>>23509017
That's a physical thing, related to spacetime. The cessation of the physical data stream and avatar, and the cessation of the interface between that particular physical avatar, and the consciousness assigned to it. It wouldn't be some physical force or phenomenon. The God would be PRIOR to physicality/spacetime. The God would transcend the spacetime, also. The God would be operating in the non-local realm, "outside" of the spacetime. Where the instruction setting/processing/calculating occurs. The spacetime would be resultant from the processing.
Unless the God chose to play a physical avatar, and enter INTO the spacetime, to operate. IE, like the Lord Jesus Christ. Then the God would be the God, and the avatar, and, I would add, a third aspect of the Godhead, the Holy trinity, one God situation.
The observer can not say, while immersed in the reality, if that is the end, or if the birth into this reality was the beginning. It's a matter of faith, because empirical means can't test it.
Yours is a comforting point of view, though, I imagine, sometimes. Being in constant service to divinity is tiring, at times. I'm personally incapable of being unfaithful/non-believing. I've tried. The fidelity is unyielding, though. Unshakable. Nevertheless, the blessed assurance of faith is MORE comforting, when the level of conviction is high.