Anonymous
(ID: TqsoNLx3)
8/23/2025, 3:59:55 AM
No.23155682
>>23155705
>>23155711
>>23155717
My wife is hooked on the amazing digital circus.
Anonymous
(ID: PwmD9PZG)
8/23/2025, 4:04:10 AM
No.23155701
I understand why. it's a pretty enjoyable show.
Anonymous
(ID: FGyEJ5N2)
8/23/2025, 4:05:42 AM
No.23155705
>>23155682 (OP)
I got 5 that Jax is going to abstract next
Anonymous
(ID: 0uknC7L1)
8/23/2025, 4:08:07 AM
No.23155711
>>23155682 (OP)
she is a shitskin fnf pedo pooner
Anonymous
(ID: 0uknC7L1)
8/23/2025, 4:11:04 AM
No.23155717
>>23156441
>>23157831
>>23155682 (OP)
she is a shitskin fnf pedo nigger jeet pooner
Anonymous
(ID: WcaXjyi6)
8/23/2025, 6:36:27 AM
No.23156292
The character interactions have weight especially for an youtube animation, the design/animation are incredible and the complete story could be good. I really hope they don't fuck up at the ending or close to it
Anonymous
(ID: iUe7PRFc)
8/23/2025, 5:40:32 PM
No.23157704
Unfortunately 99% of "death game" writers only know how to end stories a single way.
>main cast find a way to break the system
>hope arises as the mysteries behind the game are uncovered and the cast can see a way out
>suddenly everything goes south
>guess it was hopeless all along *queue abstractions*
>"guess all the characters you got immersed in we're just... le insignificant cog in the machine after all!"
>circus continues into the sunset
Happy endings don't exist for these settings because making the system vulnerable brings down it's threat level and the show wants you to see it as an oh so powerful representation of existential dread.
