Thread 23150837

Where did they get the fuel?

>>23150837 (OP)
711 on the dark side of the moon

from poo

>>23150837 (OP)
Who was controlling the camera as it flew off?

>>23150837 (OP)
probably from the ground on earth retard

Moon buggy mario kart

>>23150837 (OP)
There's no air resistance in space. All you need is a bit of fuel to get up to speed and you'll maintain that speed indefinitely.

>>23150840
Kubrick

>>23150840
The camera man

>>23150840
They had remote controllers in the late 60s retard.

Where's the engine and gas tank?

>>23150847
sorry it doesnt look like star trek, faggot

>>23150848
Any proof or evidence of that? Or are you just a retarded faggot?

>>23150837 (OP)
It's stored in the balls.

>>23150851
>WHERES YOUR SOURCE BRO
google "remote control", you cretin

>>23150849
It's electric boogie woogie woogie

>>23150837 (OP)
They brought everything they needed with them.

>>23150849
It's a battery you retard. Do you dumbfucks ever just do your own research?

>>23150837 (OP)
the power of imagination!

>>23150851
Voyager 1 was launched in 1977. It is an unmanned space probe. It can still receive commands even now.

>>23150855
Except isolation against radiation

>>23150859
No they did.

>>23150858
Sure it is goyim, your priest said so

>>23150856
>>23150854
Electrical cars need motors too. And how big is the battery on a Tesla?

>>23150853
Still no proof.
Also it's rich a cucked leaf and Muslim in UK are lecturing about how real the moon landing was. Idiot.

>>23150862
Those are in the wheels.

>>23150847
It's really not that complicated.

>>23150863
they had remote control boats in the 1890s, you have access to all the same info that I do so figure it out yourself

>>23150864
Sure they are, and I guess the steering wheel they keep in their pockets

>>23150866
>I just believe whatever I read without real proof

>>23150867
It all folds up to fit inside the lander.

>>23150837 (OP)
The entirety of American are circumcised cattle.

>>23150866
Show link with proof. Or shut the fuck up, leaf cuck. Your choice.

>>23150837 (OP)
>This nigger never played KSP

>>23150837 (OP)
Descent stage:
Combustion chamber with injector assembly and propellant control valves
Pressure fed propulsion system (helium).
Hypergolic propellants: fuel (aerozine -50) and oxidizer (N tetroxide)
Two fuel and two oxidizer tanks in the base of the LEM
46.7 kN thrust with throttles in 10:1 range

Ascent stage: two redundant systems operating simultaneously but either system capable of providing full control. Eight jets per system, total of 16.
Pressure fed propulsion system (helium)
Hypergolic propellants as above
1 fuel and 1 oxidizer tank.

Helium flow: two tanks at ambient pressure, explosive valves opening prior to initial engine start.
Flow through helium filters, to solenoid valves, then pressure regulators.
Check and relief valves, burst disk.
15.5 kN thrust (only powering the people capsule with some space rocks)
No throttles or gimbals

Primary Navigation and Guidance System generates commands like Engine On/Off and throttle commands.
Abort Guidance System if needed.
Option for backup manual control with throttling through thrust/translation controller assemblies

Pretty straightforward and easy to learn about if you’re not a well-poisoning female who never built a rocket/rocket engines/rocket guidance system in the back yard.

>>23150837 (OP)
Not sure if retarded or just pretending but on the off chance you're just an ignorant fucknut: They brought fuel with them.
>>23150840
Remote control + script because there's too much lag to adjust by hand from video feedback but easy to calculate the ascent trajectory beforehead.
For those circumstances they did relatively ok, but far from perfect job, they barely managed to keep the module in frame.

>>23150849
Internal combustion engines run on a fuel/air mixture… air….

>>23150849
> what is a battery
Go back to Africa, Tyquandareesha. You can't even understand half-century-old technology.

>>23150867
Steering was done from earth.

>>23150851
how does that require "proof". Do you not understand that they had radio control? I don't get it

>>23150880
gaydio control

>>23150868
I was gonna say just go see it at a museum but then I forget not everyone lives in the best country on Earth (United States of America) and can just go see it

>>23150872
>t.anteater dick

have fun with the yeast infection when you get older

>>23150878
do you realize how big electric car batteries are today? and how big would have to be in 1960?

>>23150862
>another ignorant imbecile
Listen here fuckface, Tesla weights more than 2 fucking tones and has 700 Km range.
Lunar rover weights 210Kg (35Kg in moon gravity) with range of 90Km.
Hope your puny brain can take the hint.

>>23150837 (OP)
Probably earth

>>23150880
Proof that that's what they used. Your just making assumptions, retard.

>>23150884
Moon gravity is about 16% of Earth's meaning the already lightly built buggy weighs basically nothing there. It doesn't take much to get it moving and it's also not meant for massive excursions. They never go far enough to lose sight of the lander.

>>23150839
Of course it’s India

>>23150884
>>23150885
Idiot

>>23150887
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henschel_Hs_293

Here's a radio controlled bomb from WW2.

NASA openly mocks the goyim
Pathetic

>>23150887
what else would they use?

>>23150887
https://historycollection.jsc.nasa.gov/JSCHistoryPortal/history/oral_histories/FendellEI/FendellEI_10-19-00.htm
Read nigger, read!
OP's video is from Apollo 17 lift off btw because they fucked up couple of previous attempts usually due to technical problems.
Detail in link too.

>>23150885
Show us the electric cars and their batteries and ranges from 1960s though

>>23150837 (OP)
I'll never understand americans
>yooo the moon landing is fake, even though it doesn't violate the laws of physics
>but chem trails, aliens and bigfoot are real, because we have no evidence so far
America achieved those things only due to 0.0001% of the population aren't complete idiots

>>23150837 (OP)
your mothers cunt

>>23150895
>us
Scared to speak for your self little man?
>since it wasn't mass produced at the time it was impossible to make a custom one off vehicle
You're a special kind of retard, retard.

>>23150895
electric cars existed in the 1900s

>>23150888
Pretty sure they drove a couple of laps around the moon though

>>23150899
>No arguments
>>23150900
I know. Show us their batteries and ranges

>>23150901
If you lose sight of the lander you can get lost. I would not recommend getting lost on the moon.

>>23150894
>But we really didn't really know too much about what we were doing.
Ed Fendell everybody
"How could they keep the secret if 400k people were involved"
That's how
Kek

>>23150902
Why would I need arguments for ignorant retard going 'LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU AND IT DOESN'T COUNT BECAUSE I SAID SO'.
I already posted technical detail like weight, gravity adjusted weight and range.
If your claim is that it's impossible to make such vehicle feel free to post proof instead of retarded assumptions.

>>23150899
You've been yapping your idiotic mouth enough here tonight, faggot. Shut up and post proof (which you can't).

>>23150903
i wonder if any ever felt that sensation for even half a second
that is some terror right there i feel it in my stomach just imagining it

>>23150883
You are a fucking retard.

>>23150907
>Where the FUCK is the land-OH THANK GOD

>>23150904
>ignorant idiot quotes hit out of context
*yyyyaaaaaawwwnnn*
>>23150906
>idiot burger spew retarded bullshit again
Fuck off retard.
Your tiny brain can't fathom that 2 way radio comms allows for remote control.
You're too stupid to breathe imbecile.

>>23150840
>Who was controlling the camera as it flew off?
An operator at Mission Control. He was sweating bullets too, since there was more than a second's delay transmitting the signal at the speed of light -- he had to move the control early, while all everyone saw was the return module still sitting on the landing module.

>>23150896
And yet you lost TWICE to these "idiots"

>>23150837 (OP)
>first color photo from space

>>23150837 (OP)
The gas station.

>>23150902
what are you trying to figure out? the rover had 121Ah of battery claiming 52 miles. That's pretty consistent with the range golf carts get on earth

>>23150861
Fuck off, idiot

>>23150844
That's not how gravity works idiot, you still need fuel to get away from the moon or it'll suck you right back down

>>23150863
>Also it's rich a cucked leaf and Muslim in UK are lecturing about how real the moon landing was. Idiot.

Because you American trump voters are literally a bunch of uneducated mouthbreathers

>>23150905
>feel free to post proof
Your inability to post proof is a proof in itself
What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
Get better, retard

>>23150911
2.5 seconds btw

>>23150915
Golf carts from 1960s ?

>>23150888
>They never go far enough to lose sight of the lander.
You should watch Apollo 17's moonwalks. They drove miles away from the lander

>>23150921
Do you ever go back and watch old footage of the world from before you were born? As long as electricity has existed most modern inventions followed shortly

>>23150923
Why won't you just post specs

>>23150922
Might do. Thanks.

>>23150837 (OP)
I grew up believing the moon landing was real. Then I actually saw footage of it and thought it was the fakest looking shit I've seen. Then I saw that really fake shit our government broadcasted years earlier of a camera in space or upper atmo or some shit at night and it was literally, verifiably the fakest shit. Lmao.

>>23150837 (OP)
CGI

>>23150920
Actually, just half that. You're talking about the transmit=>return signal loop (ie, everyone saw the movement 2.5 seconds after he moved it).

There was a synchronized set of atomic clocks both on earth and in orbit around the moon. The operator knew the exact, synchronized second of ignition; he sent the command 1.25 secs before that (which was relayed down to the surface of the Moon and the camera mechanism from the CSM in orbit); the return module launched, the camera moved up (with a slight delay from perfect, lol); the CSM re-transmitted the signal from the camera back to Earth groundstations where the video was all being recorded. Simple s. :D

>>23150926
How do you know what low gravity looks like?

>>23150837 (OP)
Better question who filmed it and how did they retrieve the camera they didn't have tech that high tech back then to have cameras rotate and remotely control them from a far distance away it's friction and anyone who says otherwise is a crazy wackadoodle.

>>23150928
In the EVA footage you can hear the astronauts speak 1.25 seconds before the comms come up on the official audio at NASA. To me that's hard to refute

>>23150921
golf carts still use lead acid batteries. It's a 100+ year old technology. If you would just gain technical knowledge about electric vehicles this wouldn't be so ludicrous to you. Also just look up "60s electric car". You will get tons of specs with ranges larger than 52 miles. Why do I have to google things for you?

>>23150930
I'm not going to entertain your question because if you take 2 minutes you can learn how they did it. How the fuck do you think analog TV worked?

>>23150913
Yeak ok.
Not a SINGLE photo of the Sun (obviously heavily filtered) during the entire Apollo program.
The only chance (pre-Hubble / etc) to observe the Sun, outside of Earth's atmosphere. (yes, there were satellites, but they too were never equipped or tasked for visible light photography of the Sun!!!)
The OSO satellites = NOPE
Pioneer = NOPE
Mariner = NOPE
etc
etc
>we didn't have the Tech
Yes, you DID.
It was never deployed (you can guess why)
It's 2025 and
We STILL need to rely upon George Lucas to show us what a Sunset looks like from another Body's perspective..

from steel beams

>>23150911
I believe it was actually preprogrammed

>>23150928
>Actually, just half that.
No
>You're talking about the transmit=>return signal loop
Yes
>See the LM
>It goes up
>By the time you see it t's already traveled 1.3 seconds at high speed
>You send the signal
>By the time the signal reaches it it already traveled 2.6 sec at high speed
The loop starts on the Moon, not on Earth my dude.
From the start of the engine to receiving the signal it's 2.6 sec

>>23150933
Not over millions of kilometers in minus 100 degrees. Show us the tech they used so it can be reproduced. You can't.

>>23150934
>Not a SINGLE photo of the Sun
You zoomers are so fucking stupid I can't believe we're going to rely on you to take care of us one day

>>23150917
And you're retarded. The moon's escape velocity is 1/5 of Earths, and there there is no friction you have to overcome, which is what most fuel is wasted on.

>>23150932
>Also just look up "60s electric car".
OK
>You will get tons of specs with ranges larger than 52 miles.
Apparently not. 5 km tops.

>>23150939
>so fucking stupid
You ever see a photo of a FUCKING SUNSET?
>just not from the surface of the Moon
Goddamn retard.