Thread 23153906

There is POC that dont even know a single language of their race.
They are so thoroughly cucked and colonized they only speak the language of their colonizers

Literally mindrape

>>23153906 (OP)
I'm English, French, German, around 30% each, then with trace amounts of Scottish/Welsh/Irish/Swedish. I already know English and French at a working profiency, been studying German for a year and was able to hold a two hour conversation with an older German that knew no English. I also know Spanish at a near fluent level. I will learn every colonizer language. Fuck indigenous languages. There should be 4, maybe 5 languages in the world tops and I will not die until every Untermenschensprache is wiped off the face of the Earth.

mankurt (plural mankurts)

A person with a lost or degraded cultural and ethnic identity or awareness about his ancestry, especially due to being affected by a dominant culture.

>>23153906 (OP)
>tf
>tp

>>23153906 (OP)
oh no no no no uk keks???

>>23153906 (OP)
Europe and settler colonies own reparations to colonized countries

>>23153906 (OP)
Pathetic Asian peninsula larping as continent.

>>23153909
It was an observation
No value judgament

>>23153907
basiert und europagepillt

>>23153906 (OP)
SCOREBOAAARD

>>23153911
You misspelled owe. Contract signed. You get nothing.

>>23153906 (OP)
We speak a Latin based language because we were raped by Rome. We embraced it and created our own identity and greatness through it. As the Roman themselves embraced the Greeks.
Such is the way of the world. Look toward the future. For us, the future is bleak. Stop crying and SEIZE YOUR CHANCE AS A PEOPLE. You manage to be even more pathetic than us if you still whine about colonizing. The germans and us killed millions of ourselves in multiples wars that were less than 100 years ago and now we moved on already.
Maybe we're simply built different, I don't know man.

>>23153917
France is a false country and embracing being cucked is shameful

>>23153906 (OP)
>POC
This piece of insipid, idiotic Western branch "socialist" modern agitprop slang is meant solely to polarize humans and act as a stealth insult to both, don't use it.
There are no people of color opposed to people of no color (a logical and incorrect thing to derive), only people.

>>23153917
That's not the way of the world, you're just an innocent moron who bamboozled himself over the sins of others.
>As the Roman themselves embraced the Greeks.
Yeah, those Greeks surely liked it.
That's called conquest. It ain't nice.

>>23153918
>an Argentinian telling a Frenchman he comes from a false country
jesus christ

>>23153906 (OP)
This map is so stupid I don't know where to start.

>>23153919
Postmodernists argue that after modernity, where categories and people would equalize to the maximum extent productive resources allow it, a post-modernity infested by competing simulacras (or something like dawkins memetic viruses) would arise
You could argue that in the past people lived in a post modernity, and they created many gods, and lineages, that competed with each other for prominence.
And so they would conquer, rape, pillage, humilliate, and destroy each other for pride and glory of themselves or those similar enough.
Being conquered or enslaved was a sign of shame.
Conquering evoked virility

>>23153921
you're talking to chikaner

>>23153918
Well it led to us subduing shitholes like yours. Just like spain did. You don't even have nuclear weapons, you can't make submarines, you can't make planes. you have nothing!
>embracing being cucked is shameful
Go back munching on coca leaves like an ape between two human sacrifice or something then.
>>23153920
I mean, the Roman adopted the Greek ways. Were they cucked for that?
Sure it ain't nice, but my point is everybody been conquered or conquered. Spain itself was under muslim rule for centuries. They moved on.
It's the way of the world since we adopted farming and settles, Assyrians were conquering their neighbors and massacring them with utmost cruelty back in the bronze age already.
it's unfortunate but you can't avoid it, you can fight against it when it happens to you, as you should.
I'm being realist.

>>23153924
I love a no sabo that only knows the phrase "Che boludo." What a lovely race of people.

>>23153906 (OP)
latin america also qualify as settlers colonies

>>23153921
France is a roman colony conquered by Franks (germans) united by nothing but a government and bastard latin
In the northwest you have bretons that came from the british islands, they are britons,
in the North center you have normans, that came from denmark and proximities, in the northeast you have franks, germanics that came from belgium and the netherlands
In the center-east you have burgundians that were from switzerland.
In the southeast you have provençals, they came from the romans and the cisalpine gauls.
In the southwest you have occitans, they are gauls mixed with basques, they then were romanized.


Assambled family ass country

>>23153906 (OP)
we should be colored orange in this map

>>23153923
Retrofuturism of post-modernity is a bold take, but even in the past not all humans were of one mind.
Last two sentences are pretty correct, though.

>>23153928
>Bretons are British
stopped reading there
stop embarassing yourself
go to France and you'll know how retarded you sound

>>23153931
Bretons are migrants from the british islands.
Genetically they are welsh, not gaulish

>Anonymous ## Modfeedback IRC Mod Icon 08/22/25(Fri)17:25:18 No.214086144
>This thread was moved to >>23153906 (OP)
Obligatory fuck the jannies. This is why /int/ is fucking dying you niggers won't even let a thread about fucking LANGUAGES on /int/

>>23153906 (OP)
1. Learning to speak a new language and assimilating into a new society is not necessarily "mind rape". It's just human adaptation, especially when it is done with the help of native allies against their oppressors (like Tlaxcaltecs and other indigenous societies becoming allies to the Spanish conquerors against the Aztecs).

2. That map is not entirely right. The Viceroyalty of New Spain was not a "colony", it was an extension of the Spanish empire with some autonomy (it had dozens of viceroys who supposedly governed at the same level of the Spanish crown in their respective territory), kind of like how Hawaii and Alaska are extensions of what's known as the U.S.A. These are not colonies.

3. I would say ideological indoctrination or reeducation based on something like critical race theory, or indigenist neo-marxism, is more akin to mind rape to those exposed to it who lack critical thinking and enough knowledge to internally contradict it.

>>23153952
They need to make space for the threads about phenotypes and the races of women they dream about groping on the bus

>>23153925
>I mean, the Roman adopted the Greek ways. Were they cucked for that?
"Cucked" is a repulsive word, and one too misused. But no, they weren't. Greeks were, as they lost. Romans did gimp own their potential, however, as any set of foreign accomplishments are made with foreign thought paradigms in mind.
>It's the way of the world since we adopted farming and settles, Assyrians were conquering their neighbors and massacring them with utmost cruelty back in the bronze age already.
>it's unfortunate but you can't avoid it, you can fight against it when it happens to you, as you should.
If a painter can only paint one picture, he's poor at painting or has certain desires. If a painter chooses to only paint one picture, it's primarily certain desires.
It is not the way of the world in the slightest, as even the environmental conditions don't reduce potential options to only evil.
>I'm being realist.
No. You're being a cynic or a surface level fact observer that masquerades as realist. You've simply stopped thinking about any other conclusions.

>>23153962
The Romans entire way of life was borrowed from other cultures. That was literally what made Rome successful. Pragmatic adoption of superior cultural practice. It's how they defeated Carthage. It's how they ascended to mastery over Europe. The idea that borrowing and using ideas and technology from another culture is somehow inherently detrimental is just nonsense. History disagrees wholly. The Greeks may have lost materially, but culturally they won. The Romans even based their gods off of the Greek pantheon.

>>23153962
Are you seriously trying to say that conflict is not the way of the world and even humanity itself here? Organized and purposeful violence has existed since before written history, since before the spoken word, and is something that was understood before man could fathom himself or define himself. Violence is inherent in every aspect of life from humanity down to the tiniest microbe. Consumption and competition. That is indeed the way of the world. Your alliterations make little to no sense.

>>23153962
Also, framing conflict as inherently evil is also total nonsense. It's a reality of life itself. For everything. Birds compete and fight. Insects compete and fight. Micro-organisms consume eachother.

Conflict and violence is not inherently evil.

Anyways your opinions contradict everything we know about human nature and life itself. Apparently you aren't familiar with the concept of the power vacuum. This stuff is a force of nature, it goes beyond the individual and beyond the collective. It is a process in and of itself that, while played out by humans, is largely out of our control. It's a force of nature that is endemic throughout history. The peace of recent decades is unprecedented and will not last forever.

>>23153991
Being on the receiving end is shameful.
Is not that it is necessarily evil but emasculating.

Men, as a gender and creature, are primeval creatures that radiate outwards "the small gamete"
As such, their role to "impose themselves" over females, who are the big gamete. Vessels.

If you are being conquered, you are being feminized, and by extent, you become your conqueror's bitch
Which is humilliating, and thus redefines your historical role.
To adopt others Tech might be convenient, but rome was first and foremost an empire.
Roman men captured enemy women, raped them, took the land of their rivals and bragged and flexed their conquests
They enslaved them for work but first and foremost as a humilliation ritual.
To redefine your role in reality not as an expansive one but as a contracting one meant to reproduce someone else dominance is a type of existence that leads to the loss of particularity, it is much like death, a dissolution of ones own identity.

Being conquered is on a fundamental level humilliating

>>23154001
To be conquered, is to be in submission.
To be sumissive imprints on those below the yoke with a new narrative in which their role is one of servility,
They exist to bear and replicate the glory of other men, because they themselves were revaged and lost their own

>>23153987
Conflict may or may not be a partial way of the world, but what it definitely isn't, is inherent evil.
It is not conflict that is the problem, nor violence, but evil.
All these conflicts do is reveal the nature of their participants, when possible. Some can be just killers, others are unjust.
>inherent
Indeed, but the nature of all these may vary, especially when sapience is involved.
And that in turn is the actual conflict. There is competition, but there also isn't. Mechanical race for resources in this iteration of material world isn't reducible to one tactic or strategy about it, and this race itself can't reduce life.
What you assume as "the way" is simply a mode of existence others have adapted to, due to their characters and very specific conclusions about certain environmental pressures, so much so that they can't adapt to anything else.

Imagine this, there are two extremely honorable armies that like killing and battle each other. They can not do certain injustices and after the battle ends they don't make things worse. They use their beliefs and strength to maintain a better way.
Now imagine two dishonorable armies. They'll just ruin everything. If those latter ones are the only ones there are, and damage continues, the eventual conclusions some, such as yourself, can make from it, is that this is the way of the world.
In other words, you incorrectly equalize the results of systematic applications of swords by certain sorts of wielders as the intrinsic outcome of the act itself.

>>23153991
>what is reading comprehension
Getting real tired of the internet these days.

My point was exactly that violence is not inherently evil.
The gripe is the conclusions that you derive as the way of the world explicitly ARE evil methods to violence, and as such should not be counted as obligatory.

You misinterpret mundanity of these conflicts and battle processes of specific character as not only inevitable, unavoidable, and unimaginative, but as the only possible conclusion.
And you misinterpret the existence of environmental conditions as sole overarching property of the universe that one must not only abide, but abide in exact manner.

The actual way of life is living itself. It has nothing to do with consumption or ANY competitions, competition is an emergent property of material resource limitations.
It is partially material in effects to those that have no means to circumvent mechanics, but it is wholly abstract in that it's just an idea one can simply not give a fuck about.
Consumption is just a dynamic also, also the one that can be done in any way, and also equally easy to dismiss.

1/2

>>23153991
One is not obligated to kill or consume in specific way even in this reality, and this is what all these human conficts are about. They are not "in conflict" as if that's the way. That's just a pretext that may take higher or lower, or 0 priority as prime mover. They are killing because they want to, or because some see value in this strategy.
Romans could've easily made friends, Greeks could've not had constant infighting or contempt for others, etc.
All these people took a very certain strategy to other people. THESE sorts take approaches that force others to live in a certain way, to the point that one can't exit the game easily. It's still one way out of many, even in the context of conflict.
That they could NOT or would NOT take any other options merely shows something about their nature.

Your issue is that you think the game (you just lost it, by the way, that's what The Game joke is partially about), is all there is.

>>23153975
>The Greeks may have lost materially, but culturally they won
They LOST, there is nothing the Greeks have won, Ancient Greece is dead. Culture isn't a dressing for tourists to oogle, or for some abstract "humanity" to care about, it's a fact of public life for its creators to experience.
They aren't born to be an accessory to somebody else's ambition, no human is. The fact is that a bunch of sinners lost to another bunch of sinners, and that is all there is to it. There is no net benefit, no win, nothing to the Greeks.

>>23154071
>If you are being conquered, you are being feminized, and by extent, you become your conqueror's bitch
Utterly false.
Just like Canadian you utilize incorrect conclusions on things, except whereas he takes actions of others as the only actions, you do a far worse sin of equalizing an interpretation lens as the truth.


Conquest is a pure concept that can bee done in any way within limits. Application of masculine-feminine dynamics to social interaction is impure reasoning that is:
Incorrect to actual masculine-feminine quintessense, a typical folly of human sinners.
Leads mostly or only to unjust conclusions, which is ironically at odds with actual political and resource interests of any conqueror with actually working brain and bare minimum of moral standards necessary to make a lasting polity.
Is a corruption and facsimile of humanity, i.e. it is inhuman in the extreme.