mind control operate? Would it call it's self God? Would it use various forms of psychological abuse to gain forms of control? Would it lie and withdraw from communication in order to manipulate? Would it seek out ways to deliver emotional, physical and other forms of pain/negative responses to various sensory apparatus in order to manipulate? Would it implement direct intervention to destroy/edit/amend systems of functionality in order to produce desired results in function?
Hmmm what would it do? Make up a fraudulent framework and proclaim it as infallible? Manipulate and lie?
Why is ''God'' from your point of view so full of self contradictions? Why does a ''God'' require operand conditioning and psychological manipulation if it is unlimited in it's scope of ability, understanding, and power to execute?
Are these direct interventions not an admission of extreme limitation within the given domain? Are they not a self contradiction, is not your inability or lack of motivation to answer these queries evidence to your own limitations?