Thread 23438739

I think the moon landing was real, and that all hoax propaganda is spread by jews, and the pajeets who serve them in order to undermine what is one of the greatest of all white achievements.

Pretty sure it's the CIA spreading the hoax propaganda

>>23438740
>Download google earth on pc.
>Get the 3d satellite view of moon.
>You can see all the moon landing site with street view.

>>23438739 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpuKu3F0BvY

So real you have to make a thread telling everyone how real you think it is.

>>23438739 (OP)
I think it was fake. Pics and vids just don't make sense. No idea why they faked it, probably part of their gay I fucking love science pledditor religion.

I mean, look at this bullshit, kek.

>>23438739 (OP)
you think that because you've never read the reports from 1967/68 on the progress off the Apollo program up until that point.

>>23438740
If that's true then they owe me a lot of back pay.

>>23438739 (OP)
Or, counterpoint, it's all lies like 99% of everything else.

>>23438744
>NASA: Noooo. That is special NASA scotch tape and aluminum foil. You have to believe us.

>>23438739 (OP)
Just look at that clearly fake picture.
The Moon is about 1/4 the diameter of the Earth.
That's 2,159 miles.
Yet in Op's picrel, you can walk to the horizon in less than 100 steps.
No one went to the moon.
You can't survive outside of the Van Allen belts unshielded due to cosmic radiation.
You were lied to, get over it, learn from it, and don't get fooled again.
Also 1pbtid

I'll accept hookers and blow in lue of cash, gold or BTC.

>>23438739 (OP)
Remember when we had technological wars that furthered science, technology, math, physics and shit? Yeah, good times.
Why didn't we keep going this way and see who could terraform the moon or mars first or who could build bases in the deepest trenches?

>>23438739 (OP)
Yep. Moon landing conspiracy theorists fell for low effort BRICS nigger propaganda.

>>23438748
You can tell the globohomo is really embarrassed by their production. I mean, we're talking 1960s special effects, so I get it. But it's sort of cringe for them that they never show this shit on TV or in schools or anywhere.

There was this big anniversary, 75 years or something, a few years back and I thought, surely they must show this gay moon landing of theirs on TV then? But nope, kek.

I think the Mars production is going to be much better now that we have computerized special effects and AI and shit like that, and they'll just continue to memoryhole the moon landing for the plebs.

>>23438749
Notice you never hear the engine they sat on in the lunar module either.

>>23438739 (OP)
Idiots too posting sound stage you woudl see a different set of stars and no star are seen convex vectors are not a plane hitler is tradiition action micrometeorites meteorite all 1 milkion 250k mph crashing destroying your 50k satellites each day because mankind does exit sapce is fake lucrative lucifer trust Fabrice egg noggger worshipijg satanic anti christ satsbuc enregy hoax space hoax

>>23438739 (OP)
Raeto wddt biglies org that shit impossible moon are their own lights

>>23438744
>trust me bro, in space one cardboard can carry a human due to lack of gravity.

>>23438744
>look at this bullshit, kek.

That's how you know it's real
when it looks fake like that

>>23438758
Well, you do you, I'm just not going to believe in any interplanetary space mission that looks like a third grade arts and crafts project. But that's me.

>>23438754
It's just so obvious at this point, maybe not as much back then, but now with the internet it is so clearly faked.
What the real tragedy is the inability of the majority of the population to accept that they were wrong and that they were lied to at great scale.
A large portion of society would rather continue living in the illusion of a lie, than rather having an ounce of humility and admit they were deceived.
This is why covid went the way it did.
Hubris is one of humanities greatest faults.

>>23438760
I believe they make choices etc based on shit that happened in the way they experienced it

Not like we do or they do but like you do

>>23438759
That's one expensive arts-and-crafts project.

https://old.bitchute.com/video/SjECczlp2NcB/

>>23438739 (OP)
This is completely correct.
Only non-whites, jews, the vaxxed, and memeflags deny the Moon landing.

>>23438744
Nice staple.

>>23438739 (OP)
Of course it's real. It's not hard to get to the moon.

>>23438760
I think it's simply too scary for most normalfags to accept. If you can't trust daddy gubberment, then basically you have to be paranoid and question anything coming down the shitpipe. That's way too stressful and scary for most plebs.

It's not that they can't be made to understand, or even that they don't actually suspect. If you talk with a plebbit normalfag one on one, they'll sort of go along with reason. But then snap back into bot mode. Because they simply can't live like that. They need to be led and to be led they need to trust their leader, so they just jump through mental hoops until they reach some sort of grudging and slightly uncomfortable acceptance.

There are many examples of this. Holocaust is a good one. Takes like 5 minutes to categorically prove that the numbers make no sense and the whole story is impossible. You can make a normalfag follow along in this process, but then they reboot and go back to dissociating from the thought.

NASA has a lot of shills dedicated to this subject.

>>23438766
I see the reason why they'd lie then, but I don't see the reason why they'd perpetuate the lie. The space station is right there and the reason no one went back to the moon is unironically a combination of lost tech from german engineers and the fact little rovers can do everything an astronaut would do there.
Anyways, NASA is working on project Artemis nowadays to have more permanent presence on the moon. I think it's just an excuse to gain government funding.

>>23438767
Just wait, if this thread gets any traction what will happen is that a lot of "flat earth" posters will suddenly appear and derail the whole thing into a discussion about the "flat earth" kek.

>>23438744
kubrick props always looked like shit upclose and hidef

First of all it would be so cold the batteries wouldn't work, the equipment wouldn't work and the astro-Nots would freeze and their oxygen would freeze.

Second I worked for a guy who told me worked for NASA, then later that day he said he wslas just kidding he never worked for NASA. 15 years later I am watching a documentary about the 1986 disaster and the guy is one of the crew members that is supposed to be dead.

Third of all, there is no moon. The moon is a reflection of the sun on the ice barrier above us.

>>23438768
>but I don't see the reason why they'd perpetuate the lie
I have no idea, I have no answers. All I know is that it looks fake as fuck. If I'm to guess I'd say it's part of their lore worldbuilding, like... the belief structure plebs exist in. The I fucking love soience pledditor cuck serf.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buqtdpuZxvk

tldr. to get you to give up your liver.

>>23438769
Obviously separating the two subjects is wise, but the two are intertwined so that will happen no matter what.

>>23438769
I think one just appeared.

>>23438768
The International space station is a repurposed abandoned hospital in Houston TX.

>>23438739 (OP)
>and that all hoax propaganda is spread by Russians and Chinks who are forever angry they didn't get there first
You were close though.

>>23438748
It makes sense with the incredibly tight payload weight tolerances, and with no atmosphere to worry about you can get away with glorified aluminum foil and scotch tape

>>23438775
I remember seeing the space station on google earth having the same teddy bear prop they allegedly used on the "real" space station.
Notice how all the "science" they do on the "space-station" is all fun and games as in doing awkward somersaults and playing with food.

>>23438777
Nice cartoon, faggot.

>>23438776
The jews took over the US finally in 1913, with the federal reserve act.

The jews took over Russia finally in 1917, with the bolshevik revolution.

You need to ask yourself whether these two spheres, both controlled by jews, were actually engaged in a real conflict and competition at all. And that's still a valid question today, because jewish oligarchs still rule both the US and Russia.

>>23438765
They were better cinematographers than they were pilots or engineers, funny that

Moon landing was real but footage was fake

>>23438779
Why don't you tell me specifically what doesn't add up about the flight plan, or you too retarded to do that?

>>23438782
That is of course a possibility.

>>23438780
It is the retard's first "argument".
"Le soviets would have said something because clearly they were in direct opposition to each other because I have seen all the Jewish cold ward propaganda Hollywood movies and that automatically makes me an expert on politics"
Another hilariously original classic is:
"Kubrick insisted on filming on location".

>>23438773
the copernican/heliocentric model is part of the globe lie, the moon landing is just more bullshit to support the crap they feed everybody. the reality is that we live in an enclosed realm with electric lights; an engineered structure.

>>23438786
Please go away.

>>23438787
please kill yourself.

>>23438778
A American Astronaught made a mistake and literally said "we are all the way over here in Houston TX" on a supposed live feed from the ISS.

>>23438787
If you accept that the imagery is fake you will obviously have found out that the photo of the globe "taken on the moon" is a bad composite and that also goes for all the globe photos NASA has published afterwards. "It's photoshopped because it has to be" etc.

>>23438789
Look at the fat jewess astronaut in the back here. Keep track of her hair, and keep track of the pendant around her neck. Both are strings attached to the main body.

So ok... they're fixing the hair of the chubby jewess astronauts' up with hair spray like troll dolls.

But why? Why are they telling us this?

>>23438790
This has nothing to do with the question of NASA faking it's moon mission. It's completely off topic.

Yes, NASA's pictures from space are fake. What can we extrapolate from this? Only that their pictures are fake, it doesn't say anything about anything else, especially the shape of the Earth, which is a completely off topic subject.

Guys is hyperborea a planet

>>23438789
There are countless amounts of footage that gives the whole swindle away, but people will as the painter from Austria said look in all other directions even when the truth has been nailed down because it is too large for their brains to comprehend. It will require a complete reboot of what one believes in and that requires an amount of mental strength that the common man does not possess.
They will always rationalize it in some way or pretend to not understand it as to not have to confront it because it is of course impossible that they, wise as they are have been fooled.

>>23438791
why does she have wire cutters in her hand anon? do you think it's to cut the line in case epstein decides to hang himself with piano wire?

>>23438792
>Yes, NASA's pictures from space are fake. What can we extrapolate from this? Only that their pictures are fake, it doesn't say anything about anything else, especially the shape of the Earth, which is a completely off topic subject.
Not if the entire premise of "space exploration" is to hide the truth about the creation.

>>23438796
It's impossible to accurately conclude the motivations NASA has for faking it's shit. Any opinion on this is going to be wild speculation.

>>23438791
The reason they are going with the "stiff hair female astronaut template" is simple. It is what they started out with in the 80s and they have to stick to it. In other videos they have objects going completely spastic, but female hair is for whatever reason always completely static. The "showering on the ISS video" is a great example.
>Stiff hair
>Water in a bag going all over the place, but that is OK, the onboard system that generates water from urine takes care of it because science

Did Tom Hanks land on the Moon?

>>23438798
Well, it looks retarded.

>>23438744
Well in order to show people what was happening they had to recreate it in Nevada. Not the same tech as today. This is 30 years before cell phones were invented.

>>23438793
No, but your mom is fat enough to be one.

>>23438801
Yes, it's possible they actually went to the moon, but for some reason they had to fake what the public saw of it, maybe for propaganda reasons.

Or they didn't go at all. I have no idea and no way of finding out.

>>23438739 (OP)
To believe the moon landing was real is to deny what is an even greater achievement: the moon landing hoax.

>>23438804
Kek, now that's a point I guess.

>>23438739 (OP)
The radiation in the Van Allen Belt and beyond is proof alone that we didn't go to the Moon. The issue that no one talks about is how incredibly difficult it is to leave Earth's gravity. Von Braun suggested two large rocket ships the size of the Empire State Building that would fly in pairs to the Moon and even then Braun didn't believe we could land on the Moon and just fly by it (on audio tape btw). We also "lost" all of the blueprints,tapes, and film that would show us how the tech was made and the raw film that could reveal if the footage was shot on the Earth or zero gravity. The photographs were shot professionally despite none of the astronauts being professional photographers and the camera being mounted on their chest with no viewfinder. Even the OP photo the suit isn't pressurized. Theirs alot more issues with the Apollo Program but these are a few that really bother me.

>>23438800
Source on that video?
I've already seen Mario Massucho's American Moon.

>>23438807
No clue, sorry, I just save shit from moon hoax threads here.

>>23438800
What about this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtZaP8VMv0c

>>23438745
This. It's funny how the cosmonaut program is only ever talked about for their failures (Soyuz 1) despite them being way ahead of the US program but never the Apollo mishaps.

>>23438805
Nobody believes it happened. There are only those who recognize the hoax and those who cannot accept that such a mass bamboozling could occur.

>>23438809
What about it specifically? I can't be bothered to watch all of it.

The freemasons faked the moon landing

https://old.bitchute.com/video/6g2B7a5WnWaj/

>>23438740
This. Denying the moon landing has absolutely no relevance and creates no change in the real world. Better to have the schizos wasting their time on something they'll never be right about than accidentally stumbling into the truth of some real world psy/black op shit. You are CIA running drugs or whatever. You want tinfoil thinking about that or thinking about irrelevant shit that happened 55 years ago?

>>23438812
Find the bits where they show chains floating in microgravity and find a way to fake that.

>>23438815
Like I said, I'm not going to sit and go through your 15 minute video, either be specific or there's no point.

Anyways, I'm sure it can be explained by
1. props
2. studio inside a plane in freefall
3. vfx

I haven't seen anything yet that can't be explained that way.

>>23438768
>The space station is right there

It's 254 miles away lol.

>the reason no one went back to the moon is unironically a combination of lost tech from german engineers and the fact little rovers can do everything an astronaut would do there

The same Nazi scientists that were involved in Project Paperclip and the Apollo Program advised a German silent film called "Woman in the Moon" where alot of the scenes match what they did during Apollo. Why didn't the Russians go to the Moon despite landing rovers way before we did?

>Anyways, NASA is working on project Artemis nowadays to have more permanent presence on the moon. I think it's just an excuse to gain government funding.


Artemis will be delayed and or becomes a massive failure. Were not built for space.

>>23438816
It's 15 minutes, if you cannot even skim through that, then you clearly cannot be taken seriously.
Tell me how it's been faked. If not, then you've just acknowledged that the footage is real.

>>23438777
I like how we can't replicate this despite it being 60 years ago.

>>23438802
And your mom is big enough to be a black hole your point being

>>23438818
>It's 15 minutes, if you cannot even skim through that, then you clearly cannot be taken seriously.
Ok, don't take me seriously then. I don't give a shit what you think.

>Tell me how it's been faked. If not, then you've just acknowledged that the footage is real.
Could whatever scene you're alluding to be created as a convincing scene in something like a Marvel movie? If so, then it obviously can be faked.

This is why discussing contemporary space shenanigans is completely uninteresting. Our level of VFX today is so good that you can fake pretty much anything convincingly. And that's why discussing the Apollo missions are much more interesting, because they just didn't have the tools to make convincing fakery back then.

Also, notice that my post about the ISS wasn't about it's reality at all, it was about how they fix up the jewess astronauts' hair with hair spray. Which can't be denied, and which is ridiculous regardless.

>>23438821
>spends 15 minutes refreshing a shit thread
>can't spend 15 minutes to watch a video that BTFO his childish arguments
Nigger.

>>23438822
Could the scene be created in a movie by special effects today?

>>23438739 (OP)
The moon landings were real but the secret space program probably got there well before the public NASA missions

>>23438823
No, because the behaviour of the chain is unlike anything they expected to see.
How would create it in vfx?

>>23438825
3D modeling and animated simulation? I have no fucking clue, I don't even know what you're talking about since you refuse to be specific.

>>23438739 (OP)
We did go to the moon, but what the public saw was filmed on a stage... just in case.

>>23438739 (OP)
Only Jews and leftists use the word «Pajeet» tho.
It was created as a distraction from Jews.

It’s mostly Canadian Jews using it. And vpn Jews.

>>23438826
>I have no fucking clue
That much is obvious, just watch the video and you'll understand.
But you won't because you prefer to stick with what confirms your beliefs rather than challenge them.

>>23438829
I watched the first 5 seconds with a chain spinning in a circle. I'd do that with props. A stiff chain and some device to rotate it off camera.

Anyways, we're just going in circles, so I don't see the point continuing this. I'm more interested in talking about the Apollo missions. Like, why are there spotlights on the moon?

>>23438828
>t. Pajeet
The only reason you are even in a white country is because of jews and leftists

>>23438830
>can't be bothered to spend 15 minutes on a new video but expects others to watch his 3 hours psycho doco rehashing the same debunked shit
Nigger.

The usual reason for denying the denial is that the Soviets would've called them out on it, and shared proof, given that they were the first ones to send a man into space, so they knew a bit about it.

So my theory is that they were both lying, and couldn't call the other out without showing their own lies, or they both ran into something out there that made them stay quiet.

>>23438832
>expects others to watch his 3 hours psycho doco
No, I posted a picture for you to look at, featuring a spotlight on the moon. This is an imageboard, not a youtube link board.

>>23438749
>I may be a loser
>but I got this secret knowledge that makes me better than everyone else!
>and it's presented as a plausible conspiiracy so no one thinks it's just a wiccan tier coping cult!
You'll respond to this with condescension.
10 years from now you'll wake up, still a loser, wondering why no one takes you seriously.
OP is entirely correct, the idea it is fake was spread to discredit calling out how fake the holocaust simply by proximity of optics.

>>23438753
This is a good point, they are embarrassed to taut it now. I don't think it really was that big even at the time, they probably debuted it with so much side tech or side theories that it was really just a niche nerdy interest and part of standard education like mlkjr.
>>23438769
Well this was their go to for years against moon deniers. Ah you must be a flat earther and laugh them out of the room. Of course there were no actual flat earthers then, just jokers who carried a card about 'the flat earth society' to pretend they are beyond quirky. But now this tact doesn't work. There will be plenty of people who say challenge accepted, if you want to take it there, then why does this reflection and laser show the giant lake is perfectly flat? It's like how questioning the holocaust used to get shut down by saying well you must support Hitler. It was beyond the pale then, like flat earth. Now someone will say, well tell me what about Hitler and the Germans was so bad?
>>23438824
As real as that photo and her being a woman

>>23438759
>trust me bro, function follows form, if it isn't as cool looking as cgi it isn't real.

>>23438834
In all the time it has taken you to refresh and post your trite evasions, you would have had time to watch the video and see just how fucking wrong you are.
But you won't because all of you hoaxers are just little kids plugging your ears going "lalala can't hear you!" and then proclaim others to not have any arguments debunking your already debunked a thousand times over bullshit.
All fields
N
I
G
G
E
R

>>23438837
Cool. If you want to believe in the space hobo shack, that's your deal.

>>23438838
You sound very agitated.

>>23438830
>why are there spotlights on the moon?
There aren't
He is standing next to the LEM, which is reflecting a shitload of light onto the ground behind the astronaut, causing it to be brighter

>>23438840
That makes no sense.

>>23438838
>all of you hoaxers are just little kids plugging your ears going "lalala can't hear you!"
And the post right below yours is literally "la la la I can't hear you, here's another meme picture"
It would be funny if it were not so sad

>>23438841
That's because you're retarded and don't understand the first thing about photography

>>23438843
>>23438842
>here's another meme picture
Kek, I'm posting pictures from your own supposed "moon landing." I know you fags hate that, but sheesh.

>>23438844
You posted a cartoon and accused others of posting cartoons when they are diagrams (can you even tell the difference you dim-witted twat?)
You're a hypocrite who won't even try to learn anything and thinks he can teach others about stuff he doesn't understand.
You absolute mongoloid freak.

>>23438845
I haven't posted any cartoons or commented on any cartoons. Are you having a schizophrenic breakdown or something? Do you need medication?

Anyways, here's one to cheer you up and calm you down. Here are some NASA scientists and their practical way of doing some impressive calculations.

>>23438843
It's supposed to be pitch black since theirs no atmosphere to scatter light. Pic related

>>23438847
Nah, the moon works in mysterious ways. Light comes from all sorts of weird angles. Shadow works differently on the moon. Like the magic moon dust. The very laws of physics don't apply to the moon.

>>23438739 (OP)
> I think the moon landing was real
Okay… why?

>>23438846
>I haven't posted any cartoons
You lying sack of shit
This is your fucking post >>23438839
Turbo retard. Go fuck your mom to finally give her a kid that she can actually love and isn't an utter failure despite being inbred, you waste of space.

>>23438739 (OP)
Correct. Webm. related, a recent unmanned landing by a private company on the moon. Note the debris settling in the lowered gravity.

>>23438850
That's not a cartoon, that's a picture of your loonie lander jewish 3rd grade arts and crafts project. I can post pics of that all night, I think it's hilarious.

>>23438851
This looks incredibly fake. How are they not in prison over this?

>>23438853
Meh, space footage from today isn't any fun now that they have proper 3D vfx. I like the animatronics tier charm of the old shit much better.

>>23438852
>I don't know how anything works, but I have STRONG opinions
Instructions for a proper noose are available online, take advantage of them them and kill yourself.
>>23438853
I hope your house burns down, nigger faggot.
Die.

Kek, good pick. Look at this fucking crap. It's too funny.

>>23438851
That's so incredibly cool
Especially that big chunk of debris that follows a perfect parabola, and then seeing it kick up even more regolith when it lands

I wonder if there's a way to calculate the force of gravity acting on it
It's moving in an arc, but there should be no additional horizontal acceleration so that should be easy to factor out

>>23438744
The conspiracy theory I like to go with is the moon landing is real but they had to use scrapped pieces from the roswell landing to protect the craft, hence some of the foils that look silly and cheap to us but are super strong or super resistant to radiation/cold.
Then once they got home, they couldn't "recreate" the tech to get there because some of it was borrowed from shit we didn't understand and probably still don't fully understand. It would explain why the only other group of humans in modern tech who've lost anything even close is the mass of video game devs who didn't bother to archive their shit.
It just doesn't happen.

>>23438858
It's literally just gold foil for rad shielding, that's it.
RETARD

>>23438858
>Then once they got home, they couldn't "recreate" the tech to get there
There were 9 manned missions that orbited the Moon, and 6 that landed successfully

>>23438857
Neat how all the dust particles quickly fall at the same rate due to the absence of air resistance.