Thread 23240142

war
war never changes

This is me spiritually.

true

Gee, OP, you're right.

War *never* changes.

>>23240142 (OP)
For how much longer must this be the way?

>>23240142 (OP)
Cosplayer dies of heartattack, classic.

Shit did you hear that? I think I heard a drone...ack

>>23246605
https://files.catbox.moe/r1wzrs.mp4

Can you ever truly feel safe in your home?

>>23256260
always, why?
inb4 in my walls

>>23246605
I was going to say, haven’t drones fundamentally changed the way war is fought? A bit like the introduction of airplanes and tanks?

>>23246779
RIP tanks, 1915 to 2025.

>>23259099
meloande

>>23259273
This is how I imagine melonade in my head despite her being an obese spic in reality (probably)

Really anon, really?

>>23259099
Yes and no, while drones have made a difference when we look at the war in ukriane they are still fundamentally just using WW1 trench warfare tactics and while FPV quadcopter suicide drones have become a very important factor in that conflict it still remains a very typical a war of atrittion especially because both sides are deploying this type of drone and because very few of these drones are actually armed with shaped charge munitions capable of disabling or destroying a tank. Most of them basically just have a hand grenade attached to them.
Also drones/UAVs being employed in warfare is nothing new and they have been in use since WW2. its how disposable and frequently used they have become that makes them particularly scary in this conflict.

>>23259761
same...
>despite her being an obese spic in reality (probably)
i dunno man, i doubt it

>>23240142 (OP)
War is a thing of duality, a relic of the third dimension. We have ascended beyond war.

>>23259099
I think drone countermeasures will beuch stronger than the drones themselves

>>23259099
Tanks will be right back after these retrofits.

>>23280261
Is this you?

i killed melonade

>>23259273
Anonymous

>>23259761
Headcanons are always superior.

>>23261166
What about the ground robots though?

>>23282604
I’m kill now, X_X

>>23291910
Those have been around since WW1 they didnt really take off untill WW2 and even then were rare but the point is: they aren't a new concept
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmanned_ground_vehicle

>>23291910
get well soon

>>23291944
didn't the US also firebomb japan with bats?

>>23291966
They got everything ready to do it then decided to nuke them instead, supposedly the bats wouldve killed more people ( ͠° ͟ °)

>>23291999
>all structures ancient bamboo and rice paper
every source said it went off without a hitch anyways

>>23292007
They never deployed them outside of tests and the bats burnt down a US airforce base xDD

>>23292023
the old fuck around and find out addage
maybe that's what i heard

>>23292027
Its far from the craziest shit ppl came up with in WW2.
Animal based incendiary bombs date back like thousands of years. There was some ancient Greek or roman or something siege where they said they would break the siege if the city gave them like one cat or bird or something from each building then they attached jars of pitch or oil or something to them and set them on fire, in their panic the animals fled home and burnt the city down.
Cant remember exact details and I think its happened several times in different ways over the centuries

>>23292052
so human on human cruelty has always been corrupted by a coward's approach?

>>23292095
Yes, or at least the whole idea of honor in warfare has always been largely fictional

War is always changing.

>>23292132
Proofs?

>>23292113
>i want to cut him but i don't want to get cut
has always been the vagina haver's approach to conflict.

>>23292171
lmao. Its funny you say that because I'm pretty sure the person that came up with the incendiary cats was a woman